Letter to the Editor in today's Lakeland Ledger:
"... Thank you to the Unitarian Universalist congregation for accepting
people for whom they are, not for what some think they should be."
Gary Eickmeier
UC - 16 Nov 2006 16:13 GMT
> Letter to the Editor in today's Lakeland Ledger:
>
> "... Thank you to the Unitarian Universalist congregation for accepting
> people for whom they are, not for what some think they should be."
>
> Gary Eickmeier
As the Bengals would say:
"Whom dey"?
Pat Durkin - 16 Nov 2006 18:06 GMT
> Letter to the Editor in today's Lakeland Ledger:
>
> "... Thank you to the Unitarian Universalist congregation for
> accepting people for whom they are, not for what some think they
> should be."
Apparently you are not one of whom.
Hatunen - 16 Nov 2006 23:02 GMT
>Letter to the Editor in today's Lakeland Ledger:
>
>"... Thank you to the Unitarian Universalist congregation for accepting
>people for whom they are, not for what some think they should be."
While the writing is a bit odd, as a Unitarian-Universalist
myself I certainly understand what the writer is trying to say.
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
vorotyntsev@yahoo.com - 17 Nov 2006 00:13 GMT
> Letter to the Editor in today's Lakeland Ledger:
>
> "... Thank you to the Unitarian Universalist congregation for accepting
> people for whom they are, not for what some think they should be."
>
> Gary Eickmeier
So obviously wrong! It should be, "...not for what some think them
should be."
Paul {Hamilton Rooney} - 17 Nov 2006 08:37 GMT
>> Letter to the Editor in today's Lakeland Ledger:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>So obviously wrong! It should be, "...not for what some think them
>should be."
Ha ha! (Though I have heard similar in deepest Herefordshire).