Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

win-win situation: opposite?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
K. Niebel-Bender - 23 Nov 2006 09:15 GMT
I've heard people talking of no-win situations and win-win situations. But
is there anything like a lose-lost situation?

thanks in advance!
Klaus

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Ich verwende die kostenlose Version von SPAMfighter,
die bei mir bis jetzt 446 Spammails entfernt hat.
Für private Anwender ist SPAMfighter völlig kostenlos!
Jetzt gratis testen: hier klicken.
stagshrine@yahoo.com - 23 Nov 2006 10:27 GMT
No.
"Win Win", "Lose Lose" and "Win Lose" are terms that come from a branch of
psychology called game therory.  They reflect the possible outcomes of a two
player game.
They are the names of the four cells of a 2X2 matrix.  The two axis of the
matrix are labled "lose" "win" .  Each axis represents the outcome for one
of the two players.
So the upper right cell is called "win win".  The lower left cell is caled
"lose lose".  As in the case of the USA & Iraq.
The upper left cell is called "win lose".  The lower right cell is called
"lose win"

"No win" means something slightly different.  A "No win" situation refers to
the options of a single player.  It means that no matter what choice the
player makes he will lose.  An example of this is when your wife asks you,
"Which of my friends would you marry after I die?"
Martin Ambuhl - 23 Nov 2006 22:02 GMT
> No.
> "Win Win", "Lose Lose" and "Win Lose" are terms that come from a branch of
> psychology called game therory.

John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern would probably be amused if told
that they were psychologists.
Martin Ambuhl - 23 Nov 2006 22:07 GMT
> No.
> "Win Win", "Lose Lose" and "Win Lose" are terms that come from a branch of
> psychology called game therory.  They reflect the possible outcomes of a two
> player game.

That is not true.
> They are the names of the four cells of a 2X2 matrix.  The two axis of the
> matrix are labled "lose" "win" .

That is not true.

> Each axis represents the outcome for one
> of the two players.

That is not true.

> So the upper right cell is called "win win".
>  The lower left cell is caled
> "lose lose".  As in the case of the USA & Iraq.
> The upper left cell is called "win lose".  The lower right cell is called
> "lose win"

What utter crap.  The "axes" of the 2x2 matrix are strategies.  Whether
both players win, both players lose, what one player wins is lost by the
other, or one loses and the other wins but with asymmetric payoffs is a
completely different question.  Please get a clue before posting again.

> "No win" means something slightly different.  A "No win" situation refers to
> the options of a single player.  It means that no matter what choice the
> player makes he will lose.  An example of this is when your wife asks you,
> "Which of my friends would you marry after I die?"

Ignorant slut.
Barbara Bailey - 23 Nov 2006 12:26 GMT
>I've heard people talking of no-win situations and win-win situations. But
>is there anything like a lose-lost situation?
>
>thanks in advance!
>Klaus

Did you mean to type "lose-lost" or "lose-lose"? There's no such thing
as a "lose-losT" situation, but "lose-losE" situations do exist; it's
the same as a "no win".

If neither party to a negotiation, dispute, confrontation or decision
get what they want or get what they are happy with, it's a lose-lose
situation -- they both "lose".  

Another type of lose-lose situation is where one person has two
choices available, neither of which will make them happy.

In either case, it's a semantic choice whether to call it a "no-win"
or a "lose-lose"

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

elfin@home - 23 Nov 2006 13:42 GMT
>>I've heard people talking of no-win situations and win-win situations. But
>>is there anything like a lose-lost situation?
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>In either case, it's a semantic choice whether to call it a "no-win"
>or a "lose-lose"

win-win is somehow pluralistic in nature.

no-win tends to be exclusive, even when each perspective may be in a
no-win situation.

lose-lose in my experience is often expressed as "everyone loses".

no-win is not necessarily the same as lose-lose. If the status quo
continues it may be in a situation of no loss or gain.
K. Niebel-Bender - 23 Nov 2006 12:35 GMT
Thank for your help!
Klaus

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Ich verwende die kostenlose Version von SPAMfighter,
die bei mir bis jetzt 446 Spammails entfernt hat.
Für private Anwender ist SPAMfighter völlig kostenlos!
Jetzt gratis testen: hier klicken.
Martin Ambuhl - 23 Nov 2006 22:09 GMT
> Thank for your help!
> Klaus

It is unfortunate that the "help" from 'stagshine' is complete crap.
Barbara Bailey's post is much better probably sufficient for you.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.