Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How to use "as if"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gloria0402@gmail.com - 28 Nov 2006 05:21 GMT
Hi,

Here is a test question. I was wondering if another answer will do.

... I chose neither of my first quick solutions. Instead, I told myself
only when I faced this unexpected obstacle head-on could I be the
victor. Then I closed my eyes to still my quaking limbs. I took a deep
breath, and continued, as if I ___ a bird, singing out for the very
first time.

a) am   b) was   c) were      d) will be

The answer is c), but since we were talking about a previous event,
would it be better if we use " had been" instead. I know "as if" can
also be used in describing an event, then can I choose " was" as an
answer?  Thanks,

Gloria
georgeh@ankerstein.org - 28 Nov 2006 13:54 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> also be used in describing an event, then can I choose " was" as an
> answer?

99 out of 100 Americans would say "was", but it is incorrect.  Since
you are not a bird (I am making an assumption there<g>), you should
use the subjunctive "were" (condition contrary to fact).  Note that
"were"
in this case is the present tense subjunctive. (You are still not a
bird.)

Clearly your native language is not German, as the whole range of
English language subjunctive forms come from German roots.

GFH
Eric Walker - 28 Nov 2006 21:13 GMT
> "I took a deep breath, and continued, as if I ___ a bird,
> singing out for the very first time."
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> also be used in describing an event, then can I choose " was" as an
> answer?

Because the act expressed by the verb exists (or existed) only as a
concept in the mind of the speaker, not as a fact, the verb needs to be
in the subjunctive mood.  The past subjunctive form of "be" is "were",
choice (c).

The form "had been" would be the past perfect tense, indicating an act
already completed at the past time to which the speaker is referring,
and so is not appropriate.

(One could use that tense if the entire statement were established in
that way: "I had taken a deep breath, and continued, as if I had been a
bird, singing out for the very first time"; but the rest of the context
paragraph would also have to match that temporal point of view.)
georgeh@ankerstein.org - 29 Nov 2006 00:16 GMT
> The past subjunctive form of "be" is "were"

No, it is not, unles you mean the "present subjuctive
using the past form".  There are three sujunctive forms
in English: 1) the "would" form; 2) the use of the simple
past form ("were" for "be") for the present ("had been" is
the past subjunctive form:; 3) the infinitive (God be praised.)
for uses such as pious wishes. ("God shed his grace on thee"
iswell known in song.)

Each has its origins in the equivilent German forms.

I hate to argue with the owl.

GFH
Eric Walker - 29 Nov 2006 02:12 GMT
> > The past subjunctive form of "be" is "were"
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> for uses such as pious wishes. ("God shed his grace on thee"
> iswell known in song.)

We need to take particular care with terminology when discussing tenses
in the subjunctive mood.  The verb "be" in the subunctive mood, past
tense, is "were" in all persons; that's a flat fact.  What makes for
confusion is that the *significances* of tenses in the subjunctive do
not parallel those in the indicative.  The subjunctive past tense--as
manifested by the accidence--very often refers to the temporal present
or even future.  "If I were master here, what a reckoning there would
be!"  The accidence is that of the subjunctive past, but the temporal
association is not.

If you have a copy of Curme, the matter is discussed at some length at
118.  (I should say here that my occasional internal references to
Curme are to the one-volume Barnes & Noble edition; the original, full,
two-volume work has a different, and inferior, indexing system--B&N, or
rather Dr. Roger A. Walterhouse of B&N--put quite some work into the
new index, and it shows.)

> I hate to argue with the owl.

Why not?  Everyone else does (albeit rarely to much profit).
georgeh@ankerstein.org - 29 Nov 2006 14:20 GMT
> > > The past subjunctive form of "be" is "were"
> >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> in the subjunctive mood.  The verb "be" in the subunctive mood, past
> tense, is "were" in all persons; that's a flat fact.

Were I to go, I would be there.  (Action not yet taken.)
In the subjunctive "were" is present; "had been" is past.
Had I been going, I would have been there. (Action in the past.)

As I pointed out, there are three different sujunctive forms.

GFH
Eric Walker - 29 Nov 2006 22:23 GMT
> Were I to go, I would be there.  (Action not yet taken.)
> In the subjunctive "were" is present; "had been" is past.
> Had I been going, I would have been there. (Action in the past.)

I repeat: the name of the tense does not equate to the temporal
significance it carries.  In the subjunctive, we often use what is
rightly designated "the past tense" to speak of events temporally
present or future.  That does not affect the right name of the form,
"past tense", as it is given in tables of verb forms.

> As I pointed out, there are three different sujunctive forms.

The very word "form" is there ambiguous.  There are several qualities
of the subjunctive that one might refer to as "form":

. the tense
. the method of expression (inflection or auxiliaries, aka "simple" &
"modern")
. the class (potential, optative)

You seem to be using it for the second of those, which is fine if one
makes that clear, but it is not a standard terminology.

It is unclear to me why you refer to three such forms; the normal
reckoning is just two.

The modern style is to use one of the "past-present" modals (can, dare,
may, shall, will, must, ought, wot) with the bare infinitive.

The older form does not use the infinitive as such, though it is
typically the same; but we do not say that the statement "I walk" is
composed of a pronoun and an infinitive, even though "walk" is the same
mechanically as the infinitive form.  Likewise, "God be praised" is not
a noun, an infinitive, and a participle.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.