For a while I have be using coöperate (.. above the second 'o' if that
does not come out) and the like for words that might normally be
hypenated, as I prefer it.
I was just now writing 'reinforced' in an essay, and was wondering
whether it too might have been 'reïnforced' at some point in its life.
kt.

Signature
So I went down the ice-cream shop, and said 'I want to buy an ice-cream'.
He said 'Hundreds & Thousands?' I said 'We'll start with one.'
Caol MacThòmais ha escrito:
> For a while I have be using coöperate (.. above the second 'o' if that
> does not come out) and the like for words that might normally be
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> So I went down the ice-cream shop, and said 'I want to buy an ice-cream'.
> He said 'Hundreds & Thousands?' I said 'We'll start with one.'
"I have been..."
It's usually spelled cooperate now. Reïnforced? I don't think so.
The diaresis was used in cooperate for a long time, and in naïve, but
is (almost) never seen now.
Prefixes get attached by hyphen when the prefix ends in the same vowel
that begins the root word -- except in cooperate. Or when prefix plus
root without hyphen can yield a completely different word, like re-wed.
Cece
> I was just now writing 'reinforced' in an essay, and was wondering
> whether it too might have been 'reïnforced' at some point in its life.
I don't think it has ever been commonplace to use a diaeresis in the
spelling of "reinforced" -- diaereses are usually used over the second of a
pair of the /same/ letter, after all -- but that needn't stop you if you
feel your audience might read it as "rein forced", for example.
Definitions:
cooperate: scale of charges of a barrel maker.
reinforced: (of a horse) compelled to move in a certain direction by
pulling of the reins.
There are lots of words -- especially a good many starting with the prefix
"re-" or "de-" that could with benefit be written with a diaeresis, though
it is not commonly done. "reëlect", "reëvaluate", etc.. I'm also fond of
it's use in noöne.
Cheers,
Daniel.
Odysseus - 30 Nov 2006 07:27 GMT
<snip>
> There are lots of words -- especially a good many starting with the prefix
> "re-" or "de-" that could with benefit be written with a diaeresis, though
> it is not commonly done. "reëlect", "reëvaluate", etc.. I'm also fond of
> it's use in noöne.
Oy! Off to APIHNA with you!

Signature
Odysseus
Daniel James - 30 Nov 2006 12:46 GMT
> > ... it's use ...
>
> Oy! Off to APIHNA with you!
Oop's. Sorry, it was late and my finger's were on auto-pil'ot.
Blushing,
Daniel.
Caol MacThòmais - 30 Nov 2006 23:54 GMT
>> I was just now writing 'reinforced' in an essay, and was wondering
>> whether it too might have been 'reïnforced' at some point in its life.
>
> I don't think it has ever been commonplace to use a diaeresis in the
> spelling of "reinforced" -- diaereses are usually used over the second
> of a pair of the /same/ letter, after all --
I have seen that in many places, but noticed that a diaerisis is
described on Wikipedia for use to point out where to put a break in
pronounciation.
> but that needn't stop you if you feel your audience might read it as
> "rein forced", for example.
>
> Definitions:
>
> cooperate: scale of charges of a barrel maker.
I was looking a a popular shop here called the Co-op, outside they
adertised coop fresh eggs - a better ambiguous sign I have never seen.
> reinforced: (of a horse) compelled to move in a certain direction by
> pulling of the reins.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> diaeresis, though it is not commonly done. "reëlect", "reëvaluate",
> etc.. I'm also fond of it's use in noöne.
I use it in noöne too. I had not seen any use if a ¨ in print until I
read a copy of the New Yorker, how nicely archaic they are ;)
kt.

Signature
I was in this restaurant and I asked for something herby.
They gave me a Volkswagen with no driver.