Hi,
I always though that if "there (or here) + be" is followed by a plural
noun, it is "there are", while "there is" is used if it is followed by
a singular noun.
But recently, I often heard "there is" (or "here is") being used
together with singular nouns.
Two examples:
Here's the keys.
There's no mosquitos in the desert.
Is that correct? If yes, what are the rules when to use "(t)here are"
and when to use "(t)here is"?
Peter
the Omrud - 19 Dec 2006 11:27 GMT
Peter Frank <peter_frankde@yahoo.de> had it:
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Here's the keys.
> There's no mosquitos in the desert.
Those are not examples of "here is" or "there is". You've changed
the question.
> Is that correct? If yes, what are the rules when to use "(t)here are"
> and when to use "(t)here is"?
"correct", perhaps not, although there is no authority for English.
Idiomatic, yes, to use "here's" or "there's" with a plural object.
It is not idiomatic to use "here is" or "there is" with a plural
object.

Signature
David
=====
Peter Duncanson - 19 Dec 2006 12:03 GMT
>Hi,
>
>I always though that if "there (or here) + be" is followed by a plural
>noun, it is "there are", while "there is" is used if it is followed by
>a singular noun.
Correct.
>But recently, I often heard "there is" (or "here is") being used
>together with singular nouns.
You have heard "there's" and "here's" being you with singular nouns.
>Two examples:
>Here's the keys.
See [1].
>There's no mosquitos in the desert.
>
>Is that correct? If yes, what are the rules when to use "(t)here are"
>and when to use "(t)here is"?
The first is for a plural noun the second for a singular noun.
The contracted forms of these are "there're" and "there's".
However, many people now use "there's" in casual speech and writing
to mean "there are" as well as "there is". I don't know when or why
this started, but "there's" can be easier to say than "there're". In
some English accents "there're" can be very difficult to pronounce
successfully.
What this means is that the expanded form of "there's" may be "there
is" or "there are" according to whether the following noun is
singular or plural.
[1] "Keys" can be understood as either plural or singular. If "the
keys" means a bunch of keys then it can be treated as a single item.

Signature
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.english.usage)
Peter Duncanson - 19 Dec 2006 12:38 GMT
>>Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>You have heard "there's" and "here's" being you with singular nouns.
---------------------------------------------^^^
Replace "you" by "used".

Signature
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.english.usage)
Odysseus - 20 Dec 2006 04:08 GMT
<snip>
> >You have heard "there's" and "here's" being you with singular nouns.
> ---------------------------------------------^^^
>
> Replace "you" by "used".
Your choice of preposition strikes me as odd: my ear tells me that "by"
belongs with "replace" only when the verb is passive, an active
"replace" demanding "with". Is that just me?

Signature
Odysseus
Aaron - 03 Jan 2007 13:46 GMT
And lo, Odysseus <odysseus1479-at@yahoo-dot.com> emerged from the ether
and spake thus:
><snip>
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> belongs with "replace" only when the verb is passive, an active
> "replace" demanding "with". Is that just me?
I do believe those crafty Brits occasionally use "by" where we here in
USia prefer "with." Whether Peter is one such Brit I do not know.

Signature
Aaron
http://www.fisheyegallery.com
http://www.singleservingphoto.com
Peter Duncanson - 03 Jan 2007 14:36 GMT
>And lo, Odysseus <odysseus1479-at@yahoo-dot.com> emerged from the ether
>and spake thus:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>I do believe those crafty Brits occasionally use "by" where we here in
>USia prefer "with." Whether Peter is one such Brit I do not know.
I am a Brit, and that particular usage of "by" seems natural. Other
Brits might prefer "with".

Signature
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.english.usage)
Peter Duncanson - 19 Dec 2006 19:29 GMT
>>Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>You have heard "there's" and "here's" being you with singular nouns.
I think we both made mistakes in those two sentences!
We should have typed "plural nouns".
>>But recently, I often heard "there is" (or "here is") being
>>used together with plural nouns.
>
>You have heard "there's" and "here's" being used with plural
>nouns.

Signature
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.english.usage)
Peter Frank - 19 Dec 2006 21:52 GMT
>>>Hi,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>We should have typed "plural nouns".
You are absolutely right. I mixed it up.
Peter
Peter Frank - 19 Dec 2006 18:10 GMT
I wrote:
>I always though that if "there (or here) + be" is followed by a plural
>noun, it is "there are", while "there is" is used if it is followed by
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>Is that correct? If yes, what are the rules when to use "(t)here are"
>and when to use "(t)here is"?
Thanks for your replies. I understand its use in casual speech now.
Actually, I have never seen this use of "(t)here's" followed by a
singular noun in print. I only heard it in movies. And it obviously
matters here whether the contracted form is used or not.
Peter
Francis Cameron - 20 Dec 2006 09:45 GMT
>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
>Peter
A change in general use is taking place. I first noticed symptoms of
this change sometime in the 1960s. I had been taught at school that
collective nouns (e.g.Parliament, team) are to be treated as singular
and therefore accompanied by a verb in the singular. Now I noticed that
popular usage had begun to accompany collective nouns with a verb in the
plural (e.g. 'Parliament are' replaced 'Parliament is'. Today the common
usage includes phrases such as 'England are' (e.g. when referring to a
cricket or football team). My prescriptive schooling has it that such
usage is incorrect. My descriptive replacement tells me that the 'rules'
of language are made by those who commonly use that language.
In the mid-1970s I noticed 'There's demands .. ' in an official
publication of one of the Australian teachers' unions.

Signature
Francis Cameron
Oxford, UK
Alan Jones - 21 Dec 2006 17:58 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Is that correct? If yes, what are the rules when to use "(t)here are"
> and when to use "(t)here is"?
Acceptable and in fact normal in conversation and other informal contexts.
Formally, it's better to use the plural - "There /Here are ..."
Alan Jones