Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

It would be "awesome" if "TomKat" "went missing"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Fred Goodwin, CMA - 03 Jan 2007 21:47 GMT
It would be "awesome" if "TomKat" "went missing"

<http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=oddlyEnoughNews&storyID=2007
-01-03T130923Z_01_NCU271694_RTRUKOC_0_US-USA-CLICHES.xml
>
http://tinyurl.com/y3bgh4

Wed Jan 3, 2007 8:09 AM ET
By Andrew Stern

CHICAGO, Dec 31 (Reuters Life!) - It would be "awesome" if "TomKat" and
other combined nicknames for celebrity couples "went missing" in the
New Year, a Michigan university said on Sunday in its annual list of
cliches deserving banishment.

Lake Superior State University's 32nd annual List of Words Banished
from the Queen's English for Mis-Use, Over-Use and General Uselessness
featured such linguistic gems as "Gitmo" for the U.S. base in
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; euphemisms such as "undocumented alien;" and such
Internet-inflected synonyms as "pwn," as in the phrase "I pwn (own)
you."

The Sault St. Marie, Michigan, university's public relations staff
culled its list of 16 cliches from 4,500 submissions, many of which
demanded that something be done to stop the onslaught of the word
"awesome."

"Overused and meaningless," complained contributor Robert Bron, writing
to the list-makers from Pattaya, Thailand. "'My mother was hit by a
car.' Awesome. 'I just got my college degree.' Awesome."

The list gave short shrift to media shorthand for celebrity duos such
as "TomKat," for the union of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, and
"Brangelina," for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

How would "Lardy" have sounded as a nickname for long-ago comedians
Laurel and Hardy, or "BogCall" for Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall,
the list's compilers asked.

Media bashers also welcomed banishment of the phrases "gone missing" or
"went missing."

"It makes 'missing' sound like a place you can visit, such as the
Poconos," wrote contributor Robin Dennis of Flower Mound, Texas.

The same goes for a robbery "gone bad," which raises the question of
whether a theft could go well and good, the list-makers said.
Similarly, reporters covering the immigration issue should try again
after coming up with "undocumented alien," which was compared to
euphemistically calling a drug dealer an "undocumented pharmacist."

The list also decried the use in everyday speech of the Internet
typographical error "pwn," as used when a game-player tells his
defeated opponent "I pwn you," instead of own you.

"Truthiness," popularized by comedian Stephen Colbert as truth
unencumbered by the facts may have been named one of the top U.S.
television buzzwords of the year in August by Global Language Monitor.
But on this list, it has overstayed its welcome.

The list also suggested that the partners of pregnant women might save
some embarrassment by avoiding, "We're pregnant," when only one of you
is, the list said.

As for those enticing real estate advertisements that "boast" of
amenities, contributor Morris Conklin, writing from Portugal, noted the
ads never say "'the bathroom apologizes for cracked linoleum,' or
'kitchen laments pathetic placement of electrical outlets.'"

Finally, contributor Joy Wiltzius of Fort Collins, Colorado, wanted to
correct the "sounds healthy" comment in reference to a nutritious
lunch, such as a fish sandwich. "If my lunch were healthy, it would
still be swimming somewhere. Grilled and nestled in salad greens, it's
'healthful.'"
Blue Hornet - 04 Jan 2007 04:14 GMT
> It would be "awesome" if "TomKat" "went missing"
>
[quoted text clipped - 68 lines]
> still be swimming somewhere. Grilled and nestled in salad greens, it's
> 'healthful.'"

Totally, dude!
mm - 11 Jan 2007 17:14 GMT
>It would be "awesome" if "TomKat" "went missing"
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>CHICAGO, Dec 31 (Reuters Life!) - It would be "awesome" if "TomKat" and
>other combined nicknames for celebrity couples "went missing" in the

I had never heard "went missing" except maybe from a hillbilly until I
moved to Baltimore 23 years ago.  Then one particular girl said it a
few times.  I didn't think she was a trend leader, but about 4 years
after that I started hearing it everywhere.

Someone should mention "moving forward".  That seemed to start in DC
and within a couple months of it escaping the beltway, it was all over
the place.  But 6 months or a year later, a mysterious infection
occurred which killed most new occurances of "moving forward".  Just
as one could tell who was with it by who said it, can we also tell who
doesn't have progressive or imaginative thinking by who still says it?

>New Year, a Michigan university said on Sunday in its annual list of
>cliches deserving banishment.
>
>Lake Superior State University's 32nd annual List of Words Banished
>from the Queen's English for Mis-Use, Over-Use and General Uselessness
>featured such linguistic gems as "Gitmo" for the U.S. base in

Gitmo is different. It has been its nickname for more than 50 years,
but mosts people had no occasion to talk about it.  Its full name is
long, but more importantly, calling it by the nickname makes it look
like one is fully informed.

>Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; euphemisms such as "undocumented alien;" and such
>Internet-inflected synonyms as "pwn," as in the phrase "I pwn (own)
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>demanded that something be done to stop the onslaught of the word
>"awesome."

>"Overused and meaningless," complained contributor Robert Bron, writing
>to the list-makers from Pattaya, Thailand. "'My mother was hit by a
>car.' Awesome. 'I just got my college degree.' Awesome."

A girl about 40 said to me on the phone that my 65 year old brother is
awesome.  I was going to tell him that, but now I'm not sure if that
is a very strong compliment or a platitude.  "Now" means not this
minute, but when I earlier became aware of the weakening of awesome.

>The list gave short shrift to media shorthand for celebrity duos such
>as "TomKat," for the union of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, and
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>some embarrassment by avoiding, "We're pregnant," when only one of you
>is, the list said.

We're having a baby, but only the woman is pregnant.

>As for those enticing real estate advertisements that "boast" of
>amenities, contributor Morris Conklin, writing from Portugal, noted the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>still be swimming somewhere. Grilled and nestled in salad greens, it's
>'healthful.'"

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
Sev - 12 Jan 2007 07:06 GMT
Journalists live on these cliches.  Hell, they've got to churn out
copy, even when there's little to say.   In the 70s, I was nearly
driven to distraction by "dead in the water."    Thought I should
protest, though I didn't want to end up like Gatsby, dead in the water.
mm - 12 Jan 2007 07:24 GMT
>Journalists live on these cliches.  Hell, they've got to churn out
>copy, even when there's little to say.   In the 70s, I was nearly
>driven to distraction by "dead in the water."    Thought I should
>protest, though I didn't want to end up like Gatsby, dead in the water.

That won't happen to me.  I stay away from water.

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
georgeh@ankerstein.org - 12 Jan 2007 13:32 GMT
> The list gave short shrift to media shorthand for celebrity duos such
> as "TomKat," for the union of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, and
> "Brangelina," for Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

Perhaps they could be beamed up to Scientology heaven.  All of them.

GFH
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.