Hello there,
I was recently watching a movie in which one moment a man was making some
kind of notes in his diary. To my surprise he wrote something like "done @
noon 1967". I thought the @ sign (which BTW is in my native Polish called
"malpka"= little monkey) is pretty recent. Does anybody know its origin?
Regards,
Jurek
Peter Duncanson - 27 Dec 2003 22:26 GMT
>Hello there,
>I was recently watching a movie in which one moment a man was making some
>kind of notes in his diary. To my surprise he wrote something like "done @
>noon 1967". I thought the @ sign (which BTW is in my native Polish called
>"malpka"= little monkey) is pretty recent. Does anybody know its origin?
It depends what you mean by "pretty recent".
The @ - the "commercial at sign" has been traced back to May 4, 1536.
See:
http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_at

Signature
Peter Duncanson
UK
(posting from a.e.u)
Raymond S. Wise - 27 Dec 2003 22:33 GMT
> Hello there,
> I was recently watching a movie in which one moment a man was making some
> kind of notes in his diary. To my surprise he wrote something like "done @
> noon 1967". I thought the @ sign (which BTW is in my native Polish called
> "malpka"= little monkey) is pretty recent. Does anybody know its origin?
It is an ancient symbol which was originally either a version of "A" for
"amphora" or a version of the Latin word "ad," meaning, among other things,
"at." See what Michael Quinion wrote about it in his *World Wide Words* Web
site at
http://www.quinion.com/words/articles/whereat.htm

Signature
Raymond S. Wise
Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
E-mail: mplsray @ yahoo . com
AoT - 28 Dec 2003 03:21 GMT
"Raymond S. Wise" wrote ... See what Michael Quinion wrote about it in his
*World Wide Words* Web > site at...
The "@" was (may still be) used by UK Customs for ' Whence' in respect of
arriving traffic (e.g., SS Halizones @ Hong Kong). This would seem to be
related to the meaning 'fetch (from forth)' given on that page.
AOT
Don Phillipson - 28 Dec 2003 13:32 GMT
> I was recently watching a movie in which one moment a man was making some
> kind of notes in his diary. To my surprise he wrote something like "done @
> noon 1967". I thought the @ sign (which BTW is in my native Polish called
> "malpka"= little monkey) is pretty recent. Does anybody know its origin?
This symbol was widely used in (English
language) business accounts in the 19th
century (or earlier) and thence borrowed
by 20th century computer programmers.
People used to write:
4 Christmas turkeys @ 3s.6d. . . . 14s.
--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada)
Raymond S. Wise - 28 Dec 2003 17:47 GMT
> > I was recently watching a movie in which one moment a man was making some
> > kind of notes in his diary. To my surprise he wrote something like "done @
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> People used to write:
> 4 Christmas turkeys @ 3s.6d. . . . 14s.
Borrowed by way of the typewriter keyboard, where it appeared precisely
because it was used in business contexts. The cents sign was also used in
business contexts and made it onto the typewriter keyboard, but it didn't
make the transition to the computer keyboard. I presume this was because at
the time it had become more standard in business letters to refer to cents
with the "$0.XX" format, but would be happy to hear others' speculation
about why the cents sign did not make it onto the computer keyboard.

Signature
Raymond S. Wise
Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
E-mail: mplsray @ yahoo . com
Peter Duncanson - 28 Dec 2003 18:27 GMT
>> > I was recently watching a movie in which one moment a man was making
>some
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>with the "$0.XX" format, but would be happy to hear others' speculation
>about why the cents sign did not make it onto the computer keyboard.
That seems a reasonable speculation.
The cents sign was on early "computer keyboards" in the form of the
keyboards on card punches - for instance the IBM 029 Key Punch.
http://www.columbia.edu/acis/history/029.html
IBM's EDCDIC code includes the cents character.
Based on the information in this page other computer makers did not follow
IBM's example.
http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~jones/cards/codes.html

Signature
Peter Duncanson
UK
(posting from a.e.u)
meirman - 03 Jan 2004 05:32 GMT
In alt.english.usage on Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:47:33 -0600 "Raymond S.
Wise" <illinoisNOSPAM@mninter.net> posted:
>Borrowed by way of the typewriter keyboard, where it appeared precisely
>because it was used in business contexts. The cents sign was also used in
The @ sign was the only character on the typewriter keyboard that
wasn't used for much in my experience. That's why when my friend Bob
and I were juniors in high school we used it as the base number for
our number system. Just as i was used to represent the square root of
-1, we used @.
>business contexts and made it onto the typewriter keyboard, but it didn't
>make the transition to the computer keyboard. I presume this was because at
>the time it had become more standard in business letters to refer to cents
>with the "$0.XX" format, but would be happy to hear others' speculation
>about why the cents sign did not make it onto the computer keyboard.
s/ meirman If you are emailing me please
say if you are posting the same response.
Born west of Pittsburgh Pa. 10 years
Indianapolis, 7 years
Chicago, 6 years
Brooklyn NY 12 years
Baltimore 20 years
David White - 04 Jan 2004 16:39 GMT
> In alt.english.usage on Sun, 28 Dec 2003 11:47:33 -0600 "Raymond S.
> Wise" <illinoisNOSPAM@mninter.net> posted:
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> Brooklyn NY 12 years
> Baltimore 20 years
As scholars in the UK in the pre-decimal 1960s, we were taught to use @ as a
mathematical shorthand for "at" when referring to the unit price of a
commodity. So, instead of writing "6 apples at 1/- each = 6/-", we could
write "6 apples @ 1/- = 6/-". It is still used today with pounds and (new)
pence.
David
Danny Kodicek - 28 Dec 2003 14:39 GMT
> Hello there,
> I was recently watching a movie in which one moment a man was making some
> kind of notes in his diary. To my surprise he wrote something like "done @
> noon 1967". I thought the @ sign (which BTW is in my native Polish called
> "malpka"= little monkey) is pretty recent. Does anybody know its origin?
Others have answered, but I thought I'd add that I call it an 'ampersat', by
extension of 'ampersand'. This was an invention of a friend of mine at
university, but it's such a perfect word that I think it deserves wider
usage...
Danny
meirman - 28 Dec 2003 21:09 GMT
In alt.english.usage on Sat, 27 Dec 2003 21:31:45 +0100 "Jurek"
<jajoorek@NO_SPAMpoczta.onet.pl> posted:
>Hello there,
>I was recently watching a movie in which one moment a man was making some
>kind of notes in his diary. To my surprise he wrote something like "done @
>noon 1967". I thought the @ sign (which BTW is in my native Polish called
>"malpka"= little monkey) is pretty recent. Does anybody know its origin?
More recent than 1967? 1967 was yesterday.
>Regards,
>Jurek
s/ meirman If you are emailing me please
say if you are posting the same response.
Born west of Pittsburgh Pa. 10 years
Indianapolis, 7 years
Chicago, 6 years
Brooklyn NY 12 years
Baltimore 20 years
Cece - 30 Dec 2003 21:13 GMT
> In alt.english.usage on Sat, 27 Dec 2003 21:31:45 +0100 "Jurek"
> <jajoorek@NO_SPAMpoczta.onet.pl> posted:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Brooklyn NY 12 years
> Baltimore 20 years
@ did not use to mean "at," but "at . . . each." "Apples @ 5 cents"
means "Apples at 5 cents each."
Cece