> I wrote "There is such a thing as cowboy customers" and got told it should
> be "There are such things as cowboy customers"
>
> Am I wrong?
I wouldn't describe your version as wrong, but I agree that the second
version is much better style. The problem with your version is that
it treats cowboy customers as a single entity, which is an unlikely
interpretation.
Larry Trask
larryt@sussex.ac.uk
Adrian Bailey - 28 Dec 2003 16:39 GMT
> > I wrote "There is such a thing as cowboy customers" and got told it should
> > be "There are such things as cowboy customers"
> >
> > Am I wrong?
No.
> I wouldn't describe your version as wrong, but I agree that the second
> version is much better style. The problem with your version is that
> it treats cowboy customers as a single entity, which is an unlikely
> interpretation.
Which is an unlikely interpretation of what?
Adrian
> I wrote "There is such a thing as cowboy customers" and got told it should
> be "There are such things as cowboy customers"
>
> Am I wrong?
Both are correct English, but I personally prefer the second.
--
Mark Wallace
-----------------------------------------------------
For the intelligent approach to nasty humour, visit:
The Anglo-American Humour (humor) Site
http://earth.prohosting.com/mwal/
-----------------------------------------------------