Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / July 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

What is the Difference between a Snob and a Gentleman?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
norak - 29 Jul 2007 05:37 GMT
A female friend of mine told me that she wanted to date men who are
gentlemen. The word I think refers to someone whose behavior shows
others he is a member of nobility. Someone who acts like a gentleman
therefore, would be a snob, right?
tony cooper - 29 Jul 2007 05:56 GMT
>A female friend of mine told me that she wanted to date men who are
>gentlemen. The word I think refers to someone whose behavior shows
>others he is a member of nobility. Someone who acts like a gentleman
>therefore, would be a snob, right?

We're quite willing, in this group, to discuss the meaning and usage
of words.  Sometimes the true meaning of the word is not how the word
is actually used.  

However, before you ask for help in understanding the meaning and
usage of words, you should at least first look at the dictionary
definitions.  If that doesn't answer your question, then ask for
further clarification.  

Look up the words "snob" and "gentleman" in the dictionary. Do you see
anything in the two definitions that link the two words?  


Signature


Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

mm - 29 Jul 2007 07:28 GMT
Tony's right, but I wrote this before reading Tony's post.

>A female friend of mine told me that she wanted to date men who are
>gentlemen. The word I think refers to someone whose behavior shows
>others he is a member of nobility.

No.  In America, and I think everywhere now, anyone can be a
gentleman.  It's based on behaviour.

> Someone who acts like a gentleman
>therefore, would be a snob, right?

No.

In fact, not only does G not imply S.  G implies not S. A gentleman
doesn't behave like a snob.  

(And btw, why would a member of nobility have to be a snob?  I don't
konw any, but do you?)

A gentleman is someone who behaves properly when he is with one or
more other people.  (He probably behaves properly the rest of the time
too, but I'm not there (unless it's me)).

He's polite to everyone.  He's not rude, so he can't very well behave
like a snob.  If he's able to be a snob without it showing, that might
not violate the definition, but I'll bet it's very rare in practice

He doesn't gossip (which is rude.)  

None of this means he's prissy like the Crane brothers, or that he
speaks with some strange accent.  But if he has an accent, that's ok
too.

It also doesn't mean that he treats the taxi driver the same as his
buddy.  He is not expected to and he only has to treat him as well as
a polite person treats a taxi driver.  (In my year as a taxi driver, I
think only one person was rude to me, plus the three who didn't pay,
but other than not paying, they weren't rude.)  Oh yeah, a gentleman
pays his bills.

He doesn't impose on someone else's hospitality.

But all of this is encompassed in behaving properly, and not being
rude.

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
Leslie Danks - 29 Jul 2007 10:24 GMT
[...]

> A gentleman is [...] not rude [...]

The definition I heard is: "A gentleman is never rude unintentionally".

Signature

Les

mm - 31 Jul 2007 04:14 GMT
>[...]
>
>> A gentleman is [...] not rude [...]
>
>The definition I heard is: "A gentleman is never rude unintentionally".

That's cute, but it's at best an exaggeration.  It refers, I expect,
to those infrequent cases where someone is entitled to be rude, maybe

a) because it's a medical emergency and there is no time for
politeness (If one knows some emergency medicine and someone else
collapses, you may push people away to get to the sick person.  You
don't have say excuse me and wait for them to move.) or

b) when someone has been rude to the gentleman in the first place.
Miss Manners doesn't call her recommended replies to rudeness as rude,
but I think many would be if they weren't in reply to rudeness.
People ask questions that are too personal, or make improper negative
observations, and while often she urges ignoring the statements and
other by-no-means rude replies, other times she'll suggest a cut, a
spicy reply.  Since I'm no good at these, I can't think of an example.

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
Odysseus - 30 Jul 2007 06:18 GMT
> Tony's right, but I wrote this before reading Tony's post.

<snip>

> > Someone who acts like a gentleman
> >therefore, would be a snob, right?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> more other people.  (He probably behaves properly the rest of the time
> too, but I'm not there (unless it's me)).

My grandfather used to say that a gentleman is someone who uses a
butter-knife when dining alone. Which is to say, I think, that it
doesn't matter whether or not anyone's there to approve: a true
gentleman behaves correctly out of habit. OTOH a snob is very sensitive
to the audience he's trying to impress, while resenting those who do so
naturally and without effort.

Signature

Odysseus

Wilstrup - 29 Jul 2007 09:38 GMT
>A female friend of mine told me that she wanted to date men
>who are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> gentleman
> therefore, would be a snob, right?

The word snob derives from the English boarding schools. When
a newcomer attended the school and had no title (i.e. was not
from the nobility), they wrote s.nob. = sine nobilitatis -
without nobility. So the word s.nob. ended up with the word
'snob' - meaning a person who is trying to pretend to belong
to the top drawer of the society, but who in reality is not
belonging there.

A gentleman is a person who knows how to behave -especially in
contacts with the ladies.

A snob might have a gentleman's attitude, but it is not in his
"breed" according to the notion of a well-breeded gentleman
from the upper class.

A gentleman is a way of knowing how to behave in certain
circumstances - a snob is just a person who is trying to
pretend that he is a part of a higher class in the society
than he is entitled to.

A snob is also considered a person who associates with a
certain class in the society, preferably with people who are
rich and influential just to keep up appearances cp. the
series: Keeping Up Appearances http://kuacentral.com/

Arne H. Wilstrup
Denmark
Robert Lieblich - 29 Jul 2007 14:37 GMT
[ ... ]

> The word snob derives from the English boarding schools. When
> a newcomer attended the school and had no title (i.e. was not
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to the top drawer of the society, but who in reality is not
> belonging there.

Another false etymology -- with aspects of acronymy, no less.  M-W
reports "etymology unknown," but elsewhere you'll find things like
this:

1781, "a shoemaker, a shoemaker's apprentice," of unknown origin. It
came to be used in Cambridge University slang c.1796 for "townsman,
local merchant," and by 1831 it was being used for "person of the
ordinary or lower classes." Meaning "person who vulgarly apes his
social superiors" arose 1843, popularized 1848 by William Thackeray's
"Book of Snobs."

<http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=snob>

Too bad.  The false etymology produces a much tidier response to the
OP.
Iain - 30 Jul 2007 12:30 GMT
> A female friend of mine told me that she wanted to date men who are
> gentlemen. The word I think refers to someone whose behavior shows
> others he is a member of nobility. Someone who acts like a gentleman
> therefore, would be a snob, right?

A gentleman is a genteel man.

Or someone who reads this British magazine:
http://www.thechap.net/

~Iain
Peter Duncanson - 30 Jul 2007 13:03 GMT
>> A female friend of mine told me that she wanted to date men who are
>> gentlemen. The word I think refers to someone whose behavior shows
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>Or someone who reads this British magazine:
>http://www.thechap.net/

Good Grief! [1]

I attempt to behave in a courteous, gentlemanly, manner but would
not wish to be classified with those "Chaps".

[1] Who is this deity Grief anyway? Perhaps he or she can be
identified with one of the Hindu pantheon.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.english.usage)

mm - 30 Jul 2007 22:54 GMT
>Good Grief! [1]
>
>I attempt to behave in a courteous, gentlemanly, manner but would
>not wish to be classified with those "Chaps".
>
>[1] Who is this deity Grief anyway? Perhaps he or she can be

A lot of people go out of their way NOT to use a deity or the title or
one in their exclamatory expressions.  I don't know what the origin is
of Good Grief or if this is an example of that, but it might be.

Other people make an effort to create a new term similar to what they
don't want to say.  And still other people call these new terms
euphemisms because they think that refers to any word substituted for
another.  When in fact it only refers to words substituted for words
that cause unpleasant fellings, not to good words are avoided in order
to not make them commonplace.

"One Day at a Time", the sitcom set in Indianapolis that starred
Valerie Bertinelli as the daughter, was the first tv series in which
anyone said "Oh, my God" or anything like that.  Either it hadn't been
permitted some time earlier, or script writers and editors had better
taste.  Even though some people said the phrase freely in those days,
the 70's I think, many people of a variety of religions would not do
so. Now television has far worse than that.

>identified with one of the Hindu pantheon.

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.