The nightmare of writing any book on grammar, punctuation,
etc., is the inevitability of making mistakes yourself.
And so you end up not looking like you know what you are on
about.
So, have I found an inevitable mistake in Eat, Shoots, and
Leaves:
This is where comma usage all starts getting tricky.
That `all' looks really odd to me. I could readily accept
This is where comma usage starts getting all tricky
but I feel much less sure about the original. Now, she has
written a book on punctuation, not grammar, so my comment
may not count. Nevertheless, if you can't get your grammar
right, what hope is there for your punctuation?
Cheers,
R.
ps I make no claims regarding my own feeble grammar!
Alan Illeman - 31 Dec 2003 22:49 GMT
> The nightmare of writing any book on grammar, punctuation,
> etc., is the inevitability of making mistakes yourself.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> ps I make no claims regarding my own feeble grammar!
"This is where comma usage all starts getting tricky."
I think 'all' is superfluous, else we are to believe, in other conditions,
that only part of comma usage gets tricky.
"This is where comma usage starts getting all tricky"
I don't think there is a reasonable distinction between 'all tricky'
and 'tricky', unless perhaps the author had previously referred
to things getting 'partly tricky' and had defined in some way the
differences.
Alan
rolleston - 01 Jan 2004 14:59 GMT
> I don't think there is a reasonable distinction between 'all tricky'
> and 'tricky', unless perhaps the author had previously referred
> to things getting 'partly tricky' and had defined in some way the
> differences.
I took it to be an informal way of saying `very tricky'.
Of course, you couldn't sensibly write:
This is where comma usage very starts getting tricky.
But then, perhaps, there's a different shade of meaning she's
trying to get across.
R.
Larry Trask - 01 Jan 2004 16:26 GMT
> The nightmare of writing any book on grammar, punctuation,
> etc., is the inevitability of making mistakes yourself.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> may not count. Nevertheless, if you can't get your grammar
> right, what hope is there for your punctuation?
Well, I've published more than a dozen books, and I can tell you
something: it is *impossible* to get a book into print with no
mistakes at all.
No matter how many times you proofread the text, and no matter how
carefully your copy-editor goes through it, there will always be one
or two glitches that slip through. This is a fundamental law of the
universe.
Larry Trask
larryt@ussex.ac.uk
david56 - 01 Jan 2004 18:15 GMT
larryt@sussex.ac.uk spake thus:
> Well, I've published more than a dozen books, and I can tell you
> something: it is *impossible* to get a book into print with no
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> or two glitches that slip through. This is a fundamental law of the
> universe.
This law is also true of computer programs, and is well understood by
programmers.

Signature
David
=====
Dr Robin Bignall - 01 Jan 2004 23:01 GMT
>The nightmare of writing any book on grammar, punctuation,
>etc., is the inevitability of making mistakes yourself.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> This is where comma usage starts getting all tricky
I think she's using it in a jocular way. That 'all' is used on both sides
of the pond in expressions such as "This is where it all starts falling
apart". From the writing she does for The Times it's obvious that she
writes to amuse rather than to even attempt to be scholarly.

Signature
wrmst rgrds
Robin Bignall
Quiet part of Hertfordshire
England
rolleston - 02 Jan 2004 15:25 GMT
> I think she's using it in a jocular way. That 'all' is used on both sides
> of the pond in expressions such as "This is where it all starts falling
> apart".
But that's fine to me. I read `it all' as `all of it'= `the whole thing'.
I guess you could go with `this is where it kind of starts falling apart'.
R.
Dr Robin Bignall - 03 Jan 2004 16:07 GMT
>> I think she's using it in a jocular way. That 'all' is used on both sides
>> of the pond in expressions such as "This is where it all starts falling
>> apart".
>
>But that's fine to me. I read `it all' as `all of it'= `the whole thing'.
>I guess you could go with `this is where it kind of starts falling apart'.
In informal speech, yes, with a rueful sort of grin and a shrug of the
shoulders.

Signature
wrmst rgrds
Robin Bignall
Quiet part of Hertfordshire
England
Gary Jones - 02 Jan 2004 10:09 GMT
> The nightmare of writing any book on grammar, punctuation,
> etc., is the inevitability of making mistakes yourself.
It's a wonderful book, but on page 89 there's a question mark that
stopped me in my tracks. I wonder why?
Gary Jones
(email address is a spam-hole)