Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / November 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

use of into over in to

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tysteel - 28 Nov 2007 15:59 GMT
Hi everyone,

I have a question I'd like to ask on the subject of when it's
appropriate to use the pharse "in to" over "into" and vice versa.
I've been looking for an explanation while searching through google,
but a lot of what I've read on the topic is vague.

Which of the following constructions would be considered correct:

a) You shouldn't give in to his lies.
b) You shouldn't give into his lies

Does it matter?
Cece - 28 Nov 2007 22:41 GMT
> Hi everyone,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Does it matter?

As a general rule, I know which one to use but I don't know why.  In
your example, however, I do know why!  a) is correct; "give in" is a
phrasal verb.

In other sentences, the difference can be subtle, but the difference
exists and, IMO, matters.  It's something I know from listening to
English all my life; I can't explain it.

Cece
Joanne Marinelli - 28 Nov 2007 23:05 GMT
>> Hi everyone,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Cece

An example I found on Google reads

She went in to finish her work.

You would not use the preposition *into* in the above. I had an English
professor in the eighties who once explained the difference to me, but like
Cece, I cannot remember it.

I do know that the three prepositions have three different meanings. Look
them up. I am too lazy to do it myself, and you seem to have a basic
understanding of written English.

Joanne
John Varela - 29 Nov 2007 02:45 GMT
> An example I found on Google reads
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> professor in the eighties who once explained the difference to me, but like
> Cece, I cannot remember it.

But she went into detail.

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email.

Joanne Marinelli - 29 Nov 2007 04:04 GMT
>> An example I found on Google reads
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> But she went into detail.

And that is the basis of your objection to what?
Glenn Knickerbocker - 28 Nov 2007 23:32 GMT
> I have a question I'd like to ask on the subject of when it's
> appropriate to use the pharse "in to" over "into" and vice versa.

Their meanings are completely different.

If you go into a box, you end up inside the box.

If you go in to a box, you end up next to the box,
inside the room or building that the box is in.

> a) You shouldn't give in to his lies.

is correct.  "Give in" is an expression meaning to yield.

¬R
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.