Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / February 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why do old abbreviations that are perfectly fine have to get longer?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
mm - 21 Feb 2008 17:30 GMT
Why do old abbreviations that are perfectly fine have to get longer?

Until 1964 or maybe much later, Post Office Box was abbreviated (or
whatever the right term is) POB.

Who didn't understand that in What's My Line
                             POB 1776
                             New York 12, New York

POB stood for post office box?   What else could it stand for in an
address?  Everyone knew it.  But somewhere along the line someone
decided they had to say PO Box.  Who was that and why?

Also OBG.    Until 1964 or maybe much later, OBG stood for Obstetrics
and Gynocology.  And nothing else.  What else could it stand for?  But
somewhere along the line someone decided it had to be OBGYN.  Who was
that and why?

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
Cece - 21 Feb 2008 19:32 GMT
> Why do old abbreviations that are perfectly fine have to get longer?
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> If you are inclined to email me
> for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)

Sorry, but I have always seen and used only "P.O. Box."  Except that
there used to be a space between "P." and "O."

Sorry, but I have never seen OBG, only OB/GYN and Ob/Gyn.  See that
virgule?

Cece
mm - 21 Feb 2008 20:56 GMT
>> Why do old abbreviations that are perfectly fine have to get longer?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>Sorry, but I have always seen and used only "P.O. Box."  Except that
>there used to be a space between "P." and "O."

Well, I don't really know how POBox is written, but POB is written
POB.  So simple.

>Sorry, but I have never seen OBG, only OB/GYN and Ob/Gyn.  See that
>virgule?

Yeah, you're right.  That makes it six characters instead of the 3 I
think it used to be.

So, how old are you?   Where do you live?  I live in the US.

>Cece

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
HVS - 21 Feb 2008 21:17 GMT
On 21 Feb 2008, mm wrote

-snip original questions-

>> Sorry, but I have always seen and used only "P.O. Box."  Except
>> that there used to be a space between "P." and "O."
>
> Well, I don't really know how POBox is written, but POB is
> written POB.  So simple.

It's not simple if you've never seen POB.

FWIW, I don't recall seeing "POB" -- it's always been "P.O. Box" for
me.  (I'm 55, with a 30/25 year split between Canada and the UK.)

Signature

Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed

Pat Durkin - 21 Feb 2008 22:36 GMT
> Why do old abbreviations that are perfectly fine have to get longer?
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> address?  Everyone knew it.  But somewhere along the line someone
> decided they had to say PO Box.  Who was that and why?

As  with Cece and Oleg, I have not seen or used POB on any mailing.  For
a long time, back in the '50s and earlier (Wisconsin, anyway) the rural
postal addresses were written "Star Route (Pony Route, Rural Route,
RFD)", the route number depending on the postman's route decisions--1,
2, 3, etc. The route number was followed on the envelope by "Box #".
(or,  Box 85, RR 1) If the addressee picked up his mail at the post
office, then "P. O. Box  #" was used.  Sometimes we just used P. O. #,
but we found out that post offices in larger towns had branches, also
with numerical designations.  ZIP codes helped a lot with that.

I don't know when postal service  dropped the use of the periods, but my
nephew gave me trouble back in the late '70s.  "It's P O Box #."
In towns with local delivery, the street name and house number was used.
No box number or other reference was needed. If you lived in a small
place long enough, just the addressee's name and the the word "City" was
sufficient for house-to-house or post office delivery.  Out-of-towners
had to name the town and the state the letter was being sent to.

> Also OBG.    Until 1964 or maybe much later, OBG stood for Obstetrics
> and Gynocology.  And nothing else.  What else could it stand for?  But
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If you are inclined to email me
> for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
Pat Durkin - 21 Feb 2008 22:48 GMT
"Pat Durkin" <durk183@sbc.com> wrote in message

>> Why do old abbreviations that are perfectly fine have to get longer?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> As  with Cece and Oleg, I have not seen or used POB on any mailing.  

Sorry.  I meant "Cece and HVS".
John Varela - 22 Feb 2008 00:34 GMT
> As  with Cece and Oleg, I have not seen or used POB on any mailing.

The US Postal Service's web site only uses the term PO Box, with no periods.

Nonetheless, the usage POB strikes a familiar note for me.  Some Googling  
turns up several examples of the POB form.  A few of them:

http://www.qrd.org/qrd/events/stonewall25.old/contact.sheet-6.14.93 "POB
33915, San Diego CA"

http://triangle.citysearch.com/profile/map/41927075/new_york_ny/new_york_bird_
club.html  "POB 286231  New York, NY 10128"

http://webideas.com/yellowpages/eng/newspapers.htm  "P. O. B. 101951  Denver,
CO"  "POB 20197,  New York, NY 10017"

and a whole mess of them at http://www.conjure.com/COG/zinest.html

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email.

mm - 22 Feb 2008 00:47 GMT
>> Why do old abbreviations that are perfectly fine have to get longer?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>2, 3, etc. The route number was followed on the envelope by "Box #".
>(or,  Box 85, RR 1)

Well that makes sense, becaues of local custom and because the box
wasn't at the post office, even if it was for use by the post office.

>If the addressee picked up his mail at the post
>office, then "P. O. Box  #" was used.  Sometimes we just used P. O. #,
>but we found out that post offices in larger towns had branches, also
>with numerical designations.  ZIP codes helped a lot with that.

That's why I put a zone in my example above.   They may have taken the
introduction of zipcodees as a good time to add more zones too, but in
cities at least there were almost as many zones as there were zipcodes
a week later.

>I don't know when postal service  dropped the use of the periods, but my
>nephew gave me trouble back in the late '70s.  "It's P O Box #."

Nephews are like that.

>In towns with local delivery, the street name and house number was used.
>No box number or other reference was needed. If you lived in a small
>place long enough, just the addressee's name and the the word "City" was
>sufficient for house-to-house or post office delivery.

We used "City" also.  I think in places with more than one zone, they
might put "City 12" or whatever the zone was.

I am sure zipcodes had something to do with the end of "city", but
even before then, there must have been occasional letters that got
shipped out of town with the other mail that was headed out of town.
Once it was in another town, "City" had an entirely different meaning,
and if they realized it was a different city, they would have to try
to read the postmark to know where to send it to.  So I'm sure that if
zipcodes didn't end "City" something else would have.  As charming as
it was.

> Out-of-towners
>had to name the town and the state the letter was being sent to.

Right.

John found some current POB usage, but I assure you that there was
much more from the start of television until 1960 and probably beyond.
(Given the lack of other observation of this, I'm setting the year
back to 1960 instead of '64. :)  )

Not just tv shows gave their addresses on tv, but various kinds of
commercial offers, prize offers, offers in cereal boxes, and I'm
pretty sure all the ones on tv at least were pob.

>> Also OBG.    Until 1964 or maybe much later, OBG stood for Obstetrics
>> and Gynocology.  And nothing else.  What else could it stand for?  But
>> somewhere along the line someone decided it had to be OBGYN.  Who was
>> that and why?

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
QT - 22 Feb 2008 12:46 GMT
> POB stood for post office box?   What else could it stand for in an
> address?  Everyone knew it.  

Someone might have mistaken it for SOB. Surely everyone knows what that
means? :-P

Signature


qt

Jan Hyde (VB MVP) - 22 Feb 2008 16:58 GMT
mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.com>'s wild thoughts were released
on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:30:59 -0500 bearing the following
fruit:

>Why do old abbreviations that are perfectly fine have to get longer?
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>If you are inclined to email me
>for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)

It's my guess that there has been an explosion of acronyms
since 1964. I've never heard seen POB used. I couldn't even
begin to guess what OBG stands for, I could make an educated
guess with OBGYN (which I also never come accross)

--
Jan Hyde

https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Jan.Hyde
Cece - 23 Feb 2008 20:30 GMT
On Feb 22, 10:58 am, "Jan Hyde (VB MVP)"
<StellaDrin...@REMOVE.ME.uboot.com> wrote:
> mm <NOPSAMmm2...@bigfoot.com>'s wild thoughts were released
> on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:30:59 -0500 bearing the following
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

It's usually written ob/gyn -- all lower-case.

Mailing:  Before ZIP Codes (now trademarked!) appeared, in 1963 as I
remember (along with a rise in first-class postage to five cents per
ounce), an envelope mailed for delivery in the same city did not need
the name of the city, or the zone of that city, on it; the last line
of the address could be "City."  Yes, the larger cities had zones.  In
some cities, those zone numbers became the last two digits of the ZIP
Code assigned; in others, not (I know that a place in Corpus Christi
TX used to be "Corpus Christi 60, Texas" and became "Corpus Christi
TX  78412").  At the same time, USPO established the two-letter state
codes, to be all caps, with no comma preceding; between the state code
and the ZIP Code, there were to be at least two spaces (up to five,
IIRC).

Then the USPO (a government agency) was replaced by the USPS (a
civilian contractor), and things went nuts.*  We got that ridiculous
+4 thing (who knows his own?), periods were frowned upon, standard
addressing etiquette was disallowed (proper placement of the "Attn:"
line), and much more.  That "Service" even messes up the ZIP Code
book!  Ever looked up an address on a street named M.L. King?  It's
printed "Ml King" -- in a sans serif font, so it could be em-one or em-
eye as easily as em-ell.

Then came the word-processing software that knows better than anyone
else, that refuses to allow two blank spaces together.  I still
keyboard them!  And, when I can, tell the software to accept being the
stupid tool it is.

*The Federal government cannot copyright or trademark anything.  USPS,
not being part of the government, registered copyright in all its
publications (ZIP Code book, fliers, everything) and trademarked the
phrase "ZIP Code."  Yes, that's the proper, official way to write it;
any other capitalization pattern is a violation.  And it refers to
only the codes used by the USPS, in the geographical area it
"serves."  Codes in other places, like the UK and Canada, are "postal
codes."

Cece
Hatunen - 25 Feb 2008 19:23 GMT
>Mailing:  Before ZIP Codes (now trademarked!) appeared, in 1963 as I
>remember (along with a rise in first-class postage to five cents per
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>TX used to be "Corpus Christi 60, Texas" and became "Corpus Christi
>TX  78412").  

So? Things change. Back in the days before ZIP codes my postal
zone got changed more than once. I don't remember the numbers
anymore, but for instance, from Tucson 16 to Tucson 19. And when
ZIP codes were adopted (I was living in Louisville at the time)
my new ZIP had nothing to do with my postal zone.

>At the same time, USPO established the two-letter state
>codes, to be all caps, with no comma preceding; between the state code
>and the ZIP Code, there were to be at least two spaces (up to five,
>IIRC).

For machine-read business mail, I would reckon. I don't send much
of that.

>Then the USPO (a government agency) was replaced by the USPS (a
>civilian contractor), and things went nuts.*  

USPS is not a civilian contractor; it's a government executive
agency. Per its web site:

"The Post Office Department was transformed into the United
States Postal Service, an independent establishment of the
executive branch of the Government of the United States. The
mission of the Postal Service remained the same, as stated in
Title 39 of the U.S. Code:

"The Postal Service shall have as its basic function the
obligation to provide postal services to bind the Nation together
through the personal, educational, literary, and business
correspondence of the people. It shall provide prompt, reliable,
and efficient services to patrons in all areas and shall render
postal services to all communities.

"The new Postal Service officially began operations on July 1,
1971, when the Postmaster General ceased to be a member of the
President’s Cabinet. The Postal Service received:

"Operational authority vested in a Board of Governors and Postal
Service executive management, rather than in Congress."

>We got that ridiculous
>+4 thing (who knows his own?),

Mine's 1235. But it's never been a required for any paperwork
I've filled out. Nevertheless, companies always seem to be able
to add it to my address.

>*The Federal government cannot copyright or trademark anything.  USPS,
>not being part of the government, registered copyright in all its
>publications (ZIP Code book, fliers, everything) and trademarked the
>phrase "ZIP Code."

I know that the feds cant' copyright anything, but I'm not so
certain about trade marking. do you have a cite for that?

I can't find any evidence of a trademark for "ZIP code" at the
government's trademark search web site (TESS), and USPS doesn't
seem to use (tm) or (R) after the term. Tell us more.

http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=tess&state=dpngin.1.1

I do see that it's United States Postal Service(R), though. And
Postal Service TM. And ZIP+4(R).

>Yes, that's the proper, official way to write it;
>any other capitalization pattern is a violation.

A violation of what? Can you show us where it's trademarked?

How many people have been busted for using "zip code"? In fact,
how many times have you actually been called upon to have to
write "ZIP code"?

>And it refers to
>only the codes used by the USPS, in the geographical area it
>"serves."  Codes in other places, like the UK and Canada, are "postal
>codes."

"ZIP" stands for Zone Improvement Program". I doubt the USPS has
set up zone improvement programs in Canada and the UK.

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

mm - 25 Feb 2008 21:38 GMT
>>*The Federal government cannot copyright or trademark anything.  USPS,
>>not being part of the government, registered copyright in all its
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>government's trademark search web site (TESS), and USPS doesn't
>seem to use (tm) or (R) after the term. Tell us more.

IIRC, the government didn't trademark Zip code or zipcode or Mr.
Zippy, and they got a lot of criticism for the last one.  Which would
mean either it can trademark things or the criticism was pretty
stupid.

>http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=tess&state=dpngin.1.1

This doesn't work for me.  It says to start my search again, but then
it doesnt go any place special.

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
mm - 26 Feb 2008 00:26 GMT
>>>*The Federal government cannot copyright or trademark anything.  USPS,
>>>not being part of the government, registered copyright in all its
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>IIRC, the government didn't trademark Zip code or zipcode or Mr.
>Zippy, and they got a lot of criticism for the last one.  Which would

YOu know, I might be mistaken.  It might be NPR which didn't trademark
Big Bird, etc. and got a lot of criticism for that.

I was at a sports meet once where Big Bird wresteled with Mr. Zippy so
that might be why I confused them.  It really wasn't a fair fight
because Big Bird's neck is so long, and vulernerable.  I complained to
the Marquis of Queensbury but it did no good.

>mean either it can trademark things or the criticism was pretty
>stupid.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>If you are inclined to email me
>for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
Hatunen - 26 Feb 2008 20:11 GMT
>>>>*The Federal government cannot copyright or trademark anything.  USPS,
>>>>not being part of the government, registered copyright in all its
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>IIRC, the government didn't trademark Zip code or zipcode or Mr.
>>Zippy, and they got a lot of criticism for the last one.  Which would

Mr Zip is trademarked.

>YOu know, I might be mistaken.  It might be NPR which didn't trademark
>Big Bird, etc. and got a lot of criticism for that.

Big Bird would have been trademarked by the Children's Television
Workshop. Big Bird doesn't appear on NPR, which is National
Public Radio.

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

mm - 27 Feb 2008 02:24 GMT
>>YOu know, I might be mistaken.  It might be NPR which didn't trademark
>>Big Bird, etc. and got a lot of criticism for that.
>
>Big Bird would have been trademarked by the Children's Television

Yeah, there the ones who didn't trademark it.

>Workshop. Big Bird doesn't appear on NPR, which is National
>Public Radio.

I specifically remember Big Bird inteviewing Al Gore in 2000.

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
John Varela - 27 Feb 2008 21:28 GMT
>> Big Bird would have been trademarked by the Children's Television
>
> Yeah, there the ones who didn't trademark it.

Oy!

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email.

Glenn Knickerbocker - 25 Feb 2008 22:29 GMT
> I can't find any evidence of a trademark for "ZIP code"

A Wikipedia author did:

http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=73001312

> Mark (words only): ZIP CODE
> Standard Character claim: No
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Transformed into a National Application: No
> Registration Date: 1976-06-29

¬R
Hatunen - 26 Feb 2008 20:12 GMT
>> I can't find any evidence of a trademark for "ZIP code"
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>> Transformed into a National Application: No
>> Registration Date: 1976-06-29

Huh. Interesting.

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

tony cooper - 25 Feb 2008 22:40 GMT
(on Zip codes)

>>We got that ridiculous
>>+4 thing (who knows his own?),
>
>Mine's 1235. But it's never been a required for any paperwork
>I've filled out. Nevertheless, companies always seem to be able
>to add it to my address.

I frequently mail things to my daughter.  By experimenting, I've found
that adding the +4 to the Zip gets the mail there one or two days
earlier than not including it.  Also, I address the envelopes by
computer rather than by hand, so the address is easily machine
processed.

--

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
mm - 26 Feb 2008 00:29 GMT
>(on Zip codes)
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>computer rather than by hand, so the address is easily machine
>processed.

You use the US mails that much.  You know, I always see your name and
think of you as British.  Probably because of the combination of Tony
Blair and Mini-Cooper.

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM  :-)
John Varela - 26 Feb 2008 20:15 GMT
> I frequently mail things to my daughter.  By experimenting, I've found that
> adding the +4 to the Zip gets the mail there one or two days earlier than not

> including it.  Also, I address the envelopes by computer rather than by hand,

> so the address is easily machine processed.

If you look, you might find that your word processor will add the Zip code in
bar code format.

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email.

Cece - 26 Feb 2008 20:31 GMT
> (on Zip codes)
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Now I've found that misaddressed mail, with no ZIP at all, gets there
faster.  One such envelope traveled a thousand miles in less than 10
hours.  Putting the wrong code, though, slows that envelope down --
one like that made it in only three months.

I know of one small office that got everything it mailed one day
brought back the next on the grounds of "insufficient address."  The
lone clerk did not have the +4, so left it off, but the postal service
insisted.  Cost that office all that postage too, as the machine-
printed dated tapes are good only the day they're printed.  And that's
a greedy little change!

Some postal service informational brochure, or maybe the national ZIP
Code book, told me about the trademark and copyright stuff, in the
mid-70s.  But it does not seem to be on record at USPTO!  (Ladies'
wear is offered under that mark.)  Officially, the USPS is not a part
of the government, whatever it is.  All a legal fiction.

Part of Indianapolis used to be zone 20; it became 46220.  Part of
Houston used to be zone 36; it became 77036 -- same for zones 5 and
6..  The Houston ones have since been split; what was 77036 might be
77081 or 77074 and what was 77005 could be 77025 or 77030 or 77054.
tony cooper - 27 Feb 2008 02:59 GMT
>Part of Indianapolis used to be zone 20; it became 46220.

I lived in Indianapolis so long ago that I was in zone III.

--

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
John Varela - 26 Feb 2008 20:13 GMT
> I know that the feds cant' copyright anything, but I'm not so certain about
> trade marking. do you have a cite for that?

Are you sure?  Didn't they trademark the Ada computer language so that no one
could call anything Ada unless it met the Ada specs?

Signature

John Varela
Trade NEW lamps for OLD for email.

georgeh@ankerstein.org - 28 Feb 2008 14:18 GMT
> Why do old abbreviations that are perfectly fine have to get longer?
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> somewhere along the line someone decided it had to be OBGYN.  Who was
> that and why?

I am in my 70s, and my father was a professor at Cornell Medical
School in NYC.
I have never heard or seen OBG, only OBGYN or OB-GYN.

I remember when the postal codes were introduced during WWII -- to aid
inexperienced
workers in mail sorting.  I lived in Pelham 65, NY.  (Today Pelham NY
10803)  I have
seen a shift from P. O. Box to P.O. Box.
In addition I have noted a shift from F. Ad. Richter to F.Ad.
Richter.  I prefer the
first choice in this case, as he died in 1910.  But on membership
lists I see no
spaces -- J.Q.M. Kersbergen, W.D.C. Lunsingh Scheurleer.  I have also
noted that
fewer and fewer people use initials instead of given names on
membership lists. OTOH,
I visited a home of an older man for tea, and his wife always
addressed him as "Mr Kok",
not by his first name.  (And, yes, he had one.)

GFH
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.