> >> >What are the rules concerning the use of commas? Sometimes I think I
> >> >use too many, but at the same time the sentence(s) looks correct.
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> Commnet tries to be cute, sometimes, but they're pretty good on
> punctuation.
Actually 'conglomerate' is a much more familar word, to me, than 'glomerate'
and has a very similiar meaning ('collect into a coherent mass'), so I'm
wondering what the prefix 'con' means? According to COD5 'conjoin' means
'join'; 'connatural' means 'inate, blonging naturally'; so apparently the prefix
'con' does very little. Would you agree?
Carter Jefferson - 09 Jan 2004 15:47 GMT
>> >> >What are the rules concerning the use of commas? Sometimes I think I
>> >> >use too many, but at the same time the sentence(s) looks correct.
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>'join'; 'connatural' means 'inate, blonging naturally'; so apparently the prefix
>'con' does very little. Would you agree?
No, I like it, even though, as you say, it may not contribute much.
"Con" means "with" in Latin. "Conglomerate" thus seems to me to
indicate co-operation, while "glomerate" implies seizure.
In "conjoin," that "with" is unnecessary, since "join" either implies
or us followed by "with." I don't hear "conjoin" much, and wouldn't
use it. It's been around since Latin days, though, so it probably
won't go away.
I've never heard of "connatural" before, and hope I don't again. It
sounds like one of those words people dream up to befuddle other
people, but Milton used it, according to the dictionary.
Carter
Carter Jefferson
carterj98@mindspring.com
http://carterj.homestead.com/