Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Punctuation Question - no child left behind

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sam Gangee - 09 Jan 2004 17:41 GMT
I was reading a bestseller recently and there was a question in the
book.  Could someone help with the answer.  Here's the question...

1. Correct the punctuation in the following sentence:
"George W. Bush is the President, who in God's name,
will protect our children."

a. The sentence is correct.

b. "George W. Bush is the President who in God's name
will protect our children."

c."George W. Bush is the President. Who, in God's name,
will protect our children?"

d."George W. Bush is the President, Who, in God's name,
will protect our children?!"
Carter Jefferson - 09 Jan 2004 20:33 GMT
>I was reading a bestseller recently and there was a question in the
>book.  Could someone help with the answer.  Here's the question...
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>d."George W. Bush is the President, Who, in God's name,
>will protect our children?!"

a.   punctuation incorrect; commas in the wrong places.
b.   awkward at best; "in God's name" should be at the end, but it
would still be awkward.
c.  sentence okay, if a bit theatrical.
d.  comma splice.

Carter Jefferson
carterj98@mindspring.com
http://carterj.homestead.com/
Robert Lieblich - 09 Jan 2004 23:52 GMT
> >I was reading a bestseller recently and there was a question in the
> >book.  Could someone help with the answer.  Here's the question...
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> c.  sentence okay, if a bit theatrical.
> d.  comma splice.

Politics aside, this variation, not listed, is also correctly
punctuated: "George W. Bush is the president who, in God's name,
will protect our children."

No one president, in God's name or otherwise, is (1) sufficient in
himself to protect all our children or (2) sufficient in himself to
endanger all our children.  Presidential wannabes try to create the
contrary illusion, but it's a flagrant exaggeration.  But that's
politics, not punctuation.

Signature

Bob Lieblich
Who trusts commas more than he does Dubya

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.