> >> [...] in "company" the "o" is more like the "u" in "bump, dump,
> >> pup, etc". I think some would call it the shwa sound.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> (Do you really think "burdock" is the "ah" sound of "papaya"?
When I say "papaya", without special emphasis, my mouth isn't nearly as
wide open for the first syllable as for the second. If the latter (like
the third) is "ah", the former would be "uh".
> And how in the world does "domain's" "o" rank in that category?
In my usual pronunciation of "domain" I barely round the "o", if at all,
so again it comes out as a 'middling' or obscure vowel.
> Personally, I think the "r" sound so distorts vowel sounds as to
> demand its own symbol, and the "disappeared r" another, or some
> indication of a sliding scale with regional points, just like the "o"
> scale.
I believe there are several IPA Rs, including at least one that's mostly
vowel -- barely rhotic, so to speak -- but I'm not fluent enough to use
any with confidence ... The character of the first schwa in "burdock" is
also a little different because of the stress; it would actually be more
like /V/ in Scottish English (and followed by a rolled R), for example.
But I was trying more to convey my sense of the boundaries of
'schwaness' than to provide typical examples.

Signature
Odysseus
Bob Cunningham - 04 Nov 2008 17:32 GMT
[...]
>> And how in the world does "domain's" "o" rank in that category?
>In my usual pronunciation of "domain" I barely round the "o", if at all,
>so again it comes out as a 'middling' or obscure vowel.
Your "o" in "domain" may be, like I think mine is, the monophthongal
[o], as opposed to the diphthongal [oU] in "dome". That seems like
enough to make the "domain" "o" more nearly obscure than the one in
"dome".
Incidentally, I think my diphthong in "dome" is more accurately [ou]
than the seemingly conventional [oU]. That is, the second piece of
the diphthong is more like the vowel of "toot" ([tu:t]) than the one
in "took" ([tUk]).

Signature
Bob Cunningham, Southern California, USA. Western American English
Odysseus - 30 Nov 2008 21:00 GMT
> On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 01:13:16 GMT, Odysseus
> <odysseus1479-at@yahoo-dot.ca> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> enough to make the "domain" "o" more nearly obscure than the one in
> "dome".
Sorry for neglecting this thread for so long ...
Speaking slowly and emphatically, perhaps to be heard over background
noise, I'd say [oU]. Under normal circumstances the vowel would indeed
be monophthongal, but as I said I'm pretty sure that it's nowhere near
[o] -- to the extent that it may be rounded it might approach [O].

Signature
Odysseus