Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

nor in a series

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Greg Worona - 05 Jan 2009 17:03 GMT
Is it proper to use "nor" when describing a series of negative
choices.  For instance, is it proper to say, "There were no problems
in room A, B, nor C."  If I use "or" instead of "nor" would that be
improper?
Pat Durkin - 05 Jan 2009 18:10 GMT
> Is it proper to use "nor" when describing a series of negative
> choices.  For instance, is it proper to say, "There were no problems
> in room A, B, nor C."  If I use "or" instead of "nor" would that be
> improper?

I hear and use both versions.  If anything, in the series I would say ".
. in room A nor B nor C", simply because the repetition of the negative
makes enumeration even more emphatic than "A, B, nor C" (and certainly
moreso than" . . .A, B, or C. . .")

Emphasis is further underlined by counting with the fingers.  (Note:
using the "nor" between A and B eliminates the need for the comma.  In
addition, though some in AEU/AUE argue about it, I would never use that
comma after the B, whether the series is linked by "or, nor or and". )
Andrew Heenan - 06 Jan 2009 00:00 GMT
> Is it proper to use "nor" when describing a series of negative
> choices.  For instance, is it proper to say, "There were no problems
> in room A, B, nor C."  If I use "or" instead of "nor" would that be
> improper?

Nor is for two choices; "neither A nor B"
Signature


Andrew
http://www.wordskit.com/
http://www.flayme.com/

"If A is success in life, then A = x + y + z.
Work is x; y is play; and z is keeping your mouth shut." ~ Albert Einstein

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 06 Jan 2009 00:14 GMT
>> Is it proper to use "nor" when describing a series of negative
>> choices.  For instance, is it proper to say, "There were no problems
>> in room A, B, nor C."  If I use "or" instead of "nor" would that be
>> improper?
>
>Nor is for two choices; "neither A nor B"

It has sometimes been used for more than two.

Quotes from the OED:

   a1616 SHAKESPEARE Measure for Measure (1623) III. i. 37 Thou hast neither
   heate, affection, limbe, nor beautie.

   1630 W. BEDELL in Ussher's Lett. (1686) 454 This Protestation having
   neither Latin, nor Law, nor Common Sence.

   1785 W. COWPER Task V. 90 Neither grub nor root nor earth-nut now Repays
   their labour more.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.english.usage)

tony cooper - 06 Jan 2009 00:39 GMT
>>> Is it proper to use "nor" when describing a series of negative
>>> choices.  For instance, is it proper to say, "There were no problems
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>    1785 W. COWPER Task V. 90 Neither grub nor root nor earth-nut now Repays
>    their labour more.

"Neither fish, nor flesh, nor good red herring" - John Heywood's 1546
proverb collection

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Odysseus - 06 Jan 2009 07:21 GMT
> >> Is it proper to use "nor" when describing a series of negative
> >> choices.  For instance, is it proper to say, "There were no problems
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> It has sometimes been used for more than two.

<snip examples>

But not without a preceding "neither", regardless of the number of
choices.

Signature

Odysseus

Lazarus Cooke - 12 Jan 2009 01:54 GMT
In article
<22fd669b-27c3-4cef-83fe-61e10f8b0b62@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,

> Is it proper to use "nor" when describing a series of negative
> choices.  For instance, is it proper to say, "There were no problems
> in room A, B, nor C."  If I use "or" instead of "nor" would that be
> improper?

Sorry, I disagree with some other posters.

I think that the natural way to express this is to write (or say)

"There were no problems in rooms A, B, or C."

I think that to say

!"There were no problems in room A, B, nor C."!

would be totally wrong, unidiomatic English.

Lazarus
Robert Lieblich - 12 Jan 2009 04:28 GMT
> In article
> <22fd669b-27c3-4cef-83fe-61e10f8b0b62@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> would be totally wrong, unidiomatic English.

AOL ... almost.  I don't like it and don't use it, but it's around.
Lotsa things are around that i don't like and don't use.  This one is
around more than I think it should be, but of course my "should be"
level for this one is zero.

Meanwhile, beware of "neither ... are."

Signature

Bob Lieblich
Either ... nor, anyone?

Nicholas Adams - 12 Jan 2009 07:24 GMT
Lazarus Cooke <kishloganbarblesshook@hotmail.com> schrieb:

>In article
><22fd669b-27c3-4cef-83fe-61e10f8b0b62@t39g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>Lazarus

"There were no problems in room A, B or C."

But: "There were no problems in room A and B, nor were there any
problems in room C"

....or so I think.

Nick
Lazarus Cooke - 12 Jan 2009 23:29 GMT
> "There were no problems in room A, B or C."
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Nick

Grammatically correct, maybe, but so weird and awkward that no native
speaker would ever say it; nor, unless they had a cloth pen, would they
ever write it, either.

Lazarus
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.