Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / March 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

proprietor and owner

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tina - 27 Mar 2009 17:56 GMT
Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
and owner?
Thank you

Kristina, CZ
mm - 27 Mar 2009 19:51 GMT
>Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
>and owner?
>Thank you
>
>Kristina, CZ

IIRC, proprius in Latin means the adjective "own".  So I hope there is
no difference.  I didn't bother to check online dictionaries, because
I was sure you had done that already.
Signature

Posters should say where they live, and for which
area they are asking questions. I have lived in
Western Pa.  10 years
Indianapolis 10 years
Chicago       6 years
Brooklyn, NY 12 years
Baltimore    26 years

tony cooper - 27 Mar 2009 20:01 GMT
>Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
>and owner?
>Thank you

Yes.  Even though the dictionary defines them as having the same
meaning, the actual usage is different.   You would use "owner" to
describe the person who owns any kind of business.  You would use
"proprietor" to describe the person who owns and runs a store.  

John is the owner of a trucking company.  Bill is the proprietor of a
clothing store.  Both are owners.  You can also say that "Bill is the
owner of a clothing store".  You can also say that John is the
proprietor of a trucking company.  However, in normal AmE usage, you
would not say "John is the proprietor of a trucking company".  

What I've said above is *not* a rule.  It's how we normally use the
words in everyday speech and writing in AmE.  

(The usual caveat applies to BrE.  Always wait for a Brit to answer a
question like this because they sometimes do things differently.)

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 27 Mar 2009 20:35 GMT
>>Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
>>and owner?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>(The usual caveat applies to BrE.  Always wait for a Brit to answer a
>question like this because they sometimes do things differently.)

This Brit has been waiting for a more knowledgeable Brit to reply.

I would interpret "proprietor" in BrE to mean an owner-manager: someone
who both owns a business and runs it.

I would also understand a proprietor to be a human being rather than a
company.

The uses of the words in specialist contexts may be different.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.english.usage)

Gerald Clough - 28 Mar 2009 04:38 GMT
>>> Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
>>> and owner?
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> The uses of the words in specialist contexts may be different.

In the U.S., it was once a common convention (now somewhat obsolete) to
include on business signs, "Thomas Jones - Proprietor" or "Thomas Jones
- Prop."  The implication was that Jones was the owner-manager or at
least the person entirely responsible for the operation. The tone was
intended to suggest that it was quite a good thing that Jones was in
charge, setting the business apart from those not so fortunate.

It would be viewed today as somewhat pretentious, unless there was an
intention to hark back to an earlier time, perhaps by designing the sign
in an old style. It is also used facetiously in speech, perhaps
welcoming one to stay the night at the speaker's home as if he operated
a hotel, the speaker referring to himself as "Tom Jones, proprietor."
That would be mildly humorous. "Tom Jones, owner" would fall flat.

Proprietor may be defined as owner, but it always implies active
management, close to the action. And when the active management is of
far more importance than who might actually own the operation or collect
the bulk of the profits, proprietor is the more meaningful term. A
person who manages a brothel would rarely be called the owner or
manager. That person is the proprietor.

It is sometimes hard to make the distinction between a business owner
who could be called a proprietor with a straight face and another
one-person business owner who might be entitled. Calling a delivery
truck owner-driver the proprietor would sound most peculiar. Proprietor
implies substance.
Alan Jones - 28 Mar 2009 10:34 GMT
[...]
> In the U.S., it was once a common convention (now somewhat obsolete)
> to include on business signs, "Thomas Jones - Proprietor" or "Thomas
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> term. A person who manages a brothel would rarely be called the owner
> or manager. That person is the proprietor.

That's also how I (BrE) understand the usage of "proprietor". When I was a
boy, my parents managed, and eventually came to own, a family omnibus and
haulage business. Its original proprietor was my paternal grandmother Alice
Lavinia, and the company went by her name: A.L.Jones and Co. The company
letter-head had my father's name as "proprietor", which for some time after
I learned to read I said as "prop-eater". But years pass and I am now in my
late 70s: I agree with Mr Clough that the term would now be thought too
antiquated for general use.

Alan Jones
Chris R - 28 Mar 2009 14:04 GMT
> [...]
>> In the U.S., it was once a common convention (now somewhat obsolete)
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> with Mr Clough that the term would now be thought too antiquated for
> general use.
Although in fact all land in England has a proprietor (or at least it does
once title is registered) because the term is used in law and by the Land
Registry - the owner is called the Registered Proprietor and he is
registered on the Proprietorship Register. I think the choice of word (which
must date from the creation of the system in 1925) must just be selection of
a slightly more formal/pompous word for "owner" - though they may have been
trying to distinguish between the owner of the registerd interest (which
could be a lease) and the owner of the freehold of the land.

The Hotel Proporietors Act certainly applies to all hotel owners, not just
to owner-managers.

Chris R
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 28 Mar 2009 11:37 GMT
>In the U.S., it was once a common convention (now somewhat obsolete) to
>include on business signs, "Thomas Jones - Proprietor" or "Thomas Jones
>- Prop."

That convention was also used in the UK. My first exposure to the word
"proprietor" was on business signs.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.english.usage)

Tina - 28 Mar 2009 11:49 GMT
Thank you for your responses.
I thought there would be something behind it but was not absolutely
sure because the 'hidden' meaning is not included in the online
dictionaries, neither anywhere else.
It is interesting how many things one can learn in one discussion.

Kristina
David Kaye - 27 Mar 2009 20:49 GMT
> Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
> and owner?

I used to own a telephone call center (answering service).  I called
myself the proprietor, even though I had about 30 employees and
delegated authority.  It was amusing to see that most of the business
world was not prepared for someone calling himself a proprietor.  When
running advertising or buying or leasing equipment most data entry
systems had predefined roles listed such as president, vice president,
manager, chairman, owner, even purchaser, acquisitions, and marketing,
but nothing for proprietor.  A yellow pages rep who didn't have such a
restriction on his entry form insisted on listing me as president,
which I always thought was pretentious.

The world, it seems, is not built for proprietors.
Rambler III - 27 Mar 2009 23:23 GMT
> Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
> and owner?
> Thank you
>
> Kristina, CZ

I have never heard of anyone being a proprietor of personal property. I am
a homeowner and I own lawnmower. I also own an automobile.

I have never heard of anyone being a proprietor of real property unless it
was leased or rented.

If I were sole owner of a business which did or did not own property, I'd
consider myself the proprietor. If the business was unincorporated and
jointly owned, guess what?

If I were a part owner of a business, it would be incorporated and I'd be a
stockholder if I wasn't an officer of the company - President, Treasurer,
Secretary, or a Member of the Board.
tony cooper - 27 Mar 2009 23:50 GMT
>> Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
>> and owner?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>I have never heard of anyone being a proprietor of real property unless it
>was leased or rented.

What about the proprietor of a hotel or guest house?  

>If I were sole owner of a business which did or did not own property, I'd
>consider myself the proprietor. If the business was unincorporated and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>stockholder if I wasn't an officer of the company - President, Treasurer,
>Secretary, or a Member of the Board.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Odysseus - 28 Mar 2009 02:44 GMT
> >> Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
> >> and owner?

<snip>

> >I have never heard of anyone being a proprietor of real property unless it
> >was leased or rented.
>
> What about the proprietor of a hotel or guest house?  

Those are rented, albeit in parts or over a shortish term, aren't they?
In the situations to which Rambler alludes the property is a business
asset, and is readily identified with the commercial entity. The
proprietor of such a business is also sometimes called an
"owner-operator".

Signature

Odysseus

tony cooper - 28 Mar 2009 04:36 GMT
>> >> Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
>> >> and owner?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Those are rented, albeit in parts or over a shortish term, aren't they?

The rooms are rented, but the hotel or guest house is owned by
someone.  The owner of a small hotel or a guest house is often called
the proprietor.

In the UK, they have such status.  See the Hotel Proprietor Act of
1956.  In the US, even _The New York Times_ recognizes the term:  
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9B0DE4DA1738E23ABC4E51DFBF668382669FDE

Also, see http://www.guesthouseatlostriver.com/  where David Mickow is
a proprietor.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Odysseus - 28 Mar 2009 10:10 GMT
> >> >> Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
> >> >> and owner?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> someone.  The owner of a small hotel or a guest house is often called
> the proprietor.

So what's the argument: why did you question the applicability of
Rambler's remark to those businesses? AFAICT they're exactly the kind of
property he meant.

Signature

Odysseus

tony cooper - 28 Mar 2009 13:40 GMT
>> >> >> Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
>> >> >> and owner?
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>Rambler's remark to those businesses? AFAICT they're exactly the kind of
>property he meant.

The way I read Rambler's posts is that he means the opposite.  Rambler
is excepting real property unless the property is leased or rented. A
guest house or hotel may be on property that is owned by the
proprietor.

This is borne out by his subsequent post where he says that all the
hotels he knows about are owned by corporations or LLCs.  It seems he
feels that this would exclude the use of "proprietorship".    Which it
doesn't.

 
Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Odysseus - 29 Mar 2009 22:25 GMT
<snip>

> >> >> >I have never heard of anyone being a proprietor of real
> >> >> >property unless it was leased or rented.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> guest house or hotel may be on property that is owned by the
> proprietor.

I guess the difference between our readings is that I understood R's
proprietor to be the lessor, while according to your interpretation he's
conversely the lessee or tenant. In my mind the latter situtation is
inconsistent with the term "proprietor", which implies ownership, so I
didn't even consider it.

Signature

Odysseus

tony cooper - 30 Mar 2009 01:23 GMT
><snip>
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>inconsistent with the term "proprietor", which implies ownership, so I
>didn't even consider it.

I don't quite follow you.  I don't see R's proprietor to be the lessee
or tenant, but he could be.  That's immaterial.  He is the owner of
the hotel business.  He may own or lease the property.  If he owns and
runs the hotel business, he's the proprietor.  The ownership of the
business entity is what makes him the proprietor.  

Many, if not most, proprietors are also tenants.  Few restaurant,
hotel, or store owners are also owners of the property.  If they lease
space in a building, and conduct a business within that space, they
are the proprietors of that business.  

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Rambler III - 28 Mar 2009 12:46 GMT
>>> Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
>>> and owner?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> What about the proprietor of a hotel or guest house?

All the hotels I'm familiar with are owned by corporations or LLCs.

I don't charge rent for the use of the guest house or over-nights on my
yacht at my palatial estate in Florida.
tony cooper - 28 Mar 2009 13:48 GMT
>>>> Hello. Is there any special difference between the terms proprietor
>>>> and owner?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
>All the hotels I'm familiar with are owned by corporations or LLCs.

That has nothing to do with the use of the word "proprietor".  A sole
owner may incorporate - and, in fact, most do - and still be the
proprietor.  If the individual who is the primary owner operates the
business, he can be called the proprietor even if there are other
corporate officers.

There are many hotels in this area that are owned by one person or one
family.  The tourist area is full of "Mom and Pop" hotels.  A common
way to get a green card is to buy a business here.  Hotels are one of
the businesses commonly purchased for this reason.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Rambler III - 28 Mar 2009 18:36 GMT
[snip]

> A sole owner may incorporate - and, in fact, most do - and still be the
> proprietor.

[snip]

If you say so,..
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.