Dear all,
My students are doing some cloze tests for practice, but there come
several items that I cannot resolve. Here are the items in questions,
including the partial text, for your reference.
1)stand for v.s. represent
The world-famous adventurer Mike Horn has several feats under his
belt. In 2008, Horn began another unique adventure – one that will
take four years to complete. He calls this latest adventure the
“Pangaea Expedition,” with “Pangaea” ____ “ a Pan Global Adventure for
Environmental Action.”
A) represents B) representing C) stands for D) standing for
The answer given is (D), but I wonder why answer (B) isn’t suitable in
this case.
2)namely v.s so to speak
In a few years previous to World War II, the Nazi government of
Germany adopted a racist policy which caused the massacre of
innumerable Jews, ___, the Holocaust.
A) namely B) for example C) needless to say D) so to speak
The given answer is (A). What bothers me is answer (D). I’ve checked
the dictionary. When we use ‘so to speak,’ it often implies something
not good. Is it why we don’t choose (D) as the answer.
3) what we call v.s what is called
Do you know what the beans were? They were ___ coffee today.
(A) what we call B) what calls C) what is called D) what to call
The correct answer is (A), but I wonder if we can also use (C) as a
possible answer. Or we have to take the agreement into account, which
means we have to change it to be ‘what are called.’
Sorry to bombard you with so many questions, but you have always been
one of reliable information sources on the Internet. With best
regards,
Gloria
jerry_friedman@yahoo.com - 27 Apr 2009 04:34 GMT
> Dear all,
>
> My students are doing some cloze tests
I'd never heard the phrase, only "fill-in-the-blank tests".
> for practice, but there come
> several items that I cannot resolve. Here are the items in questions,
> including the partial text, for your reference.
>
> 1)stand for v.s. represent
(The usual abbreviation for "versus" is "vs.", or "v." in the names of
law cases. I'm sure the final period can be removed from one of
those.)
> The world-famous adventurer Mike Horn has several feats under his
> belt. In 2008, Horn began another unique adventure – one that will
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The answer given is (D), but I wonder why answer (B) isn’t suitable in
> this case.
I don't remember ever hearing "represent" for an initialism or
acronym.
> 2)namely v.s so to speak
> In a few years previous to World War II, the Nazi government of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the dictionary. When we use ‘so to speak,’ it often implies something
> not good. Is it why we don’t choose (D) as the answer.
"So to speak" is a way of apologizing for something about what one has
just said, maybe something incongruous, imprecise, or excessively
clever (in which case "so to speak" may be more of a way of calling
attention to one's cleverness). It's not like "namely" at all and
wouldn't make sense here.
If I can make up an example, "the Nazi racist policies that led to a
massacre of the innocents, so to speak". "So to speak" here indicates
that the person who said this would be uncomfortable with the
comparison to the Massacre of the Innocents in the book of Matthew--
because this Christian story seems an incongruous comparison for the
Holocaust, in which the majority of the victims weren't Jewish, or the
killing of babies seems an incongruous comparison for the killing of
people of all ages (most of whom weren't as innocent as babies), or
some such.
> 3) what we call v.s what is called
> Do you know what the beans were? They were ___ coffee today.
> (A) what we call B) what calls C) what is called D) what to call
> The correct answer is (A), but I wonder if we can also use (C) as a
> possible answer. Or we have to take the agreement into account, which
> means we have to change it to be ‘what are called.’
...
"What is called" sounds fine to me, as you suggest. Not "what are
called"--it's sort of "the substance that is called coffee".
--
Jerry Friedman
MC - 27 Apr 2009 11:22 GMT
In article
<a27e0a0a-22cb-43f1-8c37-cfd9b91d4514@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
> "So to speak" is a way of apologizing for something about what one has
> just said, maybe something incongruous, imprecise, or excessively
> clever (in which case "so to speak" may be more of a way of calling
> attention to one's cleverness).
Is it interchangeable with "as it were"?

Signature
Watch out for the random hedgehogs
Mike Mooney - 29 Apr 2009 12:50 GMT
> In article
> <a27e0a0a-22cb-43f1-8c37-cfd9b91d4...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Is it interchangeable with "as it were"?
I think so. When I was at school we had a history teacher who could
cram several of these phrases into each utterance, along the lines of
of:
"Errrrmmmm.... the, er, Battle - as it were - of, erm.... Hastings....
in fact....occurred - so to speak - in, er....ten... erm... sixty-six.
Are you - as it were - WITH us, Mooney?"
Mike M
jerry_friedman@yahoo.com - 30 Apr 2009 14:47 GMT
> In article
> <a27e0a0a-22cb-43f1-8c37-cfd9b91d4...@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Is it interchangeable with "as it were"?
It's the dead spit, if I can put it that way, or, in a manner of
speaking, fungible with it.
--
Jerry Friedman
Default User - 27 Apr 2009 19:31 GMT
> > Dear all,
> >
> > My students are doing some cloze tests
>
> I'd never heard the phrase, only "fill-in-the-blank tests".
I hadn't either. It's in Merriam-Webster online:
Main Entry:
Function:
adjective
Etymology:
by shortening & alteration from closure
Date:
1953
: of, relating to, or being a test of reading comprehension that
involves having the person being tested supply words which have been
systematically deleted from a text
Brian

Signature
Day 84 of the "no grouchy usenet posts" project
Django Cat - 28 Apr 2009 09:26 GMT
> > Dear all,
> >
> > My students are doing some cloze tests
>
> I'd never heard the phrase, only "fill-in-the-blank tests".
Welcome to the wonderful world of ESL/EFL, Jerry, where 'cloze' is a
well-recognised term. Just as with any professional terminology,
there's no reason to expect people who don't work in the field to be
familiar with it.
DC
--
jerry_friedman@yahoo.com - 28 Apr 2009 19:39 GMT
> jerry_fried...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> there's no reason to expect people who don't work in the field to be
> familiar with it.
What strikes me as odd is that I don't remember hearing it in my three
or four education courses. Maybe I'd have had to take something more
advanced, or specialized in ESL.
--
Jerry Friedman
Athel Cornish-Bowden - 29 Apr 2009 12:16 GMT
>>> Dear all,
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> there's no reason to expect people who don't work in the field to be
> familiar with it.
Ah but they do expect it. We have sevearl discussions about whether
it's OK to assume people in this news group know what sth. and sb. mean
in sample sentences -- to tell sb. about sth., for example.

Signature
athel
Alan Jones - 29 Apr 2009 12:24 GMT
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> it's OK to assume people in this news group know what sth. and sb.
> mean in sample sentences -- to tell sb. about sth., for example.
"Cloze" isn't just ESL:/EFL jargon. I first heard the word at a UK
examiners' meeting, and assumed the spelling was with an s.
Alan Jones
Django Cat - 29 Apr 2009 12:35 GMT
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> it's OK to assume people in this news group know what sth. and sb.
> mean in sample sentences -- to tell sb. about sth., for example.
I know - I've been involved in those discussions.
At least nobody's been on asking about third conditional for a while...
DC
--
Bob G - 27 Apr 2009 04:52 GMT
> 1)stand for v.s. represent
> The world-famous adventurer Mike Horn has several feats under his
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> The answer given is (D), but I wonder why answer (B) isn’t suitable in
> this case.
"Pangaea" is Mr. Horn's acronym for "Pan Global...". That's what it
stands for. To say that it represents it is to say that it speaks or
acts for it, or maybe performs its functions in its absence.
> 2)namely v.s so to speak
> In a few years previous to World War II, the Nazi government of
> Germany adopted a racist policy which caused the massacre of
> innumerable Jews, ___, the Holocaust.
> A) namely B) for example C) needless to say D) so to speak
> The given answer is (A). What bothers me is answer (D). I’ve checked
> the dictionary. When we use ‘so to speak,’ it often implies something
> not good. Is it why we don’t choose (D) as the answer.
Corrected: A few years before World War II, the Nazi government of
Germany began to adopt racist policies that resulted in the massacre
of
innumerable Jews, a tragedy which came to be known as the Holocaust.
"So to speak" is entirely wrong. The expression is often used
mockingly, perhaps after an exaggeration, to imply that what one is
saying is somewhat of a stretch.
At any rate, the original sentence is ambiguous in that it seems to
imply that it was the policy, not the actual tragedy, that became the
Holocaust.
> 3) what we call v.s what is called
> Do you know what the beans were? They were ___ coffee today.
> (A) what we call B) what calls C) what is called D) what to call
> The correct answer is (A), but I wonder if we can also use (C) as a
> possible answer. Or we have to take the agreement into account, which
> means we have to change it to be ‘what are called.’
I may be wrong, but what we usually mean by coffee is the actual
liquid beverage. I think most people would say "coffee beans" to refer
to the beans.
Odysseus - 28 Apr 2009 03:42 GMT
In article
<efd4cf7f-4703-43e2-89f8-a6d5e1a35378@v1g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
[In article
<2cea841c-82b9-4805-8725-15eeff7e37ce@q33g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
gloria <gloria0402@gmail.com> wrote:]
> > 1)stand for v.s. represent
> > The world-famous adventurer Mike Horn has several feats under his
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> stands for. To say that it represents it is to say that it speaks or
> acts for it, or maybe performs its functions in its absence.
If the acronym weren't in quotes I might concur, but with them there I
read it as a mention rather than a use -- a symbol rather than its
referent -- and for such a subject, "representing" means pretty much the
same thing as "standing for".
I agree with Don that it should have been written "PANGAEA", or perhaps
"PanGAEA".

Signature
Odysseus
Don Phillipson - 27 Apr 2009 12:50 GMT
> 1). . . adventurer Mike Horn has several feats under his
> belt. In 2008, Horn began another unique adventure – one that will
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the answer given is (D), but I wonder why answer (B) isn’t suitable in
> this case.
1. You are right: solutions B and D are equally suitable.
The specific indicator is the form of each verb among the
four solutions: because the last clause of the sentence is
a subordinate clause, a present participle suffices.
2. The question is also defective in that:
2a. "feats under his belt" is a sports journalism colloquialism
mature writers would avoid, as too close to "feet under
his belt."
2b. Punctuation: the dash is wrong (should be a comma.)
2c. The name Pangaea has its own meaning in palaeogeography,
which has nothing to do with Mr. Horn. When acronyms are
coined from initials, we print them in capitals, viz. PANGAEA.
2d. The paragraph belongs to the genre of advertising or
publicity, which is independent of (not limited by) the
grammar of everyday English. (We assume the intention
is to teach everyday English, not jargon.)
> 2) . . . In a few years previous to World War II, the Nazi government of
> Germany adopted a racist policy which caused the massacre of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> the dictionary. When we use ‘so to speak,’ it often implies something
> not good. Is it why we don’t choose (D) as the answer.
Grammar is the basis of the solution (not nuances of meaning.)
1. Grammar requires no word after the second comma, i.e.
". . . Jews, the Holocaust." is perfectly grammatical.
2. Solution A is preferable only on stylistic grounds.
3. The phrase "so to speak" is not mainly pejorative, i.e. your
dictionary is misleading in this respect. This error is especially
grievous if the exercise seeks to teach style as well as grammar.

Signature
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)