> This pertains to USA usage.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Thank you.... Lee
> <carken...@juno.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Illegitimacy has no real meaning now. But when it did: no, that
child was born to a married couple and is not a bastard. In this
instance, American law is based on English law (going way back), and
English law is the same. If the couple has gone through a marriage
ceremony before the baby is born, the baby is legitimate.
And there used to be a lot of eight-pound premature babies...
Hatunen - 23 May 2009 18:20 GMT
>Illegitimacy has no real meaning now. But when it did: no, that
>child was born to a married couple and is not a bastard. In this
>instance, American law is based on English law (going way back), and
>English law is the same. If the couple has gone through a marriage
>ceremony before the baby is born, the baby is legitimate.
Also true if the mother marries someone else before the baby is
born.

Signature
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
David Kaye - 25 May 2009 19:13 GMT
> Illegitimacy has no real meaning now. But when it did: no, that
> child was born to a married couple and is not a bastard.
When I was a kid, on my grandmother's farm there was a family living
in the water tankhouse with a kid whom she (and others) called "Johnny
the Bastard". This was meant to distinguish him from "Uncle Johnny".
Oddly enough it was the only time my grandmother used the term
"bastard" because when she swore, she used the sound-alike "basset"
instead.
Since Johnny had creamy caramel colored skin and I didn't know what a
bastard was, but I did know what custard was, I assumed that he was
called a bastard because of his nice-looking skin.