Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / May 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

let's discuss "bastard"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
carkenord@juno.com - 21 May 2009 19:30 GMT
This pertains to USA usage.

An example:

John and Jane are not married to anyone.  Both are single.  John and
Jane have sexual intercourse.

John impregnates Jane.

They  immediately get legally married to each other.

A few months later, the baby is born.  John and Jane are still
married  to each other at the time of the baby's birth.

Would that baby be considered a "bastard"...?

Thank you....      Lee
Peter Duncanson (BrE) - 21 May 2009 21:52 GMT
>This pertains to USA usage.
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Would that baby be considered a "bastard"...?

I am not an American lawyer - I am not any sort of lawyer.
As far as I know, if the parents are married at the time of the birth
the child is legitimate (not a bastard).

The OED (Oxford English Dictionary) says:

   bastard, n. and a.

   One begotten and born out of wedlock; an illegitimate or natural
   child.
     By the civil and canon laws, a child born out of wedlock is
     legitimated by the subsequent marriage of his parents; but by the
     law of England, retained in some of the United States, a child to
     be legitimate must at least be born after the marriage of the
     parents.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.english.usage)

mm - 24 May 2009 02:26 GMT
>>This pertains to USA usage.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>      be legitimate must at least be born after the marriage of the
>      parents.

I don't know why I mention this. Just ftr I guess. It is canon law,
church law, and doesn't relate to Jews.  The word mamzer, which is
often translated bastard because the meaning is somewhat similar, only
refers to children who are born because of incest or adultery.  There
is no special name, etc. for children of unmarried parents, or married
parents, and no distinction legally wrt, for example, inheritance,
etc.
Signature

Posters should say where they live, and for which
area they are asking questions. I have lived in
Western Pa.  10 years
Indianapolis 10 years
Chicago       6 years
Brooklyn, NY 12 years
Baltimore    26 years

Rambler III - 21 May 2009 22:00 GMT
> This pertains to USA usage.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Thank you....      Lee

The birth would be considered premature.
Cece - 22 May 2009 20:51 GMT
> <carken...@juno.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -

Illegitimacy has no real meaning now.  But when it did:  no, that
child was born to a married couple and is not a bastard.  In this
instance, American law is based on English law (going way back), and
English law is the same.  If the couple has gone through a marriage
ceremony before the baby is born, the baby is legitimate.

And there used to be a lot of eight-pound premature babies...
Hatunen - 23 May 2009 18:20 GMT
>Illegitimacy has no real meaning now.  But when it did:  no, that
>child was born to a married couple and is not a bastard.  In this
>instance, American law is based on English law (going way back), and
>English law is the same.  If the couple has gone through a marriage
>ceremony before the baby is born, the baby is legitimate.

Also true if the mother marries someone else before the baby is
born.

Signature

  ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
  *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
  * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

David Kaye - 25 May 2009 19:13 GMT
> Illegitimacy has no real meaning now.  But when it did:  no, that
> child was born to a married couple and is not a bastard.  

When I was a kid, on my grandmother's farm there was a family living
in the water tankhouse with a kid whom she (and others) called "Johnny
the Bastard".  This was meant to distinguish him from "Uncle Johnny".
Oddly enough it was the only time my grandmother used the term
"bastard" because when she swore, she used the sound-alike "basset"
instead.

Since Johnny had creamy caramel colored skin and I didn't know what a
bastard was, but I did know what custard was, I assumed that he was
called a bastard because of his nice-looking skin.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.