>> Sorry if this deprives any AEU-er of some of that advance gratitude.
>
> <sigh> Crossposting is bad, but multi-posting is evil.
> Crossposting is not bad.
Not bad? Well, it's not *good*, and is too often done without
adequate justification ... many people crosspost to several groups
rather than bothering to work out which (if any) of them is the
appropriate group.
I'd say that most crossposted messages should not have been so, but
that doesn't mean that there's never a good reason to do it. Some
messages are appropriate in more than one group, and when that is
the case any ensuing discussion is likely to be so, too.
Cheers,
Daniel.
mUs1Ka - 29 Jan 2004 15:14 GMT
>> Crossposting is not bad.
>
> I'd say that most crossposted messages should not have been so, but
> that doesn't mean that there's never a good reason to do it.
As I said, crossposting is not bad. The reasons for doing so, may be.
m.