Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

"More than" versus "Less than"

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Celery - 27 Jan 2004 15:24 GMT
Hi All,

How do you interpret the meaning of "more than" and "less than"? If
someone says "more than 30", does it mean a value greater than 30 (30
excluded) or a value greater than 30 (30 included)? If someone says
"less than 30", does it mean a value smaller than 30 (30 excluded)?

Do you personally think that there is a cultural difference in the
perception of "more than" and "less than" across different native
language speakers?

Thanks in advance for your input
Robert Lieblich - 27 Jan 2004 16:36 GMT
> Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance for your input

This has been thoroughly covered already over on AUE, where a
duplicate of this post appeared.

Sorry if this deprives any AEU-er of some of that advance gratitude.

Signature

Bob Lieblich
Glad to help

Daniel James - 28 Jan 2004 10:56 GMT
> Sorry if this deprives any AEU-er of some of that advance gratitude.

<sigh> Crossposting is bad, but multi-posting is evil.

Cheers,
Daniel.

mUs1Ka - 28 Jan 2004 16:40 GMT
>> Sorry if this deprives any AEU-er of some of that advance gratitude.
>
> <sigh> Crossposting is bad, but multi-posting is evil.

Crossposting is not bad.
m.
Daniel James - 29 Jan 2004 12:53 GMT
> Crossposting is not bad.

Not bad? Well, it's not *good*, and is too often done without
adequate justification ... many people crosspost to several groups
rather than bothering to work out which (if any) of them is the
appropriate group.

I'd say that most crossposted messages should not have been so, but
that doesn't mean that there's never a good reason to do it. Some
messages are appropriate in more than one group, and when that is
the case any ensuing discussion is likely to be so, too.

Cheers,
Daniel.

mUs1Ka - 29 Jan 2004 15:14 GMT
>> Crossposting is not bad.
>
> I'd say that most crossposted messages should not have been so, but
> that doesn't mean that there's never a good reason to do it.

As I said, crossposting is not bad. The reasons for doing so, may be.
m.
Carter Jefferson - 27 Jan 2004 17:21 GMT
>Hi All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>Thanks in advance for your input

Both exclude 30. I don't know of any differences among native
speakers, but anything is possible.

If you want to include 30, say "30 or more (or less)."

Carter

Carter Jefferson
carterj98@mindspring.com
http://carterj.homestead.com/
Odysseus - 28 Jan 2004 05:16 GMT
> If you want to include 30, say "30 or more (or less)."

Or, respectively, "at least (at most) 30".

Signature

Odysseus

Celery - 28 Jan 2004 12:34 GMT
Thank you for all your replies.

I agree with your answer. That was the answer I gave to a
&#65332;aiwanese who asked me about this question yesterday.

I believe there may be some cultural differences in the perception of
"more than" and "less than", just from what I heard from this
Taiwanese who told me that the value of 30 should be included for the
phrase "more than 30", but the value of 30 should be excluded for the
phrase "less than 30" in Chinese.

I am a native Cantonese speaker. I also speak Mandarin Chinese but I
attended an English school when I was small. That is why I come to
think my different educational and language background is the possible
cause of such a difference in the perception of these two phrases.

Thanks again for your reply

> > If you want to include 30, say "30 or more (or less)."
> >
> Or, respectively, "at least (at most) 30".
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.