Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / October 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

arrow in the bulls' quiver

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kevin - 23 Oct 2009 04:23 GMT
Hi - I find difficulty in following sentences. What is "an arrow in
the bulls' quiver"? Does it mean the strength is just nothing.? With
thanks.

The index of leading economic indicators rose by 1% in September for
its sixth consecutive gain.   The strength in the leading index is an
arrow in the bulls' quiver".

Kevin
tony cooper - 23 Oct 2009 04:33 GMT
>Hi - I find difficulty in following sentences. What is "an arrow in
>the bulls' quiver"? Does it mean the strength is just nothing.? With
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>its sixth consecutive gain.   The strength in the leading index is an
>arrow in the bulls' quiver".

It's horrible.  The author is saying that a strong leading index is an
indication that we are in, or approaching, a bull market.  Why he
didn't just write that is beyond me.

Well, on second thought, why he needed to even point out that gains in
the index of the leading economic indicators is an indication that the
market will be strong is also beyond me.

It's like saying "In the morning, when it starts to get light outside,
that's an indication that the sun is coming up."  We could have
figured that out on our own.


Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Kevin - 23 Oct 2009 04:40 GMT
I better copied the whole paragraphs...because it seems t me that he
thinks the indicator is not reliable...

The index of leading economic indicators rose by 1.0% m-o-m in
September for its sixth
consecutive gain (Consensus: 0.8%). The strength in the leading index
is an arrow in the bulls’
quiver. It has risen by more over the last sixth months than in any
period since 1983. Historically,
this type of rapid gain has been consistent with a vigorous economic
recovery. Recent
increases have also been broad-based: in September, eight components
of the index
contributed positively and only two declined. We continue to believe
that the index does not
properly capture the factors that are likely to lead to subdued growth
next year – such as the
distressed commercial real estate sector, a fragile banking system,
consumer deleveraging and
dismal state and local government finances. But at least at face
value, the leading index clearly
points to upside risks to our growth call. The coincident index – a
composite of the four monthly
variables used to determine recession dates – was unchanged.

Kevin
tony cooper - 23 Oct 2009 05:16 GMT
>I better copied the whole paragraphs...because it seems t me that he
>thinks the indicator is not reliable...
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>this type of rapid gain has been consistent with a vigorous economic
>recovery.

Here he says that the gains in the LEIs are indicative that we are in
for a strong economic recovery based on what's happened in the past.

>Recent
>increases have also been broad-based: in September, eight components
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>consumer deleveraging and
>dismal state and local government finances.

Here he says that no matter what significance the gains in the LEIs
have meant in the past, the current situation may be different.

>But at least at face
>value, the leading index clearly
>points to upside risks to our growth call. The coincident index – a
>composite of the four monthly
>variables used to determine recession dates – was unchanged.

Here he says that another indicator - the coincident index - isn't
telling us anything.

He apparently doesn't feel that the positive indicators are positive
enough to completely offset the underlying conditions.  He's
predicting "subdued growth".  
Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

Kevin - 23 Oct 2009 06:45 GMT
Tony - Many thanks.
Then back to the "arrow in the bull's quiver", I simply guess, so it's
highly likely that I am wrong.
I guess an arrow that hits the bull which only quivers, then the arrow
is nothing.
Is it correct to think so? or it is established idiom that means
something different.
With thanks.
Kevin
Leslie Danks - 23 Oct 2009 08:51 GMT
> Tony - Many thanks.
> Then back to the "arrow in the bull's quiver", I simply guess, so it's
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Is it correct to think so? or it is established idiom that means
> something different.

The latter: a quiver is a receptacle in which arrows are kept; in this
case it and the arrows belong to the bull. It has nothing to do
with "quivering". An "arrow in the bull's quiver" refers metaphorically
to a {weapon|technique|device|instrument|approach} that the bull might
use to pursue his or her objective.

Signature

Les (BrE)

Kevin - 23 Oct 2009 09:17 GMT
> The latter: a quiver is a receptacle in which arrows are kept; in this
> case it and the arrows belong to the bull. It has nothing to do
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> --
> Les (BrE)

Leslie - Many thanks for your explanation.  It sounds tricky to me,
perhaps I am not the native speaker of English.
And this bull is also metaphorically the rising market?
Kevin
CDB - 23 Oct 2009 10:39 GMT
>> The latter: a quiver is a receptacle in which arrows are kept; in
>> this case it and the arrows belong to the bull. It has nothing to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> perhaps I am not the native speaker of English.
> And this bull is also metaphorically the rising market?

I agree with Leslie, except on one point.  The word "bull" is
plural -- "the bulls' quiver" -- and therefore it presumably refers to
the group of traders who predict a bull market.  An arrow in their
quiver is a weapon in their imagined war with the bears: a point in
the debate that they are engaged in with the pessimists, about whether
the market will rise or fall.
Ray O'Hara - 24 Oct 2009 22:36 GMT
>> The latter: a quiver is a receptacle in which arrows are kept; in this
>> case it and the arrows belong to the bull. It has nothing to do
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> And this bull is also metaphorically the rising market?
> Kevin

On Wall Street investors are refered to as Bulls and Bears. the Bulls are
agressive investors and the Bears are cautious.
an arrow in the quiver means its a weapon/asset .
A bullish market is a strong/rising market and a bearish market is a weak
shrinking market.
Bulls charge and Bears hibernate.
Kevin - 27 Oct 2009 02:21 GMT
Thanks all.
I got it now.
Kevin
Odysseus - 24 Oct 2009 03:54 GMT
<snip>

> [A] quiver is a receptacle in which arrows are kept; in this
> case it and the arrows belong to the bull. It has nothing to do
> with "quivering". An "arrow in the bull's quiver" refers metaphorically
> to a {weapon|technique|device|instrument|approach} that the bull might
> use to pursue his or her objective.

The metaphor is most apt when the figurative arrow is one of several
similar devices/techniques/&c. available to the possessor of the
figurative quiver.

Signature

Odysseus

tony cooper - 23 Oct 2009 14:05 GMT
>Tony - Many thanks.
>Then back to the "arrow in the bull's quiver", I simply guess, so it's
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>With thanks.
>Kevin

Others have explained this, but its a phrase that you should ignore.
You'll never see it again.  It shouldn't have been used in the first
place.

The idea is that an arrow is a metaphor for a tool, and the LEIs are
tools used by stock market watchers.  Bulls, investors who feel the
market will go up, look for trends that indicate this.

Mixing bulls and arrows and quivers, though, is an unpardonable reach
for a business writer.  We can only be relieved that bears weren't
involved even though a decline in the LEIs would be an arrow in their
quiver.

You are completely off when you think the arrow strikes the bull.  The
bull *uses* the arrow after he draws it out of the quiver.  Ridiculous
metaphor.

Signature

Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida

mm - 30 Oct 2009 17:47 GMT
>>Tony - Many thanks.
>>Then back to the "arrow in the bull's quiver", I simply guess, so it's
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>involved even though a decline in the LEIs would be an arrow in their
>quiver.

YOu're right.  Bulls don't use a bow and arrow because they can't grip
the bow string with their hooves.  OTOH, bears could handle the bow
string with their claws, but have a very hard tie gripping the bow
itself with the other paw.

Otoh, since much less gripping is required, bears can strum a guitar
or play pizzicato on a violin, quite well.

>You are completely off when you think the arrow strikes the bull.  The

Quite right.

>bull *uses* the arrow after he draws it out of the quiver.  Ridiculous
>metaphor.

At the present time.  There are laboratories across the country
training animals in new skills, and when the bears' paws have been
fitted with prosthetic gripping devices, you may see a whole new side
of things.
Signature

Posters should say where they live, and for which area
they are asking questions. I was born and then lived in
Western Pa.   10 years
Indianapolis   7 years
Chicago          6 years
Brooklyn, NY 12 years
Baltimore       26 years

Bill McCray - 30 Oct 2009 23:04 GMT
> At the present time.  There are laboratories across the country
> training animals in new skills, and when the bears' paws have been
> fitted with prosthetic gripping devices, you may see a whole new side
> of things.

That should make hunting more of a fair sport.

Bill in Kentucky

----------------------------------------------------------------
Reverse parts of the user name and ISP name for my e-address
musika - 30 Oct 2009 23:19 GMT
>> At the present time.  There are laboratories across the country
>> training animals in new skills, and when the bears' paws have been
>> fitted with prosthetic gripping devices, you may see a whole new side
>> of things.
>
> That should make hunting more of a fair sport.

Perhaps we should call it the Fairsport Convention.

Signature

Ray
UK

mm - 23 Oct 2009 16:15 GMT
>Hi - I find difficulty in following sentences. What is "an arrow in
>the bulls' quiver"? Does it mean the strength is just nothing.? With

No, not at all.   It is strong because for 6 months it's been going
up.  Later says the 8 parts are not the best possible indicators, but
that doesn't change the fact that 6 of the 8 are going up, and that
means something, even if they are not the best indicators.

>thanks.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Kevin

The bulls are those who see the market as going up or likely to go up.
It's a stock market tern.    A quiver is where archers keep their
arrows. It straps on the back of an archer (usually or always).  The
bulls, he thinks, have more than one arrow in their quiver, more than
one way to show themselves or their clients that the market is going
to go up and the increase in the index of leading economic indicators
is one of them.  Or maybe each of the leading economic indicators that
increased is a separate arrow in the quiver.

Signature

Posters should say where they live, and for which area
they are asking questions. I was born and then lived in
Western Pa.   10 years
Indianapolis   7 years
Chicago          6 years
Brooklyn, NY 12 years
Baltimore       26 years

Cece - 23 Oct 2009 20:07 GMT
> >Hi - I find difficulty in following sentences. What is "an arrow in
> >the bulls' quiver"? Does it mean the strength is just nothing.? With
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Brooklyn, NY 12 years
> Baltimore       26 years

The stock market can be a bull market, with rising prices, or a bear
market, with falling prices.  An easy way to remember which is which:
a bull's horns toss one up while a bear's paws strike one down (thank
you, Cherry Ames)..
John Dean - 24 Oct 2009 11:25 GMT
>> Hi - I find difficulty in following sentences. What is "an arrow in
>> the bulls' quiver"? Does it mean the strength is just nothing.? With
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> is one of them.  Or maybe each of the leading economic indicators that
> increased is a separate arrow in the quiver.

Why, it's like having another string to their bow ...
Signature

John Dean
Oxford

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.