> On NPR, All Things Considered, I think.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Another word whose meaning has been forgotten.

Signature
Cordially,
Eric Walker, Owlcroft House
http://owlcroft.com/english/
>> On NPR, All Things Considered, I think.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>AHD: Widely or commonly occurring, existing, accepted, or practiced. See
>synonyms at 'prevailing'.
I did look it up. I don't believe that definition. :-) I was
curious if others would.
>"Prevailing" is given with two senses:
>1) Most frequent or common
>2) Generally current; widespread
I don't believe number 2 either. :-)
>I believe the AHD lists senses in chronological order of development, so
>even "prevailing" would now seem to mean, as prevalent does, simply
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>More annoying, if the original quotation is verbatim, is its failure to
No, the original "quotation" isn't verbatim. That's why I didn't put
it in quotes.
>use the genitive ("spouse's") with the gerund ("insulting").
Yeah, an argument could surely be made I should have used spouse's.
There is something about this situation that made me want to write it
without the apostrolphe. Maybe that make me a PKB.

Signature
Posters should say where they live, and for which area
they are asking questions. I was born and then lived in
Western Pa. 10 years
Indianapolis 7 years
Chicago 6 years
Brooklyn, NY 12 years
Baltimore 26 years
Robert Lieblich - 10 Jan 2010 16:16 GMT
> >> On NPR, All Things Considered, I think.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> I did look it up. I don't believe that definition. :-) I was
> curious if others would.
I didn't know that English usage was a matter of faith. (Or does that
explain the smiley?) I find it hard to believe (whoops -- I guess it
is a matter of faith) that anyone would reject the quoted AH
definition.
Looking it up really does help.
> >"Prevailing" is given with two senses:
> >1) Most frequent or common
> >2) Generally current; widespread
>
> I don't believe number 2 either. :-)
Goodness, what do you believe? The Flying Spaghetti Monster, perhaps?
> >I believe the AHD lists senses in chronological order of development, so
> >even "prevailing" would now seem to mean, as prevalent does, simply
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Yeah, an argument could surely be made I should have used spouse's.
Yeah, right.
> There is something about this situation that made me want to write it
> without the apostrolphe.
You've been around British posters for so long you're starting to
sound like them, innit?
> Maybe that make me a PKB.
Maybe that do.

Signature
Bob Lieblich
Whose view of "prevalent" is prevalent