
Signature
You'd be crazy to e-mail me with the crazy. But leave the div alone.
On 22 Feb 2010, Patok wrote
>>>> Have you looked up "nuance" in a dictionary? Mine defines it
>>>> as a "subtle difference in or shade of meaning".
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I understand "subtle nuance" as "a very subtle difference in
> meaning".
To some of us, "subtle" simply seems like the wrong adjective to
use with "nuance", since it's part of the definition of the word.
It creates a redundancy that's similar to...(let me think)...and
"alternative option" or "overweight obesity".
> I think most who have replied here understand it the
> same way.
Hmmm...I think they should opt for a less tautological qualifier.

Signature
Cheers, Harvey
CanEng and BrEng, indiscriminately mixed
Athel Cornish-Bowden - 23 Feb 2010 09:39 GMT
> On 22 Feb 2010, Patok wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Hmmm...I think they should opt for a less tautological qualifier.
At least on my newsreader "most of us" seems to mean two out of three,
decreased to two out of four now that you've added your voice. (Of
course, some of the comments may not be displayed as they may have been
filtered before they reach me.) Not a very significant sample.

Signature
athel
jbg - 23 Feb 2010 21:18 GMT
On Feb 23, 4:39 am, Athel Cornish-Bowden <acorn...@ibsm.cnrs-mrs.fr>
wrote:
> > On 22 Feb 2010, Patok wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> --
> athel
Where does "obvious nuance" fit into this rainbow?
Regards,
John