Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / October 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Roast dinner/roast meat with salad

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Marius Hancu - 22 Oct 2006 15:46 GMT
Hello:

What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat
with salad," in BrE?

Is it just in quantity and the presence of salad?:-)

Thank you.
Marius Hancu
the Omrud - 22 Oct 2006 16:35 GMT
Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it:

> Hello:
>
> What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat
> with salad," in BrE?
>
> Is it just in quantity and the presence of salad?:-)

"Roast dinner" consists of roast meat (chicken, beef, pork, lamb),
potatoes in some form (roast, mashed, boiled - not so often chips)
and one or two types of traditional vegetable (carrots, peas, leeks,
cabbage).  There will almost certainly be gravy and there may be
stuffing or Yorkshire pudding.

"Roast meat with salad" is just a description of what you can see on  
a plate - it's not a standard meal.

Signature

David
=====

John Dean - 22 Oct 2006 16:38 GMT
> Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> "Roast meat with salad" is just a description of what you can see on
> a plate - it's not a standard meal.

And the roast dinner is likely to be hot while the roast meat with salad
isn't.
Signature

John Dean
Oxford

Mike Lyle - 22 Oct 2006 16:53 GMT
> > Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> And the roast dinner is likely to be hot while the roast meat with salad
> isn't.

Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I
maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even in
families which don't have their main meal at about one o'clock on any
other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then it's an
affront to the cooks to call it "lunch".

Signature

Mike.

Jeffrey Turner - 22 Oct 2006 18:20 GMT
>>>Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then it's an
> affront to the cooks to call it "lunch".

I don't know about "lunch," but a "luncheon" can be quite an affair.

--Jeff

Signature

Not ignorance, but ignorance of ignorance,
is the death of knowledge.
-Alfred North Whitehead

Mike Lyle - 22 Oct 2006 18:27 GMT
> >>>Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it:
> >>>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> I don't know about "lunch," but a "luncheon" can be quite an affair.

Ah, but "a luncheon" is to "lunch" as "a dinner" is to "dinner", if not
more so.

Signature

Mike.

John Dean - 22 Oct 2006 23:12 GMT
>>> Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> any other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then
> it's an affront to the cooks to call it "lunch".

Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a
Southern softie big jessie affectation.
Signature

John Dean
Oxford

Mike Lyle - 23 Oct 2006 00:03 GMT
[...]
> > Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I
> > maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a
> Southern softie big jessie affectation.

Yes, strange that, coming from a group so effete that they call supper
by the ladylike term "tea".

Signature

Mike.

Matthew Huntbach - 23 Oct 2006 09:23 GMT
>>> Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I
>>> maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even
>>> in families which don't have their main meal at about one o'clock on
>>> any other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then
>>> it's an affront to the cooks to call it "lunch".

>> Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a
>> Southern softie big jessie affectation.

> Yes, strange that, coming from a group so effete that they call supper
> by the ladylike term "tea".

Also usage amongst the southern working class.

Matthew Huntbach
Matthew Huntbach - 23 Oct 2006 09:21 GMT
>> Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I
>> maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even
>> in families which don't have their main meal at about one o'clock on
>> any other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then
>> it's an affront to the cooks to call it "lunch".

> Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a
> Southern softie big jessie affectation.

As ever, northerners believe the south consists solely of middle class people.

What you describe as usage "Oop North" is just as much usage down south
for working class people.

Matthew Huntbach
Mike Barnes - 23 Oct 2006 09:48 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:

>> Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a
>> Southern softie big jessie affectation.
>
>As ever, northerners believe the south consists solely of middle class people.

Isn't that what John just said?

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Matthew Huntbach - 23 Oct 2006 11:41 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:

>>> Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a
>>> Southern softie big jessie affectation.

>> As ever, northerners believe the south consists solely of middle class people.

> Isn't that what John just said?

"Breakfast, dinner and tea" are the names of the three main meals for millions
of southerners. Why is is that so many northerners seem not to know that?
Why is it that what is actually working class usage in the south as well
as the north, in many other things as well, is so often described as
"northern"?

Matthew Huntbach
Nick Spalding - 23 Oct 2006 11:50 GMT
Matthew Huntbach wrote, in
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0610231136060.731@frank.dcs.qmul.ac.uk>
on Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:41:08 +0100:

>> In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>as the north, in many other things as well, is so often described as
>"northern"?

Come hither friends, be warned by me
That breakfast, dinner, lunch and tea
Are all the human frame requires.
With that the wretched boy expires.
Signature

Nick Spalding

Mike Barnes - 23 Oct 2006 14:46 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:
>> In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>"Breakfast, dinner and tea" are the names of the three main meals for millions
>of southerners. Why is is that so many northerners seem not to know that?

Surely you're not casting John in the role of the northerner that
doesn't know that? But if not him, who?

It looks to me as if John was making a point rather similar to your
point about northerners, but humorously.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Matthew Huntbach - 23 Oct 2006 17:16 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:
>>> In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:

>>>>> Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal,
>>>>> merely as a Southern softie big jessie affectation.

>>>> As ever, northerners believe the south consists solely of middle
>>>> class people.

>>> Isn't that what John just said?

>> "Breakfast, dinner and tea" are the names of the three main meals for millions
>> of southerners. Why is is that so many northerners seem not to know that?

> Surely you're not casting John in the role of the northerner that
> doesn't know that? But if not him, who?
>
> It looks to me as if John was making a point rather similar to your
> point about northerners, but humorously.

As it's my own backgriound, I've always been irritated by the way the
southern working class are written out of existence. I don't find it
amusing, because there's actually a lot of issues about being working class
in a predominantly middle class area which just don't get properly dealt
with because they don't fit in with people's stereotypes. How'd you like
it if you were constantly told by popular culture that you don't exist?

Matthew Huntbach
Richard Bollard - 25 Oct 2006 05:59 GMT
[...]

>As it's my own backgriound, I've always been irritated by the way the
>southern working class are written out of existence. I don't find it
>amusing, because there's actually a lot of issues about being working class
>in a predominantly middle class area which just don't get properly dealt
>with because they don't fit in with people's stereotypes. How'd you like
>it if you were constantly told by popular culture that you don't exist?

Ask a Tasmanian of aboriginal descent.
Signature

Richard Bollard
Canberra Australia

To email, I'm at AMT not spAMT.

the Omrud - 25 Oct 2006 08:41 GMT
Richard Bollard <richardb@spamt.edu.au> had it:

> [...]
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> >
> Ask a Tasmanian of aboriginal descent.

obBookReview: Mum gave me the novel "English Passengers" which in
part chronicles the end of the Tasmanian natives, and which I found
excellent after a rather slow start.

Signature

David
=====

Robert Bannister - 26 Oct 2006 00:36 GMT
> obBookReview: Mum gave me the novel "English Passengers" which in
> part chronicles the end of the Tasmanian natives, and which I found
> excellent after a rather slow start.

Would you care to rephrase that? I don't think you really felt the end
of the Tasmanian natives was excellent, even if their end started slowly.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Robin Bignall - 26 Oct 2006 22:19 GMT
>> obBookReview: Mum gave me the novel "English Passengers" which in
>> part chronicles the end of the Tasmanian natives, and which I found
>> excellent after a rather slow start.
>>
>Would you care to rephrase that? I don't think you really felt the end
>of the Tasmanian natives was excellent, even if their end started slowly.

Well, it would mean that if David didn't have that 'and' before his
final 'which'.  "Novel which...., and which...."
Signature

Robin
Herts, England

the Omrud - 27 Oct 2006 22:50 GMT
Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:

> > obBookReview: Mum gave me the novel "English Passengers" which in
> > part chronicles the end of the Tasmanian natives, and which I found
> > excellent after a rather slow start.
> >
> Would you care to rephrase that? I don't think you really felt the end
> of the Tasmanian natives was excellent, even if their end started slowly.

Does it mean that?  I don't think it does.

Signature

David
=====

T.H. Entity - 28 Oct 2006 18:09 GMT
>Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Does it mean that?  I don't think it does.

Nor do I. The only Oy!-worthy thing I see is that you need a comma
after "Passengers" (unless there are several novels called "English
Passengers" but only one that doesn't chronicles the end of the
natives). The "and" makes it clear that both relatives refer to the
same antecedent.

--
THE

"If you or I use a word inappropriately, that's an error. If a newspaper
uses a word inappropriately, that's a citation source for the dictionaries."
-- Peter Moylan
Robert Bannister - 28 Oct 2006 23:51 GMT
>>Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> natives). The "and" makes it clear that both relatives refer to the
> same antecedent.

Of course, I didn't write "Oy". It was only small quip. Tom Holt wrote
something like "God only created humans because he wanted a straight man".
Signature

Rob Bannister

Oleg Lego - 23 Oct 2006 15:53 GMT
The Matthew Huntbach entity posted thusly:

>> In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>as the north, in many other things as well, is so often described as
>"northern"?

I find it strange that a country so small that turkeys can be safely
shipped fresh from the ends of it, could have north/south animosity.
Mike Lyle - 23 Oct 2006 17:49 GMT
> The Matthew Huntbach entity posted thusly:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> I find it strange that a country so small that turkeys can be safely
> shipped fresh from the ends of it, could have north/south animosity.

Hell, man, there are _villages_ that have compass-point animosity! You
only need a population of two. Or, in extreme cases, one.

Signature

Mike.

Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:00 GMT
>>> Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I
>>> maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> As ever, northerners believe the south consists solely of middle class
> people.

Still, to be fair, many of "our" lot think all Northerners are either
coal miners, sheep herders or mill workers. My grandfather (on the
dreaded Lancashire side of the family) owned a cotton mill until he went
bust in the 30s. Alas for riches lost.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Mike Page - 26 Oct 2006 21:02 GMT
...>
>Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a
>Southern softie big jessie affectation.

Well, tha's wrong there. When I were a grave digger in Lincoln in
the late 1960s, 'lunch' was the snack taken at about 9:00. We
started work at 07:30, knocked off for 'breakfast' at 08:00 for a
quarter of an hour. We had a tea break about eleven, dinner from
12:00 to 13:00 and another tea break in the afternoon. Trade
unions were a wonderful thing.

Mike Page
LFS - 26 Oct 2006 21:14 GMT
> ...>
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> 12:00 to 13:00 and another tea break in the afternoon. Trade
> unions were a wonderful thing.

I am mildly intrigued: how many graves got dug in the short pauses
between all these breaks?

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

Robin Bignall - 26 Oct 2006 22:27 GMT
>> ...>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>I am mildly intrigued: how many graves got dug in the short pauses
>between all these breaks?

That must have been the Amalgamated Union of Entombers, an early AUE
manifestation.
Signature

Robin
Herts, England

Mike Page - 27 Oct 2006 14:37 GMT
>> ...>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>I am mildly intrigued: how many graves got dug in the short pauses
>between all these breaks?

The job was mainly gardening and tidying up. There wasn't much
trade in the Summer when I was working there. We were given an
allowance of only two hours to dig a grave, but it was nice
outdoor work and I've always enjoyed 'working with people'.

Mike 'just on my lunch break' Page
Robert Bannister - 23 Oct 2006 01:31 GMT
>>>Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then it's an
> affront to the cooks to call it "lunch".

Because someone usually underestimates the size of turkey or forgets how
long it will take to thaw, Christmas dinner is frequently delayed to as
late as 3 pm, so goodness knows which meal that makes it.

Signature

Rob Bannister

the Omrud - 23 Oct 2006 08:52 GMT
Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:

> > Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I
> > maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even in
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> long it will take to thaw, Christmas dinner is frequently delayed to as
> late as 3 pm, so goodness knows which meal that makes it.

Thaw?  I bet there aren't many Brits here who buy a frozen turkey for
Christmas.  Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a
certain class.

Signature

David
=====

Tony Cooper - 23 Oct 2006 14:30 GMT
>Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Christmas.  Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a
>certain class.

I really don't understand this comment.  Do Brits of a certain class
not buy a turkey for Christmas, or do Brits of a certain class not buy
a frozen turkey for Christmas?  

It seems like you mean the latter, but that would mean that unfrozen
vs frozen is somehow a class indicator.  In the US, only frozen
turkeys are available in areas where turkeys are not locally raised
and slaughtered.  Fresh doesn't ship well.

I don't really know if it's possible to buy an unfrozen turkey in this
area.  ("Unfrozen" to mean a live turkey that would be slaughtered by
the buyer or a turkey slaughtered locally and sold immediately)

Wild turkey are indigenous to parts of Florida, and are hunted.
However, the turkey-hunting season is in March.  It would be illegal
to kill a wild turkey in December.

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Wood Avens - 23 Oct 2006 15:30 GMT
>>Thaw?  I bet there aren't many Brits here who buy a frozen turkey for
>>Christmas.  Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>turkeys are available in areas where turkeys are not locally raised
>and slaughtered.  Fresh doesn't ship well.

There are turkey farms, and farms which breed turkeys, in various
parts of the UK, and everywhere (aside from some of the Scottish
islands, I suppose) is within less than a day's journey by chilled
container of at least one of these.

>I don't really know if it's possible to buy an unfrozen turkey in this
>area.  ("Unfrozen" to mean a live turkey that would be slaughtered by
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>However, the turkey-hunting season is in March.  It would be illegal
>to kill a wild turkey in December.

I don't think we have many wild turkeys in these parts, but I expect
they'd be top of the upmarket ladder if we did.  As it is, downmarket
is frozen, next would be mass-produced non-organic chilled, and then
it runs through various permutations of free-range, organic, and
several different breeds, the top rung for most of us being currently
occupied by bronze free-range organic turkeys from one's local farm or
farmers' market.

Signature

Katy Jennison

spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @

Tony Cooper - 23 Oct 2006 15:49 GMT
>>>Thaw?  I bet there aren't many Brits here who buy a frozen turkey for
>>>Christmas.  Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>islands, I suppose) is within less than a day's journey by chilled
>container of at least one of these.

Ah.  Size matters.

I wonder if shopping habits also apply.  My wife usually shops for
holiday dinners quite a few days before the event.  A frozen turkey
would be safer to keep around for several days.  

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Paul Wolff - 23 Oct 2006 17:50 GMT
>>>>Thaw?  I bet there aren't many Brits here who buy a frozen turkey for
>>>>Christmas.  Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>holiday dinners quite a few days before the event.  A frozen turkey
>would be safer to keep around for several days.

And at least two of those days should be spent defrosting the thing, if
it's any size.  The recommended method is to defrost in the fridge.

Yes, we have had frozen turkey in the past, but now we get ours, fresh
as a bird, from the farm half a mile away.  I'm not sure that they can
be had without a prior order (shoulder arms, right dress, that sort of
thing?).
Signature

Paul
In bocca al Lupo!

Garrett Wollman - 23 Oct 2006 17:20 GMT
>I don't think we have many wild turkeys in these parts, but I expect
>they'd be top of the upmarket ladder if we did.

I don't think you have *any* wild turkeys in those parts.  Feral
turkeys, perhaps, but not wild.  The only wild turkeys are in the
Western Hemisphere.  (Thereby joining a long list[1] of staples for which
European cooking owes us a debt of gratitude.)

-GAWollman

[1] Including, inter alia, peppers, potatoes, corn (maize), vanilla,
chocolate, tomatoes, squash, lima beans, and common beans.  All told
something like seven out of the world's top ten most valuable crops.

Signature

Garrett A. Wollman   | The real tragedy of human existence is not that we are
wollman@csail.mit.edu| nasty by nature, but that a cruel structural asymmetry
Opinions not those   | grants to rare events of meanness such power to shape
of MIT or CSAIL.     | our history. - S.J. Gould, Ten Thousand Acts of Kindness

Wood Avens - 23 Oct 2006 17:41 GMT
>>I don't think we have many wild turkeys in these parts, but I expect
>>they'd be top of the upmarket ladder if we did.
>
>I don't think you have *any* wild turkeys in those parts.  

True.  I was attempting a spot of typical British understatement.  Ho
hum.

Signature

Katy Jennison

spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @

John Dean - 24 Oct 2006 00:54 GMT
>>> I don't think we have many wild turkeys in these parts, but I expect
>>> they'd be top of the upmarket ladder if we did.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> True.  I was attempting a spot of typical British understatement.  Ho
> hum.

There are no wild turkeys around here if and only if Bernard Matthews'
establishments are more secure than a Group 4 Prison.
Signature

John "Is that a wallaby?" Dean
Oxford

Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:06 GMT
>>I don't think we have many wild turkeys in these parts, but I expect
>>they'd be top of the upmarket ladder if we did.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> chocolate, tomatoes, squash, lima beans, and common beans.  All told
> something like seven out of the world's top ten most valuable crops.

You omitted tobacco. I believe there is some argument about both tobacco
and maize, as, I think, both have been found in Ancient Egyptian tombs.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Mike Page - 26 Oct 2006 21:19 GMT
...>
>>I don't really know if it's possible to buy an unfrozen turkey in this
>>area.  ("Unfrozen" to mean a live turkey that would be slaughtered by
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>occupied by bronze free-range organic turkeys from one's local farm or
>farmers' market.

Quite a few of the upper middle classes have gone over to goose
for Christmas. As you say, the fresher, more organic and free
range it is, the more boasting points you get with it. Some
people order them to be grown up for them in June, get constant
reports from the farmer and the goose more or less becomes one of
the family by Christmas.


Mike Page
Skitt - 26 Oct 2006 21:21 GMT
> Quite a few of the upper middle classes have gone over to goose
> for Christmas. As you say, the fresher, more organic and free
> range it is, the more boasting points you get with it. Some
> people order them to be grown up for them in June, get constant
> reports from the farmer and the goose more or less becomes one of
> the family by Christmas.

... and then it is finally absorbed by it.
Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
http://www.geocities.com/opus731/

Roland Hutchinson - 27 Oct 2006 05:08 GMT
>> Quite a few of the upper middle classes have gone over to goose
>> for Christmas. As you say, the fresher, more organic and free
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> ... and then it is finally absorbed by it.

In part.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Amethyst Deceiver - 27 Oct 2006 10:40 GMT
> Quite a few of the upper middle classes have gone over to goose
> for Christmas. As you say, the fresher, more organic and free
> range it is, the more boasting points you get with it. Some
> people order them to be grown up for them in June, get constant
> reports from the farmer and the goose more or less becomes one of
> the family by Christmas.

The problem with goose is that there's a lot of space inside the ribs
compared with meat outside them. They can look pretty big but not have a lot
of meat on them.

Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

Mike Page - 27 Oct 2006 14:35 GMT
>> Quite a few of the upper middle classes have gone over to goose
>> for Christmas. As you say, the fresher, more organic and free
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>compared with meat outside them. They can look pretty big but not have a lot
>of meat on them.

Another boasting point - they are so conspicuously expensive.
Last year Lidl had some frozen German (you could tell by the way
they walked) geese at a reasonable price.

Mike 'just on my lunch break' Page
Matthew Huntbach - 23 Oct 2006 17:00 GMT
>> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:

>>> Because someone usually underestimates the size of turkey or forgets how
>>> long it will take to thaw, Christmas dinner is frequently delayed to as
>>> late as 3 pm, so goodness knows which meal that makes it.

>> Thaw?  I bet there aren't many Brits here who buy a frozen turkey for
>> Christmas.  Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a
>> certain class.

> I really don't understand this comment.  Do Brits of a certain class
> not buy a turkey for Christmas, or do Brits of a certain class not buy
> a frozen turkey for Christmas?

Both, I think. It would be regarded as posh to have goose, or some other
meat at Christmas. It would definitely be a way of showing one's superior
status for a white European family to make a point of not celebrating
Christmas at all. But I think what David is getting at is that People Like
Us buy fresh turkies - which are widely available just before Christmas,
I don't think there is any serious geographical barrier to having one if one
wants.

I'm not so sure as he is, however, that frozen turkies are so irredeemably naff
that you'd have to be a Sun-reading ITV-watcher (is that a bit old-fashioned?
I haven't caught up with the satellite/cable revolution in TV habits) to
entertain the prospect of having one. I rather think it spreads further
up the class spectrum than he thinks, particularly amongst the young and
those who have got out of the habit of old-time food preparation.

Matthew Huntbach
LFS - 23 Oct 2006 17:46 GMT
>>> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> status for a white European family to make a point of not celebrating
> Christmas at all.

I think you need a further qualifying adjective there. I know quite a
few "white European" families like my own who don't celebrate Xmas at
all. We are not generally viewed as being of "superior status" in this
regard.

[..]

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:16 GMT
> I think you need a further qualifying adjective there. I know quite a
> few "white European" families like my own who don't celebrate Xmas at
> all. We are not generally viewed as being of "superior status" in this
> regard.

I know a number of Muslims and one Jewish family who have a celebration
of sorts at Christmas. For them, it's just a question of having fun at
the same time as everyone else. I don't think they have Xmas trees, but
they do the big dinner thing and I think they give a small number of
presents to the children. I doubt many people really thing very hard
about the connection between the Yuletide festivities and Christianity.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Paul Wolff - 24 Oct 2006 20:32 GMT
>> I think you need a further qualifying adjective there. I know quite a
>>few "white European" families like my own who don't celebrate Xmas at
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>presents to the children. I doubt many people really thing very hard
>about the connection between the Yuletide festivities and Christianity.

My white European Jewish forbears in southwest Germany were very keen on
Christmas -- Christmas Eve, of course.  And carnival, though that's less
thought of as a religious festival -- it's more of a secular knees-up
before religion kicks in for the few next day, or next week.  They were
fundies with emphasis on fun.
Signature

Paul
In bocca al Lupo!

Roland Hutchinson - 27 Oct 2006 08:21 GMT
> Matthew Huntbach wrote:

>> It would be regarded as posh to have goose, or some other
>> meat at Christmas. It would definitely be a way of showing one's superior
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> few "white European" families like my own who don't celebrate Xmas at
> all.

American Jews tradtionally go to the movies and dine in a Chinese restaurant
on Christmas Day (a kosher Chinese restaurant for the more strictly
observant, of course).  Is there no such custom in the Movverland?

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

LFS - 27 Oct 2006 09:52 GMT
>>Matthew Huntbach wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> on Christmas Day (a kosher Chinese restaurant for the more strictly
> observant, of course).  Is there no such custom in the Movverland?

No, the cinemas here are closed and you need a second mortgage to eat at
one of the very few kosher Chinese establishments. WIWAL we did worthy
things like helping out in hospitals to give staff a break.

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

Sara Lorimer - 27 Oct 2006 19:30 GMT
> > American Jews tradtionally go to the movies and dine in a Chinese restaurant
> > on Christmas Day (a kosher Chinese restaurant for the more strictly
> > observant, of course).  Is there no such custom in the Movverland?
>
> No, the cinemas here are closed...

In my experience, the movie theaters here in the US are _packed_ on
Christmas Day. I wonder why English theater owners don't try to get that
extra bit of cash.

Signature

SML

Graeme Thomas - 27 Oct 2006 20:53 GMT
>> No, the cinemas here are closed...
>
>In my experience, the movie theaters here in the US are _packed_ on
>Christmas Day. I wonder why English theater owners don't try to get that
>extra bit of cash.

The answer is a bit complex, but it comes down to "different cultures".

The UK Christmas is an extended family affair, with a traditional large
and late lunch.  We're too busy rediscovering why we haven't seen Aunt
Muriel since last Christmas[1] to go out to the cinema.  Then, too, we
have to switch on the TV to see the Queen's Christmas Broadcast.

Because of all that, it's difficult to get staff to work on Christmas
Day.  They tend to want *lots* of overtime pay.  It's been some time
since I was in an industry that did that sort of thing[2], but "triple
time and a day in lieu" was not untypical of the sorts of bribes
required.

So, there will be limited demand, and vastly increased costs, so it's no
wonder that cinemas don't open on Christmas Day.

Similar remarks extend to other shops.  There is always a massive sale
between Christmas and New Year, but the shops don't open until Boxing
Day, or even the day after.

[1] In my experience no family is complete without a loathed relative.

[2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31.  My
employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner, in order
to get me to forgo a New Year's party.  I'd have done it for less, but
don't tell my employers that.
Signature

Graeme Thomas

Skitt - 27 Oct 2006 21:07 GMT
> [2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31.  My
> employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner, in order
> to get me to forgo a New Year's party.  I'd have done it for less, but
> don't tell my employers that.

Funny.  That date was not on my calendar.

Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
http://www.geocities.com/opus731/

Graeme Thomas - 27 Oct 2006 21:27 GMT
>> [2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31.  My
>> employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner, in order
>> to get me to forgo a New Year's party.  I'd have done it for less, but
>> don't tell my employers that.
>
>Funny.  That date was not on my calendar.

1999-12-31.  But you knew that.

Signature

Graeme Thomas

Evan Kirshenbaum - 27 Oct 2006 21:30 GMT
>> [2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31.  My
>> employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner, in order
>> to get me to forgo a New Year's party.  I'd have done it for less, but
>> don't tell my employers that.
>
> Funny.  That date was not on my calendar.

That's why it costs so much to get people to work on it.

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |Just sit right back
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |  and you'll hear a tale,
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |  a tale of the Stanford red
                                      |That started when a little boy
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com             |  named Leland did drop dead
   (650)857-7572

   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

Default User - 27 Oct 2006 22:55 GMT
> >> [2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31.
> My >> employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> That's why it costs so much to get people to work on it.

Yeah, going into the parallel dimension gives me a headache.

Brian

Signature

If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

R H Draney - 28 Oct 2006 01:18 GMT
Default User filted:

>> >> [2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31.
>> My >> employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>Yeah, going into the parallel dimension gives me a headache.

It's not the going in so much as the parking....r

Signature

"Keep your eye on the Bishop.  I want to know when
he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.

Roland Hutchinson - 27 Oct 2006 22:07 GMT
> The UK Christmas is an extended family affair, with a traditional large
> and late lunch.  We're too busy rediscovering why we haven't seen Aunt
> Muriel since last Christmas[1] to go out to the cinema.  Then, too, we
> have to switch on the TV to see the Queen's Christmas Broadcast.

Hey, some of us Americans manage family dinner, the Queen's speech (if
interested and Internet-connected), the rebroadcast of King's College
Festival of Lessons and Carols, a movie, and a church gig or two.  Not
lacking in moral fibre and general industry, we!  Oh yeah, and the
compulsory spectation of three or four different, and yet all the same, TV
adaptations of Dickens in any given year (though, mercifully, not all
broadcast on Christmas Day).

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

John Dean - 27 Oct 2006 23:41 GMT
>>> No, the cinemas here are closed...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> to get me to forgo a New Year's party.  I'd have done it for less, but
> don't tell my employers that.

Why not? I hate to be the one to break it, Graeme, but you're not going to
be their first choice for Y3K.
Signature

John Dean
Oxford

Sara Lorimer - 27 Oct 2006 23:53 GMT
> >In my experience, the movie theaters here in the US are _packed_ on
> >Christmas Day. I wonder why English theater owners don't try to get that
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Muriel since last Christmas[1] to go out to the cinema.  Then, too, we
> have to switch on the TV to see the Queen's Christmas Broadcast.

Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast. Then, after the large
and late lunch, we're filled with post-prandial loathing. Thus movies.
The entire family can go together, yet is not expected to make civil
conversation.

> Because of all that, it's difficult to get staff to work on Christmas
> Day.  They tend to want *lots* of overtime pay.

Ah. See, when I worked in a movie theater, I didn't have a say in such
things. We were told to work; we worked.

Signature

SML

Tony Cooper - 28 Oct 2006 01:14 GMT
>Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast.

What is the Queen's Christmas Broadcast all about?  I mean, is it
entertainment, discussion, state of the unio...err...kingdom, fireside
chat?  What?

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Robert Bannister - 28 Oct 2006 02:09 GMT
>>Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast.
>
> What is the Queen's Christmas Broadcast all about?  I mean, is it
> entertainment, discussion, state of the unio...err...kingdom, fireside
> chat?  What?

I don't think anyone's worked that out yet. They're too busy commenting
on her vowels, dress, hairstyle and awful family. Still, anus horribilis
sticks in the mind - I think that did come from one Xmas broadcast.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Graeme Thomas - 28 Oct 2006 02:28 GMT
>>Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast.
>
>What is the Queen's Christmas Broadcast all about?  I mean, is it
>entertainment, discussion, state of the unio...err...kingdom, fireside
>chat?  What?

I suppose someone who has listened to it would be able to give a better
answer, but it's a Christmas message to all the people of the
Commonwealth.  It has, I believe, become a lot more informal over the
years.  WIWAL HM the Q would dress up in her ballgown and would be
dripping with jewels while making a formal speech.  These days she does
a voice-over while pictures are shown, often of the Royal Family doing
Good Works or just relaxing.  The old accent (used by glaziers to cut
glass) has gone, to be replaced by something that could almost be
uttered by a normal human being.

WIWAL there was almost a compulsion to watch it.  It was shown on both
TV channels simultaneously, and broadcast on the wireless.  The whole
nation would stop while it was on.  That sort of thing sdoesn't seem to
happen any more.  Perhaps we ought to go back to the jewels and the
accent.
Signature

Graeme Thomas

the Omrud - 28 Oct 2006 09:57 GMT
Graeme Thomas <graeme@graemet.demon.co.uk> had it:

> >>Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> happen any more.  Perhaps we ought to go back to the jewels and the
> accent.

I'm astonished by the revelation that swathes of Americans are
watching HMQ on Christmas Day.  The UK population has largely stopped
bothering with it, you know.  It doesn't bother me (indeed, I'm a
weak monarchist), but we're not all Alf Garnett.  I think she used to
record it in August with general good wishes and unseasonal
decorations in the background, but it's now recorded much closer to
to the day.

I might catch the radio version during the day, but I'm far more
devoted to the Nine Lessons And Carols (Christmas Eve, of course).

Signature

David
=====

Donna Richoux - 30 Oct 2006 12:12 GMT
> I'm astonished by the revelation that swathes of Americans are
> watching HMQ on Christmas Day.  

I think your swathe was one person, Roland, and actually I don't know
where he's from. I read Sara as saying she agreed with him up to --
i.e., not through, but stopping before -- the Queen's Speech. (Which
speech is, of course, generally unknown and unavailable in the US --
Roland mentioned Internet).

I believe we've seen a pondal difference with "up to," right? The
British "up to" includes the thing, while the Americans have "up
through" for that.

Sometimes you have to know what was meant in order to know what was
meant.

Signature

Best -- Donna Richoux

the Omrud - 30 Oct 2006 12:21 GMT
Donna Richoux <trio@euronet.nl> had it:

> > I'm astonished by the revelation that swathes of Americans are
> > watching HMQ on Christmas Day.  
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> speech is, of course, generally unknown and unavailable in the US --
> Roland mentioned Internet).

I thought perhaps it might be on BBC World.

> I believe we've seen a pondal difference with "up to," right? The
> British "up to" includes the thing, while the Americans have "up
> through" for that.
>
> Sometimes you have to know what was meant in order to know what was
> meant.

Ah, right.  I thought Sara was saying she did watch the Queen's
speech but then did something different.

Signature

David
=====

Sara Lorimer - 30 Oct 2006 17:42 GMT
> Donna Richoux <trio@euronet.nl> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Ah, right.  I thought Sara was saying she did watch the Queen's
> speech but then did something different.

Nope, Donna had it right. I'd forgotten about the "up to" difference.
Signature

SML

R H Draney - 31 Oct 2006 16:43 GMT
Sara Lorimer filted:

>> Donna Richoux <trio@euronet.nl> had it:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Nope, Donna had it right. I'd forgotten about the "up to" difference.

Jay Leno made fun last night, during his "Headlines" segment, of what may have
been an instance of this difference...a newspaper had run a correction,
apologizing for saying that some event was to run from November 5th to the 9th,
when it actually should have been from November 5th through the 9th....r

Signature

"Keep your eye on the Bishop.  I want to know when
he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.

Roland Hutchinson - 30 Oct 2006 18:50 GMT
>> I'm astonished by the revelation that swathes of Americans are
>> watching HMQ on Christmas Day.
>
> I think your swathe was one person, Roland, and actually I don't know
> where he's from.

Born in SoCal, educated (university) in the Neighborhood of Boston and on
the Penninsula, now resident in Nova Caesarea, USA[1].  Have visited the UK
several times, mostly in connection with musical performance or research,
but never lived there.  Regard the Queen's speech as a curious cultural
artifact and have been known to watch it, though (to tell the truth) not to
make a regular yearly ritual of doing so.

[1] a/k/a "Joisey"

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Skitt - 30 Oct 2006 19:19 GMT
> Sometimes you have to know what was meant in order to know what was
> meant.

That's sig material.  Awesome!
Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
http://www.geocities.com/opus731/

Donna Richoux - 30 Oct 2006 21:50 GMT
> > Sometimes you have to know what was meant in order to know what was
> > meant.
>
> That's sig material.  Awesome!

Tautologies 'R' Us.
Robert Bannister - 28 Oct 2006 02:07 GMT
>>>In my experience, the movie theaters here in the US are _packed_ on
>>>Christmas Day. I wonder why English theater owners don't try to get that
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> The entire family can go together, yet is not expected to make civil
> conversation.

The way I see it is:
Firstly, Christmas dinner (ie lunch) is frequently served late at 2 or
even 3 pm.
Secondly, especially those of us with European backgrounds still stick
to the hot meal, even if it's 42° C outside, and so afterwards, no-one
wants to move.
Thirdly, after post-prandial snooze, it's almost traditional (in our
family, to play board games or) to watch "special Christmas editions" of
ancient TV programmes. It is a special torture to watch the SpChED of
some programme that everybody hates.

I think only once or twice ever did we do the more Aussie thing of
eating seafood outside. Mind you, we only ventured as far as the garden
rather than to the beach, and we still ended up playing board games and
watching truly terrible television.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Graeme Thomas - 28 Oct 2006 02:20 GMT
>> The UK Christmas is an extended family affair, with a traditional large
>> and late lunch.  We're too busy rediscovering why we haven't seen Aunt
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast. Then, after the large
>and late lunch, we're filled with post-prandial loathing.

Perhaps I misunderstood.  I was under the impression that you
Leftponders got all that post-prandial loathing over and done with at
Thanksgiving, leaving Christmas for a cosier session of disliking one's
immediate family.

>> Because of all that, it's difficult to get staff to work on Christmas
>> Day.  They tend to want *lots* of overtime pay.
>
>Ah. See, when I worked in a movie theater, I didn't have a say in such
>things. We were told to work; we worked.

As with many such things, things are changing here.  But until
relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the
emergency services, would be closed on Christmas Day.  Sure, police and
hospitals would be open, but nothing else.  (I recently listened to the
last part of a radio programme discussing a trans-Pennine canal tunnel.
The "mechanism" for ensuring that canal boats would not meet in the
middle was a chap who had the only key to the gates.  When a "convoy" of
boats had entered he would lock the gate, and then walk over the top to
the other end, where he'd let the boats out, and then let in any waiting
boats for the reverse journey.  He did this every day for 37 years, with
his only day of being Christmas Day.)

Signature

Graeme Thomas

Tony Cooper - 28 Oct 2006 02:31 GMT
>  He did this every day for 37 years, with
>his only day of being Christmas Day.)

Was his name Earnest?

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Robert Bannister - 28 Oct 2006 23:55 GMT
> As with many such things, things are changing here.  But until
> relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the
> emergency services, would be closed on Christmas Day.  Sure, police and
> hospitals would be open, but nothing else.

Huh! I remember taking my dumb sister to Hertford hospital on Xmas day
after she had somehow managed to cut herself badly with a wine glass. As
far as I could make out, all the doctors and nurses were drunk. I
thought my sister was going to bleed to death.

Of course, now I have 2 doctors and a nurse in the family, I think
differently about this (or else).
Signature

Rob Bannister

Paul Wolff - 29 Oct 2006 00:25 GMT
>> As with many such things, things are changing here.  But until
>> relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>Of course, now I have 2 doctors and a nurse in the family, I think
>differently about this (or else).

A few seconds' research suggests that Christmas Day and Good Friday have
a special status among public holidays in England-and-Wales in that they
are 'common law' holidays and as such are not, or were not, specified
among the bank holidays needing to be legislated for (in 1871?).  Their
status seems to derive from their being ancient (who remembers if they
go back to time immemorial?) religious holidays when everyone expected
to be away from work, without the need for any special acknowledgement.
At any rate, their acceptance as days otiose is deeply ingrained.
Signature

Paul
Not negotiable

Robert Bannister - 29 Oct 2006 01:00 GMT
>>> As with many such things, things are changing here.  But until
>>> relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> to be away from work, without the need for any special acknowledgement.
> At any rate, their acceptance as days otiose is deeply ingrained.

Prolly goes back to the Druids.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Don Aitken - 29 Oct 2006 01:24 GMT
>>>> As with many such things, things are changing here.  But until
>>>> relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Prolly goes back to the Druids.

In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is
fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as
the 1960s.

Signature

Don Aitken
Mail to the From: address is not read.
To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"

the Omrud - 29 Oct 2006 10:55 GMT
Don Aitken <don-aitken@freeuk.com> had it:

> In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is
> fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as
> the 1960s.

Although it was perhaps only in the 80s that commercial TV started to
show adverts on Christmas Day.

Signature

David
=====

Graeme Thomas - 29 Oct 2006 13:07 GMT
>In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is
>fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as
>the 1960s.

I suppose that public transport (did we use that term in the 60s?) was
seen as a "public service", and therefore necessary, in the same way
that police, fire brigade, and hospitals are necessary.  I quoted
upthread a case where a chap worked 364 days a year, his sole day off
being Christmas Day.  That would be in the mid- to late-1800s.  (The
radio programme where I heard this interviewed his very elderly
granddaughter.)
Signature

Graeme Thomas

Peter Duncanson - 29 Oct 2006 14:24 GMT
>>In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is
>>fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as
>>the 1960s.

But, it was a reduced service. If I remember correctly it was
reduced below the level of the reduced service normally operated on
Sundays.

>I suppose that public transport (did we use that term in the 60s?) was
>seen as a "public service", and therefore necessary, in the same way
>that police, fire brigade, and hospitals are necessary.  

Police, fire brigade, hospital and other essential workers had to
get to and from work somehow. Not all of them would have lived
within walking distance of their workplaces.

The increase of car ownership that began post-WWII eventually made
public transport on Christmas Day inessential.

>I quoted
>upthread a case where a chap worked 364 days a year, his sole day off
>being Christmas Day.  That would be in the mid- to late-1800s.  (The
>radio programme where I heard this interviewed his very elderly
>granddaughter.)
Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Robin Bignall - 29 Oct 2006 22:57 GMT
>>>>> As with many such things, things are changing here.  But until
>>>>> relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as
>the 1960s.

The Royal Mail worked on Christmas Day morning, at least in the 1950s.
The postmen did the sorting and the temps, mostly students, made the
deliveries.  I don't remember whether there was a Christmas Day
delivery in the early 1960s.  Sonia and I worked at the Mornington
Crescent sorting office 1961 through 1963, and we finished on
Christmas Eve.
Signature

Robin
Herts, England

Robert Bannister - 29 Oct 2006 23:56 GMT
> The Royal Mail worked on Christmas Day morning, at least in the 1950s.
> The postmen did the sorting and the temps, mostly students, made the
> deliveries.  I don't remember whether there was a Christmas Day
> delivery in the early 1960s.  Sonia and I worked at the Mornington
> Crescent sorting office 1961 through 1963, and we finished on
> Christmas Eve.

I worked as a temp approximately 1959-1964 at Hoddesdon post office,
both as a sorter and deliverer. I only remember working one Xmas
morning, and I'm fairly certain deliveries also stopped. It may have
coincided with the time they refused to continue employing me because
they discovered that, despite my being a student, they had to pay me a
full adult wage.
Signature

Rob Bannister

Paul Wolff - 30 Oct 2006 21:26 GMT
>>In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is
>>fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Crescent sorting office 1961 through 1963, and we finished on
>Christmas Eve.

I did Christmas temp work at the PO from 1961 to 1963 or 4 and confirm
that the regular postmen, or some of them, did talk about being in on
Christmas Day.  I seldom did mail delivery, being much more enjoyably
employed as a telegram delivery boy on me mo'orboike, for which I was
paid a supplementary mileage allowance (and any tips I could collect --
the local Greek shipping magnate was v. generous, with a ten-bob note,
and afterwards I became friendly with his number two son at University,
and he possessed banknotes of denominations I had only heard tell of,
besides a Triumph Spitfire).  The telegrams were printed on gummed tape
by a sort of ticker machine, after which they were stuck on to a regular
form or, if the consignor had paid extra, a special greetings card.
Signature

Paul
In bocca al Lupo!

Robert Bannister - 29 Oct 2006 23:51 GMT
> In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is
> fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as
> the 1960s.

That was something I didn't know. I always thought Western Australia was
even more austere than the UK when it came to Xmas Day (although Good
Friday is worse), but at least we do have some buses and trains. As it
used to be in Britain, it's more or less a Sunday service.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Sara Lorimer - 29 Oct 2006 18:34 GMT
> Perhaps I misunderstood.  I was under the impression that you
> Leftponders got all that post-prandial loathing over and done with at
> Thanksgiving, leaving Christmas for a cosier session of disliking one's
> immediate family.

We are a large and wealthy nation. We have enough post-prandial loathing
for second helpings all around. Even Julia Child liked it with
marshmallows on top... or am I confused?

Signature

SML

Roland Hutchinson - 27 Oct 2006 22:01 GMT
>>>>It would be regarded as posh to have goose, or some other
>>>>meat at Christmas. It would definitely be a way of showing one's
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> one of the very few kosher Chinese establishments. WIWAL we did worthy
> things like helping out in hospitals to give staff a break.

Ah, yes -- the traditional mitzvah of (you should pardon the expression)
being someone else's shabbes goy for a change: that is not unknown here,
either.  And of course one can also go and join, in a more-or-less
unofficial capacity, the celebrations of gentile friends and/or family
(though technically that might be viewed as bad form by those with
religious scruples against doing that sort of thing).

But cinemas closed!  The very idea seems downright un-American, it does.  In
more recent years it has even become the custom for major-studio films to
premier on Christmas Day (and by no means to exclusively Jewish audiences).

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

mUs1Ka - 27 Oct 2006 10:00 GMT
>>> It would be regarded as posh to have goose, or some other
>>> meat at Christmas. It would definitely be a way of showing one's
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> on Christmas Day (a kosher Chinese restaurant for the more strictly
> observant, of course).  Is there no such custom in the Movverland?

I wouldn't have thought there were enough Chinese restaurants in Israel.

Signature

Ray
UK

Peter Duncanson - 23 Oct 2006 18:04 GMT
>>> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>up the class spectrum than he thinks, particularly amongst the young and
>those who have got out of the habit of old-time food preparation.

Matthew, I was with you right up to the final clause.

I thought that in this thread we are using "frozen turkey" to mean a
whole turkey that has been frozen. The preparation and cooking of a
thawed frozen turkey is that same as for a fresh (unfrozen) turkey.

Your mention of those who are "out of the habit of old-time food
preparation" would be relevant to the use of a frozen pack of turkey
portions rather than a whole turkey.

http://www.tesco.com/superstore/product/shelf.aspx?shelfId=F43CB#
Click on the image for details.
Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

R H Draney - 23 Oct 2006 21:51 GMT
Peter Duncanson filted:

>>I'm not so sure as he is, however, that frozen turkies are so irredeemably naff
>>that you'd have to be a Sun-reading ITV-watcher (is that a bit old-fashioned?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>preparation" would be relevant to the use of a frozen pack of turkey
>portions rather than a whole turkey.

Someone is going to bring up this "new-time food preparation", so it might as
well be me:

 http://www.karenskitchen.com/a/recipe_deep_fried_turkey.htm

(Next time, the "turducken")....r

Signature

"Keep your eye on the Bishop.  I want to know when
he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.

Mike Lyle - 24 Oct 2006 19:17 GMT
[...]
> Someone is going to bring up this "new-time food preparation", so it might as
> well be me:
>
>   http://www.karenskitchen.com/a/recipe_deep_fried_turkey.htm

Terrifying. But would be more interesting if turkeys were worth eating.

Signature

Mike.

Default User - 24 Oct 2006 19:46 GMT
> [...]
> > Someone is going to bring up this "new-time food preparation", so
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Terrifying. But would be more interesting if turkeys were worth
> eating.

The fried turkeys are quite tasty. There are a few of problems:

1. Setting up a safe place to do it can be tricky.

2. Somebody has to delegated to watch the operation the entire time. As
this has to be performed outside, that's often not fun duty.

3. No nice turkey drippings for gravy.

Brian

Signature

If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

the Omrud - 23 Oct 2006 19:25 GMT
Matthew Huntbach <mmh@dcs.qmul.ac.uk> had it:

> >> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> I don't think there is any serious geographical barrier to having one if one
> wants.

That's what I was getting at.  All butchers and most supermarkets
have fresh turkeys at Christmas, but they vary from more expensive
than frozen to outrageously expensive.  Christmas is the only day we
would consider buying a whole turkey so we hang the expense and get
an outrageously expensive one.

There's no component of "showing" in this since we do not entertain
anybody at Christmas and we don't meet anybody we know at the
butchers.  It's simply the right thing to do.

> I'm not so sure as he is, however, that frozen turkies are so irredeemably naff
> that you'd have to be a Sun-reading ITV-watcher (is that a bit old-fashioned?
> I haven't caught up with the satellite/cable revolution in TV habits) to
> entertain the prospect of having one. I rather think it spreads further
> up the class spectrum than he thinks, particularly amongst the young and
> those who have got out of the habit of old-time food preparation.

I accept that's it's a general marker, rather than a guaranteed
indicator.

For the record, neither I, nor Wife, nor either of our pairs of
parents, have ever bought a frozen whole turkey.  But then we don't
buy frozen meat of any sort.  We buy it fresh and freeze it
ourselves.

Signature

David
=====

Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:09 GMT
> I'm not so sure as he is, however, that frozen turkies are so
> irredeemably naff
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> up the class spectrum than he thinks, particularly amongst the young and
> those who have got out of the habit of old-time food preparation.

I also wonder, as I do about the "fresh fish" I buy at the fishmonger's,
how many turkeys have, in fact, been defrosted by the butcher so that
they are ready on the day you pick them up. It is almost impossible to tell.

Signature

Rob Bannister

the Omrud - 24 Oct 2006 09:02 GMT
Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:

> > I'm not so sure as he is, however, that frozen turkies are so
> > irredeemably naff
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> how many turkeys have, in fact, been defrosted by the butcher so that
> they are ready on the day you pick them up. It is almost impossible to tell.

Any fish at the fish counter in our supermarket which as previously
been frozen is marked "previously frozen" on the price label.

Signature

David
=====

Alan Jones - 24 Oct 2006 09:11 GMT
> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Any fish at the fish counter in our supermarket which as previously
> been frozen is marked "previously frozen" on the price label.

I don't know about supermarkets, but restaurants and some fishmongers in
Wiltshire claim that they receive fresh fish from Cornwall each morning, and
the toing-and-froing of refrigerated delivery vans seems to confirm that
claim. (I say fishmongers, but it's usually high-class butchers that sell
fresh fish here - the specialist fishmonger is more or less defunct.)

Alan Jones
Mike Barnes - 24 Oct 2006 09:34 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Robert Bannister wrote:
>I also wonder, as I do about the "fresh fish" I buy at the
>fishmonger's, how many turkeys have, in fact, been defrosted by the
>butcher so that they are ready on the day you pick them up. It is
>almost impossible to tell.

In the UK it's illegal to describe previously-frozen meat or fish as
"fresh". Might the same be true there?

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Default User - 24 Oct 2006 18:21 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, Robert Bannister wrote:
> > I also wonder, as I do about the "fresh fish" I buy at the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> In the UK it's illegal to describe previously-frozen meat or fish as
> "fresh". Might the same be true there?

For poultry, the USDA has labeling regulations. "Fresh" has never been
below 26F. Below 0F it must be labeled "previously frozen". Birds
between those two points aren't required to have any particular
labeling, although they can't be called "fresh".

Brian

Signature

If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Robert Bannister - 25 Oct 2006 01:16 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, Robert Bannister wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> In the UK it's illegal to describe previously-frozen meat or fish as
> "fresh". Might the same be true there?

It is not necessary to append the word "fresh". My fishmonger simply
labels what kind of fish they are. I usually ask what is freshest.
Sometimes, I am told a particular fish was caught that morning;
sometimes, they tell me where the fish is from, and that makes me
suspect freezing. Even though it is quite possible to freight fish on
ice thousands of miles, I have my doubts.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Amethyst Deceiver - 24 Oct 2006 11:08 GMT
>>> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> having one
> if one wants.

We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We cycle
through boar, venison, duck and goose.

ObAUE: turkies?
dontbother - 24 Oct 2006 11:22 GMT
"Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote
[...]
> We never have turkey because they're very big for a small
> family. We cycle through boar, venison, duck and goose.
>
> ObAUE: turkies?

Turkeys. Like monkeys.

Signature

Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan.
Unmunged email: /at/easypeasy.com
"Impatience is the mother of misery."

Roland Hutchinson - 25 Oct 2006 07:14 GMT
> "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote
> [...]
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Turkeys. Like monkeys.

But do monkeys like turkeys?b

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Oleg Lego - 25 Oct 2006 15:52 GMT
The Roland Hutchinson entity posted thusly:

>> "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote
>> [...]
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
>But do monkeys like turkeys?b

Time flies like an arrow.
dontbother - 25 Oct 2006 17:12 GMT
> dontbother wrote:
>> "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> But do monkeys like turkeys?b

Only if the skin is crisp and roasted under a layer of Blackhawk
bacon.

Signature

Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan.
Unmunged email: /at/easypeasy.com
"Impatience is the mother of misery."

Robert Bannister - 26 Oct 2006 00:37 GMT
>>"Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote
>>[...]
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> But do monkeys like turkeys?b

Do pelicans like pigeons? (reference to recent newspaper report from St
Jame's Park)

Signature

Rob Bannister

Amethyst Deceiver - 25 Oct 2006 15:51 GMT
> "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote
> [...]
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Turkeys. Like monkeys.

I know that, but the post I was quoting (which you deleted) had "turkies".

Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

dontbother - 25 Oct 2006 17:11 GMT
> dontbother wrote:
>> "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> I know that, but the post I was quoting (which you deleted) had
> "turkies".

Sorry about that, Linz. I didn't know that it was you, and now I
can't dredge up the post I replied to without going to Google Groups.
I'll try to be more carefulll next time.

Signature

Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan.
Unmunged email: /at/easypeasy.com
"Impatience is the mother of misery."

Amethyst Deceiver - 26 Oct 2006 12:45 GMT
>> dontbother wrote:
>>> "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> can't dredge up the post I replied to without going to Google Groups.
> I'll try to be more carefulll next time.

Not to worry!

Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

Matthew Huntbach - 24 Oct 2006 13:11 GMT
>> But I think what David is getting at is
>> that People Like Us buy fresh turkies

> ObAUE: turkies?

Agreed, it's wrong. I'm not sure what got into me to use that as the plural,
it jumped out at me as wrong when I saw it quoted. Not that I ever recall
before needing to use the plural of "turkey".

Matthew Huntbach
Robert Bannister - 25 Oct 2006 01:20 GMT
>>> But I think what David is getting at is
>>> that People Like Us buy fresh turkies
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> it jumped out at me as wrong when I saw it quoted. Not that I ever recall
> before needing to use the plural of "turkey".

I've never done that with turkeys, but I have caught myself doing it to
trolleys and valleys - the latter would even worse.
Signature

Rob Bannister

Pat Durkin - 24 Oct 2006 19:51 GMT
>>>> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We
> cycle through boar, venison, duck and goose.

But aren't they all (except for the duck, and just maybe the goose)
bigger than the turkey?

Oh, I suppose you don't get the smoked turkey breasts or the frozen
wings or breasts or drumsticks sold separately, rather than entire bird.
Robert Bannister - 25 Oct 2006 01:22 GMT
> Oh, I suppose you don't get the smoked turkey breasts or the frozen
> wings or breasts or drumsticks sold separately, rather than entire bird.

Whenever I have bought turkey parts, I have found the meat a lot drier
than a whole turkey. I do, however, frequently buy minced turkey.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Amethyst Deceiver - 25 Oct 2006 15:53 GMT
>> We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We
>> cycle through boar, venison, duck and goose.
>
> But aren't they all (except for the duck, and just maybe the goose)
> bigger than the turkey?

Yes, but I can buy joints of deer and boar pretty easily.

> Oh, I suppose you don't get the smoked turkey breasts or the frozen
> wings or breasts or drumsticks sold separately, rather than entire
> bird.

Not as easily. I could get a crown but I'd rather have something I'll enjoy
eating.
Robert Bannister - 25 Oct 2006 01:19 GMT
> We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We cycle
> through boar, venison, duck and goose.

My mind boggles at the size of a turkey that is bigger than a pig, let
alone a deer, and most geese are about the same weight as a turkey.
However, I did enjoy the duck we had last Christmas. I didn't know how
to make orange sauce, so I used a bottle of Chinese plum sauce and added
orange zest and Cointreau, which was a considerable success.
Signature

Rob Bannister

Amethyst Deceiver - 25 Oct 2006 15:54 GMT
>> We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We
>> cycle through boar, venison, duck and goose.
>
> My mind boggles at the size of a turkey that is bigger than a pig, let
> alone a deer, and most geese are about the same weight as a turkey.

I've seen some very nice little pigs. And I can buy parts of pig rather than
a whole one.

> However, I did enjoy the duck we had last Christmas. I didn't know how
> to make orange sauce, so I used a bottle of Chinese plum sauce and
> added orange zest and Cointreau, which was a considerable success.

I'm getting a boned and stuffed duck this year, I think.

Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

R H Draney - 26 Oct 2006 01:53 GMT
Amethyst Deceiver filted:

>> My mind boggles at the size of a turkey that is bigger than a pig, let
>> alone a deer, and most geese are about the same weight as a turkey.
>
>I've seen some very nice little pigs. And I can buy parts of pig rather than
>a whole one.

I don't much care for the little ones...I find that one in three tastes of
straw....r

Signature

"Keep your eye on the Bishop.  I want to know when
he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.

Roland Hutchinson - 26 Oct 2006 04:58 GMT
> Amethyst Deceiver filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I don't much care for the little ones...I find that one in three tastes of
> straw....r

Well, there's no reason to get huffy.

(Or, for that matter, puffy.)

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

R J Valentine - 26 Oct 2006 05:20 GMT
} R H Draney wrote:
}
}> Amethyst Deceiver filted:
...
}>>I've seen some very nice little pigs. And I can buy parts of pig rather
}>>than a whole one.
}>
}> I don't much care for the little ones...I find that one in three tastes of
}> straw....r
}
} Well, there's no reason to get huffy.
}
} (Or, for that matter, puffy.)

You heard the one about the three little kittens, right?  Fluffy, Tuffy,
and Paderewski.  Fluffy was the fluffiest, Tuffy was the toughest, and
....

Signature

rjv

R H Draney - 26 Oct 2006 19:56 GMT
R J Valentine filted:

>} Well, there's no reason to get huffy.
>}
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>and Paderewski.  Fluffy was the fluffiest, Tuffy was the toughest, and
>....

I'm sure I've heard it before, but encountering the setup just now I had to work
out the punchline from context....

Thanks....r

Signature

"Keep your eye on the Bishop.  I want to know when
he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.

Mike Barnes - 26 Oct 2006 20:35 GMT
In alt.usage.english, R H Draney wrote:
>R J Valentine filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>had to work
>out the punchline from context....

I'm still wrestling with it.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Default User - 26 Oct 2006 22:35 GMT
> In alt.usage.english, R H Draney wrote:
> > R J Valentine filted:
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> I'm still wrestling with it.

I'd always heard it with puppies and Liberace. He was a pianist, you
know.

Brian

Signature

If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Mike Page - 27 Oct 2006 14:40 GMT
>> We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We cycle
>> through boar, venison, duck and goose.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>to make orange sauce, so I used a bottle of Chinese plum sauce and added
>orange zest and Cointreau, which was a considerable success.

Just stick on a couple of spoonfuls of marmalade about 20mins
before the duck is done. You can thin down the marmalade with a
bit of port and use it as a glaze if you like. Use home made or
Cooper's Oxford rather than Golden Shred (shudder).

Mike 'just on my lunch break' Page
Robert Bannister - 28 Oct 2006 00:07 GMT
>>>We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We cycle
>>>through boar, venison, duck and goose.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> bit of port and use it as a glaze if you like. Use home made or
> Cooper's Oxford rather than Golden Shred (shudder).

Marmalade and port sounds good. I wonder whether that would mix with
plum sauce and Cointreau for double impact.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Default User - 23 Oct 2006 08:33 GMT
> > > "Roast dinner" consists of roast meat (chicken, beef, pork, lamb),
> > > potatoes in some form (roast, mashed, boiled - not so often chips)
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> any other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then
> it's an affront to the cooks to call it "lunch".

I'd never really heard either term, "roast dinner" or "Christmas
lunch". Then tonight I watched a Gordon Ramsay show, "The F Word",
where both were used. Now, I'm sure that having read about them here
sensitized me, but interesting anyway.

Brian
Signature

If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Robert Bannister - 23 Oct 2006 01:29 GMT
> Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> "Roast meat with salad" is just a description of what you can see on  
> a plate - it's not a standard meal.

Moreover, I would suspect cold roast meat if it were with salad. Mind
you, I've just been reading a Julian May fantasy, and she has some very
strange concoctions: one that struck me was "hot buttered malt with
honey" - I couldn't work out whether it was like Tibetan tea with whisky
or like that stuff we used eat out of a jar when we were kids.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Wood Avens - 23 Oct 2006 09:44 GMT
>I've just been reading a Julian May fantasy, and she has some very
>strange concoctions: one that struck me was "hot buttered malt with
>honey" - I couldn't work out whether it was like Tibetan tea with whisky
>or like that stuff we used eat out of a jar when we were kids.

Malt loaf?

Signature

Katy Jennison

spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @

the Omrud - 23 Oct 2006 19:27 GMT
Wood Avens <woodavens@askjennison.com> had it:

> >I've just been reading a Julian May fantasy, and she has some very
> >strange concoctions: one that struck me was "hot buttered malt with
> >honey" - I couldn't work out whether it was like Tibetan tea with whisky
> >or like that stuff we used eat out of a jar when we were kids.
>
> Malt loaf?

Extract of Malt was, of course, Roo's "Strengthening Medicine".  And
not just "when we were kids" - I've got some in the cupboard now.

Signature

David
=====

Mike Lyle - 23 Oct 2006 19:30 GMT
> Wood Avens <woodavens@askjennison.com> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Extract of Malt was, of course, Roo's "Strengthening Medicine".  And
> not just "when we were kids" - I've got some in the cupboard now.

Any chance you could post the recipe for hot buttered extract of malt
with honey? This I must try.

Signature

Mike.

Wood Avens - 23 Oct 2006 20:03 GMT
>> Wood Avens <woodavens@askjennison.com> had it:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Any chance you could post the recipe for hot buttered extract of malt
>with honey? This I must try.

I tell you what, it'd be delicious poured over ice cream.

Signature

Katy Jennison

spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @

Robin Bignall - 23 Oct 2006 23:14 GMT
>> Wood Avens <woodavens@askjennison.com> had it:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>Any chance you could post the recipe for hot buttered extract of malt
>with honey? This I must try.

Why not try putting all three ingredients into a pan, heating it
gently, and seeing what happens?  I imagine important things like
gunpowder were discovered that way.
Signature

Robin
Herts, England

Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:19 GMT
>>I've just been reading a Julian May fantasy, and she has some very
>>strange concoctions: one that struck me was "hot buttered malt with
>>honey" - I couldn't work out whether it was like Tibetan tea with whisky
>>or like that stuff we used eat out of a jar when we were kids.
>
> Malt loaf?

I don't know and can't even guess what that is. Solidified beer?

Signature

Rob Bannister

Graeme Thomas - 24 Oct 2006 02:04 GMT
>> Malt loaf?
>>
>I don't know and can't even guess what that is. Solidified beer?

I'm not quite sure how I'd describe it.  It's somewhere between a cake
and a very rich bread.  It's dark in colour.  The best-known brand in
the UK is Soreen.  It's eaten sliced fairly thinly (like bread), and
buttered.  I don't suppose having some honey on it would go amiss.

WIWAL a friend (or, I suppose, his mother) bought some malt loaf that
had gone mouldy.  When she complained about it at the shop they
apologized, and gave her two loaves in compensation, and a good time was
had by all.  A couple of weeks later a chap in a van delivered a large
case of the stuff.  The complaint had obviously reached Soreen, and
they'd sent the case (of, I think, 72 loaves).

This batch quickly exceeded their capacity for eating it.  (Elsewhere on
this thread we've seen that many of the complaints about meat loaf stem
from the fact that it keeps on the menu for days on end.)  They gave it
to friends and neighbours.  They discovered that the dog didn't care for
it.  The batch lasted for months, and yet it never went mouldy.  When
last I hear they were still wondering what went wrong with the original
loaf.

Signature

Graeme Thomas

Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 02:26 GMT
>>>Malt loaf?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the UK is Soreen.  It's eaten sliced fairly thinly (like bread), and
> buttered.  I don't suppose having some honey on it would go amiss.

I am a dummy. Must have been a brain-glitch. I remember it now. Not
something I would normally eat, but it's sweetish: a bit like raisin
bread without the fruit. I think people often toast it.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Graeme Thomas - 22 Oct 2006 16:37 GMT
>What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat
>with salad," in BrE?

Without further context it's difficult to be sure.

A roast dinner will comprise slices of roast meat, roast potatoes, and a
couple of other vegetables.  There will almost certainly be a starter (=
AmE: "appetizer") and a pudding or dessert.

A "roast meat with salad" is a large mixed salad with cold roast meat,
served as one dish.  It's normally referred to just by the name of the
meat, as in "beef salad", or "chicken salad".  The salad will be lettuce
(or rocket, or similar leaf), tomato, and (most of) cucumber, celery,
radish, (spring) onion, and perhaps other things.

>Is it just in quantity and the presence of salad?:-)

That's part of it, sure, but the salad is just one course, albeit the
main one, whereas the roast dinner is the whole meal, with two or three
courses.

Signature

Graeme Thomas

Buckwheat Soba - 22 Oct 2006 16:17 GMT
>>What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat
>>with salad," in BrE?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> couple of other vegetables.  There will almost certainly be a starter (=
> AmE: "appetizer") and a pudding or dessert.

It just occurred to me that in AmE, SFAIK, no one would use the
term "appetizer" other than in a restaurantic context.  MIJM.

> A "roast meat with salad" is a large mixed salad with cold roast meat,
> served as one dish.  It's normally referred to just by the name of the
> meat, as in "beef salad", or "chicken salad".  The salad will be lettuce
> (or rocket,

= ModAmE "arugula".

Signature

Buckwheat Soba

Robert Bannister - 23 Oct 2006 01:35 GMT
> That's part of it, sure, but the salad is just one course, albeit the
> main one, whereas the roast dinner is the whole meal, with two or three
> courses.

I really don't understand this, unless you are using "course" in an
unfamiliar way. How can you have something being "the whole meal, with 2
or 3 courses"? If it is the whole meal, that's it; if there are several
courses, then the whole meal consists of those. Cold meat and salad
could be the main course of a three-course meal or it could be all
you're getting.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Graeme Thomas - 23 Oct 2006 02:28 GMT
>> That's part of it, sure, but the salad is just one course, albeit the
>> main one, whereas the roast dinner is the whole meal, with two or three
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>could be the main course of a three-course meal or it could be all
>you're getting.

Brevis esse laboro, obscurus fio, as me old pal Horace used to say.

If I were offered a "roast dinner", I would expect a 2 or 3 course meal,
with the "meat and two veg" the central part of it.  If, on the other
hand, I were offered a "roast meat salad", then I'd expect just the cold
meat and salad.  There could be other things, of course, but they
wouldn't have been offered.  (I once had an amazing three course meal
that came with seven courses.  The restaurant has long since closed, now
doubt for financial reasons.)

Signature

Graeme Thomas

Alan Jones - 22 Oct 2006 18:08 GMT
> Hello:
>
> What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat
> with salad," in BrE?
>
> Is it just in quantity and the presence of salad?:-)

If I were promised a "roast dinner" I should look forward to slices of roast
meat served with potatoes (probably both boiled and roast) and other
vegetables. There would be traditional accompaniments such as Yorkshire
pudding and horseradish sauce with beef, apple sauce with pork and so on. A
rich gravy would be served rather than some more elaborate sauce.  I think
there would be the implied promise of a pudding for "afters" - apple pie
especially - and perhaps one would also get a "starter" such as prawn
cocktail. That's what you'd expect at an ordinarily decent pub in Wiltshire
for Sunday lunch, and it's what many would eat in their own homes if they
could summon up the energy to prepare and cook it and do the enormous amount
of washing-up it would entail.

"A roast meat" suggests perhaps just the meat without the rest of what I've
described, though perhaps with a small serving of a chef-type sauce and with
a salad served separately. The meal would be, at its best, elegant rather
than hearty: lower calorie and less work.

Alan Jones
Marius Hancu - 22 Oct 2006 22:07 GMT
I think I was parked in the right area:-)

Thank you all.

Marius Hancu
Stuart Chapman - 23 Oct 2006 09:50 GMT
>> Hello:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> If I were promised a "roast dinner" I should look forward to slices of roast
> meat served with potatoes (probably both boiled and roast) and other

Boiled AND roasted? Hmm. Reminds me of a story my mother has. She went
to a restaurant which advertised three vegetables as part of the dish.
Out came baked potato, mash potato, and chips.

> vegetables. There would be traditional accompaniments such as Yorkshire
> pudding and horseradish sauce with beef, apple sauce with pork and so on. A
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> could summon up the energy to prepare and cook it and do the enormous amount
> of washing-up it would entail.

Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're
served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and Crepes
Suzette. AIKI, a prawn cocktail consists of fairly dodgy defrosted
school prawns, served on a bed of iceberg lettuce and drowned in
Thousand Island Dressing. There will be a wedge of lemon to go with it,
and if you're lucky, a sprig of parsley. ISTR they were oftenly served
in a stemmed, conical steel cup.

Its not what I would expect as decent pub fare in Wiltshire or
elsewhere, unless the pub really is 'ordinarily' decent.

Stupot
Evan Kirshenbaum - 23 Oct 2006 16:16 GMT
> Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're
> served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> to go with it, and if you're lucky, a sprig of parsley. ISTR they
> were oftenly served in a stemmed, conical steel cup.

What you're describing sounds more like (a not very appetizing) Shrimp
Louie.  An American shrimp cocktail canonically consists of six or
eight large shrimp (large enough that you can pick them up by their
tails and could conceivably get more than one bite out of them),
chilled, typically with the tail on, served hanging over the edge of a
cocktail glass (or a similar special-purpose glass dish) with a
serving of "cocktail sauce" (basically ketchup and horseradish, maybe
worcestershire sauce or tabasco sauce) next to them (not on them), and
a wedge of lemon.

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |"You can't prove it *isn't* so!" is
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |as good as Q.E.D. in folk logic--as
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |though it were necessary to submit
                                      |a piece of the moon to chemical
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com             |analysis before you could be sure
   (650)857-7572                      |that it was not made of green
                                      |cheese.
   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/        |           Bergen Evans

Mike Lyle - 23 Oct 2006 18:27 GMT
> > Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're
> > served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> worcestershire sauce or tabasco sauce) next to them (not on them), and
> a wedge of lemon.

Remember the Pondial difference: your shrimp are Br prawns, while Br
shrimp are probably not regarded as human food over there -- they're so
small that they aren't all that common in Br, either, though I think
somebody or other said they taste better, and I believe they're used
ground up (shell and all) in some dishes or preparations.

The prawn cocktail is making a comeback after its decline from a high
point in the 60s or 70s. We, however, have never stopped having it as
hors d'oeuvre for our Christmas dinner/lunch/meal/grub, with avocado,
sauce aurore, and lemon wedge; there may conceivably be a faint ironic
smirk around, but basically we just like it. Borscht, goose and stuff,
then the usual stuff.

Signature

Mike.

Skitt - 23 Oct 2006 18:37 GMT
> Remember the Pondial difference: your shrimp are Br prawns, while Br
> shrimp are probably not regarded as human food over there -- they're
> so small that they aren't all that common in Br, either, though I
> think somebody or other said they taste better, and I believe they're
> used ground up (shell and all) in some dishes or preparations.

Rock shrimp rock!

http://sarasota.extension.ufl.edu/fcs/FlaFoodFare/RkShrimp.htm
Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
http://www.geocities.com/opus731/

Mike Lyle - 23 Oct 2006 19:46 GMT
> > Remember the Pondial difference: your shrimp are Br prawns, while Br
> > shrimp are probably not regarded as human food over there -- they're
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Skitt (in Hayward, California)
> http://www.geocities.com/opus731/

I wondered if it would be the same as our rock lobster, or crayfish,
but it isn't. No point in my quoting from the web except for the name:
"The Southern rock lobster is one of only two species of the family
Jasus found in Tasmanian waters". Presumably baptised by a surprised
Irish migrant.

But check out a good old Aussie bug:
http://images.google.com.au/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&cr=countryAU&ie=ISO-8859-1
&q=moreton+bay+bug&btnG=Search

or
http://tinyurl.com/y5dvkq

Signature

Mike.

Tony Cooper - 23 Oct 2006 23:02 GMT
>I wondered if it would be the same as our rock lobster, or crayfish,
>but it isn't. No point in my quoting from the web except for the name:
>"The Southern rock lobster is one of only two species of the family
>Jasus found in Tasmanian waters". Presumably baptised by a surprised
>Irish migrant.

The International Brotherhood of Wholesale Fishmongers or somesuch has
tried mightily in Florida to get the term "rock lobster" off Florida
menus.  They want restauranteurs to use "langouste" or "sea crayfish"
to protect the image of the genuine Homaridae, genus Homarus, beast.

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Paul Wolff - 23 Oct 2006 21:23 GMT
>> Remember the Pondial difference: your shrimp are Br prawns, while Br
>> shrimp are probably not regarded as human food over there -- they're
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>http://sarasota.extension.ufl.edu/fcs/FlaFoodFare/RkShrimp.htm

Br shrimps (with an 's') seem to like Lancashire, especially shallow
sandy bays like Morecambe and Southport. It seems that there are brown
ones and the rest; the former are the best for potting in butter (15oz
shrimps to 12oz butter).  I'd guess, from memory, that after peeling,
topping and tailing the edible remains are about 1cm long.  Potted
shrimps are a delight eaten on thin toast.

More at:
http://www.waitrose.com/food_drink/wfi/foodissues/campaigns/0106036.asp

You can tell a clothed shrimp from a prawn (I'd say 'shelled' if it
didn't mean the opposite of what I want it to mean) by the way the
carapace segments overlap.  The outermost segment in a shrimp is midway
along the body.
Signature

Paul
In bocca al Lupo!

John Holmes - 29 Oct 2006 07:35 GMT
> You can tell a clothed shrimp from a prawn (I'd say 'shelled' if it
> didn't mean the opposite of what I want it to mean) by the way the
> carapace segments overlap.  The outermost segment in a shrimp is
> midway along the body.

Yes, see diagram on page 2 here:
http://www.museum.vic.gov.au/Infosheets/10295.pdf

Signature

Regards
John
for mail: my initials plus a u e
at tpg dot com dot au

TsuiDF - 23 Oct 2006 21:11 GMT
> Remember the Pondial difference: your shrimp are Br prawns, while Br
> shrimp are probably not regarded as human food over there -- they're so
> small that they aren't all that common in Br, either, though I think
> somebody or other said they taste better, and I believe they're used
> ground up (shell and all) in some dishes or preparations.

Mmmm, yummm, somebody mention Morecambe Bay potted shrimps?  Potted in
little ramekins or whatever the correct term is for little dishes for
which I can think of few other uses, in butter flavoured with nutmeg
and -- other stuff.  Undoubtedly highly calorific and completely
delightful.  Particularly when enjoyed overlooking a Lake (as in
District) on a summer's day.

Yummy in a similar fashion over here are 'crevettes grises',
traditionally served in a tomato -- but with lashings of mayonnaise,
not as spicy as the Morecambe stuff.

cheers,
Stephanie
in Brussels
Nick Atty - 23 Oct 2006 21:36 GMT
>>> Hello:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>Boiled AND roasted?

Well the boiled - as well as adding contrast - provide nice starchy
water for making gravy.
Signature

On-line canal route planner: http://www.canalplan.org.uk

(Waterways World site of the month, April 2001)
My Reply-To address *is* valid, though likely to die soon

Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:24 GMT
> Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're
> served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and Crepes
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> and if you're lucky, a sprig of parsley. ISTR they were oftenly served
> in a stemmed, conical steel cup.

In the good old days, the three prawns were padded out with "seafood
filler" (crab flavoured fish). Can I add Chicken Kiev to that list?
Signature

Rob Bannister

Stuart Chapman - 24 Oct 2006 10:19 GMT
>> Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're
>> served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and Crepes
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> In the good old days, the three prawns were padded out with "seafood
> filler" (crab flavoured fish). Can I add Chicken Kiev to that list?

Ah yes, the infamous seafood extender, as I know it. It's meant to be
bad, but I have a perverse appreciation of this product, as do the Japanese:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seafood_extender

I have actually thought of writing a cookbook for this stuff.

Stupot
Robert Bannister - 25 Oct 2006 01:23 GMT
>>> Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're
>>> served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> bad, but I have a perverse appreciation of this product, as do the
> Japanese:

Confession time? OK, I like it too, and recently I've been able to
obtain some Japanese crab and lobster flavoured stuff that is even
better. I like extender and prawns in a sandwich for lunch.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Mike Barnes - 23 Oct 2006 09:45 GMT
In alt.usage.english, Marius Hancu wrote:
>What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat
>with salad," in BrE?

"Dinner" is a meal; "meat with salad" is a course.

"Roast dinner" is a traditional British meal, often of three courses.
The main course consists of hot roast meat (beef, lamb, pork, chicken,
turkey, etc) served sliced, with roast potatoes, possibly boiled
potatoes, and two or more additional vegetables (peas, carrots, Brussels
sprouts, parsnips, etc) and a rich gravy. Other traditional
accompaniments include Yorkshire pudding and horseradish sauce (with
beef), mint sauce (with lamb), crackling and apple sauce (with pork),
herb stuffing (with chicken), etc. I'm sure you get the idea.

Roast dinner is traditionally served in the middle of the day, even in
areas such as the south of England where the word "dinner" normally
refers to the evening meal. It's especially common as a family meal on
Sundays and (especially with turkey) on Christmas Day.

"Roast meat with salad" is a comparatively simple affair, just sliced
cold sliced roast meat (=AmE "cold cuts") with a salad consisting of
lettuce, tomato, cucumber, spring onions (=AmE "scallions"), etc.

Those formulae would have been strictly adhered to in, say, the 1960s.
With today's very different lifestyles and the availability of more
exotic ingredients, there's a great deal of variation.

Signature

Mike Barnes
Cheshire, England

Buckwheat Soba - 23 Oct 2006 12:33 GMT
> "Roast meat with salad" is a comparatively simple affair, just sliced
> cold sliced roast meat (=AmE "cold cuts")

In my dialect, at least, only a subset of "cold cuts" would be describable
as "cold sliced roast meat".

Signature

Buckwheat Soba

Philip Eden - 23 Oct 2006 13:57 GMT
"Mike Barnes" <mikebarnes@bluebottle.com> wrote :
> In alt.usage.english, Marius Hancu wrote:
>>What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> cold sliced roast meat (=AmE "cold cuts") with a salad consisting of
> lettuce, tomato, cucumber, spring onions (=AmE "scallions"), etc.

All agreed. I would simply add that while a "roast dinner" is traditionally
served as a midday meal on Sundays, "roast meat with salad" is what
you get on Mondays.

Philip Eden
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.