Roast dinner/roast meat with salad
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Marius Hancu - 22 Oct 2006 15:46 GMT Hello:
What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat with salad," in BrE?
Is it just in quantity and the presence of salad?:-)
Thank you. Marius Hancu
the Omrud - 22 Oct 2006 16:35 GMT Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it:
> Hello: > > What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat > with salad," in BrE? > > Is it just in quantity and the presence of salad?:-) "Roast dinner" consists of roast meat (chicken, beef, pork, lamb), potatoes in some form (roast, mashed, boiled - not so often chips) and one or two types of traditional vegetable (carrots, peas, leeks, cabbage). There will almost certainly be gravy and there may be stuffing or Yorkshire pudding.
"Roast meat with salad" is just a description of what you can see on a plate - it's not a standard meal.
 Signature David =====
John Dean - 22 Oct 2006 16:38 GMT > Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > "Roast meat with salad" is just a description of what you can see on > a plate - it's not a standard meal. And the roast dinner is likely to be hot while the roast meat with salad isn't.
 Signature John Dean Oxford
Mike Lyle - 22 Oct 2006 16:53 GMT > > Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it: > > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > And the roast dinner is likely to be hot while the roast meat with salad > isn't. Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even in families which don't have their main meal at about one o'clock on any other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then it's an affront to the cooks to call it "lunch".
 Signature Mike.
Jeffrey Turner - 22 Oct 2006 18:20 GMT >>>Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it: >>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then it's an > affront to the cooks to call it "lunch". I don't know about "lunch," but a "luncheon" can be quite an affair.
--Jeff
 Signature Not ignorance, but ignorance of ignorance, is the death of knowledge. -Alfred North Whitehead
Mike Lyle - 22 Oct 2006 18:27 GMT > >>>Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it: > >>> [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > I don't know about "lunch," but a "luncheon" can be quite an affair. Ah, but "a luncheon" is to "lunch" as "a dinner" is to "dinner", if not more so.
 Signature Mike.
John Dean - 22 Oct 2006 23:12 GMT >>> Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it: >>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > any other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then > it's an affront to the cooks to call it "lunch". Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a Southern softie big jessie affectation.
 Signature John Dean Oxford
Mike Lyle - 23 Oct 2006 00:03 GMT [...]
> > Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I > > maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a > Southern softie big jessie affectation. Yes, strange that, coming from a group so effete that they call supper by the ladylike term "tea".
 Signature Mike.
Matthew Huntbach - 23 Oct 2006 09:23 GMT >>> Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I >>> maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even >>> in families which don't have their main meal at about one o'clock on >>> any other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then >>> it's an affront to the cooks to call it "lunch".
>> Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a >> Southern softie big jessie affectation.
> Yes, strange that, coming from a group so effete that they call supper > by the ladylike term "tea". Also usage amongst the southern working class.
Matthew Huntbach
Matthew Huntbach - 23 Oct 2006 09:21 GMT >> Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I >> maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even >> in families which don't have their main meal at about one o'clock on >> any other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then >> it's an affront to the cooks to call it "lunch".
> Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a > Southern softie big jessie affectation. As ever, northerners believe the south consists solely of middle class people.
What you describe as usage "Oop North" is just as much usage down south for working class people.
Matthew Huntbach
Mike Barnes - 23 Oct 2006 09:48 GMT In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:
>> Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a >> Southern softie big jessie affectation. > >As ever, northerners believe the south consists solely of middle class people. Isn't that what John just said?
 Signature Mike Barnes Cheshire, England
Matthew Huntbach - 23 Oct 2006 11:41 GMT > In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:
>>> Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a >>> Southern softie big jessie affectation.
>> As ever, northerners believe the south consists solely of middle class people.
> Isn't that what John just said? "Breakfast, dinner and tea" are the names of the three main meals for millions of southerners. Why is is that so many northerners seem not to know that? Why is it that what is actually working class usage in the south as well as the north, in many other things as well, is so often described as "northern"?
Matthew Huntbach
Nick Spalding - 23 Oct 2006 11:50 GMT Matthew Huntbach wrote, in <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610231136060.731@frank.dcs.qmul.ac.uk> on Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:41:08 +0100:
>> In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >as the north, in many other things as well, is so often described as >"northern"? Come hither friends, be warned by me That breakfast, dinner, lunch and tea Are all the human frame requires. With that the wretched boy expires.
 Signature Nick Spalding
Mike Barnes - 23 Oct 2006 14:46 GMT In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:
>> In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >"Breakfast, dinner and tea" are the names of the three main meals for millions >of southerners. Why is is that so many northerners seem not to know that? Surely you're not casting John in the role of the northerner that doesn't know that? But if not him, who?
It looks to me as if John was making a point rather similar to your point about northerners, but humorously.
 Signature Mike Barnes Cheshire, England
Matthew Huntbach - 23 Oct 2006 17:16 GMT > In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote: >>> In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote:
>>>>> Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, >>>>> merely as a Southern softie big jessie affectation.
>>>> As ever, northerners believe the south consists solely of middle >>>> class people.
>>> Isn't that what John just said?
>> "Breakfast, dinner and tea" are the names of the three main meals for millions >> of southerners. Why is is that so many northerners seem not to know that?
> Surely you're not casting John in the role of the northerner that > doesn't know that? But if not him, who? > > It looks to me as if John was making a point rather similar to your > point about northerners, but humorously. As it's my own backgriound, I've always been irritated by the way the southern working class are written out of existence. I don't find it amusing, because there's actually a lot of issues about being working class in a predominantly middle class area which just don't get properly dealt with because they don't fit in with people's stereotypes. How'd you like it if you were constantly told by popular culture that you don't exist?
Matthew Huntbach
Richard Bollard - 25 Oct 2006 05:59 GMT [...]
>As it's my own backgriound, I've always been irritated by the way the >southern working class are written out of existence. I don't find it >amusing, because there's actually a lot of issues about being working class >in a predominantly middle class area which just don't get properly dealt >with because they don't fit in with people's stereotypes. How'd you like >it if you were constantly told by popular culture that you don't exist? Ask a Tasmanian of aboriginal descent.
 Signature Richard Bollard Canberra Australia
To email, I'm at AMT not spAMT.
the Omrud - 25 Oct 2006 08:41 GMT Richard Bollard <richardb@spamt.edu.au> had it:
> [...] > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > > Ask a Tasmanian of aboriginal descent. obBookReview: Mum gave me the novel "English Passengers" which in part chronicles the end of the Tasmanian natives, and which I found excellent after a rather slow start.
 Signature David =====
Robert Bannister - 26 Oct 2006 00:36 GMT > obBookReview: Mum gave me the novel "English Passengers" which in > part chronicles the end of the Tasmanian natives, and which I found > excellent after a rather slow start. Would you care to rephrase that? I don't think you really felt the end of the Tasmanian natives was excellent, even if their end started slowly.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Robin Bignall - 26 Oct 2006 22:19 GMT >> obBookReview: Mum gave me the novel "English Passengers" which in >> part chronicles the end of the Tasmanian natives, and which I found >> excellent after a rather slow start. >> >Would you care to rephrase that? I don't think you really felt the end >of the Tasmanian natives was excellent, even if their end started slowly. Well, it would mean that if David didn't have that 'and' before his final 'which'. "Novel which...., and which...."
 Signature Robin Herts, England
the Omrud - 27 Oct 2006 22:50 GMT Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
> > obBookReview: Mum gave me the novel "English Passengers" which in > > part chronicles the end of the Tasmanian natives, and which I found > > excellent after a rather slow start. > > > Would you care to rephrase that? I don't think you really felt the end > of the Tasmanian natives was excellent, even if their end started slowly. Does it mean that? I don't think it does.
 Signature David =====
T.H. Entity - 28 Oct 2006 18:09 GMT >Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it: > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Does it mean that? I don't think it does. Nor do I. The only Oy!-worthy thing I see is that you need a comma after "Passengers" (unless there are several novels called "English Passengers" but only one that doesn't chronicles the end of the natives). The "and" makes it clear that both relatives refer to the same antecedent.
-- THE
"If you or I use a word inappropriately, that's an error. If a newspaper uses a word inappropriately, that's a citation source for the dictionaries." -- Peter Moylan
Robert Bannister - 28 Oct 2006 23:51 GMT >>Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it: >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > natives). The "and" makes it clear that both relatives refer to the > same antecedent. Of course, I didn't write "Oy". It was only small quip. Tom Holt wrote something like "God only created humans because he wanted a straight man".
 Signature Rob Bannister
Oleg Lego - 23 Oct 2006 15:53 GMT The Matthew Huntbach entity posted thusly:
>> In alt.usage.english, Matthew Huntbach wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >as the north, in many other things as well, is so often described as >"northern"? I find it strange that a country so small that turkeys can be safely shipped fresh from the ends of it, could have north/south animosity.
Mike Lyle - 23 Oct 2006 17:49 GMT > The Matthew Huntbach entity posted thusly: > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > I find it strange that a country so small that turkeys can be safely > shipped fresh from the ends of it, could have north/south animosity. Hell, man, there are _villages_ that have compass-point animosity! You only need a population of two. Or, in extreme cases, one.
 Signature Mike.
Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:00 GMT >>> Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I >>> maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > As ever, northerners believe the south consists solely of middle class > people. Still, to be fair, many of "our" lot think all Northerners are either coal miners, sheep herders or mill workers. My grandfather (on the dreaded Lancashire side of the family) owned a cotton mill until he went bust in the 30s. Alas for riches lost.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Mike Page - 26 Oct 2006 21:02 GMT ...>
>Problem doesn't arise Oop North. "lunch" is not known as a meal, merely as a >Southern softie big jessie affectation. Well, tha's wrong there. When I were a grave digger in Lincoln in the late 1960s, 'lunch' was the snack taken at about 9:00. We started work at 07:30, knocked off for 'breakfast' at 08:00 for a quarter of an hour. We had a tea break about eleven, dinner from 12:00 to 13:00 and another tea break in the afternoon. Trade unions were a wonderful thing.
Mike Page
LFS - 26 Oct 2006 21:14 GMT > ...> > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > 12:00 to 13:00 and another tea break in the afternoon. Trade > unions were a wonderful thing. I am mildly intrigued: how many graves got dug in the short pauses between all these breaks?
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Robin Bignall - 26 Oct 2006 22:27 GMT >> ...> >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >I am mildly intrigued: how many graves got dug in the short pauses >between all these breaks? That must have been the Amalgamated Union of Entombers, an early AUE manifestation.
 Signature Robin Herts, England
Mike Page - 27 Oct 2006 14:37 GMT >> ...> >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >I am mildly intrigued: how many graves got dug in the short pauses >between all these breaks? The job was mainly gardening and tidying up. There wasn't much trade in the Summer when I was working there. We were given an allowance of only two hours to dig a grave, but it was nice outdoor work and I've always enjoyed 'working with people'.
Mike 'just on my lunch break' Page
Robert Bannister - 23 Oct 2006 01:31 GMT >>>Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it: >>> [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then it's an > affront to the cooks to call it "lunch". Because someone usually underestimates the size of turkey or forgets how long it will take to thaw, Christmas dinner is frequently delayed to as late as 3 pm, so goodness knows which meal that makes it.
 Signature Rob Bannister
the Omrud - 23 Oct 2006 08:52 GMT Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
> > Which brings me, as night follows day, to Christmas "lunch". I > > maintain, in the teeth of some deeply entrenched practice, that even in [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > long it will take to thaw, Christmas dinner is frequently delayed to as > late as 3 pm, so goodness knows which meal that makes it. Thaw? I bet there aren't many Brits here who buy a frozen turkey for Christmas. Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a certain class.
 Signature David =====
Tony Cooper - 23 Oct 2006 14:30 GMT >Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it: > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >Christmas. Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a >certain class. I really don't understand this comment. Do Brits of a certain class not buy a turkey for Christmas, or do Brits of a certain class not buy a frozen turkey for Christmas?
It seems like you mean the latter, but that would mean that unfrozen vs frozen is somehow a class indicator. In the US, only frozen turkeys are available in areas where turkeys are not locally raised and slaughtered. Fresh doesn't ship well.
I don't really know if it's possible to buy an unfrozen turkey in this area. ("Unfrozen" to mean a live turkey that would be slaughtered by the buyer or a turkey slaughtered locally and sold immediately)
Wild turkey are indigenous to parts of Florida, and are hunted. However, the turkey-hunting season is in March. It would be illegal to kill a wild turkey in December.
 Signature Tony Cooper Orlando, FL
Wood Avens - 23 Oct 2006 15:30 GMT >>Thaw? I bet there aren't many Brits here who buy a frozen turkey for >>Christmas. Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >turkeys are available in areas where turkeys are not locally raised >and slaughtered. Fresh doesn't ship well. There are turkey farms, and farms which breed turkeys, in various parts of the UK, and everywhere (aside from some of the Scottish islands, I suppose) is within less than a day's journey by chilled container of at least one of these.
>I don't really know if it's possible to buy an unfrozen turkey in this >area. ("Unfrozen" to mean a live turkey that would be slaughtered by [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >However, the turkey-hunting season is in March. It would be illegal >to kill a wild turkey in December. I don't think we have many wild turkeys in these parts, but I expect they'd be top of the upmarket ladder if we did. As it is, downmarket is frozen, next would be mass-produced non-organic chilled, and then it runs through various permutations of free-range, organic, and several different breeds, the top rung for most of us being currently occupied by bronze free-range organic turkeys from one's local farm or farmers' market.
 Signature Katy Jennison
spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @
Tony Cooper - 23 Oct 2006 15:49 GMT >>>Thaw? I bet there aren't many Brits here who buy a frozen turkey for >>>Christmas. Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >islands, I suppose) is within less than a day's journey by chilled >container of at least one of these. Ah. Size matters.
I wonder if shopping habits also apply. My wife usually shops for holiday dinners quite a few days before the event. A frozen turkey would be safer to keep around for several days.
 Signature Tony Cooper Orlando, FL
Paul Wolff - 23 Oct 2006 17:50 GMT >>>>Thaw? I bet there aren't many Brits here who buy a frozen turkey for >>>>Christmas. Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] >holiday dinners quite a few days before the event. A frozen turkey >would be safer to keep around for several days. And at least two of those days should be spent defrosting the thing, if it's any size. The recommended method is to defrost in the fridge.
Yes, we have had frozen turkey in the past, but now we get ours, fresh as a bird, from the farm half a mile away. I'm not sure that they can be had without a prior order (shoulder arms, right dress, that sort of thing?).
 Signature Paul In bocca al Lupo!
Garrett Wollman - 23 Oct 2006 17:20 GMT >I don't think we have many wild turkeys in these parts, but I expect >they'd be top of the upmarket ladder if we did. I don't think you have *any* wild turkeys in those parts. Feral turkeys, perhaps, but not wild. The only wild turkeys are in the Western Hemisphere. (Thereby joining a long list[1] of staples for which European cooking owes us a debt of gratitude.)
-GAWollman
[1] Including, inter alia, peppers, potatoes, corn (maize), vanilla, chocolate, tomatoes, squash, lima beans, and common beans. All told something like seven out of the world's top ten most valuable crops.
 Signature Garrett A. Wollman | The real tragedy of human existence is not that we are wollman@csail.mit.edu| nasty by nature, but that a cruel structural asymmetry Opinions not those | grants to rare events of meanness such power to shape of MIT or CSAIL. | our history. - S.J. Gould, Ten Thousand Acts of Kindness
Wood Avens - 23 Oct 2006 17:41 GMT >>I don't think we have many wild turkeys in these parts, but I expect >>they'd be top of the upmarket ladder if we did. > >I don't think you have *any* wild turkeys in those parts. True. I was attempting a spot of typical British understatement. Ho hum.
 Signature Katy Jennison
spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @
John Dean - 24 Oct 2006 00:54 GMT >>> I don't think we have many wild turkeys in these parts, but I expect >>> they'd be top of the upmarket ladder if we did. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > True. I was attempting a spot of typical British understatement. Ho > hum. There are no wild turkeys around here if and only if Bernard Matthews' establishments are more secure than a Group 4 Prison.
 Signature John "Is that a wallaby?" Dean Oxford
Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:06 GMT >>I don't think we have many wild turkeys in these parts, but I expect >>they'd be top of the upmarket ladder if we did. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > chocolate, tomatoes, squash, lima beans, and common beans. All told > something like seven out of the world's top ten most valuable crops. You omitted tobacco. I believe there is some argument about both tobacco and maize, as, I think, both have been found in Ancient Egyptian tombs.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Mike Page - 26 Oct 2006 21:19 GMT ...>
>>I don't really know if it's possible to buy an unfrozen turkey in this >>area. ("Unfrozen" to mean a live turkey that would be slaughtered by [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >occupied by bronze free-range organic turkeys from one's local farm or >farmers' market. Quite a few of the upper middle classes have gone over to goose for Christmas. As you say, the fresher, more organic and free range it is, the more boasting points you get with it. Some people order them to be grown up for them in June, get constant reports from the farmer and the goose more or less becomes one of the family by Christmas.
Mike Page
Skitt - 26 Oct 2006 21:21 GMT > Quite a few of the upper middle classes have gone over to goose > for Christmas. As you say, the fresher, more organic and free > range it is, the more boasting points you get with it. Some > people order them to be grown up for them in June, get constant > reports from the farmer and the goose more or less becomes one of > the family by Christmas. ... and then it is finally absorbed by it.
 Signature Skitt (in Hayward, California) http://www.geocities.com/opus731/
Roland Hutchinson - 27 Oct 2006 05:08 GMT >> Quite a few of the upper middle classes have gone over to goose >> for Christmas. As you say, the fresher, more organic and free [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > ... and then it is finally absorbed by it. In part.
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
Amethyst Deceiver - 27 Oct 2006 10:40 GMT > Quite a few of the upper middle classes have gone over to goose > for Christmas. As you say, the fresher, more organic and free > range it is, the more boasting points you get with it. Some > people order them to be grown up for them in June, get constant > reports from the farmer and the goose more or less becomes one of > the family by Christmas. The problem with goose is that there's a lot of space inside the ribs compared with meat outside them. They can look pretty big but not have a lot of meat on them.
 Signature Linz Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford My accent may vary
Mike Page - 27 Oct 2006 14:35 GMT >> Quite a few of the upper middle classes have gone over to goose >> for Christmas. As you say, the fresher, more organic and free [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >compared with meat outside them. They can look pretty big but not have a lot >of meat on them. Another boasting point - they are so conspicuously expensive. Last year Lidl had some frozen German (you could tell by the way they walked) geese at a reasonable price.
Mike 'just on my lunch break' Page
Matthew Huntbach - 23 Oct 2006 17:00 GMT >> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
>>> Because someone usually underestimates the size of turkey or forgets how >>> long it will take to thaw, Christmas dinner is frequently delayed to as >>> late as 3 pm, so goodness knows which meal that makes it.
>> Thaw? I bet there aren't many Brits here who buy a frozen turkey for >> Christmas. Like some modes of speech, it's a marker of, er, a >> certain class.
> I really don't understand this comment. Do Brits of a certain class > not buy a turkey for Christmas, or do Brits of a certain class not buy > a frozen turkey for Christmas? Both, I think. It would be regarded as posh to have goose, or some other meat at Christmas. It would definitely be a way of showing one's superior status for a white European family to make a point of not celebrating Christmas at all. But I think what David is getting at is that People Like Us buy fresh turkies - which are widely available just before Christmas, I don't think there is any serious geographical barrier to having one if one wants.
I'm not so sure as he is, however, that frozen turkies are so irredeemably naff that you'd have to be a Sun-reading ITV-watcher (is that a bit old-fashioned? I haven't caught up with the satellite/cable revolution in TV habits) to entertain the prospect of having one. I rather think it spreads further up the class spectrum than he thinks, particularly amongst the young and those who have got out of the habit of old-time food preparation.
Matthew Huntbach
LFS - 23 Oct 2006 17:46 GMT >>> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it: > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > status for a white European family to make a point of not celebrating > Christmas at all. I think you need a further qualifying adjective there. I know quite a few "white European" families like my own who don't celebrate Xmas at all. We are not generally viewed as being of "superior status" in this regard.
[..]
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:16 GMT > I think you need a further qualifying adjective there. I know quite a > few "white European" families like my own who don't celebrate Xmas at > all. We are not generally viewed as being of "superior status" in this > regard. I know a number of Muslims and one Jewish family who have a celebration of sorts at Christmas. For them, it's just a question of having fun at the same time as everyone else. I don't think they have Xmas trees, but they do the big dinner thing and I think they give a small number of presents to the children. I doubt many people really thing very hard about the connection between the Yuletide festivities and Christianity.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Paul Wolff - 24 Oct 2006 20:32 GMT >> I think you need a further qualifying adjective there. I know quite a >>few "white European" families like my own who don't celebrate Xmas at [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >presents to the children. I doubt many people really thing very hard >about the connection between the Yuletide festivities and Christianity. My white European Jewish forbears in southwest Germany were very keen on Christmas -- Christmas Eve, of course. And carnival, though that's less thought of as a religious festival -- it's more of a secular knees-up before religion kicks in for the few next day, or next week. They were fundies with emphasis on fun.
 Signature Paul In bocca al Lupo!
Roland Hutchinson - 27 Oct 2006 08:21 GMT > Matthew Huntbach wrote:
>> It would be regarded as posh to have goose, or some other >> meat at Christmas. It would definitely be a way of showing one's superior [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > few "white European" families like my own who don't celebrate Xmas at > all. American Jews tradtionally go to the movies and dine in a Chinese restaurant on Christmas Day (a kosher Chinese restaurant for the more strictly observant, of course). Is there no such custom in the Movverland?
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
LFS - 27 Oct 2006 09:52 GMT >>Matthew Huntbach wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > on Christmas Day (a kosher Chinese restaurant for the more strictly > observant, of course). Is there no such custom in the Movverland? No, the cinemas here are closed and you need a second mortgage to eat at one of the very few kosher Chinese establishments. WIWAL we did worthy things like helping out in hospitals to give staff a break.
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Sara Lorimer - 27 Oct 2006 19:30 GMT > > American Jews tradtionally go to the movies and dine in a Chinese restaurant > > on Christmas Day (a kosher Chinese restaurant for the more strictly > > observant, of course). Is there no such custom in the Movverland? > > No, the cinemas here are closed... In my experience, the movie theaters here in the US are _packed_ on Christmas Day. I wonder why English theater owners don't try to get that extra bit of cash.
 Signature SML
Graeme Thomas - 27 Oct 2006 20:53 GMT >> No, the cinemas here are closed... > >In my experience, the movie theaters here in the US are _packed_ on >Christmas Day. I wonder why English theater owners don't try to get that >extra bit of cash. The answer is a bit complex, but it comes down to "different cultures".
The UK Christmas is an extended family affair, with a traditional large and late lunch. We're too busy rediscovering why we haven't seen Aunt Muriel since last Christmas[1] to go out to the cinema. Then, too, we have to switch on the TV to see the Queen's Christmas Broadcast.
Because of all that, it's difficult to get staff to work on Christmas Day. They tend to want *lots* of overtime pay. It's been some time since I was in an industry that did that sort of thing[2], but "triple time and a day in lieu" was not untypical of the sorts of bribes required.
So, there will be limited demand, and vastly increased costs, so it's no wonder that cinemas don't open on Christmas Day.
Similar remarks extend to other shops. There is always a massive sale between Christmas and New Year, but the shops don't open until Boxing Day, or even the day after.
[1] In my experience no family is complete without a loathed relative.
[2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31. My employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner, in order to get me to forgo a New Year's party. I'd have done it for less, but don't tell my employers that.
 Signature Graeme Thomas
Skitt - 27 Oct 2006 21:07 GMT > [2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31. My > employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner, in order > to get me to forgo a New Year's party. I'd have done it for less, but > don't tell my employers that. Funny. That date was not on my calendar.
 Signature Skitt (in Hayward, California) http://www.geocities.com/opus731/
Graeme Thomas - 27 Oct 2006 21:27 GMT >> [2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31. My >> employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner, in order >> to get me to forgo a New Year's party. I'd have done it for less, but >> don't tell my employers that. > >Funny. That date was not on my calendar. 1999-12-31. But you knew that.
 Signature Graeme Thomas
Evan Kirshenbaum - 27 Oct 2006 21:30 GMT >> [2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31. My >> employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner, in order >> to get me to forgo a New Year's party. I'd have done it for less, but >> don't tell my employers that. > > Funny. That date was not on my calendar. That's why it costs so much to get people to work on it.
 Signature Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------ HP Laboratories |Just sit right back 1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 | and you'll hear a tale, Palo Alto, CA 94304 | a tale of the Stanford red |That started when a little boy kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com | named Leland did drop dead (650)857-7572
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/
Default User - 27 Oct 2006 22:55 GMT > >> [2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31. > My >> employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner, [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > That's why it costs so much to get people to work on it. Yeah, going into the parallel dimension gives me a headache.
Brian
 Signature If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
R H Draney - 28 Oct 2006 01:18 GMT Default User filted:
>> >> [2] I was asked to provide Y2K cover on the evening of 1999-11-31. >> My >> employers paid me nearly a week's wages, plus a large dinner, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >Yeah, going into the parallel dimension gives me a headache. It's not the going in so much as the parking....r
 Signature "Keep your eye on the Bishop. I want to know when he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.
Roland Hutchinson - 27 Oct 2006 22:07 GMT > The UK Christmas is an extended family affair, with a traditional large > and late lunch. We're too busy rediscovering why we haven't seen Aunt > Muriel since last Christmas[1] to go out to the cinema. Then, too, we > have to switch on the TV to see the Queen's Christmas Broadcast. Hey, some of us Americans manage family dinner, the Queen's speech (if interested and Internet-connected), the rebroadcast of King's College Festival of Lessons and Carols, a movie, and a church gig or two. Not lacking in moral fibre and general industry, we! Oh yeah, and the compulsory spectation of three or four different, and yet all the same, TV adaptations of Dickens in any given year (though, mercifully, not all broadcast on Christmas Day).
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
John Dean - 27 Oct 2006 23:41 GMT >>> No, the cinemas here are closed... >> [quoted text clipped - 30 lines] > to get me to forgo a New Year's party. I'd have done it for less, but > don't tell my employers that. Why not? I hate to be the one to break it, Graeme, but you're not going to be their first choice for Y3K.
 Signature John Dean Oxford
Sara Lorimer - 27 Oct 2006 23:53 GMT > >In my experience, the movie theaters here in the US are _packed_ on > >Christmas Day. I wonder why English theater owners don't try to get that [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Muriel since last Christmas[1] to go out to the cinema. Then, too, we > have to switch on the TV to see the Queen's Christmas Broadcast. Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast. Then, after the large and late lunch, we're filled with post-prandial loathing. Thus movies. The entire family can go together, yet is not expected to make civil conversation.
> Because of all that, it's difficult to get staff to work on Christmas > Day. They tend to want *lots* of overtime pay. Ah. See, when I worked in a movie theater, I didn't have a say in such things. We were told to work; we worked.
 Signature SML
Tony Cooper - 28 Oct 2006 01:14 GMT >Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast. What is the Queen's Christmas Broadcast all about? I mean, is it entertainment, discussion, state of the unio...err...kingdom, fireside chat? What?
 Signature Tony Cooper Orlando, FL
Robert Bannister - 28 Oct 2006 02:09 GMT >>Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast. > > What is the Queen's Christmas Broadcast all about? I mean, is it > entertainment, discussion, state of the unio...err...kingdom, fireside > chat? What? I don't think anyone's worked that out yet. They're too busy commenting on her vowels, dress, hairstyle and awful family. Still, anus horribilis sticks in the mind - I think that did come from one Xmas broadcast.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Graeme Thomas - 28 Oct 2006 02:28 GMT >>Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast. > >What is the Queen's Christmas Broadcast all about? I mean, is it >entertainment, discussion, state of the unio...err...kingdom, fireside >chat? What? I suppose someone who has listened to it would be able to give a better answer, but it's a Christmas message to all the people of the Commonwealth. It has, I believe, become a lot more informal over the years. WIWAL HM the Q would dress up in her ballgown and would be dripping with jewels while making a formal speech. These days she does a voice-over while pictures are shown, often of the Royal Family doing Good Works or just relaxing. The old accent (used by glaziers to cut glass) has gone, to be replaced by something that could almost be uttered by a normal human being.
WIWAL there was almost a compulsion to watch it. It was shown on both TV channels simultaneously, and broadcast on the wireless. The whole nation would stop while it was on. That sort of thing sdoesn't seem to happen any more. Perhaps we ought to go back to the jewels and the accent.
 Signature Graeme Thomas
the Omrud - 28 Oct 2006 09:57 GMT Graeme Thomas <graeme@graemet.demon.co.uk> had it:
> >>Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast. > > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > happen any more. Perhaps we ought to go back to the jewels and the > accent. I'm astonished by the revelation that swathes of Americans are watching HMQ on Christmas Day. The UK population has largely stopped bothering with it, you know. It doesn't bother me (indeed, I'm a weak monarchist), but we're not all Alf Garnett. I think she used to record it in August with general good wishes and unseasonal decorations in the background, but it's now recorded much closer to to the day.
I might catch the radio version during the day, but I'm far more devoted to the Nine Lessons And Carols (Christmas Eve, of course).
 Signature David =====
Donna Richoux - 30 Oct 2006 12:12 GMT > I'm astonished by the revelation that swathes of Americans are > watching HMQ on Christmas Day. I think your swathe was one person, Roland, and actually I don't know where he's from. I read Sara as saying she agreed with him up to -- i.e., not through, but stopping before -- the Queen's Speech. (Which speech is, of course, generally unknown and unavailable in the US -- Roland mentioned Internet).
I believe we've seen a pondal difference with "up to," right? The British "up to" includes the thing, while the Americans have "up through" for that.
Sometimes you have to know what was meant in order to know what was meant.
 Signature Best -- Donna Richoux
the Omrud - 30 Oct 2006 12:21 GMT Donna Richoux <trio@euronet.nl> had it:
> > I'm astonished by the revelation that swathes of Americans are > > watching HMQ on Christmas Day. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > speech is, of course, generally unknown and unavailable in the US -- > Roland mentioned Internet). I thought perhaps it might be on BBC World.
> I believe we've seen a pondal difference with "up to," right? The > British "up to" includes the thing, while the Americans have "up > through" for that. > > Sometimes you have to know what was meant in order to know what was > meant. Ah, right. I thought Sara was saying she did watch the Queen's speech but then did something different.
 Signature David =====
Sara Lorimer - 30 Oct 2006 17:42 GMT > Donna Richoux <trio@euronet.nl> had it: > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Ah, right. I thought Sara was saying she did watch the Queen's > speech but then did something different. Nope, Donna had it right. I'd forgotten about the "up to" difference.
 Signature SML
R H Draney - 31 Oct 2006 16:43 GMT Sara Lorimer filted:
>> Donna Richoux <trio@euronet.nl> had it: >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Nope, Donna had it right. I'd forgotten about the "up to" difference. Jay Leno made fun last night, during his "Headlines" segment, of what may have been an instance of this difference...a newspaper had run a correction, apologizing for saying that some event was to run from November 5th to the 9th, when it actually should have been from November 5th through the 9th....r
 Signature "Keep your eye on the Bishop. I want to know when he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.
Roland Hutchinson - 30 Oct 2006 18:50 GMT >> I'm astonished by the revelation that swathes of Americans are >> watching HMQ on Christmas Day. > > I think your swathe was one person, Roland, and actually I don't know > where he's from. Born in SoCal, educated (university) in the Neighborhood of Boston and on the Penninsula, now resident in Nova Caesarea, USA[1]. Have visited the UK several times, mostly in connection with musical performance or research, but never lived there. Regard the Queen's speech as a curious cultural artifact and have been known to watch it, though (to tell the truth) not to make a regular yearly ritual of doing so.
[1] a/k/a "Joisey"
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
Skitt - 30 Oct 2006 19:19 GMT > Sometimes you have to know what was meant in order to know what was > meant. That's sig material. Awesome!
 Signature Skitt (in Hayward, California) http://www.geocities.com/opus731/
Donna Richoux - 30 Oct 2006 21:50 GMT > > Sometimes you have to know what was meant in order to know what was > > meant. > > That's sig material. Awesome! Tautologies 'R' Us.
Robert Bannister - 28 Oct 2006 02:07 GMT >>>In my experience, the movie theaters here in the US are _packed_ on >>>Christmas Day. I wonder why English theater owners don't try to get that [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > The entire family can go together, yet is not expected to make civil > conversation. The way I see it is: Firstly, Christmas dinner (ie lunch) is frequently served late at 2 or even 3 pm. Secondly, especially those of us with European backgrounds still stick to the hot meal, even if it's 42° C outside, and so afterwards, no-one wants to move. Thirdly, after post-prandial snooze, it's almost traditional (in our family, to play board games or) to watch "special Christmas editions" of ancient TV programmes. It is a special torture to watch the SpChED of some programme that everybody hates.
I think only once or twice ever did we do the more Aussie thing of eating seafood outside. Mind you, we only ventured as far as the garden rather than to the beach, and we still ended up playing board games and watching truly terrible television.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Graeme Thomas - 28 Oct 2006 02:20 GMT >> The UK Christmas is an extended family affair, with a traditional large >> and late lunch. We're too busy rediscovering why we haven't seen Aunt [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Same here, up to the Queen's Christmas Broadcast. Then, after the large >and late lunch, we're filled with post-prandial loathing. Perhaps I misunderstood. I was under the impression that you Leftponders got all that post-prandial loathing over and done with at Thanksgiving, leaving Christmas for a cosier session of disliking one's immediate family.
>> Because of all that, it's difficult to get staff to work on Christmas >> Day. They tend to want *lots* of overtime pay. > >Ah. See, when I worked in a movie theater, I didn't have a say in such >things. We were told to work; we worked. As with many such things, things are changing here. But until relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the emergency services, would be closed on Christmas Day. Sure, police and hospitals would be open, but nothing else. (I recently listened to the last part of a radio programme discussing a trans-Pennine canal tunnel. The "mechanism" for ensuring that canal boats would not meet in the middle was a chap who had the only key to the gates. When a "convoy" of boats had entered he would lock the gate, and then walk over the top to the other end, where he'd let the boats out, and then let in any waiting boats for the reverse journey. He did this every day for 37 years, with his only day of being Christmas Day.)
 Signature Graeme Thomas
Tony Cooper - 28 Oct 2006 02:31 GMT > He did this every day for 37 years, with >his only day of being Christmas Day.) Was his name Earnest?
 Signature Tony Cooper Orlando, FL
Robert Bannister - 28 Oct 2006 23:55 GMT > As with many such things, things are changing here. But until > relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the > emergency services, would be closed on Christmas Day. Sure, police and > hospitals would be open, but nothing else. Huh! I remember taking my dumb sister to Hertford hospital on Xmas day after she had somehow managed to cut herself badly with a wine glass. As far as I could make out, all the doctors and nurses were drunk. I thought my sister was going to bleed to death.
Of course, now I have 2 doctors and a nurse in the family, I think differently about this (or else).
 Signature Rob Bannister
Paul Wolff - 29 Oct 2006 00:25 GMT >> As with many such things, things are changing here. But until >> relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >Of course, now I have 2 doctors and a nurse in the family, I think >differently about this (or else). A few seconds' research suggests that Christmas Day and Good Friday have a special status among public holidays in England-and-Wales in that they are 'common law' holidays and as such are not, or were not, specified among the bank holidays needing to be legislated for (in 1871?). Their status seems to derive from their being ancient (who remembers if they go back to time immemorial?) religious holidays when everyone expected to be away from work, without the need for any special acknowledgement. At any rate, their acceptance as days otiose is deeply ingrained.
 Signature Paul Not negotiable
Robert Bannister - 29 Oct 2006 01:00 GMT >>> As with many such things, things are changing here. But until >>> relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > to be away from work, without the need for any special acknowledgement. > At any rate, their acceptance as days otiose is deeply ingrained. Prolly goes back to the Druids.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Don Aitken - 29 Oct 2006 01:24 GMT >>>> As with many such things, things are changing here. But until >>>> relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > >Prolly goes back to the Druids. In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as the 1960s.
 Signature Don Aitken Mail to the From: address is not read. To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"
the Omrud - 29 Oct 2006 10:55 GMT Don Aitken <don-aitken@freeuk.com> had it:
> In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is > fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as > the 1960s. Although it was perhaps only in the 80s that commercial TV started to show adverts on Christmas Day.
 Signature David =====
Graeme Thomas - 29 Oct 2006 13:07 GMT >In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is >fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as >the 1960s. I suppose that public transport (did we use that term in the 60s?) was seen as a "public service", and therefore necessary, in the same way that police, fire brigade, and hospitals are necessary. I quoted upthread a case where a chap worked 364 days a year, his sole day off being Christmas Day. That would be in the mid- to late-1800s. (The radio programme where I heard this interviewed his very elderly granddaughter.)
 Signature Graeme Thomas
Peter Duncanson - 29 Oct 2006 14:24 GMT >>In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is >>fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as >>the 1960s. But, it was a reduced service. If I remember correctly it was reduced below the level of the reduced service normally operated on Sundays.
>I suppose that public transport (did we use that term in the 60s?) was >seen as a "public service", and therefore necessary, in the same way >that police, fire brigade, and hospitals are necessary. Police, fire brigade, hospital and other essential workers had to get to and from work somehow. Not all of them would have lived within walking distance of their workplaces.
The increase of car ownership that began post-WWII eventually made public transport on Christmas Day inessential.
>I quoted >upthread a case where a chap worked 364 days a year, his sole day off >being Christmas Day. That would be in the mid- to late-1800s. (The >radio programme where I heard this interviewed his very elderly >granddaughter.)  Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Robin Bignall - 29 Oct 2006 22:57 GMT >>>>> As with many such things, things are changing here. But until >>>>> relatively recently it was taken for granted that everything, except the [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as >the 1960s. The Royal Mail worked on Christmas Day morning, at least in the 1950s. The postmen did the sorting and the temps, mostly students, made the deliveries. I don't remember whether there was a Christmas Day delivery in the early 1960s. Sonia and I worked at the Mornington Crescent sorting office 1961 through 1963, and we finished on Christmas Eve.
 Signature Robin Herts, England
Robert Bannister - 29 Oct 2006 23:56 GMT > The Royal Mail worked on Christmas Day morning, at least in the 1950s. > The postmen did the sorting and the temps, mostly students, made the > deliveries. I don't remember whether there was a Christmas Day > delivery in the early 1960s. Sonia and I worked at the Mornington > Crescent sorting office 1961 through 1963, and we finished on > Christmas Eve. I worked as a temp approximately 1959-1964 at Hoddesdon post office, both as a sorter and deliverer. I only remember working one Xmas morning, and I'm fairly certain deliveries also stopped. It may have coincided with the time they refused to continue employing me because they discovered that, despite my being a student, they had to pay me a full adult wage.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Paul Wolff - 30 Oct 2006 21:26 GMT >>In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is >>fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >Crescent sorting office 1961 through 1963, and we finished on >Christmas Eve. I did Christmas temp work at the PO from 1961 to 1963 or 4 and confirm that the regular postmen, or some of them, did talk about being in on Christmas Day. I seldom did mail delivery, being much more enjoyably employed as a telegram delivery boy on me mo'orboike, for which I was paid a supplementary mileage allowance (and any tips I could collect -- the local Greek shipping magnate was v. generous, with a ten-bob note, and afterwards I became friendly with his number two son at University, and he possessed banknotes of denominations I had only heard tell of, besides a Triumph Spitfire). The telegrams were printed on gummed tape by a sort of ticker machine, after which they were stuck on to a regular form or, if the consignor had paid extra, a special greetings card.
 Signature Paul In bocca al Lupo!
Robert Bannister - 29 Oct 2006 23:51 GMT > In fact the practice of everything closing down for Christmas is > fairly new. Public transport operated on Christmas Day as recently as > the 1960s. That was something I didn't know. I always thought Western Australia was even more austere than the UK when it came to Xmas Day (although Good Friday is worse), but at least we do have some buses and trains. As it used to be in Britain, it's more or less a Sunday service.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Sara Lorimer - 29 Oct 2006 18:34 GMT > Perhaps I misunderstood. I was under the impression that you > Leftponders got all that post-prandial loathing over and done with at > Thanksgiving, leaving Christmas for a cosier session of disliking one's > immediate family. We are a large and wealthy nation. We have enough post-prandial loathing for second helpings all around. Even Julia Child liked it with marshmallows on top... or am I confused?
 Signature SML
Roland Hutchinson - 27 Oct 2006 22:01 GMT >>>>It would be regarded as posh to have goose, or some other >>>>meat at Christmas. It would definitely be a way of showing one's [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > one of the very few kosher Chinese establishments. WIWAL we did worthy > things like helping out in hospitals to give staff a break. Ah, yes -- the traditional mitzvah of (you should pardon the expression) being someone else's shabbes goy for a change: that is not unknown here, either. And of course one can also go and join, in a more-or-less unofficial capacity, the celebrations of gentile friends and/or family (though technically that might be viewed as bad form by those with religious scruples against doing that sort of thing).
But cinemas closed! The very idea seems downright un-American, it does. In more recent years it has even become the custom for major-studio films to premier on Christmas Day (and by no means to exclusively Jewish audiences).
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
mUs1Ka - 27 Oct 2006 10:00 GMT >>> It would be regarded as posh to have goose, or some other >>> meat at Christmas. It would definitely be a way of showing one's [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > on Christmas Day (a kosher Chinese restaurant for the more strictly > observant, of course). Is there no such custom in the Movverland? I wouldn't have thought there were enough Chinese restaurants in Israel.
 Signature Ray UK
Peter Duncanson - 23 Oct 2006 18:04 GMT >>> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it: > [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >up the class spectrum than he thinks, particularly amongst the young and >those who have got out of the habit of old-time food preparation. Matthew, I was with you right up to the final clause.
I thought that in this thread we are using "frozen turkey" to mean a whole turkey that has been frozen. The preparation and cooking of a thawed frozen turkey is that same as for a fresh (unfrozen) turkey.
Your mention of those who are "out of the habit of old-time food preparation" would be relevant to the use of a frozen pack of turkey portions rather than a whole turkey.
http://www.tesco.com/superstore/product/shelf.aspx?shelfId=F43CB# Click on the image for details.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
R H Draney - 23 Oct 2006 21:51 GMT Peter Duncanson filted:
>>I'm not so sure as he is, however, that frozen turkies are so irredeemably naff >>that you'd have to be a Sun-reading ITV-watcher (is that a bit old-fashioned? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >preparation" would be relevant to the use of a frozen pack of turkey >portions rather than a whole turkey. Someone is going to bring up this "new-time food preparation", so it might as well be me:
http://www.karenskitchen.com/a/recipe_deep_fried_turkey.htm
(Next time, the "turducken")....r
 Signature "Keep your eye on the Bishop. I want to know when he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.
Mike Lyle - 24 Oct 2006 19:17 GMT [...]
> Someone is going to bring up this "new-time food preparation", so it might as > well be me: > > http://www.karenskitchen.com/a/recipe_deep_fried_turkey.htm Terrifying. But would be more interesting if turkeys were worth eating.
 Signature Mike.
Default User - 24 Oct 2006 19:46 GMT > [...] > > Someone is going to bring up this "new-time food preparation", so [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Terrifying. But would be more interesting if turkeys were worth > eating. The fried turkeys are quite tasty. There are a few of problems:
1. Setting up a safe place to do it can be tricky.
2. Somebody has to delegated to watch the operation the entire time. As this has to be performed outside, that's often not fun duty.
3. No nice turkey drippings for gravy.
Brian
 Signature If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
the Omrud - 23 Oct 2006 19:25 GMT Matthew Huntbach <mmh@dcs.qmul.ac.uk> had it:
> >> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it: > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > I don't think there is any serious geographical barrier to having one if one > wants. That's what I was getting at. All butchers and most supermarkets have fresh turkeys at Christmas, but they vary from more expensive than frozen to outrageously expensive. Christmas is the only day we would consider buying a whole turkey so we hang the expense and get an outrageously expensive one.
There's no component of "showing" in this since we do not entertain anybody at Christmas and we don't meet anybody we know at the butchers. It's simply the right thing to do.
> I'm not so sure as he is, however, that frozen turkies are so irredeemably naff > that you'd have to be a Sun-reading ITV-watcher (is that a bit old-fashioned? > I haven't caught up with the satellite/cable revolution in TV habits) to > entertain the prospect of having one. I rather think it spreads further > up the class spectrum than he thinks, particularly amongst the young and > those who have got out of the habit of old-time food preparation. I accept that's it's a general marker, rather than a guaranteed indicator.
For the record, neither I, nor Wife, nor either of our pairs of parents, have ever bought a frozen whole turkey. But then we don't buy frozen meat of any sort. We buy it fresh and freeze it ourselves.
 Signature David =====
Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:09 GMT > I'm not so sure as he is, however, that frozen turkies are so > irredeemably naff [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > up the class spectrum than he thinks, particularly amongst the young and > those who have got out of the habit of old-time food preparation. I also wonder, as I do about the "fresh fish" I buy at the fishmonger's, how many turkeys have, in fact, been defrosted by the butcher so that they are ready on the day you pick them up. It is almost impossible to tell.
 Signature Rob Bannister
the Omrud - 24 Oct 2006 09:02 GMT Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it:
> > I'm not so sure as he is, however, that frozen turkies are so > > irredeemably naff [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > how many turkeys have, in fact, been defrosted by the butcher so that > they are ready on the day you pick them up. It is almost impossible to tell. Any fish at the fish counter in our supermarket which as previously been frozen is marked "previously frozen" on the price label.
 Signature David =====
Alan Jones - 24 Oct 2006 09:11 GMT > Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it: > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > Any fish at the fish counter in our supermarket which as previously > been frozen is marked "previously frozen" on the price label. I don't know about supermarkets, but restaurants and some fishmongers in Wiltshire claim that they receive fresh fish from Cornwall each morning, and the toing-and-froing of refrigerated delivery vans seems to confirm that claim. (I say fishmongers, but it's usually high-class butchers that sell fresh fish here - the specialist fishmonger is more or less defunct.)
Alan Jones
Mike Barnes - 24 Oct 2006 09:34 GMT In alt.usage.english, Robert Bannister wrote:
>I also wonder, as I do about the "fresh fish" I buy at the >fishmonger's, how many turkeys have, in fact, been defrosted by the >butcher so that they are ready on the day you pick them up. It is >almost impossible to tell. In the UK it's illegal to describe previously-frozen meat or fish as "fresh". Might the same be true there?
 Signature Mike Barnes Cheshire, England
Default User - 24 Oct 2006 18:21 GMT > In alt.usage.english, Robert Bannister wrote: > > I also wonder, as I do about the "fresh fish" I buy at the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > In the UK it's illegal to describe previously-frozen meat or fish as > "fresh". Might the same be true there? For poultry, the USDA has labeling regulations. "Fresh" has never been below 26F. Below 0F it must be labeled "previously frozen". Birds between those two points aren't required to have any particular labeling, although they can't be called "fresh".
Brian
 Signature If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
Robert Bannister - 25 Oct 2006 01:16 GMT > In alt.usage.english, Robert Bannister wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > In the UK it's illegal to describe previously-frozen meat or fish as > "fresh". Might the same be true there? It is not necessary to append the word "fresh". My fishmonger simply labels what kind of fish they are. I usually ask what is freshest. Sometimes, I am told a particular fish was caught that morning; sometimes, they tell me where the fish is from, and that makes me suspect freezing. Even though it is quite possible to freight fish on ice thousands of miles, I have my doubts.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Amethyst Deceiver - 24 Oct 2006 11:08 GMT >>> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it: > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > having one > if one wants. We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We cycle through boar, venison, duck and goose.
ObAUE: turkies?
dontbother - 24 Oct 2006 11:22 GMT "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote [...]
> We never have turkey because they're very big for a small > family. We cycle through boar, venison, duck and goose. > > ObAUE: turkies? Turkeys. Like monkeys.
 Signature Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan. Unmunged email: /at/easypeasy.com "Impatience is the mother of misery."
Roland Hutchinson - 25 Oct 2006 07:14 GMT > "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote > [...] [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Turkeys. Like monkeys. But do monkeys like turkeys?b
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
Oleg Lego - 25 Oct 2006 15:52 GMT The Roland Hutchinson entity posted thusly:
>> "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote >> [...] [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >But do monkeys like turkeys?b Time flies like an arrow.
dontbother - 25 Oct 2006 17:12 GMT > dontbother wrote: >> "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > But do monkeys like turkeys?b Only if the skin is crisp and roasted under a layer of Blackhawk bacon.
 Signature Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan. Unmunged email: /at/easypeasy.com "Impatience is the mother of misery."
Robert Bannister - 26 Oct 2006 00:37 GMT >>"Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote >>[...] [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > But do monkeys like turkeys?b Do pelicans like pigeons? (reference to recent newspaper report from St Jame's Park)
 Signature Rob Bannister
Amethyst Deceiver - 25 Oct 2006 15:51 GMT > "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote > [...] [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Turkeys. Like monkeys. I know that, but the post I was quoting (which you deleted) had "turkies".
 Signature Linz Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford My accent may vary
dontbother - 25 Oct 2006 17:11 GMT > dontbother wrote: >> "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I know that, but the post I was quoting (which you deleted) had > "turkies". Sorry about that, Linz. I didn't know that it was you, and now I can't dredge up the post I replied to without going to Google Groups. I'll try to be more carefulll next time.
 Signature Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan. Unmunged email: /at/easypeasy.com "Impatience is the mother of misery."
Amethyst Deceiver - 26 Oct 2006 12:45 GMT >> dontbother wrote: >>> "Amethyst Deceiver" <spam@lindsayendell.org.uk> wrote [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > can't dredge up the post I replied to without going to Google Groups. > I'll try to be more carefulll next time. Not to worry!
 Signature Linz Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford My accent may vary
Matthew Huntbach - 24 Oct 2006 13:11 GMT >> But I think what David is getting at is >> that People Like Us buy fresh turkies
> ObAUE: turkies? Agreed, it's wrong. I'm not sure what got into me to use that as the plural, it jumped out at me as wrong when I saw it quoted. Not that I ever recall before needing to use the plural of "turkey".
Matthew Huntbach
Robert Bannister - 25 Oct 2006 01:20 GMT >>> But I think what David is getting at is >>> that People Like Us buy fresh turkies [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > it jumped out at me as wrong when I saw it quoted. Not that I ever recall > before needing to use the plural of "turkey". I've never done that with turkeys, but I have caught myself doing it to trolleys and valleys - the latter would even worse.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Pat Durkin - 24 Oct 2006 19:51 GMT >>>> Robert Bannister <robban@it.net.au> had it: >> [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We > cycle through boar, venison, duck and goose. But aren't they all (except for the duck, and just maybe the goose) bigger than the turkey?
Oh, I suppose you don't get the smoked turkey breasts or the frozen wings or breasts or drumsticks sold separately, rather than entire bird.
Robert Bannister - 25 Oct 2006 01:22 GMT > Oh, I suppose you don't get the smoked turkey breasts or the frozen > wings or breasts or drumsticks sold separately, rather than entire bird. Whenever I have bought turkey parts, I have found the meat a lot drier than a whole turkey. I do, however, frequently buy minced turkey.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Amethyst Deceiver - 25 Oct 2006 15:53 GMT >> We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We >> cycle through boar, venison, duck and goose. > > But aren't they all (except for the duck, and just maybe the goose) > bigger than the turkey? Yes, but I can buy joints of deer and boar pretty easily.
> Oh, I suppose you don't get the smoked turkey breasts or the frozen > wings or breasts or drumsticks sold separately, rather than entire > bird. Not as easily. I could get a crown but I'd rather have something I'll enjoy eating.
Robert Bannister - 25 Oct 2006 01:19 GMT > We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We cycle > through boar, venison, duck and goose. My mind boggles at the size of a turkey that is bigger than a pig, let alone a deer, and most geese are about the same weight as a turkey. However, I did enjoy the duck we had last Christmas. I didn't know how to make orange sauce, so I used a bottle of Chinese plum sauce and added orange zest and Cointreau, which was a considerable success.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Amethyst Deceiver - 25 Oct 2006 15:54 GMT >> We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We >> cycle through boar, venison, duck and goose. > > My mind boggles at the size of a turkey that is bigger than a pig, let > alone a deer, and most geese are about the same weight as a turkey. I've seen some very nice little pigs. And I can buy parts of pig rather than a whole one.
> However, I did enjoy the duck we had last Christmas. I didn't know how > to make orange sauce, so I used a bottle of Chinese plum sauce and > added orange zest and Cointreau, which was a considerable success. I'm getting a boned and stuffed duck this year, I think.
 Signature Linz Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford My accent may vary
R H Draney - 26 Oct 2006 01:53 GMT Amethyst Deceiver filted:
>> My mind boggles at the size of a turkey that is bigger than a pig, let >> alone a deer, and most geese are about the same weight as a turkey. > >I've seen some very nice little pigs. And I can buy parts of pig rather than >a whole one. I don't much care for the little ones...I find that one in three tastes of straw....r
 Signature "Keep your eye on the Bishop. I want to know when he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.
Roland Hutchinson - 26 Oct 2006 04:58 GMT > Amethyst Deceiver filted: >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > I don't much care for the little ones...I find that one in three tastes of > straw....r Well, there's no reason to get huffy.
(Or, for that matter, puffy.)
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
R J Valentine - 26 Oct 2006 05:20 GMT } R H Draney wrote: } }> Amethyst Deceiver filted: ... }>>I've seen some very nice little pigs. And I can buy parts of pig rather }>>than a whole one. }> }> I don't much care for the little ones...I find that one in three tastes of }> straw....r } } Well, there's no reason to get huffy. } } (Or, for that matter, puffy.)
You heard the one about the three little kittens, right? Fluffy, Tuffy, and Paderewski. Fluffy was the fluffiest, Tuffy was the toughest, and ....
 Signature rjv
R H Draney - 26 Oct 2006 19:56 GMT R J Valentine filted:
>} Well, there's no reason to get huffy. >} [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >and Paderewski. Fluffy was the fluffiest, Tuffy was the toughest, and >.... I'm sure I've heard it before, but encountering the setup just now I had to work out the punchline from context....
Thanks....r
 Signature "Keep your eye on the Bishop. I want to know when he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.
Mike Barnes - 26 Oct 2006 20:35 GMT In alt.usage.english, R H Draney wrote:
>R J Valentine filted: >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >had to work >out the punchline from context.... I'm still wrestling with it.
 Signature Mike Barnes Cheshire, England
Default User - 26 Oct 2006 22:35 GMT > In alt.usage.english, R H Draney wrote: > > R J Valentine filted: [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > I'm still wrestling with it. I'd always heard it with puppies and Liberace. He was a pianist, you know.
Brian
 Signature If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
Mike Page - 27 Oct 2006 14:40 GMT >> We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We cycle >> through boar, venison, duck and goose. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >to make orange sauce, so I used a bottle of Chinese plum sauce and added >orange zest and Cointreau, which was a considerable success. Just stick on a couple of spoonfuls of marmalade about 20mins before the duck is done. You can thin down the marmalade with a bit of port and use it as a glaze if you like. Use home made or Cooper's Oxford rather than Golden Shred (shudder).
Mike 'just on my lunch break' Page
Robert Bannister - 28 Oct 2006 00:07 GMT >>>We never have turkey because they're very big for a small family. We cycle >>>through boar, venison, duck and goose. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > bit of port and use it as a glaze if you like. Use home made or > Cooper's Oxford rather than Golden Shred (shudder). Marmalade and port sounds good. I wonder whether that would mix with plum sauce and Cointreau for double impact.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Default User - 23 Oct 2006 08:33 GMT > > > "Roast dinner" consists of roast meat (chicken, beef, pork, lamb), > > > potatoes in some form (roast, mashed, boiled - not so often chips) [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > any other day, if the big Christmas meal happens at that time, then > it's an affront to the cooks to call it "lunch". I'd never really heard either term, "roast dinner" or "Christmas lunch". Then tonight I watched a Gordon Ramsay show, "The F Word", where both were used. Now, I'm sure that having read about them here sensitized me, but interesting anyway.
Brian
 Signature If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
Robert Bannister - 23 Oct 2006 01:29 GMT > Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@videotron.ca> had it: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > "Roast meat with salad" is just a description of what you can see on > a plate - it's not a standard meal. Moreover, I would suspect cold roast meat if it were with salad. Mind you, I've just been reading a Julian May fantasy, and she has some very strange concoctions: one that struck me was "hot buttered malt with honey" - I couldn't work out whether it was like Tibetan tea with whisky or like that stuff we used eat out of a jar when we were kids.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Wood Avens - 23 Oct 2006 09:44 GMT >I've just been reading a Julian May fantasy, and she has some very >strange concoctions: one that struck me was "hot buttered malt with >honey" - I couldn't work out whether it was like Tibetan tea with whisky >or like that stuff we used eat out of a jar when we were kids. Malt loaf?
 Signature Katy Jennison
spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @
the Omrud - 23 Oct 2006 19:27 GMT Wood Avens <woodavens@askjennison.com> had it:
> >I've just been reading a Julian May fantasy, and she has some very > >strange concoctions: one that struck me was "hot buttered malt with > >honey" - I couldn't work out whether it was like Tibetan tea with whisky > >or like that stuff we used eat out of a jar when we were kids. > > Malt loaf? Extract of Malt was, of course, Roo's "Strengthening Medicine". And not just "when we were kids" - I've got some in the cupboard now.
 Signature David =====
Mike Lyle - 23 Oct 2006 19:30 GMT > Wood Avens <woodavens@askjennison.com> had it: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Extract of Malt was, of course, Roo's "Strengthening Medicine". And > not just "when we were kids" - I've got some in the cupboard now. Any chance you could post the recipe for hot buttered extract of malt with honey? This I must try.
 Signature Mike.
Wood Avens - 23 Oct 2006 20:03 GMT >> Wood Avens <woodavens@askjennison.com> had it: >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >Any chance you could post the recipe for hot buttered extract of malt >with honey? This I must try. I tell you what, it'd be delicious poured over ice cream.
 Signature Katy Jennison
spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @
Robin Bignall - 23 Oct 2006 23:14 GMT >> Wood Avens <woodavens@askjennison.com> had it: >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] >Any chance you could post the recipe for hot buttered extract of malt >with honey? This I must try. Why not try putting all three ingredients into a pan, heating it gently, and seeing what happens? I imagine important things like gunpowder were discovered that way.
 Signature Robin Herts, England
Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:19 GMT >>I've just been reading a Julian May fantasy, and she has some very >>strange concoctions: one that struck me was "hot buttered malt with >>honey" - I couldn't work out whether it was like Tibetan tea with whisky >>or like that stuff we used eat out of a jar when we were kids. > > Malt loaf? I don't know and can't even guess what that is. Solidified beer?
 Signature Rob Bannister
Graeme Thomas - 24 Oct 2006 02:04 GMT >> Malt loaf? >> >I don't know and can't even guess what that is. Solidified beer? I'm not quite sure how I'd describe it. It's somewhere between a cake and a very rich bread. It's dark in colour. The best-known brand in the UK is Soreen. It's eaten sliced fairly thinly (like bread), and buttered. I don't suppose having some honey on it would go amiss.
WIWAL a friend (or, I suppose, his mother) bought some malt loaf that had gone mouldy. When she complained about it at the shop they apologized, and gave her two loaves in compensation, and a good time was had by all. A couple of weeks later a chap in a van delivered a large case of the stuff. The complaint had obviously reached Soreen, and they'd sent the case (of, I think, 72 loaves).
This batch quickly exceeded their capacity for eating it. (Elsewhere on this thread we've seen that many of the complaints about meat loaf stem from the fact that it keeps on the menu for days on end.) They gave it to friends and neighbours. They discovered that the dog didn't care for it. The batch lasted for months, and yet it never went mouldy. When last I hear they were still wondering what went wrong with the original loaf.
 Signature Graeme Thomas
Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 02:26 GMT >>>Malt loaf? >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > the UK is Soreen. It's eaten sliced fairly thinly (like bread), and > buttered. I don't suppose having some honey on it would go amiss. I am a dummy. Must have been a brain-glitch. I remember it now. Not something I would normally eat, but it's sweetish: a bit like raisin bread without the fruit. I think people often toast it.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Graeme Thomas - 22 Oct 2006 16:37 GMT >What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat >with salad," in BrE? Without further context it's difficult to be sure.
A roast dinner will comprise slices of roast meat, roast potatoes, and a couple of other vegetables. There will almost certainly be a starter (= AmE: "appetizer") and a pudding or dessert.
A "roast meat with salad" is a large mixed salad with cold roast meat, served as one dish. It's normally referred to just by the name of the meat, as in "beef salad", or "chicken salad". The salad will be lettuce (or rocket, or similar leaf), tomato, and (most of) cucumber, celery, radish, (spring) onion, and perhaps other things.
>Is it just in quantity and the presence of salad?:-) That's part of it, sure, but the salad is just one course, albeit the main one, whereas the roast dinner is the whole meal, with two or three courses.
 Signature Graeme Thomas
Buckwheat Soba - 22 Oct 2006 16:17 GMT >>What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat >>with salad," in BrE? [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > couple of other vegetables. There will almost certainly be a starter (= > AmE: "appetizer") and a pudding or dessert. It just occurred to me that in AmE, SFAIK, no one would use the term "appetizer" other than in a restaurantic context. MIJM.
> A "roast meat with salad" is a large mixed salad with cold roast meat, > served as one dish. It's normally referred to just by the name of the > meat, as in "beef salad", or "chicken salad". The salad will be lettuce > (or rocket, = ModAmE "arugula".
 Signature Buckwheat Soba
Robert Bannister - 23 Oct 2006 01:35 GMT > That's part of it, sure, but the salad is just one course, albeit the > main one, whereas the roast dinner is the whole meal, with two or three > courses. I really don't understand this, unless you are using "course" in an unfamiliar way. How can you have something being "the whole meal, with 2 or 3 courses"? If it is the whole meal, that's it; if there are several courses, then the whole meal consists of those. Cold meat and salad could be the main course of a three-course meal or it could be all you're getting.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Graeme Thomas - 23 Oct 2006 02:28 GMT >> That's part of it, sure, but the salad is just one course, albeit the >> main one, whereas the roast dinner is the whole meal, with two or three [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >could be the main course of a three-course meal or it could be all >you're getting. Brevis esse laboro, obscurus fio, as me old pal Horace used to say.
If I were offered a "roast dinner", I would expect a 2 or 3 course meal, with the "meat and two veg" the central part of it. If, on the other hand, I were offered a "roast meat salad", then I'd expect just the cold meat and salad. There could be other things, of course, but they wouldn't have been offered. (I once had an amazing three course meal that came with seven courses. The restaurant has long since closed, now doubt for financial reasons.)
 Signature Graeme Thomas
Alan Jones - 22 Oct 2006 18:08 GMT > Hello: > > What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat > with salad," in BrE? > > Is it just in quantity and the presence of salad?:-) If I were promised a "roast dinner" I should look forward to slices of roast meat served with potatoes (probably both boiled and roast) and other vegetables. There would be traditional accompaniments such as Yorkshire pudding and horseradish sauce with beef, apple sauce with pork and so on. A rich gravy would be served rather than some more elaborate sauce. I think there would be the implied promise of a pudding for "afters" - apple pie especially - and perhaps one would also get a "starter" such as prawn cocktail. That's what you'd expect at an ordinarily decent pub in Wiltshire for Sunday lunch, and it's what many would eat in their own homes if they could summon up the energy to prepare and cook it and do the enormous amount of washing-up it would entail.
"A roast meat" suggests perhaps just the meat without the rest of what I've described, though perhaps with a small serving of a chef-type sauce and with a salad served separately. The meal would be, at its best, elegant rather than hearty: lower calorie and less work.
Alan Jones
Marius Hancu - 22 Oct 2006 22:07 GMT I think I was parked in the right area:-)
Thank you all.
Marius Hancu
Stuart Chapman - 23 Oct 2006 09:50 GMT >> Hello: >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > If I were promised a "roast dinner" I should look forward to slices of roast > meat served with potatoes (probably both boiled and roast) and other Boiled AND roasted? Hmm. Reminds me of a story my mother has. She went to a restaurant which advertised three vegetables as part of the dish. Out came baked potato, mash potato, and chips.
> vegetables. There would be traditional accompaniments such as Yorkshire > pudding and horseradish sauce with beef, apple sauce with pork and so on. A [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > could summon up the energy to prepare and cook it and do the enormous amount > of washing-up it would entail. Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and Crepes Suzette. AIKI, a prawn cocktail consists of fairly dodgy defrosted school prawns, served on a bed of iceberg lettuce and drowned in Thousand Island Dressing. There will be a wedge of lemon to go with it, and if you're lucky, a sprig of parsley. ISTR they were oftenly served in a stemmed, conical steel cup.
Its not what I would expect as decent pub fare in Wiltshire or elsewhere, unless the pub really is 'ordinarily' decent.
Stupot
Evan Kirshenbaum - 23 Oct 2006 16:16 GMT > Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're > served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > to go with it, and if you're lucky, a sprig of parsley. ISTR they > were oftenly served in a stemmed, conical steel cup. What you're describing sounds more like (a not very appetizing) Shrimp Louie. An American shrimp cocktail canonically consists of six or eight large shrimp (large enough that you can pick them up by their tails and could conceivably get more than one bite out of them), chilled, typically with the tail on, served hanging over the edge of a cocktail glass (or a similar special-purpose glass dish) with a serving of "cocktail sauce" (basically ketchup and horseradish, maybe worcestershire sauce or tabasco sauce) next to them (not on them), and a wedge of lemon.
 Signature Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------ HP Laboratories |"You can't prove it *isn't* so!" is 1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |as good as Q.E.D. in folk logic--as Palo Alto, CA 94304 |though it were necessary to submit |a piece of the moon to chemical kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com |analysis before you could be sure (650)857-7572 |that it was not made of green |cheese. http://www.kirshenbaum.net/ | Bergen Evans
Mike Lyle - 23 Oct 2006 18:27 GMT > > Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're > > served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > worcestershire sauce or tabasco sauce) next to them (not on them), and > a wedge of lemon. Remember the Pondial difference: your shrimp are Br prawns, while Br shrimp are probably not regarded as human food over there -- they're so small that they aren't all that common in Br, either, though I think somebody or other said they taste better, and I believe they're used ground up (shell and all) in some dishes or preparations.
The prawn cocktail is making a comeback after its decline from a high point in the 60s or 70s. We, however, have never stopped having it as hors d'oeuvre for our Christmas dinner/lunch/meal/grub, with avocado, sauce aurore, and lemon wedge; there may conceivably be a faint ironic smirk around, but basically we just like it. Borscht, goose and stuff, then the usual stuff.
 Signature Mike.
Skitt - 23 Oct 2006 18:37 GMT > Remember the Pondial difference: your shrimp are Br prawns, while Br > shrimp are probably not regarded as human food over there -- they're > so small that they aren't all that common in Br, either, though I > think somebody or other said they taste better, and I believe they're > used ground up (shell and all) in some dishes or preparations. Rock shrimp rock!
http://sarasota.extension.ufl.edu/fcs/FlaFoodFare/RkShrimp.htm
 Signature Skitt (in Hayward, California) http://www.geocities.com/opus731/
Mike Lyle - 23 Oct 2006 19:46 GMT > > Remember the Pondial difference: your shrimp are Br prawns, while Br > > shrimp are probably not regarded as human food over there -- they're [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Skitt (in Hayward, California) > http://www.geocities.com/opus731/ I wondered if it would be the same as our rock lobster, or crayfish, but it isn't. No point in my quoting from the web except for the name: "The Southern rock lobster is one of only two species of the family Jasus found in Tasmanian waters". Presumably baptised by a surprised Irish migrant.
But check out a good old Aussie bug: http://images.google.com.au/images?svnum=10&hl=en&lr=&cr=countryAU&ie=ISO-8859-1 &q=moreton+bay+bug&btnG=Search or http://tinyurl.com/y5dvkq
 Signature Mike.
Tony Cooper - 23 Oct 2006 23:02 GMT >I wondered if it would be the same as our rock lobster, or crayfish, >but it isn't. No point in my quoting from the web except for the name: >"The Southern rock lobster is one of only two species of the family >Jasus found in Tasmanian waters". Presumably baptised by a surprised >Irish migrant. The International Brotherhood of Wholesale Fishmongers or somesuch has tried mightily in Florida to get the term "rock lobster" off Florida menus. They want restauranteurs to use "langouste" or "sea crayfish" to protect the image of the genuine Homaridae, genus Homarus, beast.
 Signature Tony Cooper Orlando, FL
Paul Wolff - 23 Oct 2006 21:23 GMT >> Remember the Pondial difference: your shrimp are Br prawns, while Br >> shrimp are probably not regarded as human food over there -- they're [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >http://sarasota.extension.ufl.edu/fcs/FlaFoodFare/RkShrimp.htm Br shrimps (with an 's') seem to like Lancashire, especially shallow sandy bays like Morecambe and Southport. It seems that there are brown ones and the rest; the former are the best for potting in butter (15oz shrimps to 12oz butter). I'd guess, from memory, that after peeling, topping and tailing the edible remains are about 1cm long. Potted shrimps are a delight eaten on thin toast.
More at: http://www.waitrose.com/food_drink/wfi/foodissues/campaigns/0106036.asp
You can tell a clothed shrimp from a prawn (I'd say 'shelled' if it didn't mean the opposite of what I want it to mean) by the way the carapace segments overlap. The outermost segment in a shrimp is midway along the body.
 Signature Paul In bocca al Lupo!
John Holmes - 29 Oct 2006 07:35 GMT > You can tell a clothed shrimp from a prawn (I'd say 'shelled' if it > didn't mean the opposite of what I want it to mean) by the way the > carapace segments overlap. The outermost segment in a shrimp is > midway along the body. Yes, see diagram on page 2 here: http://www.museum.vic.gov.au/Infosheets/10295.pdf
 Signature Regards John for mail: my initials plus a u e at tpg dot com dot au
TsuiDF - 23 Oct 2006 21:11 GMT > Remember the Pondial difference: your shrimp are Br prawns, while Br > shrimp are probably not regarded as human food over there -- they're so > small that they aren't all that common in Br, either, though I think > somebody or other said they taste better, and I believe they're used > ground up (shell and all) in some dishes or preparations. Mmmm, yummm, somebody mention Morecambe Bay potted shrimps? Potted in little ramekins or whatever the correct term is for little dishes for which I can think of few other uses, in butter flavoured with nutmeg and -- other stuff. Undoubtedly highly calorific and completely delightful. Particularly when enjoyed overlooking a Lake (as in District) on a summer's day.
Yummy in a similar fashion over here are 'crevettes grises', traditionally served in a tomato -- but with lashings of mayonnaise, not as spicy as the Morecambe stuff.
cheers, Stephanie in Brussels
Nick Atty - 23 Oct 2006 21:36 GMT >>> Hello: >>> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Boiled AND roasted? Well the boiled - as well as adding contrast - provide nice starchy water for making gravy.
 Signature On-line canal route planner: http://www.canalplan.org.uk
(Waterways World site of the month, April 2001) My Reply-To address *is* valid, though likely to die soon
Robert Bannister - 24 Oct 2006 01:24 GMT > Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're > served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and Crepes [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > and if you're lucky, a sprig of parsley. ISTR they were oftenly served > in a stemmed, conical steel cup. In the good old days, the three prawns were padded out with "seafood filler" (crab flavoured fish). Can I add Chicken Kiev to that list?
 Signature Rob Bannister
Stuart Chapman - 24 Oct 2006 10:19 GMT >> Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're >> served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and Crepes [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > In the good old days, the three prawns were padded out with "seafood > filler" (crab flavoured fish). Can I add Chicken Kiev to that list? Ah yes, the infamous seafood extender, as I know it. It's meant to be bad, but I have a perverse appreciation of this product, as do the Japanese:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seafood_extender
I have actually thought of writing a cookbook for this stuff.
Stupot
Robert Bannister - 25 Oct 2006 01:23 GMT >>> Are prawn cocktails still common in the UK?. I don't think they're >>> served here without 'irony' any more; same with Steak Diane and [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > bad, but I have a perverse appreciation of this product, as do the > Japanese: Confession time? OK, I like it too, and recently I've been able to obtain some Japanese crab and lobster flavoured stuff that is even better. I like extender and prawns in a sandwich for lunch.
 Signature Rob Bannister
Mike Barnes - 23 Oct 2006 09:45 GMT In alt.usage.english, Marius Hancu wrote:
>What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat >with salad," in BrE? "Dinner" is a meal; "meat with salad" is a course.
"Roast dinner" is a traditional British meal, often of three courses. The main course consists of hot roast meat (beef, lamb, pork, chicken, turkey, etc) served sliced, with roast potatoes, possibly boiled potatoes, and two or more additional vegetables (peas, carrots, Brussels sprouts, parsnips, etc) and a rich gravy. Other traditional accompaniments include Yorkshire pudding and horseradish sauce (with beef), mint sauce (with lamb), crackling and apple sauce (with pork), herb stuffing (with chicken), etc. I'm sure you get the idea.
Roast dinner is traditionally served in the middle of the day, even in areas such as the south of England where the word "dinner" normally refers to the evening meal. It's especially common as a family meal on Sundays and (especially with turkey) on Christmas Day.
"Roast meat with salad" is a comparatively simple affair, just sliced cold sliced roast meat (=AmE "cold cuts") with a salad consisting of lettuce, tomato, cucumber, spring onions (=AmE "scallions"), etc.
Those formulae would have been strictly adhered to in, say, the 1960s. With today's very different lifestyles and the availability of more exotic ingredients, there's a great deal of variation.
 Signature Mike Barnes Cheshire, England
Buckwheat Soba - 23 Oct 2006 12:33 GMT > "Roast meat with salad" is a comparatively simple affair, just sliced > cold sliced roast meat (=AmE "cold cuts") In my dialect, at least, only a subset of "cold cuts" would be describable as "cold sliced roast meat".
 Signature Buckwheat Soba
Philip Eden - 23 Oct 2006 13:57 GMT "Mike Barnes" <mikebarnes@bluebottle.com> wrote :
> In alt.usage.english, Marius Hancu wrote: >>What's the main difference between a "roast dinner" and "a roast meat [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > cold sliced roast meat (=AmE "cold cuts") with a salad consisting of > lettuce, tomato, cucumber, spring onions (=AmE "scallions"), etc. All agreed. I would simply add that while a "roast dinner" is traditionally served as a midday meal on Sundays, "roast meat with salad" is what you get on Mondays.
Philip Eden
|
|
|