Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

BrE: if Charles had taken you that motor drive

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Marius Hancu - 04 Nov 2006 20:04 GMT
Hello:

I expected an "along" or "on" before "motor."

How about it in BrE?

-----
" ... if Charles had taken you that motor drive--well, you'd have
reached the house a perfect wreck."

E. M. Foster, Howard's End, p. 69
------

Thanks.
Marius Hancu
Buckwheat Soba - 04 Nov 2006 19:44 GMT
> Hello:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> E. M. Foster, Howard's End, p. 69
> ------

I don't speak BrE, but it seems to me that a word is missing ("on", most
likely).

Signature

Buckwheat Soba

Peter Duncanson - 04 Nov 2006 21:05 GMT
>> Hello:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>I don't speak BrE, but it seems to me that a word is missing ("on", most
>likely).

Yes, by today's standards. It is possible that the version lacking
"on" or "for" was normal at the time, social stratum and location of
the story. (It might still be normal in some dialects or register
today.)
Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

golaoi@gmail.com - 04 Nov 2006 21:41 GMT
"On" is undoubtedly missing, at least in standard English of today.
It's bizarre without it, unless it's dialect.
Amethyst Deceiver - 04 Nov 2006 22:55 GMT
>"On" is undoubtedly missing, at least in standard English of today.
>It's bizarre without it, unless it's dialect.

Please quote what you're responding to.
Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

Martin Ambuhl - 04 Nov 2006 23:47 GMT
> "On" is undoubtedly missing,

The number of words missing from the context is very large indeed. For
example, "ordinary" and "six" is both missing.  So is "context."

> at least in standard English of today.
> It's bizarre without it, unless it's dialect.
Derek Turner - 05 Nov 2006 13:43 GMT
>>> Hello:
>>>
>>> I expected an "along" or "on" before "motor."

> Yes, by today's standards. It is possible that the version lacking
> "on" or "for" was normal at the time, social stratum and location of
> the story. (It might still be normal in some dialects or register
> today.)

And 'Howard's End' is, if nothing else, a biting study of the British
class system and social nuance. Leonard's 'what ho!' is almost certainly
an attempt to ape his 'betters'.
Marius Hancu - 05 Nov 2006 14:57 GMT
> And 'Howard's End' is, if nothing else, a biting study of the British
> class system and social nuance. Leonard's 'what ho!' is almost certainly
> an attempt to ape his 'betters'.

Are you saying that 'what ho!' was more frequently utilised by the
"higher classes?"

Thanks.
Marius Hancu
Derek Turner - 05 Nov 2006 15:31 GMT
>> And 'Howard's End' is, if nothing else, a biting study of the British
>> class system and social nuance. Leonard's 'what ho!' is almost certainly
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Thanks.
> Marius Hancu

very much so: as someone said in an earlier posting, it was typical of
the 'Bertie Wooster' leisured classes and (I think) probably Public
(=private) School slang.
Mike Lyle - 05 Nov 2006 15:35 GMT
> >> Hello:
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> the story. (It might still be normal in some dialects or register
> today.)

I'm sure that's right, as there seem to be analogues: Gray's "plods his
weary way" comes to mind. More closely, "led him a merry dance." The
more I think about it, the less strange it seems as a construction;
what's unusual is perhaps that he used it with "motor drive" -- it
feels like a pre-mechanisation form.

Signature

Mike.

Peter Duncanson - 05 Nov 2006 17:05 GMT
>> >> Hello:
>> >>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>what's unusual is perhaps that he used it with "motor drive" -- it
>feels like a pre-mechanisation form.

Yes, but a number of words and phrases were and have been carried
over from the horsedrawn to the horseless carriage -- not least
"drive" itself, which originated in the sense of driving animals.
Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Mike Lyle - 05 Nov 2006 17:24 GMT
> >> >> Hello:
> >> >>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> over from the horsedrawn to the horseless carriage -- not least
> "drive" itself, which originated in the sense of driving animals.

I think my favourite one of those is "dashboard": these days you're in
trouble if it's acting as a mudguard.

Signature

Mike.

Robert Bannister - 05 Nov 2006 23:36 GMT
> Yes, but a number of words and phrases were and have been carried
> over from the horsedrawn to the horseless carriage -- not least
> "drive" itself, which originated in the sense of driving animals.

"Dashboard" and the now obsolete "running board".
Signature

Rob Bannister

Steve Hayes - 06 Nov 2006 00:55 GMT
>> Yes, but a number of words and phrases were and have been carried
>> over from the horsedrawn to the horseless carriage -- not least
>> "drive" itself, which originated in the sense of driving animals.
>
>"Dashboard" and the now obsolete "running board".

The model for the MS Windows user interface.

Signature

Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
http://people.tribe.net/hayesstw
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.