Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

big and large

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
carlos - 09 Nov 2006 12:46 GMT
When should I use "big" instead of "large"?

Also, If big is opposite to small and large is opposite to little, then
why do I drink a small whisky followed by a large gin and tonic?

Thanks again
dontbother - 09 Nov 2006 12:55 GMT
> When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
>
> Also, If big is opposite to small and large is opposite to
> little, then why do I drink a small whisky followed by a large
> gin and tonic?

It certainly sounds crazy to me to drink a large gin and tonic after
any whiskey at all. I give up. Why in the hell do you do such a weird
thing? Or, equally possible, I suppose, why in the hell is that large
G&T following your small whiskey? Is the G&T a rummy dick and the
small whiskey a corny perp?
Signature

Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan.
Unmunged email: /at/easypeasy.com
"Impatience is the mother of misery."

carlos - 09 Nov 2006 13:02 GMT
> > When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> G&T following your small whiskey? Is the G&T a rummy dick and the
> small whiskey a corny perp?

It was a hypothetical comment, I never drink that combination, or
perhaps I don't remember afterwards.
Amethyst Deceiver - 09 Nov 2006 15:19 GMT
>> When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> G&T following your small whiskey? Is the G&T a rummy dick and the
> small whiskey a corny perp?

Carlos didn't mention whiskey at all.

Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

dontbother - 09 Nov 2006 15:22 GMT
> dontbother wrote:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Carlos didn't mention whiskey at all.

True. He did say something about drinking a little broom, though.
Close enough.

Signature

Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan.
Unmunged email: /at/easypeasy.com
"Impatience is the mother of misery."

CDB - 09 Nov 2006 13:32 GMT
> When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
>
> Also, If big is opposite to small and large is opposite to little,
> then why do I drink a small whisky followed by a large gin and
> tonic?

It is more accurate to say that "big" is opposed to "little" and
"large" is opposed to "small".
J. J. Lodder - 09 Nov 2006 13:54 GMT
> > When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It is more accurate to say that "big" is opposed to "little" and
> "large" is opposed to "small".

As in little big man for example?

Jan
CDB - 09 Nov 2006 16:08 GMT
>>> When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> As in little big man for example?

Two states warring within the bosom of a single First Nationsperson.
Robert Bannister - 10 Nov 2006 00:32 GMT
>>When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> It is more accurate to say that "big" is opposed to "little" and
> "large" is opposed to "small".

That explains why I felt slightly offended at a recent newspaper article
that used "big amounts" instead of "large amounts". I nearly posted
about it at the time, but thought it too trivial.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Charles Riggs - 16 Nov 2006 14:48 GMT
>>>When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>that used "big amounts" instead of "large amounts". I nearly posted
>about it at the time, but thought it too trivial.

Post away; I'd call that a major error, especially when compared to
some we've discussed.
Signature

Charles Riggs

matt271829-news@yahoo.co.uk - 09 Nov 2006 15:05 GMT
> When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
>
> Also, If big is opposite to small and large is opposite to little, then
> why do I drink a small whisky followed by a large gin and tonic?
>
> Thanks again

"Big" tends to sound less formal than "large", and tends to be used
more in speech than in writing (formal writing, at any rate). For
example, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalith we read: "A megalith
is a large stone which has been used to construct..." In this sort of
formal setting it would be a little odd to read: "A megalith is a big
stone which has been used to construct..."

However, apart from stock phrases ("he has a big mouth", "as large as
life" etc.), I'm struggling to think of any example where changing
"big" to "large" (or vice versa) would actually be incorrect.
athel...@yahoo - 09 Nov 2006 15:22 GMT
> When should I use "big" instead of "large"?

I don't think there is any logic to it. In any given context one sounds
more natural to a native speaker than another, but it's hopeless trying
to say why. So far as opposites are concerned, "big" can go with either
"small" or "little", but "large" normally only goes with "small". To
complicate matters further, three of these words have compareative and
superlative forms (bigger, biggest, etc.), but "little " does not:
"littler" and "littlest" are used by small children speaking with one
another, and by adults talking to small children, but not, on the
whole, between adults.

Once you have all these sorted out you can start fitting "great" into
the scheme.

As for "large", it is interesting that its cognates in French, Spanish
and Italian mean "wide", "long" and "slow" respectively, thus
accounting for three of the four dimensions in space-time. Does anyone
know of a language where the cognate means "deep"?

athel
Millicent Tendency - 09 Nov 2006 17:21 GMT
>> When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
>>
>I don't think there is any logic to it. In any given context one sounds
>more natural to a native speaker than another, but it's hopeless trying
>to say why.

I think there's a small er I mean little bit of logic to it.

Let's look at some okay uses of "big"/"large", with
not-quite-convincing ones marked "* (?)", dodgy ones marked "*?", and
dead-wrong ones marked "*".

    A large [*? big] sum of money was found under the floorboards.

    I had a big [* large] argument with my husband last night

    There's a big [large] difference between one and the other.

    A big [*(?) large]truck came and took everything away.

    The flat has a big [large] bedroom but the kitchen's tiny.

    As his big [* large] finale, the magician....

This suggests --only suggests, mind; it certainly doesn't prove
anything -- that when we're describing physical size in three
dimensions we can use either "big" or "large" (see the "truck" and
"bedroom" examples). As for the rest, I have no idea. The "argument"
and "finale" examples seem to show that when it means "massive" in a
figurative sense we prefer "big", but this is clearly rubbished by the
"difference" example. Or perhaps arguments and finales can be loud and
violent, unlike differences (hmm, thinking aloud now -- time to shut
up).

I know that EFL students are taught that "big" goes with "little" and
is lower register than "large"/"small", but that seems to be
simplifying things beyond what is going to be helpful to anyone except
elementary students. (Oddly, though, it's not something that came up
much when I taught EFL.)

My copy of Swan is in a virtual box (hi, Mike!), so I can't check
whether he covers it or not.

Signature

Millicent Tendency
(TEFKATHE)

Mike Lyle - 09 Nov 2006 22:15 GMT
[...]
> I know that EFL students are taught that "big" goes with "little" and
> is lower register than "large"/"small", but that seems to be
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> My copy of Swan is in a virtual box (hi, Mike!), so I can't check
> whether he covers it or not.

'day, Millie! Because it was in with the dictionaries, mine isn't so
cabined, cribb'd, or confined. I can therefore report that Swan says
"big" is more conversational than "large" for physical size, and than
"great" for abstract senses ("a big/great mistake" etc). For
uncountables, only "great" is usually used.

I do remember some Arabs having the idea that "big" and "large" had
different meanings -- I never got to the bottom of what they meant, but
I think this may have been confused interference from French.

Signature

Mike.

Skitt - 09 Nov 2006 19:50 GMT
>> When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Once you have all these sorted out you can start fitting "great" into
> the scheme.

That would be for balls of fire, innit?

Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
http://www.geocities.com/opus731/

Ian Noble - 10 Nov 2006 22:00 GMT
>When should I use "big" instead of "large"?
>
>Also, If big is opposite to small and large is opposite to little, then
>why do I drink a small whisky followed by a large gin and tonic?

Incipient alcoholism.

Cheers - Ian
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.