Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Old-fashioned look

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
b_salina - 09 Nov 2006 22:52 GMT
What is and old-fashioned look?

"What was once called an old-fashioned look".

I've done some googling, and it appears to be a disapproving look, but
that's all I know. Not a clue why it should have been "old-fashioned",
for one thing, or whether "disapproving look" is an apt definition.

B.
Donna Richoux - 09 Nov 2006 23:00 GMT
> What is and old-fashioned look?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> that's all I know. Not a clue why it should have been "old-fashioned",
> for one thing, or whether "disapproving look" is an apt definition.

Was it a look that someone gave to someone else (a glance, a stare...)
or was it an appearance (it had a fresh look, a new look)?

Signature

Best - Donna Richoux

Arcadian Rises - 10 Nov 2006 03:22 GMT
> > What is and old-fashioned look?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > for one thing, or whether "disapproving look" is an apt definition.Was it a look that someone gave to someone else (a glance, a stare...)
> or was it an appearance (it had a fresh look, a new look)?

Since OP mentioned "disapproving look" in the same vein, I don't see
how disaproval can be expressed sartorial(ly?)
Donna Richoux - 10 Nov 2006 11:38 GMT
> > > "What was once called an old-fashioned look".
> >
> > > I've done some googling, and it appears to be a disapproving look, but
> > > that's all I know. Not a clue why it should have been "old-fashioned",
> > > for one thing, or whether "disapproving look" is an apt definition.

>>> Was
>>> it a look that someone gave to someone else (a glance, a stare...) >
>>> or was it an appearance (it had a fresh look, a new look)?

As Rob and Pat have worked out, the disapproving look must be pondial.
Giving people disapproving looks certainly exists in North America, and
being old-fashioned, too, but not AFAIK a special label of
"old-fashioned looks."

> Since OP mentioned "disapproving look" in the same vein, I don't see
> how disaproval can be expressed sartorial(ly?)

True, but a person could have -- wear, exhibit -- old fashioned styles
and have an old-fashioned look.

You're asking me to explain why I asked for context? The original poster
said was that s/he found it *could* be used to mean a disapproving look.
Context would have shown me if that was appropriate. We often find,
several posts down the road, that the shape of the hole that the
questioner is trying to force a square peg into is round. As our Intro A
Guidlines say:

    Please explain the context of the usage; that will allow people to
    give you a sensible answer.

I could have just bided my time and awaited further developments, but I
didn't mind asking a question.
Signature

Best -- Donna Richoux

Arcadian Rises - 10 Nov 2006 13:31 GMT
> > > > "What was once called an old-fashioned look".
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> You're asking me to explain why I asked for context?

No, I was just somehow surprised that you didn't understand what kind
of look was the OT referring to. I thought it was obvious OT meant
_glance_, not _appearance_.

[snipped irrelevant part]
matt271829-news@yahoo.co.uk - 09 Nov 2006 23:07 GMT
> What is and old-fashioned look?
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> B.

Yes, I understand it to mean a kind of disapproving or reproachful
expression, such as you'd adopt to show you weren't best pleased with
someone. Why "old-fashioned" I have no idea.
Robert Bannister - 10 Nov 2006 01:19 GMT
>>What is and old-fashioned look?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> expression, such as you'd adopt to show you weren't best pleased with
> someone. Why "old-fashioned" I have no idea.

I don't take it necessarily to mean disapproving. More a puzzled,
surprised look: "Did you really mean that?".

Signature

Rob Bannister

matt271829-news@yahoo.co.uk - 10 Nov 2006 02:14 GMT
> >>What is and old-fashioned look?
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I don't take it necessarily to mean disapproving. More a puzzled,
> surprised look: "Did you really mean that?".

Yes, from the dictionary definitions that have been unearthed it seems
as if there are two shades of meaning: quizzical or disapproving - or
maybe some combination of both. I admit that it's not an expression
I've come across very often...
CDB - 10 Nov 2006 14:28 GMT
>> What is and old-fashioned look?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> expression, such as you'd adopt to show you weren't best pleased
> with someone. Why "old-fashioned" I have no idea.

The citations posted downthread by John Dean start in 1911.
"Old-fashioned" at that time seems likely to mean Victorian, and
therefore unamused.
Pat Durkin - 09 Nov 2006 23:11 GMT
> What is and old-fashioned look?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> that's all I know. Not a clue why it should have been "old-fashioned",
> for one thing, or whether "disapproving look" is an apt definition.

I think, as Donna is hinting, that the person may be dressed or coifed
in the styles of yesteryear.

We really need more context to be sure.  I know of no facial expression
that would indicate a style from the past.
Robert Bannister - 10 Nov 2006 01:20 GMT
>>What is and old-fashioned look?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> We really need more context to be sure.  I know of no facial expression
> that would indicate a style from the past.

Both your comment and Donna's make me think this is pondial. You are
quite on the wrong track, and it's not from the past: this phrase is
still current.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Pat Durkin - 10 Nov 2006 02:06 GMT
>>>What is and old-fashioned look?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> quite on the wrong track, and it's not from the past: this phrase is
> still current.

I am wrong, for sure, and stand corrected.  Donna, I think, was asking
for clarification before answering.    I am sure the usage is pondial.
Peter Duncanson - 09 Nov 2006 23:26 GMT
>What is and old-fashioned look?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>that's all I know. Not a clue why it should have been "old-fashioned",
>for one thing, or whether "disapproving look" is an apt definition.

From:
http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?refid=5
61505950

or
http://tinyurl.com/y8j2a8

   old-fash·ioned look (plural old-fash·ioned looks)
   
   noun
   Definition:    
   U.K. quizzical or reproving look: a quizzical or reproving look
   directed at somebody who has done or said something amiss

I can't discover the origin of the phrase.
Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Mike Lyle - 09 Nov 2006 23:42 GMT
> >What is and old-fashioned look?
> >
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> I can't discover the origin of the phrase.

I've always assumed, without any evidence, that it implies that the
looker is expressing an old-fashioned attitude in the sense of "People
today! We didn't do/say that kind of thing when I was a gel".

All Lombard Street to a China orange that it's a facial expression, not
a style of dress: the latter is pretty well (though not completely)
ruled out by "what was once called". We do sometimes see fashions come
back, but it's not very likely; and the expression does, I think,
qualify for "what was once called".

Signature

Mike.

John Dean - 10 Nov 2006 00:25 GMT
>>> What is and old-fashioned look?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> back, but it's not very likely; and the expression does, I think,
> qualify for "what was once called".

Uh huh. Nothing to do with what anyone is wearing. You could give an old
fashioned look in a nudist colony. As it happens OED covers the ground quite
thoroughly:

  4. Disapproving, tart, reproachful: used spec. of facial expression. Also
as adv., in a disapproving, reproachful or quizzical manner. Freq. in phr.
to give (someone) an old-fashioned look, to look old-fashioned at (someone).
  Quot. 1911 may belong in sense 3.
  1911 F. H. Burnett Secret Garden xvii. 181 She+examined them with a
solemn savage little face. She looked so sour and old-fashioned that the
nurse turned her head aside to hide the twitching of her mouth.  a1922 T. S.
Eliot Waste Land Drafts (1971) 13 No, ma'am, you needn't look old-fashioned
at me.  1926 S. Jameson Three Kingdoms vi. 154 Laurence listened, said: 'Oh.
Bring her up in two minutes,' and gave Macdougal what he mentally classified
as an old-fashioned look.  1933 E. Williams Late Christopher Bean ii. 51, I
was wrong thinking wrong things, and acting so old fashioned with you.  1935
Archit. Rev. LXXVII. 270/3 He straightened his back and gave me an
old-fashioned look as who should say 'And I dare you to laugh at me in your
damn superior way, blast you.'  1935 N. Marsh Enter Murderer vii. 83 'Don't
you act old-fashioned at me,' snarled the man.  1943 P. Cheyney You can
always Duck i. 15 She looks at me sorta old-fashioned.  1948 'N. Shute' No
Highway vi. 149 They'll probably look a bit old-fashioned at me.  1951 M.
Kennedy Lucy Carmichael vii. iv. 379 I've tried to tell her twice+and all I
get is an old-fashioned look.  1959 'R. Simons' Houseboat Killings xiii. 133
The commissionaire gave them an old-fashioned look as they spun the
revolving doors, but it was lost on Wace.  1974 Blackw. Mag. Sept. 197/2
Comrade Supervisor gave her an old-fashioned look and answered: 'Lidia died
the moment she fell, the moment she touched the ground.'

Signature

John Dean
Oxford

Philip Eden - 10 Nov 2006 13:48 GMT
"John Dean" <john-dean@fraglineone.net> wrote :

>>>> What is and old-fashioned look?
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 60 lines]
> old-fashioned look and answered: 'Lidia died the moment she fell, the
> moment she touched the ground.'

My own feeling that such a look is likely to be exaggerated or posed for
effect, but I note there is no suggestion of this in the OED entry.

Philip Eden
John Dean - 10 Nov 2006 16:14 GMT
> "John Dean" <john-dean@fraglineone.net> wrote :
>>>>> What is and old-fashioned look?
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> for effect, but I note there is no suggestion of this in the OED
> entry.

That will certainly be true on occasions. But I have known times when I have
been accused of giving such a look when I was simply being non-vocally
quizzical. And I have seen the look delivered by those who would scorn
exaggeration or posing.
Signature

John Dean
Oxford

Peter Duncanson - 10 Nov 2006 17:13 GMT
>"John Dean" <john-dean@fraglineone.net> wrote :
>>>>
>>>>> What is and old-fashioned look?
<major snip>

>My own feeling that such a look is likely to be exaggerated or posed for
>effect, but I note there is no suggestion of this in the OED entry.

A possible confusion is that an "old-fashioned look" involves two
categories of meaning of the noun "look":

1. "looking at"

   the act of directing the eyes toward something and perceiving it
   visually (Example: "He went out to have a look")

2."appearance".

   the expression on a person's face (Example: "A look of triumph")
   physical appearance (Example: "I don't like the looks of this
   place")

When A gives B an "old-fashioned look", A directs his eyes toward B.
What makes the look "old-fashioned" is the expression on A's face.
This can only be seen by B or someone else directing their eyes to
A's face.

So, A and B must look at one another for B to recognise A's facial
expression as being an "old-fashioned look".
 
Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

John Dean - 10 Nov 2006 18:33 GMT
>> "John Dean" <john-dean@fraglineone.net> wrote :
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> So, A and B must look at one another for B to recognise A's facial
> expression as being an "old-fashioned look".

I see no reason why C should not observe A giving B an old fashioned look of
which B is in blissful ignorance.
Signature

John Dean
Oxford

Peter Duncanson - 10 Nov 2006 20:26 GMT
>>> "John Dean" <john-dean@fraglineone.net> wrote :
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>I see no reason why C should not observe A giving B an old fashioned look of
>which B is in blissful ignorance.

I included C, D, et al. in "This can only be seen by B or someone
else directing their eyes to A's face". I failed to include "someone
else" in my final sentence.
Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

John Dean - 11 Nov 2006 00:39 GMT
>>>> "John Dean" <john-dean@fraglineone.net> wrote :
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> else directing their eyes to A's face". I failed to include "someone
> else" in my final sentence.

So where exactly does "someone else" fit in your final sentence?
Signature

John Dean
Oxford

Peter Duncanson - 11 Nov 2006 11:14 GMT
>>>>> "John Dean" <john-dean@fraglineone.net> wrote :
>>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
>So where exactly does "someone else" fit in your final sentence?

A fair question. I'll reword that as 'I failed to mention "someone
else" in my final sentence'.

However, the "final sentence" as written is complete from the points
of view of A and B:

   So, A and B must look at one another for B to recognise A's
   facial expression as being an "old-fashioned look".

We could add a second sentence such as:

   Of course, if neither B nor anyone else looks at A, then no one,
   except A, will know that A gave B an "old-fashioned look".
Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Donna Richoux - 11 Nov 2006 12:12 GMT
> We could add a second sentence such as:
>
>     Of course, if neither B nor anyone else looks at A, then no one,
>     except A, will know that A gave B an "old-fashioned look".

Except an omniscient narrator. And everyone who reads it.

But really, isn't deciding that a particular look is an "old-fashioned
look" something that the observer does, not the giver? It's not a phrase
I use; would it more likely be "So I gave him an old-fashioned look" or
"She gave me an old-fashioned look"?

People in America are apt to say the Look. Capitalizing the L with
emphasized tone. "She gave him the Look." Quelling. Miss Manners goes on
at some length about the usefulness of silent family signals that mean
"Stop that right now."

Which reminds me of a signal we set up within my family. If we were out
in public and one of us (often me) starting babbling too loudly about a
subject that another of us found sensitive, then the signal was to
mention Aunt Sophie (I think we used various names, but always aunts.)
Like, "Yes, I think you should tell Aunt Sophie all about that next time
you see her." We don't *have* any Aunt Sophie or hardly any aunts at
all, so that would stop the speaker in her tracks. So it was a very
innocuous way to say "Shut up."

Feel free to adapt it for your own purposes.

Signature

Best -- Donna Richoux

Peter Duncanson - 11 Nov 2006 13:19 GMT
>> We could add a second sentence such as:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>But really, isn't deciding that a particular look is an "old-fashioned
>look" something that the observer does, not the giver?

Um. Yes, no or maybe.

Here we are discussing the making of a facial expression as a form
of communication. In this context the person who makes the
expression described as an "old-fashioned look" intends to convey
some meaning. Assuming that the expression is observed by the
intended recipient (or someone else) there is then the matter of
whether the expression has been understood correctly.

Facial expressions can be misunderstood. What an observer thinks is
an "old-fashioned look" may not have been intended as such.
Similarly someone may make a face which is intended to be an
"old-fashioned look" but which is not interpreted as such by an
observer. (Where there is more than one observer there may not be
unanimity in the interpretation of any one facial expression.)

There is nothing special about this -- it applies in all forms of
communication: spoken, written and signed language, etc.

>It's not a phrase
>I use;

I don't use the phrase either. I would classify it as old-fashioned.

>would it more likely be "So I gave him an old-fashioned look" or
>"She gave me an old-fashioned look"?

Probably the latter and the third-party "She gave him an
old-fashioned look".

From the point of view of the giver of the look "So I gave him an
old-fashioned look" is possible, but I think I'd expect something
along the lines of "So I gave him a warning look" or "I looked at
him in alarm" with the accompanying facial expression being implicit
in the latter. (No doubt more apt adjectives can be found.)

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

b_salina - 09 Nov 2006 23:48 GMT
Peter Duncanson ha scritto:

> >What is and old-fashioned look?
> >
> >"What was once called an old-fashioned look".
[...]
> From:
> http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?refid=5
61505950

[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I can't discover the origin of the phrase.

Thanks. "Quizzical" is just fine.

B.
Pat Durkin - 10 Nov 2006 02:03 GMT
>>What is and old-fashioned look?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>    U.K. quizzical or reproving look: a quizzical or reproving look
>    directed at somebody who has done or said something amiss

My oh my oh my!  Learn something new every other post.  Thanks all.
SherLok Merfy - 10 Nov 2006 22:46 GMT
(...)
> From:
> http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?refid=5
61505950

[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I can't discover the origin of the phrase.

SherLok Merfy flattened his eyebrows for the author and told him to say
what he means,
rather than write some phrase that's a none too polite reminder of the
fact that most of our reproof comes from our elders. I'm not surprised
that the orijin of the phrase is scarcely known, because it's sloppy.
_______
<a href="http://www.mynumo.com/SherLok">BrewJay's Babble Bin, lite.</a>
Amethyst Deceiver - 11 Nov 2006 15:18 GMT
>(...)
>> From:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>fact that most of our reproof comes from our elders. I'm not surprised
>that the orijin of the phrase is scarcely known, because it's sloppy.

The what of the phrase?
Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

Peter Duncanson - 11 Nov 2006 16:25 GMT
>>(...)
>>> From:
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
>The what of the phrase?

Perhaps SherLok Merfy is teetotal and abhors the three letter
sequence g i n.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.