Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Joe Sestak = Joe Sixpack

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
tinwhistler - 11 Nov 2006 20:32 GMT
Joe Sestak, a former Navy vice admiral who won a Republican House seat
in Pennsylvania, said: "I honestly believe this nation in its vote
has said: 'What are we doing in Iraq? We can't stay there.' I
think they are rightfully leading the leaders to say, 'Set a date;
move toward it.' "
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/12/us/politics/12class.html?ei=5094&en=c28b82096a
3935d5&hp=&ex=1163307600&partner=homepage&pagewanted=all


If it's good enough for Joe Sixpack, it's good enough for me.
Yeah, this is supposed to be a nonpolitical forum: the AUE point is to
provide the first known recorded usage of "Joe Sixpack" as an
epithet for the ex-military guy.  Can anyone antedate it?

Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
Ray O'Hara - 11 Nov 2006 22:08 GMT
> Joe Sestak, a former Navy vice admiral who won a Republican House seat
> in Pennsylvania, said: "I honestly believe this nation in its vote
> has said: 'What are we doing in Iraq? We can't stay there.' I
> think they are rightfully leading the leaders to say, 'Set a date;
> move toward it.' "

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/12/us/politics/12class.html?ei=5094&en=c28b82
096a3935d5&hp=&ex=1163307600&partner=homepage&pagewanted=all

> If it's good enough for Joe Sixpack, it's good enough for me.
> Yeah, this is supposed to be a nonpolitical forum: the AUE point is to
> provide the first known recorded usage of "Joe Sixpack" as an
> epithet for the ex-military guy.  Can anyone antedate it?
>
> Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego

"Joe Sixpack" has no military conotations. It is not an epithet either, it
is just the average american male.
tinwhistler - 11 Nov 2006 22:31 GMT
> "Joe Sixpack" has no military conotations. It is not an epithet either, it
> is just the average american male.

Isn't calling a former vice admiral, now a US congressman-elect, an
"average American male" rather offensive?  Consider this excerpt from
OED2's entry for "epithet, n.:"

[1.] b. An offensive or derogatory expression used of a person; an
abusive term; a profanity. Cf. epitheted ppl. a. c.

  [1712 Arbuthnot Lewis Baboon turned Honest i. 2 Blockhead, Dunce,
a.s, Coxcomb, were the best Epithets he gave poor John.]   ...  1981 S.
Wentworth Say Hello to Yesterday v. 103 'You louse! You swine!'
With every epithet she hit out at him blindly.

Botanists use "epithet" in a much less loaded way -- it's simply an
ascribed quality.  I like the greatly increased flexibility of the word
when understood in that sense, just a concatenation.

Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
Ray O'Hara - 12 Nov 2006 03:55 GMT
> > "Joe Sixpack" has no military conotations. It is not an epithet either, it
> > is just the average american male.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> [

No. And I don't care what the OED calls it, nobody is offended by it. An
epithet that doesn't offend is not an epithet.

And where is  the Admiral called "Joe Sixpack".
Eric Walker - 11 Nov 2006 22:58 GMT
[...]

> [T]he AUE point is to provide the first known recorded usage of
> "Joe Sixpack" as an epithet for the ex-military guy.

That is not it's meaning: it signifies "the average Joe", or "man in
the street".

The name was apparently coined, in the slightly different form "Joe
Sikspak", by the late San Francisco humor columnist Art Hoppe; Hoppe's
characteristic use was to present a feigned letter addressed to someone
in government and signed "Joe Sikspak, American".  Joe was presented as
a somewhat low-wattage redneck.

(See--

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/02/03/MN9
8987.DTL


--for a citation; but I myself well remember Hoppe's columns using it
at least as far back as the early 70s.)
tinwhistler - 11 Nov 2006 23:15 GMT
> > [T]he AUE point is to provide the first known recorded usage of
> > "Joe Sixpack" as an epithet for the ex-military guy.
>
> That is not it's meaning: it signifies "the average Joe", or "man in
> the street".

Quote:
“An epithet (Greek - επιθετον and Latin - epitheton;
literally meaning 'imposed') is a descriptive word or phrase. It has
various shades of meaning when applied to real or fictitious people,
divinities, objects and biological nomenclature. It also means a
derogatory word or phrase used to insult someone.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epithet

I don’t mean to insult the guy – his quotation in the paper today
is one us Joe Sixpacks want to support, not denigrate.

Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
Eric Walker - 11 Nov 2006 23:41 GMT
[...]

>  Quote:
> “An epithet (Greek - επιθετον and Latin - epitheton; . . . .

Just so.  I was not addressing the use of the term "epithet" but rather
that of who or what the epithet characterizes.
tinwhistler - 12 Nov 2006 00:23 GMT
> [...]
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Just so.  I was not addressing the use of the term "epithet" but rather
> that of who or what the epithet characterizes.

My title for this thread imposes the phrase, "Joe Sixpack," on Joe
Sestak.  Is the practice here is to ignore thread titles?

Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
Peter Duncanson - 12 Nov 2006 00:39 GMT
>> [...]
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>My title for this thread imposes the phrase, "Joe Sixpack," on Joe
>Sestak.  Is the practice here is to ignore thread titles?

Yes, is the quick answer to that question.

From time to time someone here will point out that many people do
not, for various reasons, read thread titles.

The customary request is to repeat the thread title in the body of
the message, so as to make the message complete.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

tinwhistler - 12 Nov 2006 01:13 GMT
> >My title for this thread imposes the phrase, "Joe Sixpack," on Joe
> >Sestak.  Is the practice here is to ignore thread titles?
> >
> Yes, is the quick answer to that question.

My backhand repetition, in the line "If it's good enough for Joe
Sixpack, it's good enough for me," was obviously too subtle.  Would I
be wrong to read the somewhat barbed postings in this thread as
wrist-slapping for having started a barbecue-stopping (ie, political)
thread?  I have to admit to a very strong resentment against the
NYTimes and other media for glossing over the "get out of Iraq" message
in Tuesday's election; eg, NBC chose two pro-war pols to interview in
today's "Meet the Press."  Keith Ellison, the Black Muslim who won in
MN, made "immediate withdrawal now" his number one position, but all
the various media say is that he was antiwar in his campaign (then
moving quickly to address other remarkable features of his victory).
Joe Sestak accurately summarized the message of the voters, but it's at
the bottom of the two-page NYTimes' article.  The drums for the war
will continue not much abashed by the voters' action --what else is
new?

Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
rzed - 12 Nov 2006 03:19 GMT
[among other things]
> The drums
> for the war will continue not much abashed by the voters' action
> --what else is new?

I'm a-guessin' they'll be a-bashed for a while longer, all right.
I've seen one plan that calls for a fairly prompt withdrawal from
Iraq, and redeployment of those troops to Afghanistan. On the whole,
it actually makes a little more sense than the current plan, whatever
it may be.

Signature

rzed

Ray O'Hara - 12 Nov 2006 03:57 GMT
Eric Walker wrote:
> tinwhistler wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Just so.  I was not addressing the use of the term "epithet" but rather
> that of who or what the epithet characterizes.

My title for this thread imposes the phrase, "Joe Sixpack," on Joe
Sestak.  Is the practice here is to ignore thread titles?

Obviously you are a TROLL looking for a fight.
take it to alt.politics. there you can have a fight.
tinwhistler - 12 Nov 2006 06:19 GMT
> Obviously you are a TROLL looking for a fight.
> take it to alt.politics. there you can have a fight.

Looking for peace in all the wrong places, I guess.

Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
tinwhistler - 11 Nov 2006 23:37 GMT
> The name was apparently coined, in the slightly different form "Joe
> Sikspak", by the late San Francisco humor columnist Art Hoppe; Hoppe's
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> --for a citation; but I myself well remember Hoppe's columns using it
> at least as far back as the early 70s.)

Barry Popik at ADS, on 27 July 2003, posted his earliest sighting of
"Joe Sixpack:"

http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0307D&L=ADS-L&P=R3787&I=-3

10 September 1973, COSHOCTON TRIBUNE (Coshocton, Ohio), pg. 6, col. 1:
  In this (Dick--ed.) Dougherty is not all that different, having an
idea to
sell Joe Sixpack on tax reform and Sen. George McGovern and colliding
several
times during the campaign with Gordon Weil, who was the senator's ("We
never
call the senator George in public.") right hand protector and nag
during much
of the long campaign.

The author of the OH paper could well have encountered Hoppe's prior
usage of "Joe Sikspak" -- maybe someone with newpaper archive
(searchable) subscription could confirm a Hoppe antedate. (??)

Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
Tony Cooper - 12 Nov 2006 00:06 GMT
>[...]
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>in government and signed "Joe Sikspak, American".  Joe was presented as
>a somewhat low-wattage redneck.

Mike Royko, Pulitzer Prize winner and columnist for the Chicago Sun-
Times, named his average character "Slats Grobnik".  You can read
about Slat's life at
http://www.press.uchicago.edu/Misc/Chicago/730735.html

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Donna Richoux - 11 Nov 2006 23:51 GMT
> Joe Sestak, a former Navy vice admiral who won a Republican House seat
> in Pennsylvania, said: "I honestly believe this nation in its vote
> has said: 'What are we doing in Iraq? We can't stay there.' I
> think they are rightfully leading the leaders to say, 'Set a date;
> move toward it.' "

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/12/us/politics/12class.html?ei=5094&en=c2
8b82096a3935d5&hp=&ex=1163307600&partner=homepage&pagewanted=all

> If it's good enough for Joe Sixpack, it's good enough for me.
> Yeah, this is supposed to be a nonpolitical forum: the AUE point is to
> provide the first known recorded usage of "Joe Sixpack" as an
> epithet for the ex-military guy.  Can anyone antedate it?
>  
It's not military. Nor does the article say that anyone called Sestak,
Sixpack -- did they?

Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang (RHHDAS):

    Joe Sixpack n. the ordinary beer-drinking working
    man. 1977 L.A. Times (Nov. 8) By that time Billy had
    become a ort of Joe Sixpack folk hero.
    [Remaining citations snipped.]

Signature

Best -- Donna Richoux

tinwhistler - 12 Nov 2006 00:13 GMT
> It's not military. Nor does the article say that anyone called Sestak,
> Sixpack -- did they?

No -- my title for this thread is the first imposing on Sestak of the
concatenation, "Joe Sixpack," that I could find.  The quest for an
antedate had better succeed lest I be credited for the first coining of
such.  I don't want to be great -- Joe Sixpack status is all I aspire
to.

Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
Ray O'Hara - 12 Nov 2006 03:59 GMT
> > It's not military. Nor does the article say that anyone called Sestak,
> > Sixpack -- did they?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> such.  I don't want to be great -- Joe Sixpack status is all I aspire
> to.

The only title you will ascend to is usenet a.s.
Mark Brader - 12 Nov 2006 09:16 GMT
Donna Richoux:
> > It's not military. Nor does the article say that anyone called Sestak,
> > Sixpack -- did they?

Ozzie Maland:
> No -- my title for this thread is the first ...

Plonk.
Signature

Mark Brader, Toronto | "This one isn't close.  It's not even close to
msb@vex.net          |  being close."                --Adam Beneschan

Pat Durkin - 12 Nov 2006 17:26 GMT
>> It's not military. Nor does the article say that anyone called
>> Sestak,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> such.  I don't want to be great -- Joe Sixpack status is all I aspire
> to.

But you aren't coining anything.  You are applying the term for an
everyday guy to an "unknown known" (to paraphrase our nearly former
defense sec'y.)  Except for the fact that he has won, Sestak kinda
reminds me of Perot's erstwhile running mate, who at least earned the
post of admiral.
tinwhistler - 12 Nov 2006 21:05 GMT
> But you aren't coining anything.

Sestak, in the NYTimes article cited, purports to identify the voting
sentiment of the average USer last Tuesday, the "Joe Sixpack" voter
expression.  I applied the phrase "Joe Sixpack" to Sestak as a result,
and if the phrase has legs as a meme, or is rejuvenated as a pro or con
epithet in one or more subsequent campaigns, a trail is created as to
where and when Joe Sestak was first called "Joe Sixpack" (assuming
there are no antedates -- I would expect there are some, particularly
among his junior officers in the Navy.)  I used "coining" in the sense
of creating a new concatenation, like Churchill coining "iron curtain"
as the phrase applicable to the USSR's sealing off Eastern Europe.

Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
DianeE - 13 Nov 2006 00:31 GMT
> Sestak, in the NYTimes article cited, purports to identify the voting
> sentiment of the average USer last Tuesday, the "Joe Sixpack" voter
> expression.
---------------
IME, "Joe Sixpack" type guys do not vote.

DianeE
Charles Riggs - 21 Nov 2006 14:41 GMT
>>> It's not military. Nor does the article say that anyone called
>>> Sestak,
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>reminds me of Perot's erstwhile running mate, who at least earned the
>post of admiral.

I recall the usages from the Caspar Weinburger days as SecDef, or
earlier. There are knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns, the
most difficult ones to forecast and budget for. The last two make
little sense, until you think about them. What I don't know is if
these terms are limited to the Department of Defence, or not. I
suspect they have far wider application.
Signature

Charles Riggs

Pat Durkin - 21 Nov 2006 15:28 GMT
>>> No -- my title for this thread is the first imposing on Sestak of
>>> the
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> these terms are limited to the Department of Defence, or not. I
> suspect they have far wider application.

I only heard the usages recently in reference to Rummy.  I didn't
realize the Cap had used the terms.  I certainly think they may have
broader than the current use.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.