Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

part of speech inquiry

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BillyBobJimBo - 12 Nov 2006 10:11 GMT
What part of speech, if there is a category, is it when you use, for
example, a person's name as a new (usually slang?) expression or term?
A recent, probably well-known, example would be the use of Monica
Lewinsky's (re: President Clinton) last name to refer to fellatio. As
in, "I got a Lewinsky last night." Or, if your friend, Quinn, is known
for doing something all the time (or once), you might say, "I pulled a
Quinn."
Eric Walker - 12 Nov 2006 10:44 GMT
> What part of speech, if there is a category, is it when you use, for
> example, a person's name as a new (usually slang?) expression or term?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> for doing something all the time (or once), you might say, "I pulled a
> Quinn."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eponym

It's worth reading in full, but the direct answer, as given there, is
"eponym":

"An eponym is the name of a person, whether real or fictitious, who has
(or is thought to have) given rise to the name of a particular place,
tribe, discovery, or other item."

An eponymous phrase is whatever part of speech it is used as, usually a
noun, sometimes an adjective, less commonly other things.  In many
eponymous uses, the person's name is an obvious tag, as in Ohm's Law;
but sometimes the bare name itself becomes the word, as in your
inquiry.

A few well-known one-word eponymous forms: bloomers (the garment),
after Ameila Bloomer; sideburns, originally burnsides (the facial
hair), after General Ambrose Burnside; or diesel (the engine type),
after Rudolf Diesel.  (Note again that the _person_ is the eponym, not
the derived word or phrase.)
Peter Moylan - 13 Nov 2006 12:24 GMT
> A few well-known one-word eponymous forms: bloomers (the garment),
> after Ameila Bloomer; sideburns, originally burnsides (the facial
> hair), after General Ambrose Burnside; or diesel (the engine type),
> after Rudolf Diesel.  (Note again that the _person_ is the eponym,
> not the derived word or phrase.)

The examples you give have survived, but more often such fame is
fleeting. Only a few years ago we got a new term for having one's penis
chopped off. The poor fellow is presumably still suffering the
after-effects, but already I've forgotten his name.

In some other cases the eponymous term survives, but the identity of the
person is lost. We still know what is meant by "he rogered the cabin
boy", but I doubt that anyone knows who the original Roger was.

Signature

Peter Moylan                             http://www.pmoylan.org

Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses.  The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses.  The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.

Bob Cunningham - 13 Nov 2006 14:03 GMT
[...]

> (Note again that the _person_ is the eponym,
> > not the derived word or phrase.)

That appears to have been true early on, but these days
dictionaries say that "eponym" can refer either to the name
of the person or to the word taken from that name.

American, _Merriam-Webster's 11th Collegiate_ (_MWCD11_):

    1 : one for whom or which something is or is
    believed to be named
    2 : a name (as of a drug or a disease) based on or
    derived from an eponym

British, _New Shorter Oxford_ (_NSOED_):

    1 A person whose name has given rise (in fact or
    by repute) to the name of a people, place,
    institution, etc.; a personal name used as a
    common noun or used to form a common noun. M19.

    b A name or noun formed in this way. L19.

The online _Oxford English Dictionary_ has the date 1846 for
"eponym" referring strictly to the person, and 1885 for the
word so formed.  It says

   ADDITIONS SERIES 1993
   eponym, n.
   Add:    [1.] c. A proper name used generically; more
   loosely, the generic name itself, or any noun phrase
   of specific meaning which includes a proper name.

   1885 Jrnl. Nerv. & Mental Dis. XII. 349 The very
   awkward dionymic eponym, Circulus Willisi.
   1946 J. DOBSON Anatomical Eponyms 2 A great many of
   the old and well-known eponyms that perpetuated the
   names of some of the masters of Anatomy have been
   successfully eliminated.
   1960 [see PENDRED n.].
   1982 Daily Tel. 23 Dec. 6/7 Some eponyms are
   euphemisms of a sort{em}Casanova, dunce and lush,
   for instance.

There be surprises, but sure enough, from _MWCD11_:

   Main Entry: dunce
   Etymology: John Duns Scotus, whose once accepted
   writings were ridiculed in the 16th century

However, _MWCD11_ says the etymology of "lush" is unknown,
and _NSOED_ guesses at its etymology but the guesses don't
include eponymicity.

But where there's smoke, someone must at least have lit a
match.  Can anyone here say why someone has thought that
"lush" was an eponym?
Donna Richoux - 13 Nov 2006 16:40 GMT
>     1982 Daily Tel. 23 Dec. 6/7 Some eponyms are
>     euphemisms of a sort{em}Casanova, dunce and lush,
>     for instance.

[snip]

> However, _MWCD11_ says the etymology of "lush" is unknown,
> and _NSOED_ guesses at its etymology but the guesses don't
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> "lush" was an eponym?
>  
Putting "lush" into that oh-so-handy Quick Search box at the AUE Website
gives this article -- see final reference:
 http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=19990519

Signature

Best - Donna Richoux

Bob Cunningham - 13 Nov 2006 18:14 GMT
> >     1982 Daily Tel. 23 Dec. 6/7 Some eponyms are
> >     euphemisms of a sort{em}Casanova, dunce and lush,
> >     for instance.

> [snip]

> > However, _MWCD11_ says the etymology of "lush" is unknown,
> > and _NSOED_ guesses at its etymology but the guesses don't
> > include eponymicity.

> > But where there's smoke, someone must at least have lit a
> > match.  Can anyone here say why someone has thought that
> > "lush" was an eponym?

> Putting "lush" into that oh-so-handy Quick Search box at the AUE Website
> gives this article -- see final reference:
>   http://www.randomhouse.com/wotd/index.pperl?date=19990519

Thanks.  That appears to nail the source of the idea.

At that URL they say

   The Oxford English Dictionary mentions a drinking
   society called the "City of Lushington," alleged
   to have met since about 1745, but this cannot be
   confirmed. Lushington was used from the early
   nineteenth century in allusive phrases referring to
   alcohol and drunkenness.

The _Oxford English Dictionary_ (_OED_) says under
"Lushington"

   [Punning use of the surname Lushington, with
   allusion to  LUSH n.2
   The ‘City of Lushington’ was the name of a
   convivial society (consisting chiefly of actors)
   which met at the Harp Tavern, Russell Street,
   until about 1895. It had a ‘Lord Mayor’ and four
  ‘aldermen’, presiding over ‘wards’ called Juniper,
   Poverty, Lunacy, and Suicide. On the admission of
   a new member, the ‘Lord Mayor’ (of late years at
   least) harangued him on the evils of excess in
   drink. The ‘City’ claimed to have existed for 150
   years; if this claim be well-founded, the
   existence of LUSH n.2 will be authenticated for a
   date considerably earlier than that of our first
   quot. Our information is from ‘Sir’ B. Davies,
   the last ‘Lord Mayor of Lushington’.]

I don't know what Random House WOTD is referring to when
they say "this cannot be confirmed", but maybe it applies
only to the date 1745.

Anyway, after reading all of the relevant material in _OED_,
I would be willing to believe that "lush", meaning "a
drunkard" and with unknown etymology, came first, and the
fictional "City of Lushington" was a play on that meaning of
"lush".  That would be in contradistinction to the
"drunkard" meaning of "lush" being derived from
"Lushington".
HVS - 13 Nov 2006 16:49 GMT
On 13 Nov 2006, Bob Cunningham wrote

> However, _MWCD11_ says the etymology of "lush" is unknown,
> and _NSOED_ guesses at its etymology but the guesses don't
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> match.  Can anyone here say why someone has thought that
> "lush" was an eponym?

There was Lord Justice Sir Robert Lush in the 19th century;  I seem
to recall that his wife (or possibly a daughter-in-law) was involved
in philanthrophic support of some sort in Victorian London.

Soo maybe somebody clocked the name and the word, and assumed
eponymicity.

Signature

Cheers, Harvey

Canadian and British English, indiscriminately mixed
For e-mail, change harvey.news to harvey.van

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.