> > I saw the following sentence in a context where the discussion is about
> > a person's academic work. I think "reference" here means the author's
> > name, publication date, and info about where it was published, e.g.
> > journal name or book title. Am I right? I'd appreciate your help.
> >
> > "Do you have some reason for not providing the reference? "
> yes, you are quite right
Well -- yes in informal speech: but "citation" is the
correct nomenclature. The giant directories published
every quarter in Philadelphia are citation indices, not
reference indices.

Signature
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Jonathan Morton - 13 Nov 2006 20:08 GMT
>>> I saw the following sentence in a context where the discussion is about
>>> a person's academic work. I think "reference" here means the author's
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> every quarter in Philadelphia are citation indices, not
> reference indices.
Ah, now it's nice to see someone who agrees with me that the plural of
"index" is always "indices". I'm sure I'm not dreaming it that some
professional compilers of these things (at least in the UK) insist that
the things at the end of books are "indexes", and that "indices" are
reserved for powers of numbers. I don't buy this.
Regards
Jonathan