> > how to understand the 'by' in the below sentence,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the equivalent of "until" for this "by", even though, to my mind, it is
> not quite the same.
IMHO, 'unit' is often used, for the similar purpose, with 'NOT'. am i
right? so the above can be changed to: until about 15000 we did not
arrived at a system ....
ain't it right?
Robert Lieblich - 15 Nov 2006 04:07 GMT
> > > how to understand the 'by' in the below sentence,
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> ain't it right?
You may have set a new record for sheer density of confusion in one
short paragraph. To begin with, it's clear you mean "until," not
"unit." Second, you're going to have to learn to use the shift key
for more than initialisms. Third, with "did" carrying the sense of
past time as the auxiliary, "arrived" should be "arrive." Fourth, the
year 15000 is far in the future; might you have intended to write
"1500"?
But most important of all, even with "arrived" and "15000" fixed, your
suggested version is unidiomatic. The simplest correction would
result in "Until about 1500, we had not arrived at a system." There
are other, better versions, but enough is enough.
What is your native language?

Signature
Bob Lieblich
Native English speaker