Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

By ... + verb + ed

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Steven Woody - 14 Nov 2006 02:41 GMT
how to understand the 'by' in the below sentence,

By about 1500 we arrived at a system which has remained nearly
unchanged until today.

thanks.

-
woody
Eric Walker - 14 Nov 2006 03:19 GMT
> how to understand the 'by' in the below sentence,
>
> By about 1500 we arrived at a system which has remained nearly
> unchanged until today.

It is the statement "By A.D. 1500, we had &c." with a qualifier "about"
for 1500, meaning that the year is an approximation of the point at
which "we arrived" &c".

"By 1500", in turn, means (as my desk dictionary puts it) "no later
than"--as in "Be home by 10 p.m."
Steven Woody - 14 Nov 2006 03:40 GMT
> > how to understand the 'by' in the below sentence,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> "By 1500", in turn, means (as my desk dictionary puts it) "no later
> than"--as in "Be home by 10 p.m."

thank you. i think you are right after check the context.
Robert Bannister - 15 Nov 2006 00:16 GMT
> how to understand the 'by' in the below sentence,
>
> By about 1500 we arrived at a system which has remained nearly
> unchanged until today.

I don't know what your native language is, but I know some languages use
the equivalent of "until" for this "by", even though, to my mind, it is
not quite the same.

Signature

Rob Bannister

Steven Woody - 15 Nov 2006 03:48 GMT
> > how to understand the 'by' in the below sentence,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> the equivalent of "until" for this "by", even though, to my mind, it is
> not quite the same.

IMHO, 'unit' is often used, for the similar purpose, with 'NOT'.  am i
right? so the above can be changed to:  until about 15000 we did not
arrived at a system ....

ain't it right?
Robert Lieblich - 15 Nov 2006 04:07 GMT
> > > how to understand the 'by' in the below sentence,
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> ain't it right?

You may have set a new record for sheer density of confusion in one
short paragraph.  To begin with, it's clear you mean "until," not
"unit."  Second, you're going to have to learn to use the shift key
for more than initialisms.  Third, with "did" carrying the sense of
past time as the auxiliary, "arrived" should be "arrive."  Fourth, the
year 15000 is far in the future; might you have intended to write
"1500"?

But most important of all, even with "arrived" and "15000" fixed, your
suggested version is unidiomatic.  The simplest correction would
result in "Until about 1500, we had not arrived at a system."  There
are other, better versions, but enough is enough.

What is your native language?

Signature

Bob Lieblich
Native English speaker

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.