> I want to clarify the definition of 'single' in the US. Do we call a
> person who is not married but with relationship as 'single'? If not,
> what do we call on that?
>
> please advice. thanks...
>> I want to clarify the definition of 'single' in the US. Do we call a
>> person who is not married but with relationship as 'single'? If not,
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> as a term of endearment for your sweetie, if it's applicable: "my
> darling posselq."
I first met this term in 1979-80, when somebody published a poem about
it in, almost certainly, the San Francisco Chronicle. It's gone from my
mind now, although Googling reveals a much shorter version attributed to
Charles Osgood (1981) by several sources:
There's nothing that I wouldn't do
If you would be my POSSLQ.
You live with me, and I with you,
And you will be my POSSLQ.
I'll be your friend and so much more;
That's what a POSSLQ is for.
The search also turned up this interesting variant:
I will give my heart to you,
if you will be my POSSLQ.
Unless you solemnly confess,
you are really OTPOTSS.

Signature
Peter Moylan http://www.pmoylan.org
Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses. The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses. The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.
tinwhistler - 20 Nov 2006 03:46 GMT
> I first met this term in 1979-80, when somebody published a poem about
> it in, almost certainly, the San Francisco Chronicle. It's gone from my
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Unless you solemnly confess,
> you are really OTPOTSS.
Warm and fuzzy -- better than Toot and Puddle (who happen to be both
males).
Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
Marc4UCB - 21 Nov 2006 01:16 GMT
> Charles Osgood (1981) by several sources:
Is this the famous experimental linguist? The inventor of the Semantic
Differential research technique and author of _Is_a_Boulder_Sweet_or_Sour?_