>> If by "just in" you mean last year.
>>
> Sorry if I offended you. I meant this just in HERE.
> It was new to me and I thought I'd share it with you gentle folk.

Signature
Maria
There's only one 'n' in my email address, and it's not in my first name.
> I, for one, hadn't heard it before. My reaction was a groan and a
> chuckle. In other words, I wasn't offended. But I think we all have
> to be careful about what jokes and off-topic matters we post here.
> Some readers may, indeed, be offended. (I've been an offender myself,
> unfortunately.)
Many of us will recall a recent incident where Daniel McGrath was
heavily criticised for an offensive message that he posted. I stayed out
of that discussion because my (limited) knowledge of autism made me
believe that Daniel genuinely didn't understand why he had given
offence. It was just one of those things where we should accept that
someone has been offended, and pass on.
Comments about religion and politics, the big taboos, will almost
certainly offend someone or other; but they're a normal part of daily
discourse, so we forge ahead as best we can. The truth is, we have such
a diverse society in AUE, especially when the lurkers are counted, that
you never quite know when you're going to offend someone.
With a growing acceptance of talking about bodies, bodily functions, and
the like, the old category of "dirty joke" is less likely to offend
these days, and those who are offended by them have already developed
the habit of skipping over such postings. Personally, I think that men
have little ability to stop staring at breasts. There's a spring in our
eyes that keep dragging the eyes in that direction no matter how
determined we are to not look. That's life!

Signature
Peter Moylan http://www.pmoylan.org
Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses. The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses. The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.
the Omrud - 22 Nov 2006 09:39 GMT
Peter Moylan <peter@ozebelgDieSpammers.org> had it:
> > I, for one, hadn't heard it before. My reaction was a groan and a
> > chuckle. In other words, I wasn't offended. But I think we all have
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> offence. It was just one of those things where we should accept that
> someone has been offended, and pass on.
There is a difference between accidentally causing offence which one
then regrets (or honestly doesn't understand), and having a viewpoint
point which one knows will offend some people, meaning that one must
either keep quiet (or not exhibit the behaviour) or cause the
offence. I will not draw back from stating my opinions (e.g. on
religion) just because they might be considered offensive by some.
You can't spend your life avoiding causing offence. There are some
reading who are offended by the singular "they".

Signature
David
=====
Robin Bignall - 22 Nov 2006 23:04 GMT
>Peter Moylan <peter@ozebelgDieSpammers.org> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>You can't spend your life avoiding causing offence. There are some
>reading who are offended by the singular "they".
I think that a great many of the seriously politically-correct people
spend a lot of their time trying to avoid giving offence to anyone.
They are doomed to failure, IMO, not just because of the deliberate
ignorance that seems to pervade much of today's world, but also
because there are a great many determined offence-takers around, many
of whom are the politically-correct themselves. This offence-taking
is not something that came about just as a consequence of PC: it was
always around. I remember thinking, when I was about six or seven and
first started listening seriously to discussion programmes on BBC
radio, that there were a lot of people around who had too much time,
too little sense, and who like spouting off. Sixty years later, I
haven't changed my view.

Signature
Robin
Herts, England