Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

This just in

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bayskater - 21 Nov 2006 03:59 GMT
This just in:
Apple Computer reported today that it has developed computer chips that can
store and play music inside women's breasts. This is considered to be a
major breakthrough because women are always complaining about men staring at
their breasts and not listening to them.
Ray O'Hara - 21 Nov 2006 04:21 GMT
> This just in:

If  by "just in" you mean last year.
bayskater - 21 Nov 2006 04:26 GMT
>> This just in:
>
> If  by "just in" you mean last year.

Sorry if I offended you. I meant this just in HERE.
It was new to me and I thought I'd share it with you gentle folk.
Maria - 21 Nov 2006 07:00 GMT
>> bayskater wrote: in message

>>> This just in:

>> If  by "just in" you mean last year.
>>
> Sorry if I offended you. I meant this just in HERE.
> It was new to me and I thought I'd share it with you gentle folk.

I, for one, hadn't heard it before. My reaction was a groan and a
chuckle. In other words, I wasn't offended. But I think we all have to
be careful about what jokes and off-topic matters we post here. Some
readers may, indeed, be offended. (I've been an offender myself,
unfortunately.)

Signature

Maria
There's only one 'n' in my email address, and it's not in my first name.

Peter Moylan - 21 Nov 2006 23:45 GMT
> I, for one, hadn't heard it before. My reaction was a groan and a
> chuckle. In other words, I wasn't offended. But I think we all have
> to be careful about what jokes and off-topic matters we post here.
> Some readers may, indeed, be offended. (I've been an offender myself,
>  unfortunately.)

Many of us will recall a recent incident where Daniel McGrath was
heavily criticised for an offensive message that he posted. I stayed out
of that discussion because my (limited) knowledge of autism made me
believe that Daniel genuinely didn't understand why he had given
offence. It was just one of those things where we should accept that
someone has been offended, and pass on.

Comments about religion and politics, the big taboos, will almost
certainly offend someone or other; but they're a normal part of daily
discourse, so we forge ahead as best we can. The truth is, we have such
a diverse society in AUE, especially when the lurkers are counted, that
you never quite know when you're going to offend someone.

With a growing acceptance of talking about bodies, bodily functions, and
the like, the old category of "dirty joke" is less likely to offend
these days, and those who are offended by them have already developed
the habit of skipping over such postings. Personally, I think that men
have little ability to stop staring at breasts. There's a spring in our
eyes that keep dragging the eyes in that direction no matter how
determined we are to not look. That's life!

Signature

Peter Moylan                             http://www.pmoylan.org

Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses.  The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses.  The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.

the Omrud - 22 Nov 2006 09:39 GMT
Peter Moylan <peter@ozebelgDieSpammers.org> had it:

> > I, for one, hadn't heard it before. My reaction was a groan and a
> > chuckle. In other words, I wasn't offended. But I think we all have
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> offence. It was just one of those things where we should accept that
> someone has been offended, and pass on.

There is a difference between accidentally causing offence which one
then regrets (or honestly doesn't understand), and having a viewpoint  
point which one knows will offend some people, meaning that one must
either keep quiet (or not exhibit the behaviour) or cause the
offence.  I will not draw back from stating my opinions (e.g. on
religion) just because they might be considered offensive by some.  
You can't spend your life avoiding causing offence.  There are some
reading who are offended by the singular "they".

Signature

David
=====

Robin Bignall - 22 Nov 2006 23:04 GMT
>Peter Moylan <peter@ozebelgDieSpammers.org> had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>You can't spend your life avoiding causing offence.  There are some
>reading who are offended by the singular "they".

I think that a great many of the seriously politically-correct people
spend a lot of their time trying to avoid giving offence to anyone.
They are doomed to failure, IMO, not just because of the deliberate
ignorance that seems to pervade much of today's world, but also
because there are a great many determined offence-takers around, many
of whom are the politically-correct themselves.  This offence-taking
is not something that came about just as a consequence of PC: it was
always around.  I remember thinking, when I was about six or seven and
first started listening seriously to discussion programmes on BBC
radio, that there were a lot of people around who had too much time,
too little sense, and who like spouting off.  Sixty years later, I
haven't changed my view.
Signature

Robin
Herts, England

dontbother - 21 Nov 2006 07:09 GMT
> "Ray O'Hara" <roh@comcast.net> wrote

>>> This just in:
>>
>> If  by "just in" you mean last year.
>>
> Sorry if I offended you. I meant this just in HERE.
> It was new to me and I thought I'd share it with you gentle folk.

I appreciated it, so I think it was worth the effort. It got a
chuckle out me.

Signature

Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan.
Unmunged email: /at/easypeasy.com
"Impatience is the mother of misery."

bayskater - 21 Nov 2006 15:46 GMT
>> "Ray O'Hara" <roh@comcast.net> wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I appreciated it, so I think it was worth the effort. It got a
> chuckle out me.

Thanks, Franke and Maria. My intentions were good.

Fred
Robert Bannister - 22 Nov 2006 00:03 GMT
> This just in:
> Apple Computer reported today that it has developed computer chips that can
> store and play music inside women's breasts. This is considered to be a
> major breakthrough because women are always complaining about men staring at
> their breasts and not listening to them.

This is clearly a fallacy. I make a point of listening to women's
breasts, and put my face as close as possible to show that I am paying
attention.

Signature

Rob Bannister

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.