Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / November 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Binding of stainless steel components - What is that d#"n word?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Harry Lethall - 24 Nov 2006 09:57 GMT
Hi all,
When you hit 55+ the brain starts to fail. Spectacles found in the
refrigerator, etc ;-)  I have forgotten a simple term I should know
backwards.

When you fit a nut to a threaded stainless steel thread, for outdoors use
you should use some form of lubricant, otherwise there is a risk that they
will "bind and permanently lock" - it is just the same with running and
engine without oil, but a bit more expensive.

Please - what is the word I am seeking? It sounds like "Seeze up" but I
cannot remember how to spell it. When I use the usual dictionary spelcheck
confirmation (BrE) I keep coming back to "cease".

BR Hairy
Leslie Danks - 24 Nov 2006 10:17 GMT
> Hi all,
> When you hit 55+ the brain starts to fail. Spectacles found in the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> cannot remember how to spell it. When I use the usual dictionary spelcheck
> confirmation (BrE) I keep coming back to "cease".

"Anti-seize thread lubricant" is probably what you mean. I used to use
Loctite - here's a link:

http://tinyurl.com/v89h7

Signature

Les

Harry Lethall - 24 Nov 2006 10:26 GMT
> > Hi all,
> > When you hit 55+ the brain starts to fail. Spectacles found in the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> > cannot remember how to spell it. When I use the usual dictionary spelcheck
> > confirmation (BrE) I keep coming back to "cease".

> "Anti-seize thread lubricant" is probably what you mean. I used to use
> Loctite - here's a link:

SEIZE - Great Les, many thanks. That is the spelling I was loking for. Funny
how I have used the word for many years, but as a radio/electronics engineer
I have never had call to actually write it down. At least, not for as long
as I can remember.

Many thanks for the link, nice to get more terminology and background info.
I love this newsgroup, little SPAM and loads of people willing to share
knowledge. May thanks once again.

BR Harry
Tony Cooper - 24 Nov 2006 14:53 GMT
>> > Please - what is the word I am seeking? It sounds like "Seeze up" but I
>> > cannot remember how to spell it. When I use the usual dictionary
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>I love this newsgroup, little SPAM and loads of people willing to share
>knowledge. May thanks once again.

I read the original post and thought the word would be "seize", but
then thought that this was so blindingly obvious that it must be
something else.

However, since the exact same thing happens to me on occasion, I do
understand.  When I do it - forget a dead-common word - I just write
it off to my age.  When someone else does it, I can't imagine what's
wrong with them.

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Donna Richoux - 24 Nov 2006 15:19 GMT
> When I do it - forget a dead-common word - I just write
> it off to my age.  When someone else does it, I can't imagine what's
> wrong with them.

I noticed this title in the American Book Center yesterday: "1,000
Unforgettable Senior Moments: Of Which We Could Remember Only 246."

Signature

Best -- Donna Richoux

Gene Wirchenko - 24 Nov 2006 21:41 GMT
[snip]

>However, since the exact same thing happens to me on occasion, I do
>understand.  When I do it - forget a dead-common word - I just write
>it off to my age.  When someone else does it, I can't imagine what's
>wrong with them.

    A pity it does not really work that.  I could do without getting
old.  I would extend you the same courtesy.  I am 46, and on
Wednesday, I surrendered to having to get glasses.  In about another
ten days, I will be a part-time four-eyed nerd.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
    I have preferences.
    You have biases.
    He/She has prejudices.
Robin Bignall - 24 Nov 2006 22:50 GMT
>[snip]
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Wednesday, I surrendered to having to get glasses.  In about another
>ten days, I will be a part-time four-eyed nerd.

At 46 you should be old enough to withstand the slings and arrows of
outrageous fortune.  I had to start wearing glasses at 15 and it was
as though the end of the world had arrived.  The old adage "Boys don't
make passes at girls who wear glasses" seemed to work in reverse, too,
back in the 1950s.
Signature

Robin
Herts, England

Sara Lorimer - 25 Nov 2006 03:31 GMT
> At 46 you should be old enough to withstand the slings and arrows of
> outrageous fortune.  I had to start wearing glasses at 15 and it was
> as though the end of the world had arrived.  The old adage "Boys don't
> make passes at girls who wear glasses" seemed to work in reverse, too,
> back in the 1950s.

Fifteen? Oooh, lucky you. Four years old, here, _plus_ an eye patch. Of
course, appealing to the opposite sex wasn't high on my priority list
then.

Signature

SML

Amethyst Deceiver - 25 Nov 2006 18:03 GMT
>> At 46 you should be old enough to withstand the slings and arrows of
>> outrageous fortune.  I had to start wearing glasses at 15 and it was
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>course, appealing to the opposite sex wasn't high on my priority list
>then.

Four years old? When YoungBloke started nursery, aged 10mo, there was
a little boy in the same room, perhaps six months older, with glasses.
One lens of which was covered with a patch. The little boy's 3 and a
bit now, and still in glasses. He looks very cute in them.
Signature

Linz
Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford
My accent may vary

Peter Moylan - 26 Nov 2006 11:23 GMT
> At 46 you should be old enough to withstand the slings and arrows of
>  outrageous fortune.  I had to start wearing glasses at 15 and it was
>  as though the end of the world had arrived.  The old adage "Boys
> don't make passes at girls who wear glasses" seemed to work in
> reverse, too, back in the 1950s.

Glasses were great heavy-framed ugly things in the 1950s. At least now
we have a wider range of styles. I'm finding that my ability to attract
women is about the same with or without my glasses: approximately zero.

Back in the 1950s we also said "Men don't make passes at girls with big
arses". These days it's rare to see a young girl without a big arse.
With obesity at epidemic levels in the rich countries, and famine
getting worse in the poor ones, it's probably about time we reintroduced
cannibalism.

Signature

Peter Moylan                             http://www.pmoylan.org

Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses.  The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses.  The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.

Prai Jei - 26 Nov 2006 21:38 GMT
Robin Bignall (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message
<lhtem2t2a5on07ou4rfo1c9t18ckdchqn0@4ax.com>:

>>[snip]
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> make passes at girls who wear glasses" seemed to work in reverse, too,
> back in the 1950s.

I'm 51 and have always enjoyed excellent eyesight. Of course, my eyes are so
pretty it would be a shame if they had to be concealed behind artificial
optics.

:))))

Signature

Terms and conditions apply. Batteries not included. Subject to status.
Financial commitment required. Always read the label. Keep out of children.

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply

Mark Brader - 24 Nov 2006 23:43 GMT
> However, since the exact same thing happens to me on occasion, I do
> understand.  When I do it - forget a dead-common word - I just write
> it off to my age.  When someone else does it, I can't imagine what's
> wrong with them.

Okay, we're 2/3 of the way to an irregular-verb joke here...
Signature

Mark Brader | "Grammar am for people who can't think for *myself*.
Toronto     |  Understanded me?"
msb@vex.net |                    -- Buck (Get Fuzzy: Darby Conley)

Prai Jei - 26 Nov 2006 21:44 GMT
Tony Cooper (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message
<cf1em2pfbcapthkhm79ige0qacgpoqkr4c@4ax.com>:

> I read the original post and thought the word would be "seize", but
> then thought that this was so blindingly obvious that it must be
> something else.

What a change of direction for this thread. As the OP feared, did it bind
and permanently lock?

Signature

Terms and conditions apply. Batteries not included. Subject to status.
Financial commitment required. Always read the label. Keep out of children.

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply

Donna Richoux - 24 Nov 2006 15:19 GMT
> I love this newsgroup, little SPAM and loads of people willing to share
> knowledge. May thanks once again.

I take it that your changing from Hairy Lethal to Harry Lethall is a
sign of your esteem for us.

Signature

Best wishes -- Donna Richoux

R H Draney - 24 Nov 2006 17:09 GMT
Harry Lethall filted:

>SEIZE - Great Les, many thanks. That is the spelling I was loking for.

The spelling follows the rule "I before E except when it isn't"....r

Signature

"Keep your eye on the Bishop.  I want to know when
he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.

Mark Brader - 24 Nov 2006 23:45 GMT
Harry Lethall:
>> SEIZE - Great Les, many thanks. That is the spelling I was loking for.

R.H. Draney:
> The spelling follows the rule "I before E except when it isn't"....r

I don't usually bother with spelling mnemonics, but I've always liked
the one that says, "to seize is improper".  A siege, on the other hand,
requires following the rules with military precision.
Signature

Mark Brader, Toronto | "So *you* say." --Toddy Beamish
msb@vex.net          |   (H.G. Wells, "The Man Who Could Work Miracles")

Roland Hutchinson - 25 Nov 2006 01:00 GMT
> Harry Lethall filted:
>>
>>SEIZE - Great Les, many thanks. That is the spelling I was loking for.
>
> The spelling follows the rule "I before E except when it isn't"....r

That's one of the few rules of English orthography that has absolutely no
exceptions.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Prai Jei - 26 Nov 2006 21:38 GMT
Roland Hutchinson (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in
message <EAM9h.9899$9e.6190@trnddc02>:

>> Harry Lethall filted:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> That's one of the few rules of English orthography that has absolutely no
> exceptions.

Einstein rewrote so many rules that it's no surprise that he breaks this one
twice.

OK so he was Swiss-German but what the f
Signature

Terms and conditions apply. Batteries not included. Subject to status.
Financial commitment required. Always read the label. Keep out of children.

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply

Roland Hutchinson - 27 Nov 2006 00:45 GMT
> Roland Hutchinson (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in
> message <EAM9h.9899$9e.6190@trnddc02>:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> OK so he was Swiss-German but what the f

No more (though no less) Swiss than he was American: a naturalized citizen
of both countries.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Prai Jei - 26 Nov 2006 21:44 GMT
Harry Lethall (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message
<ek6hcf$27v$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se>:

> Many thanks for the link, nice to get more terminology and background
> info. I love this newsgroup, little SPAM and loads of people willing to
> share knowledge. May thanks once again.

We're all a bunch of basically nice people here.
Signature

Terms and conditions apply. Batteries not included. Subject to status.
Financial commitment required. Always read the label. Keep out of children.

Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply

Peter Moylan - 27 Nov 2006 01:07 GMT
> Harry Lethall (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message
> <ek6hcf$27v$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se>:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> We're all a bunch of basically nice people here.

Oh no we're not!

Signature

Peter Moylan                             http://www.pmoylan.org

Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses.  The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses.  The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.

Mike Lyle - 27 Nov 2006 12:26 GMT
> > Harry Lethall (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message
> > <ek6hcf$27v$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se>:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Oh no we're not!

And who asked you, fercrysay?

Signature

Mike.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.