Binding of stainless steel components - What is that d#"n word?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Harry Lethall - 24 Nov 2006 09:57 GMT Hi all, When you hit 55+ the brain starts to fail. Spectacles found in the refrigerator, etc ;-) I have forgotten a simple term I should know backwards.
When you fit a nut to a threaded stainless steel thread, for outdoors use you should use some form of lubricant, otherwise there is a risk that they will "bind and permanently lock" - it is just the same with running and engine without oil, but a bit more expensive.
Please - what is the word I am seeking? It sounds like "Seeze up" but I cannot remember how to spell it. When I use the usual dictionary spelcheck confirmation (BrE) I keep coming back to "cease".
BR Hairy
Leslie Danks - 24 Nov 2006 10:17 GMT > Hi all, > When you hit 55+ the brain starts to fail. Spectacles found in the [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > cannot remember how to spell it. When I use the usual dictionary spelcheck > confirmation (BrE) I keep coming back to "cease". "Anti-seize thread lubricant" is probably what you mean. I used to use Loctite - here's a link:
http://tinyurl.com/v89h7
 Signature Les
Harry Lethall - 24 Nov 2006 10:26 GMT > > Hi all, > > When you hit 55+ the brain starts to fail. Spectacles found in the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > cannot remember how to spell it. When I use the usual dictionary spelcheck > > confirmation (BrE) I keep coming back to "cease".
> "Anti-seize thread lubricant" is probably what you mean. I used to use > Loctite - here's a link: SEIZE - Great Les, many thanks. That is the spelling I was loking for. Funny how I have used the word for many years, but as a radio/electronics engineer I have never had call to actually write it down. At least, not for as long as I can remember.
Many thanks for the link, nice to get more terminology and background info. I love this newsgroup, little SPAM and loads of people willing to share knowledge. May thanks once again.
BR Harry
Tony Cooper - 24 Nov 2006 14:53 GMT >> > Please - what is the word I am seeking? It sounds like "Seeze up" but I >> > cannot remember how to spell it. When I use the usual dictionary [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >I love this newsgroup, little SPAM and loads of people willing to share >knowledge. May thanks once again. I read the original post and thought the word would be "seize", but then thought that this was so blindingly obvious that it must be something else.
However, since the exact same thing happens to me on occasion, I do understand. When I do it - forget a dead-common word - I just write it off to my age. When someone else does it, I can't imagine what's wrong with them.
 Signature Tony Cooper Orlando, FL
Donna Richoux - 24 Nov 2006 15:19 GMT > When I do it - forget a dead-common word - I just write > it off to my age. When someone else does it, I can't imagine what's > wrong with them. I noticed this title in the American Book Center yesterday: "1,000 Unforgettable Senior Moments: Of Which We Could Remember Only 246."
 Signature Best -- Donna Richoux
Gene Wirchenko - 24 Nov 2006 21:41 GMT [snip]
>However, since the exact same thing happens to me on occasion, I do >understand. When I do it - forget a dead-common word - I just write >it off to my age. When someone else does it, I can't imagine what's >wrong with them. A pity it does not really work that. I could do without getting old. I would extend you the same courtesy. I am 46, and on Wednesday, I surrendered to having to get glasses. In about another ten days, I will be a part-time four-eyed nerd.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation: I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.
Robin Bignall - 24 Nov 2006 22:50 GMT >[snip] > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Wednesday, I surrendered to having to get glasses. In about another >ten days, I will be a part-time four-eyed nerd. At 46 you should be old enough to withstand the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. I had to start wearing glasses at 15 and it was as though the end of the world had arrived. The old adage "Boys don't make passes at girls who wear glasses" seemed to work in reverse, too, back in the 1950s.
 Signature Robin Herts, England
Sara Lorimer - 25 Nov 2006 03:31 GMT > At 46 you should be old enough to withstand the slings and arrows of > outrageous fortune. I had to start wearing glasses at 15 and it was > as though the end of the world had arrived. The old adage "Boys don't > make passes at girls who wear glasses" seemed to work in reverse, too, > back in the 1950s. Fifteen? Oooh, lucky you. Four years old, here, _plus_ an eye patch. Of course, appealing to the opposite sex wasn't high on my priority list then.
 Signature SML
Amethyst Deceiver - 25 Nov 2006 18:03 GMT >> At 46 you should be old enough to withstand the slings and arrows of >> outrageous fortune. I had to start wearing glasses at 15 and it was [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >course, appealing to the opposite sex wasn't high on my priority list >then. Four years old? When YoungBloke started nursery, aged 10mo, there was a little boy in the same room, perhaps six months older, with glasses. One lens of which was covered with a patch. The little boy's 3 and a bit now, and still in glasses. He looks very cute in them.
 Signature Linz Wet Yorks via Cambridge, York, London and Watford My accent may vary
Peter Moylan - 26 Nov 2006 11:23 GMT > At 46 you should be old enough to withstand the slings and arrows of > outrageous fortune. I had to start wearing glasses at 15 and it was > as though the end of the world had arrived. The old adage "Boys > don't make passes at girls who wear glasses" seemed to work in > reverse, too, back in the 1950s. Glasses were great heavy-framed ugly things in the 1950s. At least now we have a wider range of styles. I'm finding that my ability to attract women is about the same with or without my glasses: approximately zero.
Back in the 1950s we also said "Men don't make passes at girls with big arses". These days it's rare to see a young girl without a big arse. With obesity at epidemic levels in the rich countries, and famine getting worse in the poor ones, it's probably about time we reintroduced cannibalism.
 Signature Peter Moylan http://www.pmoylan.org
Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses. The domain eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses. The optusnet address could disappear at any time.
Prai Jei - 26 Nov 2006 21:38 GMT Robin Bignall (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message <lhtem2t2a5on07ou4rfo1c9t18ckdchqn0@4ax.com>:
>>[snip] >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > make passes at girls who wear glasses" seemed to work in reverse, too, > back in the 1950s. I'm 51 and have always enjoyed excellent eyesight. Of course, my eyes are so pretty it would be a shame if they had to be concealed behind artificial optics.
:))))
 Signature Terms and conditions apply. Batteries not included. Subject to status. Financial commitment required. Always read the label. Keep out of children.
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
Mark Brader - 24 Nov 2006 23:43 GMT > However, since the exact same thing happens to me on occasion, I do > understand. When I do it - forget a dead-common word - I just write > it off to my age. When someone else does it, I can't imagine what's > wrong with them. Okay, we're 2/3 of the way to an irregular-verb joke here...
 Signature Mark Brader | "Grammar am for people who can't think for *myself*. Toronto | Understanded me?" msb@vex.net | -- Buck (Get Fuzzy: Darby Conley)
Prai Jei - 26 Nov 2006 21:44 GMT Tony Cooper (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message <cf1em2pfbcapthkhm79ige0qacgpoqkr4c@4ax.com>:
> I read the original post and thought the word would be "seize", but > then thought that this was so blindingly obvious that it must be > something else. What a change of direction for this thread. As the OP feared, did it bind and permanently lock?
 Signature Terms and conditions apply. Batteries not included. Subject to status. Financial commitment required. Always read the label. Keep out of children.
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
Donna Richoux - 24 Nov 2006 15:19 GMT > I love this newsgroup, little SPAM and loads of people willing to share > knowledge. May thanks once again. I take it that your changing from Hairy Lethal to Harry Lethall is a sign of your esteem for us.
 Signature Best wishes -- Donna Richoux
R H Draney - 24 Nov 2006 17:09 GMT Harry Lethall filted:
>SEIZE - Great Les, many thanks. That is the spelling I was loking for. The spelling follows the rule "I before E except when it isn't"....r
 Signature "Keep your eye on the Bishop. I want to know when he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.
Mark Brader - 24 Nov 2006 23:45 GMT Harry Lethall:
>> SEIZE - Great Les, many thanks. That is the spelling I was loking for. R.H. Draney:
> The spelling follows the rule "I before E except when it isn't"....r I don't usually bother with spelling mnemonics, but I've always liked the one that says, "to seize is improper". A siege, on the other hand, requires following the rules with military precision.
 Signature Mark Brader, Toronto | "So *you* say." --Toddy Beamish msb@vex.net | (H.G. Wells, "The Man Who Could Work Miracles")
Roland Hutchinson - 25 Nov 2006 01:00 GMT > Harry Lethall filted: >> >>SEIZE - Great Les, many thanks. That is the spelling I was loking for. > > The spelling follows the rule "I before E except when it isn't"....r That's one of the few rules of English orthography that has absolutely no exceptions.
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
Prai Jei - 26 Nov 2006 21:38 GMT Roland Hutchinson (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message <EAM9h.9899$9e.6190@trnddc02>:
>> Harry Lethall filted: >>> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > That's one of the few rules of English orthography that has absolutely no > exceptions. Einstein rewrote so many rules that it's no surprise that he breaks this one twice.
OK so he was Swiss-German but what the f
 Signature Terms and conditions apply. Batteries not included. Subject to status. Financial commitment required. Always read the label. Keep out of children.
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
Roland Hutchinson - 27 Nov 2006 00:45 GMT > Roland Hutchinson (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in > message <EAM9h.9899$9e.6190@trnddc02>: [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > OK so he was Swiss-German but what the f No more (though no less) Swiss than he was American: a naturalized citizen of both countries.
 Signature Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
Prai Jei - 26 Nov 2006 21:44 GMT Harry Lethall (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message <ek6hcf$27v$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se>:
> Many thanks for the link, nice to get more terminology and background > info. I love this newsgroup, little SPAM and loads of people willing to > share knowledge. May thanks once again. We're all a bunch of basically nice people here.
 Signature Terms and conditions apply. Batteries not included. Subject to status. Financial commitment required. Always read the label. Keep out of children.
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
Peter Moylan - 27 Nov 2006 01:07 GMT > Harry Lethall (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message > <ek6hcf$27v$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se>: [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > We're all a bunch of basically nice people here. Oh no we're not!
 Signature Peter Moylan http://www.pmoylan.org
Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses. The domain eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses. The optusnet address could disappear at any time.
Mike Lyle - 27 Nov 2006 12:26 GMT > > Harry Lethall (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in message > > <ek6hcf$27v$1@news.al.sw.ericsson.se>: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Oh no we're not! And who asked you, fercrysay?
 Signature Mike.
|
|
|