Windows Media Player 11 Released
|
|
Thread rating:  |
admin.softwaresearch@gmail.com - 18 Dec 2006 09:33 GMT Windows Media Player 11 Released
click here to download (http://downloadhub.uni.cc/category/detail.php?id=5951) Windows Media Player 11 for Windows XP offers great new ways to store and enjoy all your music, video, pictures, and recorded TV. Play it, view it, and sync it to a portable device for enjoying on the go or even share with devices around your home-all from one place. Simplicity In Design
Simplicity In Design Bring a whole new look to your digital entertainment. More of the Music You Love
More of the Music You Love Breathe new life into your digital music experience. All Your Entertainment in One Place
All Your Entertainment in One Place Store and enjoy all of your music, video, pictures, and recorded TV. Enjoy Everywhere
Enjoy Everywhere Stay connected with your music, video, and pictures no matter where you are. click here to download http://downloadhub.uni.cc/category/detail.php?id=5951
Skyway - 18 Dec 2006 11:15 GMT I would think twice before doing this. The URL looks mighty suspicious...the real URL is...
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/player/11/default.aspx
> Windows Media Player 11 Released > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > click here to download > http://downloadhub.uni.cc/category/detail.php?id=5951 Jon Slaughter - 18 Dec 2006 22:21 GMT >I would think twice before doing this. The URL looks mighty >suspicious...the real URL is... > > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/player/11/default.aspx That url looks suspicious too. I wouldn't go there either.
Clark F Morris - 18 Dec 2006 23:55 GMT >>I would think twice before doing this. The URL looks mighty >>suspicious...the real URL is... >> >> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/player/11/default.aspx > >That url looks suspicious too. I wouldn't go there either. I might go to www.microsoft.com and follow links just in case the url above was booby trapped (there are interesting nasty ways to do this that work for some e-mail clients). However, a more interesting question is whether Media Player 11 is worth having or does it act more like a virus? For those who hold the latter opinion, I would be interested in why and how this is different from prior versions. I believe that all software is weird, including what I wrote.
Skyway - 19 Dec 2006 01:18 GMT My link was the actual one. I am a beta tester for Vista and WMP 11 is included in the Ultimate version. Its ok but nothing to get all excited about. I like that you can now burn DVD's right from it without needing 3rd party software. Other than that, it seems to be the same.
As for Vista...Aero is neat and Windows got "smarter" in fixing things that go wrong. It also has live error reporting and solutions but have yet had a real need for it. Manufacturers are behind on providing drivers for certain hardware as well. The only other down side to Vista is the need for a fairly beefy PC to handle it. I have 512MB of RAM and just get by. 1GB would be best. You also need a fairly new video card to get Aero working. You don't have to have the Aero portion to run Vista but its nice. I have a Northwood/Prescott Intel 3.2Ghz processor and still want more speed, especially when the background services start cranking away when you leave the PC idle for awhile.
Chris
>>>I would think twice before doing this. The URL looks mighty >>>suspicious...the real URL is... [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > interested in why and how this is different from prior versions. I > believe that all software is weird, including what I wrote. SleepyHead - 21 Dec 2006 11:53 GMT > My link was the actual one. I am a beta tester for Vista and WMP 11 is > included in the Ultimate version. Its ok but nothing to get all excited [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > go wrong. It also has live error reporting and solutions but have yet had a > real need for it. Windows XP has live error reporting. What's the difference between the new version and the XP version?
> Manufacturers are behind on providing drivers for certain hardware as well. New Windows, same old problems!
> The only other down side to Vista is the need for a > fairly beefy PC to handle it. I have 512MB of RAM and just get by. 1GB > would be best. Just to run the OS? Isn't that a bit OTT?
> You also need a fairly new video card to get Aero working. > You don't have to have the Aero portion to run Vista but its nice. I have a > Northwood/Prescott Intel 3.2Ghz processor and still want more speed, > especially when the background services start cranking away when you leave > the PC idle for awhile. Well I'm not an official tester for MS, but my impression of the new Windows is that it conforms to the typical MS way of doing things: Buy a f.cking great big PC and let your coders run riot on it. Don't bother to try and make them make best use of what people already have, just keep throwing resources at the thing until it does what you want. Idiots.
> Chris > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > interested in why and how this is different from prior versions. I > > believe that all software is weird, including what I wrote. David Haggett - 21 Dec 2006 12:59 GMT > Well I'm not an official tester for MS, but my impression of the new > Windows is that it conforms to the typical MS way of doing things: Buy > a f.cking great big PC and let your coders run riot on it. If you bought Windows, you automatically become an official tester. The only unofficial testers are those running a pirate copy.
 Signature David Haggett Linux user since 01/01/2003 Email: david<at>haggett<dot>demon<dot>co<dot>uk
SleepyHead - 21 Dec 2006 13:05 GMT > > Well I'm not an official tester for MS, but my impression of the new > > Windows is that it conforms to the typical MS way of doing things: Buy > > a f.cking great big PC and let your coders run riot on it. > > If you bought Windows, you automatically become an official tester. The > only unofficial testers are those running a pirate copy. Yeah, I'd forgotten that M$ outsourced their testing budget to the "public sector" years ago.
> -- > David Haggett > Linux user since 01/01/2003 > Email: david<at>haggett<dot>demon<dot>co<dot>uk Larry - 20 Dec 2006 19:34 GMT I actually like WMP 11.
Don't get me started on the DRM sh.t though. And there's no way to remove the Music Store button from the top that I know of.
-Larry
>>>I would think twice before doing this. The URL looks mighty >>>suspicious...the real URL is... [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > interested in why and how this is different from prior versions. I > believe that all software is weird, including what I wrote. Picasso - 19 Dec 2006 01:25 GMT >> I would think twice before doing this. The URL looks mighty >> suspicious...the real URL is... >> >> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/player/11/default.aspx > > That url looks suspicious too. I wouldn't go there either. spyware
raymo - 18 Dec 2006 12:04 GMT For you're own sakes, DO NOT install this product.
Raymo.
mike.j.harvey@gmail.com - 18 Dec 2006 15:28 GMT > For you're own sakes, DO NOT install this product. > > Raymo. Agreed. Don't install the real one either. That's nearly as bad as having a Trojan.
mike.j.harvey@gmail.com - 18 Dec 2006 15:30 GMT > For you're own sakes, DO NOT install this product. > > Raymo. Steve Hayes - 20 Dec 2006 12:00 GMT >> For you're own sakes, DO NOT install this product. >> >> Raymo. And your point is?
 Signature Terms and conditions apply.
Steve Hayes hayesmstw@hotmail.com
mike.j.harvey@gmail.com - 21 Dec 2006 10:00 GMT > >> For you're own sakes, DO NOT install this product. > >> > >> Raymo. > > And your point is? See changed subject line.
Steve Hayes - 23 Dec 2006 04:46 GMT >> >> For you're own sakes, DO NOT install this product. >> >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >See changed subject line. What "changed subject line"?
There IS no changed subject line.
A changed subject line has a "was:" to indicate that it was changed. There is no "was:" in this subject line, which means that it is a brand new subject, but with meaningless garbage in the body of the message.
 Signature Terms and conditions apply.
Steve Hayes hayesmstw@hotmail.com
Will - 21 Dec 2006 10:04 GMT > For you're own sakes, DO NOT install this product. > > Raymo. Since this thread has unaccountably been posted in AUE, might I take this opportunity to "oy" you?
Will.
Armond Perretta - 22 Dec 2006 13:12 GMT > Windows Media Player 11 Released I loaded this application only to find that it required me to "validate" my computer in a manner similar to the MS WGA setup. I had become used to validating entire operating systems, but this was the first instance I encountered where MS required that an individual application be validated (neglecting Office). This differs from Media Player 10.
However that's not why I called this meeting. I have rarely seen cross-posting with such variety and with apparently so little in common:
rec.music.beatles,misc.transport.road,alt.usage.english,rec.music.theory,alt.guitar.beginner
 Signature Good luck and good sailing. s/v Kerry Deare of Barnegat http://home.comcast.net/~kerrydeare
dontbother - 22 Dec 2006 13:43 GMT > admin.softwaresearch@gmail.com wrote: >> Windows Media Player 11 Released [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > an individual application be validated (neglecting Office). > This differs from Media Player 10. Anything MS thinks is not strictly a security-issue download has to be validated these days, and that includes most of MS's useful free apps (e.g., WMP and Sync Toy), as well as updates to MS Office that aren't specifically for plugging security holes. Don't be fooled into downloading WGA if you don't want it to call home every 30 or 60 days, as it will. You can use the alternative method: GenuineCheck.exe
 Signature Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan. Unmunged email: /at/easypeasy.com "as long as the human population is 90% gullible, violence-prone dipshits, the last thing you want to do is increase the supply of unclaimed religious real estate"[i.e., the moon]. Scott Adams, The Dilbert Blog, December 06, 2006 http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/
R H Draney - 22 Dec 2006 16:39 GMT Armond Perretta filted:
>However that's not why I called this meeting. I have rarely seen >cross-posting with such variety and with apparently so little in common: > >rec.music.beatles,misc.transport.road,alt.usage.english,rec.music.theory,alt.guitar.beginner Yeah, what the heck is misc.transport.road doing in there with all those music groups?...r
 Signature "Keep your eye on the Bishop. I want to know when he makes his move", said the Inspector, obliquely.
Skitt - 22 Dec 2006 18:57 GMT > Armond Perretta filted: >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Yeah, what the heck is misc.transport.road doing in there with all > those music groups?...r Show Me The Way To Go Home ...
 Signature Skitt I may not understand what you say, but I'll defend to your death my right to deny it. --Albert Alligator
Tony Cooper - 22 Dec 2006 19:13 GMT >> Armond Perretta filted: >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > >Show Me The Way To Go Home ... On the Road Again?
 Signature Tony Cooper Orlando, FL
Peter Duncanson - 22 Dec 2006 19:47 GMT >>> Armond Perretta filted: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >On the Road Again? The Long & Winding Road?
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Robin Bignall - 22 Dec 2006 22:20 GMT >>>> Armond Perretta filted: >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >The Long & Winding Road? It's the hit musical "Road to AUE", starring Ron, Alec and Tony. Bing, Bob and Dorothy make guest appearances posthumously.
 Signature Robin Herts, England
Richard Bollard - 02 Jan 2007 03:23 GMT >Armond Perretta filted: >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Yeah, what the heck is misc.transport.road doing in there with all those music >groups?...r Did road music come before Garage?
 Signature Richard Bollard Canberra Australia
To email, I'm at AMT not spAMT.
|
|
|