
Signature
Brad Germolene
ADVANCE REMONIKERIZATION ALERT: Archie Valparaiso is
coming (to stay, I promise) in January 2007.
Pierre Viry, apparently, asks about:
>>> "To recall": Is it correctly used in the example "Her photographs
>>> recall a dark episode in US history" ?
Nancy G.:
>> Not to this USian, it isn't. A person can recall something; an
>> inanimate object can't.
It works for me as written, although it's not the primary sense of
"recall".
>> An alternate definition of "recall" can be "to remind one of", but
>> that is used in the physical sense, meaning to *resemble* someone or
>> something...
I don't make that distinction.
Ross Howard:
> Agreed. The best one-word alternative might be "evoked",
Certainly a good choice, except the original is present tense, so we
want "evoke".
> unless they were photographs of the dark episode itself, in which case
> "recorded" would do the job.
It might be factually correct, but it wouldn't say that they bring the
episode to one's mind, which was presumably the point.

Signature
Mark Brader "You can't [compare] computer memory and recall
Toronto with human memory and recall. It's comparing
msb@vex.net apples and bicycles." -- Ed Knowles
My text in this article is in the public domain.