Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / December 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

is to recall a synonym for "call to mind"?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
darras - 26 Dec 2006 16:59 GMT
Hi,

"To recall": Is it correctly used in the example "Her photographs
recall a dark episode in US history" ?
nancy13g@verizon.net - 26 Dec 2006 19:50 GMT
> Hi,
>
> "To recall": Is it correctly used in the example "Her photographs
> recall a dark episode in US history" ?

Not to this USian, it isn't. A person can recall something; an
inanimate object can't.

An alternate definition of "recall" can be "to remind one of", but that
is used in the physical sense, meaning to *resemble* someone or
something, not merely to make a person think about them.
Brad Germolene - 26 Dec 2006 20:30 GMT
>> Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>is used in the physical sense, meaning to *resemble* someone or
>something, not merely to make a person think about them.

Agreed. The best one-word alternative might be "evoked", unless they
were photographs of the dark episode itself, in which case "recorded"
would do the job.

Signature

Brad Germolene

ADVANCE REMONIKERIZATION ALERT: Archie Valparaiso is
coming (to stay, I promise) in January 2007.

Mark Brader - 27 Dec 2006 05:03 GMT
Pierre Viry, apparently, asks about:
>>> "To recall": Is it correctly used in the example "Her photographs
>>> recall a dark episode in US history" ?

Nancy G.:
>> Not to this USian, it isn't. A person can recall something; an
>> inanimate object can't.

It works for me as written, although it's not the primary sense of
"recall".

>> An alternate definition of "recall" can be "to remind one of", but
>> that is used in the physical sense, meaning to *resemble* someone or
>> something...

I don't make that distinction.

Ross Howard:
> Agreed.  The best one-word alternative might be "evoked",

Certainly a good choice, except the original is present tense, so we
want "evoke".

> unless they were photographs of the dark episode itself, in which case
> "recorded" would do the job.

It might be factually correct, but it wouldn't say that they bring the
episode to one's mind, which was presumably the point.
Signature

Mark Brader           "You can't [compare] computer memory and recall
Toronto                with human memory and recall.  It's comparing
msb@vex.net            apples and bicycles."          -- Ed Knowles

My text in this article is in the public domain.

vorotyntsev@yahoo.com - 26 Dec 2006 22:36 GMT
> > Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Not to this USian, it isn't. A person can recall something; an
> inanimate object can't.

Why not?

> An alternate definition of "recall" can be "to remind one of", but that
> is used in the physical sense, meaning to *resemble* someone or
> something, not merely to make a person think about them.
shadoe - 26 Dec 2006 21:40 GMT
| Hi,
|
| "To recall": Is it correctly used in the example "Her photographs
| recall a dark episode in US history" ?

I like this best.......

"Her photographs brought to mind a dark episode in US history"

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

shadoe - 26 Dec 2006 21:47 GMT
|| Hi,
||
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
|
| "Her photographs brought to mind a dark episode in US history"

  OR   "Seeing her photographs, brought to mind a dark episode in US
history."

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Oleg Lego - 27 Dec 2006 05:05 GMT
The darras entity posted thusly:

>Hi,
>
>"To recall": Is it correctly used in the example "Her photographs
>recall a dark episode in US history" ?

Sounds fine to me. It's another way of saying "bring to mind", or
"make one think of". Reference: Western Canada.
Robert Bannister - 28 Dec 2006 00:43 GMT
> The darras entity posted thusly:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Sounds fine to me. It's another way of saying "bring to mind", or
> "make one think of". Reference: Western Canada.

I notice all the objectors are from the USA. To me, it seems fine;
better than "are reminiscent of".

Signature

Rob Bannister
31 years England; 35 years Australia

Harry Lethall - 27 Dec 2006 07:17 GMT
> Hi,
>
> "To recall": Is it correctly used in the example "Her photographs
> recall a dark episode in US history" ?

Suggest replacing "recall" with "recount", or "remind one of".

"Remind one of" is probably the intended meaning, but "recall" doesn't fit
because the photographs do not recall anything. Recollection requires a
memory, which photographs do not have. Photographs are only a static record.

You may have been searching for the similar word "recount". In a more
romantic way, photographs can tell a story to those having the appropriate
memories to recall. "Recall" will fit, albeit with a slightly changed
meaning.

Regards Harry
_____________________
Old proverb DO die:
"If 'ifs' and 'ands' were pots and pans, there'd be no need for tinkers."
Robert Lieblich - 27 Dec 2006 12:29 GMT
> > Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> because the photographs do not recall anything. Recollection requires a
> memory, which photographs do not have. Photographs are only a static record.

Are we to be forbidden all metaphorical uses of English words?  Can
one letter no longer reply to another?  Can a movie or play no longer
give one cause to think?  Can a school no longer educate?  How far are
you prepared to push this notion?

And what do you say to the lexicographers who have perpetrated the
likes of this:

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/orexxcall?view=uk (def. 2)

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=recall def.
2b)

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=65917&dict=CALD (def. 2
with example)

http://www.bartleby.com/61/84/R0078400.html (def. 2)

> You may have been searching for the similar word "recount". In a more
> romantic way, photographs can tell a story to those having the appropriate
> memories to recall. "Recall" will fit, albeit with a slightly changed
> meaning.

Oh, so "recall" fits after all.  Never mind.

Signature

Bob Lieblich
What was *that* all about?

darras - 31 Dec 2006 14:27 GMT
Robert Lieblich a ?crit :

> > > Hi,
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Oh, so "recall" fits after all.  Never mind.
Mike Lyle - 31 Dec 2006 14:59 GMT
> > Hi,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> memories to recall. "Recall" will fit, albeit with a slightly changed
> meaning.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the very frequent, and standard,
use of "recall" in this sense. "Remind one of" is correct, but not so
neat. "Recount" is probably wrong here: a picture is rarely worth a
thousand words.

Signature

Mike.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.