> From nl.taal:
> ===
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> sucking method was used to test 2-month-old English
> infants' perception of languages. This method tests for
[ ... ]
> However: what is 'suprasegmental specification'
> and how do I see the similarities?
I think you need to risk having your head bitten off by asking this at
sci.lang. They know that sort of thing there, even though they don't
always have as kind and gentle a way of treating newcomers as we aim
for in aue. (An exception should be noted, in all fairness: Yusuf
Gursey is unfailingly courteous and helpful, but I doubt whether this
is his sort of question.)
athel
Mike Lyle - 05 Jan 2007 12:18 GMT
> > From nl.taal:
> > ===
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> Gursey is unfailingly courteous and helpful, but I doubt whether this
> is his sort of question.)
Just for fun, I'll have a go. (Be aware that it's a long time since I
"studied" this kind of thing -- I use the word in a loose sense. One of
the pros could soon be along to deride my efforts.)
Segmental sounds are the irreducible units within the recognised range
of sounds of a particular language -- phonemes. Suprasegmental ones are
the result of modifications to those sounds: things like stress and
tone. I assume "specification" here refers to that range of sounds
belonging to the language in question.

Signature
Mike.