Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Wet sidewalks

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
LFS - 11 Jan 2007 13:16 GMT
At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US referred to the
"wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This expression was new to many
present, although the meaning was obvious. Ggling attributes this to one
Roger Blough who was head of US Steel in the 1960s but it's not clear if
he invented it or has just been the most famous person to use it.

Is it a common expression in Leftpondia?
Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

Don Phillipson - 11 Jan 2007 14:00 GMT
> At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US referred to the
> "wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This expression was new to many
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Is it a common expression in Leftpondia?

Some Americans are likely to call to mind Ronald
Reagan's similar suggestion that trees cause air pollution,
ascribed to him when campaigning for re-election
as governor of California:  but I fancy younger
Americans do not know him or his public roles.

Signature

Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)

Tony Cooper - 11 Jan 2007 14:16 GMT
>At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US referred to the
>"wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This expression was new to many
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Is it a common expression in Leftpondia?

I have managed not be where it has been said or written for over six
decades.

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Frances Kemmish - 11 Jan 2007 15:04 GMT
>>At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US referred to the
>>"wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This expression was new to many
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I have managed not be where it has been said or written for over six
> decades.

I haven't heard it. I must ask my daughter, as she works for a lobbying
firm that represents the steel industry.

I did marvel recently at the "self-licking ice cream cone".

Fran
CDB - 11 Jan 2007 17:22 GMT
[...]

> I did marvel recently at the "self-licking ice cream cone".

Mmm. Oxtongue ripple.
Jitze Couperus - 11 Jan 2007 19:10 GMT
>[...]
>
>> I did marvel recently at the "self-licking ice cream cone".
>
>Mmm. Oxtongue ripple.

Eh? This caused me to do a double take until I realised
that "ripple" here refers to ice-cream. My brain instead
interpreted "Oxtongue ripple" as some sort of cheap red
wine that would normaly be drunk out of a bottle wrapped
in a brown paper bag.

"Wine and Cheese"  = "Velveeta and Ripple"

Jitze
CDB - 11 Jan 2007 21:52 GMT
>> [...]
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> "Wine and Cheese"  = "Velveeta and Ripple"

The canonical equivalent around here (Eastern Ontario) is, or used to
be, Catawba; or maybe Thunderbird.  Anything to make the velveeta and
tongue sundae slide down smooth.
Richard Bollard - 12 Jan 2007 02:34 GMT
>>[...]
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>wine that would normaly be drunk out of a bottle wrapped
>in a brown paper bag.

"Stormy petrel on a stick. Gannet ripple."

Signature

Richard Bollard
Albatross!

Oleg Lego - 12 Jan 2007 07:21 GMT
The Richard Bollard entity posted thusly:

>>>[...]
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>"Stormy petrel on a stick. Gannet ripple."

Ew! I don't like the gannet. They soil their nests!
Peter Moylan - 12 Jan 2007 12:21 GMT
> The Richard Bollard entity posted thusly:

>>> Eh? This caused me to do a double take until I realised
>>> that "ripple" here refers to ice-cream. My brain instead
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Ew! I don't like the gannet. They soil their nests!

But it's a Standard British Bird!

Signature

Peter Moylan                             http://www.pmoylan.org

Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses.  The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses.  The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.

rzed - 11 Jan 2007 15:48 GMT
> At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US referred
> to the "wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This expression was
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Is it a common expression in Leftpondia?

Not common throughout the general populace. It may be more common
among those who attend management seminars and the like. Only the
most profoundly ellefescent among them would use the phrase, I would
imagine.

Signature

rzed

LFS - 11 Jan 2007 16:59 GMT
>>At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US referred
>>to the "wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This expression was
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> most profoundly ellefescent among them would use the phrase, I would
> imagine.

I thought that ellefescent had a rather more positive connotation, Mr Z.
I now feel ever so slightly insulted. I expect I'll get over it.

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

rzed - 11 Jan 2007 17:10 GMT
>>>At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US
>>>referred to the "wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> connotation, Mr Z. I now feel ever so slightly insulted. I
> expect I'll get over it.

Doubtless a misuse of the term on my part. I sit with dunce cap on
the stool in the corner, ready to be corrected. I did not intend
it to be insulting, and I hope it doesn't affect your mood. I
certainly wouldn't want to put a damper on your undeniable
ellefescence.

Signature

rzed

Peter Duncanson - 11 Jan 2007 19:14 GMT
>>>At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US referred
>>>to the "wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This expression was
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>I thought that ellefescent had a rather more positive connotation, Mr Z.
>I now feel ever so slightly insulted. I expect I'll get over it.

To me ellefescent evokes an image of a happy and charming pink
elephant blowing bubbles through her trunk.

This carries no negative connotations at all.

Signature

Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)

Jacqui - 12 Jan 2007 13:33 GMT
Peter Duncanson wibbled:
>>I thought that ellefescent had a rather more positive connotation, Mr Z.
>>I now feel ever so slightly insulted. I expect I'll get over it.
>
> To me ellefescent evokes an image of a happy and charming pink
> elephant blowing bubbles through her trunk.

And using a telefong! I'm sure *that* elephant was ellefescent.

Jac
Mike Lyle - 12 Jan 2007 17:49 GMT
> Peter Duncanson wibbled:
> >>I thought that ellefescent had a rather more positive connotation, Mr Z.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> And using a telefong! I'm sure *that* elephant was ellefescent.

Ah, I should have guessed you'd know! Jac, can you post the full
version, please? I've lost the scrap of paper.

Signature

Mike.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Donna Richoux - 15 Jan 2007 06:43 GMT
> > Peter Duncanson wibbled:
> > >>I thought that ellefescent had a rather more positive connotation,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Ah, I should have guessed you'd know! Jac, can you post the full
> version, please? I've lost the scrap of paper.

Eletelephony
By Laura E. Richards 1850-1943

Once there was an elephant,
Who tried to use the telephant-
No! no! I mean an elephone
Who tried to use the telephone-
(Dear me! I am not certain quite
That even now I've got it right.)

Howe'er it was, he got his trunk
Entangled in the telephunk;
The more he tried to get it free,
The louder buzzed the telephee-
(I fear I'd better drop the song
Of elephop and telephong!)
Mike Lyle - 15 Jan 2007 14:52 GMT
[...]
> Eletelephony
> By Laura E. Richards 1850-1943
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> (I fear I'd better drop the song
> Of elephop and telephong!)

Danny, thonny manks -- No, no!
'Tis monny thinks I mean. Or so
I thought, but another thing
You'll agree I had coming.
Donna, manky thens!
What need for prodosy among friends?

Signature

Mike.

Robert Lieblich - 15 Jan 2007 21:12 GMT
> [...]
> > Eletelephony
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Donna, manky thens!
> What need for prodosy among friends?

I fear that I shall never think
Of what to call the elephink.
Or find that I am pleased to meet
A poem lively as a treet.
Althought it ought not to upset me
This Kilmerish rhythm seems to get me.

Signature

Bob Lieblich
With no idea who he's channeling

Joe Fineman - 12 Jan 2007 02:38 GMT
> At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US referred to
> the "wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This expression was new to
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Is it a common expression in Leftpondia?

I had not come across it.  It calls to mind, tho, Ogden Nash's
suggestion that the wind is caused by trees waving their branches.
Signature

---  Joe Fineman    joe_f@verizon.net

||:  The wise man gratifies every appetite and every passion; the  :||
||:  fool sacrifices all the rest to pall and satiate one.         :||
LFS - 14 Jan 2007 09:31 GMT
>>At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US referred to
>>the "wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This expression was new to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I had not come across it.  It calls to mind, tho, Ogden Nash's
> suggestion that the wind is caused by trees waving their branches.

Can you tell me where to find that, please? I'm collecting examples of
egregiously misattributed causation.

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

John Dean - 14 Jan 2007 13:18 GMT
>>> At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US referred to
>>> the "wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This expression was new to
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Can you tell me where to find that, please? I'm collecting examples of
> egregiously misattributed causation.

I'm not sure that was Ogden. I think the "trees cause wind" has been around
a while:
http://www.iusedtobelieve.com/nature/weather/trees_make_wind/trees_make_wind_s1.php

In my case, baked beans cause wind. But you didn't want to know that.
Signature

John Dean
Oxford

HVS - 14 Jan 2007 13:31 GMT
On 14 Jan 2007, John Dean wrote

>>> It calls to mind, tho, Ogden Nash's suggestion that the wind
>>> is caused by trees waving their branches.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> http://www.iusedtobelieve.com/nature/weather/trees_make_wind/tree
> s_make_wind_s1.php

Googling on it, I see some journalist attributed it to Spike
Milligan;  all the Nash attributions I could see gave no source
reference, which raises suspicions.

It does have the ring of somebody earlier -- Leacock, perhaps, or
someone of that vintage?

Signature

Cheers, Harvey

Canadian and British English, indiscriminately mixed
For e-mail, change harvey.news to harvey.van

Donna Richoux - 15 Jan 2007 06:43 GMT
> On 14 Jan 2007, John Dean wrote
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> It does have the ring of somebody earlier -- Leacock, perhaps, or
> someone of that vintage?

I'm quite sure that John Holt referred to it one as of his books as an
example of a child's logic. Not in verse nor associated to a poet.  But
it doesn't turn up Googling, and I don't plan to leaf through his ten or
so books looking for it.

Signature

Best -- Donna Richoux

LFS - 14 Jan 2007 13:34 GMT
>>>>At an event I attended yesterday, a speaker from the US referred to
>>>>the "wet sidewalks cause rain" theory. This expression was new to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> I'm not sure that was Ogden.

That's why I asked. I used to be fairly familiar with ON's oeuvre and
able to quote great chunks of it. Much of what I remembered now seems to
have been wiped or over-written, though.

I think the "trees cause wind" has been around
> a while:
> http://www.iusedtobelieve.com/nature/weather/trees_make_wind/trees_make_wind_s1.php

A fascinating site. But after reading posts there for a few minutes I
stopped being amused and found myself feeling slightly troubled by the
extent of people's misapprehension.

> In my case, baked beans cause wind. But you didn't want to know that.

No, thanks.

But any examples similar to the wet sidewalks theory would be very
welcome. I've been relying on the elephant powder story for rather a
long time.

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

HVS - 14 Jan 2007 13:42 GMT
On 14 Jan 2007, LFS wrote

> But any examples similar to the wet sidewalks theory would be
> very welcome. I've been relying on the elephant powder story for
> rather a long time.

This isn't in the same category of causality, but I've always liked
the logic of the response, on asking somebody to see if it's raining
outside, of "Yes, but only in the puddles.  Stay out of those and
you'll be fine."

I tend to think of this as Irish logic;  is there a proper/non-
stereotype term for it?

Signature

Cheers, Harvey

Canadian and British English, indiscriminately mixed
For e-mail, change harvey.news to harvey.van

Roland Hutchinson - 15 Jan 2007 04:43 GMT
> But any examples similar to the wet sidewalks theory would be very
> welcome. I've been relying on the elephant powder story for rather a
> long time.

There's a similar idea that shows up somewhere or other in the Charles
Schultz "Peanuts" strips and/or animated cartoons: Snow comes up out of the
ground, and snowstorms are the result of the wind blowing it around.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Skitt - 15 Jan 2007 18:43 GMT
>> But any examples similar to the wet sidewalks theory would be very
>> welcome. I've been relying on the elephant powder story for rather a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> of the ground, and snowstorms are the result of the wind blowing it
> around.

That's pretty much the case at Thule, Greenland.  It does not snow there
very often.  The 100mph winds that happen now and then blow the snow from
the icecap all over the Air Base.
Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
http://www.geocities.com/opus731/

Robert Lieblich - 15 Jan 2007 21:14 GMT
> >> But any examples similar to the wet sidewalks theory would be very
> >> welcome. I've been relying on the elephant powder story for rather a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> very often.  The 100mph winds that happen now and then blow the snow from
> the icecap all over the Air Base.

Enjoy the memories, Skitt.  The icecap is not long for this globe.

Signature

Al Gore

Roland Hutchinson - 16 Jan 2007 00:45 GMT
>> > LFS wrote (under a pseudonym):
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Enjoy the memories, Skitt.  The icecap is not long for this globe.

Yes, indeed: There's no Thule like an old Thule.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

LFS - 16 Jan 2007 17:02 GMT
>>>>LFS wrote (under a pseudonym):

Pseudonym? What pseudonym?

>>>>>But any examples similar to the wet sidewalks theory would be very
>>>>>welcome. I've been relying on the elephant powder story for rather a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Yes, indeed: There's no Thule like an old Thule.

Apart from Ultima.

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

Roland Hutchinson - 17 Jan 2007 05:35 GMT
>>>>>LFS wrote (under a pseudonym):
>
> Pseudonym? What pseudonym?

Oops!  I messed up the attributions.  It was the learned Mr Lieblich who
signed his posting as "Al Gore" (with a kosher signature separator and
everything).

I suppose strictly speaking, that's writing _over_ a pseudonym.

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

HVS - 15 Jan 2007 21:14 GMT
On 15 Jan 2007, Skitt wrote

>>> But any examples similar to the wet sidewalks theory would be
>>> very welcome. I've been relying on the elephant powder story
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> snow there very often.  The 100mph winds that happen now and
> then blow the snow from the icecap all over the Air Base.

Now you've done it....Floyd's gonna be here any minute to tell you
that you've got that ALL WRONG.....

Signature

Cheers, Harvey

Canadian and British English, indiscriminately mixed
For e-mail, change harvey.news to harvey.van

R J Valentine - 16 Jan 2007 03:41 GMT
} On 15 Jan 2007, Skitt wrote
}
}> Roland Hutchinson wrote:
}>> LFS wrote:
}>
}>>> But any examples similar to the wet sidewalks theory would be
}>>> very welcome. I've been relying on the elephant powder story
}>>> for rather a long time.
}>>
}>> There's a similar idea that shows up somewhere or other in the
}>> Charles Schultz "Peanuts" strips and/or animated cartoons: Snow
}>> comes up out of the ground, and snowstorms are the result of
}>> the wind blowing it around.
}>
}> That's pretty much the case at Thule, Greenland.  It does not
}> snow there very often.  The 100mph winds that happen now and
}> then blow the snow from the icecap all over the Air Base.
}
} Now you've done it....Floyd's gonna be here any minute to tell you
} that you've got that ALL WRONG.....

I want to hear what he says about the woman behind every tree.

(Have I mentioned that my father used to fly in there about once a week
while Skitt was there?)

Signature

rjv

Skitt - 16 Jan 2007 19:21 GMT
> HVS wrote:
>} Skitt wrote
>}> Roland Hutchinson wrote:
>}>> LFS wrote:

>}>>> But any examples similar to the wet sidewalks theory would be
>}>>> very welcome. I've been relying on the elephant powder story
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> (Have I mentioned that my father used to fly in there about once a
> week while Skitt was there?)

The mail plane?
Signature

Skitt (in Hayward, California)
http://www.geocities.com/opus731/

Mike Page - 15 Jan 2007 14:28 GMT
...>>>>
>>>>I had not come across it.  It calls to mind, tho, Ogden Nash's
>>>>suggestion that the wind is caused by trees waving their branches.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>able to quote great chunks of it. Much of what I remembered now seems to
>have been wiped or over-written, though.

A short browse through the copy of 'Selected Poetry by Ogden
Nash', given to my wide and me by a sensitive and erudite friend
together with a dedicatory poem in his style, came up with the
following

A Word on Wind

...
Scientists try to tell us that wind is caused by atmospheric
conditions at the North Pole or over distant Canadian ranches,
But I guess scientists don't ever get to the country because
everybody who has ever been in the country knows that wind is
caused by the trees waggling their branches.

...

Mike Page
LFS - 15 Jan 2007 14:47 GMT
> ...>>>>
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> everybody who has ever been in the country knows that wind is
> caused by the trees waggling their branches.

Ah, thank you! I should have thought to ask you.

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

Mike Page - 15 Jan 2007 15:11 GMT
...>> A short browse through the copy of 'Selected Poetry by
Ogden
>> Nash', given to my wide and me by a sensitive and erudite friend
>> together with a dedicatory poem in his style, came up with the
>> following

..
Wide? I meant 'wife'. Fortunately, she does not read aue.

>Ah, thank you! I should have thought to ask you.

Thank you for not Oy!ing.

Mike Page
Evan Kirshenbaum - 16 Jan 2007 22:09 GMT
> Can you tell me where to find that, please? I'm collecting examples of
> egregiously misattributed causation.

We unfortunately never wrote it down, but when I was in high school,
some friends of mine and I spent a fair bit of time coming up with an
elaborate theory of how light bulbs sucked darkeness out of the
surrounding area.

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |I value writers such as Fiske.
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |They serve as valuable object
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |lessons by showing that the most
                                      |punctilious compliance with the
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com             |rules of usage has so little to do
   (650)857-7572                      |with either writing or thinking
                                      |well.
   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/        |        --Richard Hershberger

Ray - 16 Jan 2007 22:36 GMT
>> Can you tell me where to find that, please? I'm collecting
>> examples of egregiously misattributed causation.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> up with an elaborate theory of how light bulbs sucked darkeness
> out of the surrounding area.

There was an article in the Journal of Irreproducible Results detailing
a complementary device years ago; the subject was "darkbulbs" which
would create darkness when switched on.  The article was accompanied by
photos of black-painted light bulbs.

Signature

Ray
(remove the Xs to reply)

the Omrud - 16 Jan 2007 23:04 GMT
kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com had it:

> > Can you tell me where to find that, please? I'm collecting examples of
> > egregiously misattributed causation.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> elaborate theory of how light bulbs sucked darkeness out of the
> surrounding area.

Ah.  I've always considered light to be an absence of dark.  You have
to be careful not to open the curtains at night or you might let the
dark in.

And the weakly English sun sucks the brown out of the arms of people
after they come back from their holidays in Tenerife.

Signature

David
=====

Eric Schwartz - 17 Jan 2007 03:12 GMT
> kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> to be careful not to open the curtains at night or you might let the
> dark in.

This lovely idea is the source of my single favourite Ask Dr. Science ever:

       Q: When I wake up in the morning and open my closet door, I'm
       afraid that instead of the light from my room shining into my
       closet, the darkness from the closet will fill up my
       room. Could this ever really happen?

       Submitted by Clair J., Age 7 from Portland OR

       A: Of course, it could. If you've been bad. When bad little
       children open their closet doors, they're often engulfed by
       great impenetrable waves of darkness. This is just nature's
       way of testing you to make sure you're mature enough to watch
       prime time television. Remember, there's nothing to be afraid
       of. It's just a shadow. Small wonder we're so afraid of
       shadows when most of humanity forms their conception of
       reality by staring at colored shadows dancing around inside a
       box! It's not your fault you were born in the television
       age. You have a right to be neurotic.

       (source: http://www.drscience.com/)

> And the weakly English sun sucks the brown out of the arms of people
> after they come back from their holidays in Tenerife.

Lovely island, Tenerife, but that volcanic sand itches like mad.

-=Eric
Nick Atty - 19 Jan 2007 12:22 GMT
>kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com had it:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>And the weakly English sun sucks the brown out of the arms of people
>after they come back from their holidays in Tenerife.

It's faintly reminiscent of De Selby's theory that darkness is an
accumulation of dark particles in the air.
Signature

On-line canal route planner: http://www.canalplan.org.uk

(Waterways World site of the month, April 2001)
My Reply-To address *is* valid, though likely to die soon

Robert Lieblich - 16 Jan 2007 23:29 GMT
> > Can you tell me where to find that, please? I'm collecting examples of
> > egregiously misattributed causation.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> elaborate theory of how light bulbs sucked darkeness out of the
> surrounding area.

Much as air-conditioners heat up the outside air? -- Oops; let's
forget that one.

In 1948 Astounding published a mock-scientific article by Isaac Asimov
titled "The Endochronic Properties of Resublimated Thiotimoline."  I
can't find the text on the Web, but I was able to confirm author,
title, and date.  The premise was that the title chemical dissolved so
fast in water that it began to dissolve *before* it hit the water.  As
I recall, the paper went on about how one quantified the effect
depending on such things as height before the drop, quantity of the
substance, etc.  It's not the usual misattributed causation, but I
think it might fit.

It's also both quite clever and pretty funny.

Signature

Bob Lieblich
No scientiest

Roland Hutchinson - 17 Jan 2007 05:48 GMT
>> > Can you tell me where to find that, please? I'm collecting examples of
>> > egregiously misattributed causation.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Much as air-conditioners heat up the outside air? -- Oops; let's
> forget that one.

More like the way things burn more vigorously in dephlogisticated air.

Say, come to think of it, there's a mistaken causality theory with
historical) legs for Laura's collection: Philogiston Theory -- and let us
not neglect its modern relative, the magic-smoke theory of operation of
electronic components. (Wikipedia s. vv. "philogiston" and "magic smoke"
gives the basics.)

Signature

Roland Hutchinson              Will play viola da gamba for food.

NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam.  If your message looks like spam I may not see it.

Peter Moylan - 17 Jan 2007 05:51 GMT
> In 1948 Astounding published a mock-scientific article by Isaac
> Asimov titled "The Endochronic Properties of Resublimated
> Thiotimoline."

There's an interesting story about the publication of that one. His
article was not only funny, it was clearly a parody of the turgid writing
style associated with some scientific publications. Asimov was working
towards his PhD (in chemistry, I believe) at the time, and as luck would
have it the article was published just before he was due to defend his
thesis in front of the examining panel. He turned up to the examination
hoping fervently that the examiners had not read _Astounding_, because
he feared that the article would ruin his credibility as a serious
scientist.

As it happened, all went well; but, right at the end of the examination,
one of the examiners said something like "Now I wonder, Mr Asimov,
whether you could tell us something about the properties of thiotimoline."

Signature

Peter Moylan                             http://www.pmoylan.org

Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses.  The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses.  The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.