Intro A: Welcome to AUE and Guidelines for Posting
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Donna Richoux - 18 Jan 2007 11:23 GMT Last Revised 2006-07-31 (31 Jul 2006) A copy of this is posted at: The alt.usage.english website http://alt-usage-english.org/
This series of seven "Intro Documents" is intended to aid newcomers to the newsgroup. The articles are posted frequently here, and are also on the Web for your convenience, at:
http://www.alt-usage-english.org/
Most of what follows is taken from Albert Marshall's and John Davies' work. Comments and corrections should be emailed to me -- Donna Richoux
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Contents of Intro A: Welcome to AUE and Guidelines for Posting ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - WELCOME TO alt.usage.english! - Guidelines for posting - Newcomers to the Net - Asking Questions; Dictionary Definitions - Dictionary Abbreviations - Responding - TO GOOGLE GROUPS USERS - Dealing with unwanted postings - alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ WELCOME TO alt.usage.english! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
alt.usage.english is a newsgroup where we discuss the English language (and also occasionally other languages).
We discuss how particular words, phrases, and syntactic forms are used; how they originated; and where in the English-speaking world they're prevalent. (All this is called "description".)
We also discuss how we think they *should* be used ("prescription").
alt.usage.english is for everyone, *not* only for linguists, native speakers, or descriptivists.
Please read or at least browse through our AUE FAQ, which is available at several addresses including
http://www.alt-usage-english.org/
There is more information about obtaining our FAQ in the regular post "Intro G: Where is the FAQ?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Guidelines for posting ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Things you may want to consider avoiding when posting here:
(1) re-opening topics (such as "singular they" and "hopefully") that experience shows lead to circular debate. (One function of the FAQ file is to point out topics that have already been discussed ad nauseam.)
(2) questions that can be answered by simple reference to a dictionary or a thesaurus.
(3) generalities. If you make a statement like: "Here in the U.S. we NEVER say 'different to'", "Retroflex 'r' is ONLY used in North America", or "'Eh' ALWAYS rhymes with 'pay'", chances are that someone will pounce on you with a counterexample.
(4) assertions that one variety of English is "true English".
(5) sloppy writing (as distinct from simple typing errors, or errors from someone whose native language is not English). The regulars are probably less willing than the general population to suffer sloppy writers gladly. Each article is written by one person, but read perhaps by thousands, so the convenience of the readers really ought to have priority over the convenience of the writer. Again, this is *not* to discourage non-native speakers from posting; readers will be able to detect that you're writing in a language that is foreign to you, and will make allowances for that.
(6) expressions of exasperation. In the course of debate, you may encounter positions based on premises radically different from yours and perhaps surprisingly novel to you. Saying things like "Oh, please", "That's absurd", "Give me a break", or "Go teach your grandmother to suck eggs, my man" is unlikely to win your opponent over.
You really *are* welcome to post here! Don't let the impatient tone of this FAQ frighten you off.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Newcomers to the Net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you are a newcomer not just to a.u.e but to Usenet newsgroups in general, you will find it helpful to read the messages posted regularly to news.announce.newusers. These contain invaluable advice on "netiquette", the rules of behaviour expected of those who post to any newsgroup. These articles are found at:
news.announce.newusers FAQs http://web.presby.edu/~nnqadmin/nan/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Asking Questions; Dictionary Definitions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please do not post questions to a.u.e. that ask "what is the meaning of...", or "what is the origin of..." Looking in a dictionary is a quicker and more reliable way of getting an answer. Some people may respond to such questions with deliberately false information, and it may not always be obvious that it is comically intended. In the unlikely event that you don't have a dictionary at hand, try the on-line Merriam-Webster dictionary at
http://www.m-w.com/
If you can't find the answer in a dictionary, it is a good idea to say so in your posting, to reassure people that you have at least looked. If you are still puzzled after you do your own research, then you are welcome to post the results of your findings.
Please explain the context of the usage; that will allow people to give you a sensible answer.
We hope that newcomers who ask a question will stay around long enough to read a variety of answers, because later responses may correct or clarify the earlier ones. This process may take two or three days.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dictionary Abbreviations ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The posters in a.u.e tend to avoid initialisms, but you can expect to find the names of dictionaries and reference works abbreviated for convenience. Here are a few of the most common initialisms, which are usually followed by a number to refer to the edition: for example, AHD3 = American Heritage Dictionary, 3rd ed.
AHD American Heritage Dictionary CIDE Cambridge International Dictionary of English COD Concise Oxford Dictionary MEU Modern English Usage (Fowler, Gowers or Burchfield) MWCD Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary NODE New Oxford Dictionary of English NSOED New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary OED Oxford English Dictionary RHDEL Random House Dictionary of the English Language RHHDAS Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang RHWCD Random House Webster's College Dictionary RHWUD Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary SOED Shorter Oxford English Dictionary W3NID Webster's Third New International Dictionary
For many more abbreviations found in a.u.e, go to http://alt-usage-english.org/abbreviations.html
~~~~~~~~~~ Responding ~~~~~~~~~~ When responding to other people, please quote *just enough* of the previous posting to set the context for readers. You rarely need to quote the whole thing. Delete the signature if your software does not do so.
Please place your remarks and signature *below* the material you are quoting. That is the tradition in this and many newsgroups. It minimizes confusion by keeping the contributions in chronological order, especially when several postings are quoted in one response, as is fairly common. Some popular newsreaders, such as Outlook Express, automatically put the cursor above the quoted material; you can take advantage of this by scrolling down through the prior posting, deleting anything superfluous, until you reach the point where you want to start your reply.
When participating in cross-posted threads, you will often do everyone a service if you use the "Followup-To" line to direct followups only to a.u.e; you should mention in the message body that you have changed this.
For more on this topic, please read "Quoting Usenet Articles in Follow-ups" at:
http://alt-usage-english.org/posting_quotes.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ TO GOOGLE GROUPS USERS ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A recent change at Google Groups is causing its users to create messages that don't quote any previous material at all, which is baffling to our readers. If you're going to use the Google interface to reply to Usenet posts, please perform this extra step:
(1) click "show options" next to the poster's name, and (2) click "Reply" in the line:
Reply | Reply to Author| Forward | Print | Individual Message
(3) Quoted material and attributions will appear in the "message box"; add your own text at the end or interspersed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dealing with unwanted postings ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please don't respond to spam, or off-topic postings, or questions that can easily be answered in a dictionary. If you feel strongly about such matters, send a polite e-mail note to the offender. Responding to the group uses up bandwidth, wastes even more of everyone's time, and has no effect on spammers, who never read the groups they spam to.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ alt.usage.english and alt.english.usage ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We are sometimes asked why there are two newsgroups with similar names. We don't know; it may have been an error. We are also asked what the difference is between the two groups. We are not aware of any official policy differences; participants of both groups report that alt.usage.english has significantly more traffic. Beyond that, you can make your own judgements about atmosphere, attitudes, personalities of current contributors, etc.
M James Hunt - 18 Jan 2007 14:44 GMT > A recent change at Google Groups is causing its users to create messages > that don't quote any previous material at all, which is baffling to our [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > (1) click "show options" next to the poster's name, and > (2) click "Reply" in the line: This doesn't seem to be a problem any more.
trio@euronet.nl - 18 Jan 2007 15:09 GMT > > A recent change at Google Groups is causing its users to create messages > > that don't quote any previous material at all, which is baffling to our [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > This doesn't seem to be a problem any more. Well, glory be. It looks like you're right. I just went to a.u.e in Google Groups (surprisingly difficult to get there, but that's another story) and the obvious "Reply" link by your message gives the desired result, quoting the previous post. When I look under "Show options," the "Reply" link there had changed color, telling me the two "Reply"s are one and the same.
Someone said recently that Google Groups was unavailable for a few days -- I guess they were cleaning house. Won't it be nice not to get those unidentifiable remarks. I'll make a note to change Intro A.
Now, why can't I get to "groups" from the main Google page? Clicking on "more" in the line
Web Images Video News Maps more ?
leads to no response. Temporary overload or new glitch?
 Signature Best -- Donna Richoux
LFS - 18 Jan 2007 15:21 GMT >>>A recent change at Google Groups is causing its users to create messages >>>that don't quote any previous material at all, which is baffling to our [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > leads to no response. Temporary overload or new glitch? Google UK gives
Web Images Groups Froogle more »
What I'd like to know is how to get to google.com without it automatically reverting to google.co.uk. It does that even if I search on "google" and click on the "google.com" link. I can get to Australian and Canadian Google home pages (both of which have the "groups" link BTW) but not the USA. Odd, that.
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Leslie Danks - 18 Jan 2007 15:47 GMT [...]
> What I'd like to know is how to get to google.com without it > automatically reverting to google.co.uk. It does that even if I search > on "google" and click on the "google.com" link. I can get to Australian > and Canadian Google home pages (both of which have the "groups" link > BTW) but not the USA. Odd, that. It always sends me to google.at so I presume it decides on the basis of where you live. Even if I go to www.google.com/support and go up one directory level I still get thrown back to google.at. Presumably it's intended to reduce the number of bits flying across the Atlantic.
 Signature Les
Archie Valparaiso - 18 Jan 2007 16:44 GMT >>>>A recent change at Google Groups is causing its users to create messages >>>>that don't quote any previous material at all, which is baffling to our [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] >and Canadian Google home pages (both of which have the "groups" link >BTW) but not the USA. Odd, that. Is Google set as the home page of your browser? Mine is and it's been misbehaving recently. Last week it took me back to google.fr by default and this week to google.com. That'd all be very nice if it wasn't suppose to go to google.es.
I blame the weather.
 Signature Archie Valparaiso
LFS - 18 Jan 2007 17:40 GMT >>>>>A recent change at Google Groups is causing its users to create messages >>>>>that don't quote any previous material at all, which is baffling to our [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > > I blame the weather. No, it isn't. I rarely go to the home page as I search Google from the toolbar in Firefox but I do also have a personalised Google home page which is very useful for collecting all the links I use frequently. They claim that it is accessible from my mobile phone but I've never managed to call it up, although I can read my Gmail account on the phone.
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
John Dean - 18 Jan 2007 23:31 GMT >>>> A recent change at Google Groups is causing its users to create >>>> messages that don't quote any previous material at all, which is [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > automatically reverting to google.co.uk. It does that even if I search > on "google" and click on the "google.com" link. Why bother? I switched to http://search.yahoo.com/ because of various annoying problems with Google - including the one you cite - and I can't see any deterioration of service.
 Signature John Dean Oxford
Vinny Burgoo - 19 Jan 2007 11:50 GMT In alt.usage.english, John Dean wrote:
>> What I'd like to know is how to get to google.com without it >> automatically reverting to google.co.uk. It does that even if I search [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >annoying problems with Google - including the one you cite - and I can't see >any deterioration of service. I'm getting fed up with the way Google thinks it knows which word you're searching for better than you do (do). Type "strategies" and it also looks for "strategy". Type "Roberto" and it looks for "Robert".
The trouble with Yahoo and some others I've tried is that they don't interpret hyphenated search terms as a phrase in inverted commas. Mind you, Google is a bit erratic about that these days too.
 Signature V
John Dean - 19 Jan 2007 18:10 GMT > In alt.usage.english, John Dean wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > interpret hyphenated search terms as a phrase in inverted commas. Mind > you, Google is a bit erratic about that these days too. Yahoo does that for me.
 Signature John Dean Oxford
Vinny Burgoo - 19 Jan 2007 23:31 GMT In alt.usage.english, John Dean wrote:
>> The trouble with Yahoo and some others I've tried is that they don't >> interpret hyphenated search terms as a phrase in inverted commas. Mind >> you, Google is a bit erratic about that these days too. > >Yahoo does that for me. I'll try it again. Thanks.
 Signature V
Mark Brader - 18 Jan 2007 23:40 GMT Laura Spira:
> What I'd like to know is how to get to google.com without it > automatically reverting to google.co.uk. Using <http://www.google.com/intl/en/> works for me, although it adds a "Go to Google Canada" link in case I really didn't mean it. Note the trailing slash in the URL; unlike at most sites, this is required.
 Signature Mark Brader, Toronto | "Those who cannot Google the past are destined to msb@vex.net | repost it." -- Huey Callison, after George Santayana
Peter Moylan - 19 Jan 2007 05:26 GMT > Laura Spira: >> What I'd like to know is how to get to google.com without it >> automatically reverting to google.co.uk. It's a nameserver thing. When you try to go to google.com, that name is turned into a numeric IP address by your nearest available nameserver. Google has fiddled the books a bit by ensuring that nameservers in different countries return different answers.
You can bypass the nameserver by giving a numeric address instead. For example, if you go to <http://64.233.187.99/> then you should get the Australian version regardless of where you're trying it from. Of course, to get these addresses you would have to ask people in different countries to execute the command "nslookup google.com" and tell you the result. You can automate this a little by manually editing a file called HOSTS in your networking software. This works in most operating systems. I've found that it will even work in Windows XP Pro provided that you reboot the computer each time it fails. (Like many things in Windows, this is probably something that used to work until it was "fixed" by one of the Microsoft vets.)
For even greater sophistication, you could install and run a nameserver on your own computer. This solution, I imagine, would appeal only to the geeks.
> Using <http://www.google.com/intl/en/> works for me, although it adds > a "Go to Google Canada" link in case I really didn't mean it. Note > the trailing slash in the URL; unlike at most sites, this is > required. That's a better trick, but how did you find it? A similar trick apparently does not work for groups.google.com, which is a pity because the world is full of people who would like to know how to avoid the dreaded Google Groups Beta and go to the earlier and superior version.
By the way, when I took a look at Google Groups to see whether there were any changes for the better, I happened to pick up James Follett's posting as an example. At the start of his article was the notice
Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This message will be removed from Groups in 5 days (Jan 25, 8:13 am).
Now, I think that we all know that James routinely puts an "X-No-Archive" line at the beginning of his postings. It appears that Google Groups is now only partially respecting that request. In theory, his posting should never have appeared on Google Groups.
 Signature Peter Moylan http://www.pmoylan.org
Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses. The domain eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses. The optusnet address could disappear at any time.
LFS - 19 Jan 2007 07:20 GMT > By the way, when I took a look at Google Groups to see whether there > were any changes for the better, I happened to pick up James Follett's [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Google Groups is now only partially respecting that request. In theory, > his posting should never have appeared on Google Groups. Peter's point seems to be that Google Groups is an archive, which implies that all postings are immediately archived, rather than having some kind of initial currency and then being removed to a storage place, which is how, I suppose, I have viewed postings until now.
This led me to reflect on the tricky question of at what point now becomes then. In the book group to which I belong we have been discussing the nature of the historical novel: what exactly makes such a work historical?
 Signature Laura (emulate St. George for email)
Peter Duncanson - 19 Jan 2007 11:37 GMT >> By the way, when I took a look at Google Groups to see whether there >> were any changes for the better, I happened to pick up James Follett's [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> Google Groups is now only partially respecting that request. In theory, >> his posting should never have appeared on Google Groups. See below.
>Peter's point seems to be that Google Groups is an archive, which >implies that all postings are immediately archived, rather than having >some kind of initial currency and then being removed to a storage place, >which is how, I suppose, I have viewed postings until now. In its treatment of Usenet postings Google Groups has a dual function.
1. It is a newsserver. In that role it retains messages for a few days. This is *not* "archiving".
2. It is a message archive. It retains messages indefinitely unless they are marked "X-No-Archive: yes". This *is* "archiving".
Google Groups has a clear definition of when 1 ends and 2 begins: after 5 days.
If all newsservers behaved as Peter M suggests for Google, that is, do not display a message marked for no archiving, then marked posts would never be seen anywhere.
>This led me to reflect on the tricky question of at what point now >becomes then. In the book group to which I belong we have been >discussing the nature of the historical novel: what exactly makes such a >work historical? Tricky.
That on-topic topic would need a thread or a thousand to do it justice here.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
Mark Brader - 19 Jan 2007 23:23 GMT Mark Brader:
>> Using <http://www.google.com/intl/en/> works for me... Peter Moylan:
> That's a better trick, but how did you find it? I don't remember. Either someone posted it in a newsgroup at the time they started doing the "guess the person's country" trick, or else I emailed Google then and got a reply telling me what to do.
 Signature Mark Brader "After all, it is necessary to get behind Toronto someone before you can stab them in the back." msb@vex.net -- Lynn & Jay, "Yes, Prime Minister"
Evan Kirshenbaum - 18 Jan 2007 18:09 GMT > Well, glory be. It looks like you're right. I just went to a.u.e in > Google Groups (surprisingly difficult to get there, but that's another > story) Just type "group:alt.usage.english" into the toolbar and click on the "Groups" button.
[snip]
> Now, why can't I get to "groups" from the main Google page? Clicking > on "more" in the line > > Web Images Video News Maps more » > > leads to no response. Temporary overload or new glitch? It works for me. Was it working for you before? If not, maybe you have JavaScript disabled. The "more" link pops up an overlay.
 Signature Evan Kirshenbaum +------------------------------------ HP Laboratories |Giving money and power to government 1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141 |is like giving whiskey and car keys Palo Alto, CA 94304 |to teenage boys. | P.J. O'Rourke kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com (650)857-7572
http://www.kirshenbaum.net/
Mark Brader - 18 Jan 2007 23:53 GMT Donna Richoux:
> > Now, why can't I get to "groups" from the main Google page? Clicking > > on "more" in the line > > > > Web Images Video News Maps more » > > > > leads to no response. Temporary overload or new glitch? Evan Kirshenbaum:
> It works for me. Was it working for you before? If not, maybe you > have JavaScript disabled. The "more" link pops up an overlay. <disingenuously> You mean there are people who *don't* have JavaScript disabled? </>
When I open the page (the /intl/en/ one, see my other posting) in Firefox, I also see
Web Images Video News Maps more »
but for me, "more »" is a link to <http://www.google.com/intl/en/options/>, a page with about 40 links to different Google services, one of which is Groups.
But if I *turn off styles* by selecting View -> Styles -> No Styles, then I see
Web Images Video News Maps more » [x] Blogs Books Froogle Groups Patents even more »
Where Patents has appeared since the last time I did this, and "even more »" is a second link to <http://www.google.com/intl/en/options/>. And there's the link to Groups, still on the home page, if you just view the page the right way. How it works in the browser they had in mind, I have no idea. The "[x]" icon is one of those annoying links that with JavaScript disabled just links to the same page with # appended to the URL.
 Signature Mark Brader, Toronto "Then she got a Googling look." msb@vex.net --Vernor Vinge, "Rainbows End"
My text in this article is in the public domain.
Peter Duncanson - 18 Jan 2007 20:34 GMT >> > A recent change at Google Groups is causing its users to create messages >> > that don't quote any previous material at all, which is baffling to our [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > >leads to no response. Temporary overload or new glitch? I can get to that from the UK by going to: http://www.google.us
which displays the home page with the url: http://www.google.com/webhp
Clicking on "more" pops-up a list: Blogs Books Froogle Groups Patents even more
Clicking on Groups opens the Groups page.
 Signature Peter Duncanson, UK (in alt.usage.english)
|
|
|