
Signature
Bob Lieblich
Or to embarrass yourself
[snip]
> So I guess
> you're right and I just missed the point. Not the first time for
> that.
>
> It's never too late to learn something. [snip]
I've been in the same mindset, but I'm not quite as willing to accept,
100%, Bob's new instruction on the meaning of "ascertain." Yes, most
of the definitions do give "find out with certainty" -- but the
Wiktionary entry gives just plain "find out" as its first definition;
see:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ascertain
With that broader definition, the addition of "with certainty" isn't
redundant.
Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
Robert Lieblich - 20 Jan 2007 22:39 GMT
> [snip]
> > So I guess
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> With that broader definition, the addition of "with certainty" isn't
> redundant.
Thanks for coming to my defene, Ozzie, but I already surrendered. I'm
even going native. It strikes me that "find out" implies certainty
also.
More generally, I think there are fuzzy boundaries around most words
and phrases that would pop up in the same thesaurus entry as
"ascertain," and they're not all the same. Words have penumbras, and
the penumbras vary. But to me, in its clear area, "ascertain" does
suggest certainty, now that I think about it. I think this is another
way of saying what Ozzie is saying. So I surrender yet again.

Signature
Bob Lieblich
Don't shoot