Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Jamaica Inn

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
irwell - 23 Jan 2007 16:22 GMT
Showing now in Branscombe!
Mike M - 23 Jan 2007 16:45 GMT
> Showing now in Branscombe!

If you wake at Midnight, and hear an SUV
Don't go drawing back the blind, or looking out to see,
Them that asks no questions isn't told a lie.
Watch the wall, my darling, while the Devon chavs go by!

Five and twenty flat-beds
Driving through the dark -
Consoles for the kiddies.
Hondas for the Clerk;
Cellphones for a lady, cameras for a spy,
And watch the wall, my darling, while the Devon chavs go by!

(Somebody want to finish it?)

Mike M
Mike Lyle - 23 Jan 2007 17:38 GMT
>> Showing now in Branscombe!
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> (Somebody want to finish it?)

I wouldn't dream of attempting to compete with such a cracker: you might
even get a few bob from one of the papers if you rush. It'd make a very
nice light leader. Note, though, that it isn't just locals.

Signature

Mike.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Tony Cooper - 23 Jan 2007 18:11 GMT
>Five and twenty flat-beds
>Driving through the dark -
>Consoles for the kiddies.
>Hondas for the Clerk;
>Cellphones for a lady, cameras for a spy,
>And watch the wall, my darling, while the Devon chavs go by!

I almost missed the rhyme.  In the US, "clerk" rhymes with "dirk".
Your rhyme of "clerk" with "spark" is something we'd expect in a movie
about outdated aristocratic Oxford student stereotypes.

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Nick Spalding - 23 Jan 2007 18:21 GMT
Tony Cooper wrote, in <tqjcr25kk106su4kn7s01dl8866uvg9q0f@4ax.com>
on Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:11:58 -0500:

> >Five and twenty flat-beds
> >Driving through the dark -
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Your rhyme of "clerk" with "spark" is something we'd expect in a movie
> about outdated aristocratic Oxford student stereotypes.

It's not his rhyme, it's from the original.
Signature

Nick Spalding

Mike Lyle - 23 Jan 2007 19:18 GMT
[...]
> It's not his rhyme, it's from the original.

As follows:
[from Puck of Pook's Hill]
A Smuggler's Song
Rudyard Kipling

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

     IF YOU wake at midnight, and hear a horse's feet,
     Don't go drawing back the blind, or looking in the street,
     Them that ask no questions isn't told a lie.
     Watch the wall, my darling, while the Gentlemen go by!
                     Five and twenty ponies,
                     Trotting through the dark-
                     Brandy for the Parson,
                     'Baccy for the Clerk;
                     Laces for a lady, letters for a spy,
     And watch the wall, my darling, while the Gentlemen go by!
     Running round the woodlump if you chance to find
     Little barrels, roped and tarred, all full of brandy-wine,
     Don't you shout to come and look, nor use 'em for your play.
     Put the brishwood back again-and they'll be gone next day!

     If you see the stable-door setting open wide;
     If you see a tired horse lying down inside;
     If your mother mends a coat cut about and tore;
     If the lining's wet and warm-don't you ask no more!

     If you meet King George's men, dressed in blue and red,
     You be careful what you say, and mindful what is said.
     If they call you "pretty maid," and chuck you 'neath the chin,
     Don't you tell where no one is, nor yet where no one's been!

     Knocks and footsteps round the house-whistles after dark-
     You've no call for running out till the house-dogs bark.
     Trusty's here, and Pincher's here, and see how dumb they lie-
     They don't fret to follow when the Gentlemen go by!

     If you do as you've been told, 'likely there's a chance,
     You'll be give a dainty doll, all the way from France,
     With a cap of Valenciennes, and a velvet hood-
     A present from the Gentlemen, along o' being good!
                     Five and twenty ponies,
                     Trotting through the dark-
                     Brandy for the Parson,
                     'Baccy for the Clerk.
     Them that asks no questions isn't told a lie-
     Watch the wall, my darling, while the Gentlemen go by!

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

TakenEvent - 23 Jan 2007 19:21 GMT
> Tony Cooper wrote, in <tqjcr25kk106su4kn7s01dl8866uvg9q0f@4ax.com>
>  on Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:11:58 -0500:
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> It's not his rhyme, it's from the original.

Seems to be "dark", not "spark", and I agree that neither rhyme with "clerk"
hereabouts either.  It seems doubtful that an American audience was
considered, though.

What's "Devon chavs"?
John Dean - 24 Jan 2007 00:28 GMT
>> Tony Cooper wrote, in <tqjcr25kk106su4kn7s01dl8866uvg9q0f@4ax.com>
>>  on Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:11:58 -0500:
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> "clerk" hereabouts either.  It seems doubtful that an American
> audience was considered, though.

Other, perhaps, than the author's wife.

> What's "Devon chavs"?

Chavs from Devon.
Signature

John Dean
Oxford

Robert Bannister - 24 Jan 2007 23:16 GMT
> Chavs from Devon.

I do wonder whether they are really chavs or simply honourable Devonfolk
continuing their centuries old practice of wrecking. They probably had
oil lamps on the cliffs to lead the ship astray.
Signature

Rob Bannister

Mike Lyle - 24 Jan 2007 23:35 GMT
>> Chavs from Devon.
>
> I do wonder whether they are really chavs or simply honourable
> Devonfolk continuing their centuries old practice of wrecking. They
> probably had oil lamps on the cliffs to lead the ship astray.

It actually seems to have turned nasty: apparently, the chancers were
coming in from far away, the damage to the beach is serious, and local
people were having stuff stolen -- y compris their wheelie bins as
convenient loot-carriers. The police eventually got authority to close
the beach off. A pity, really, as I don't grudge the locals their
bounty.

Signature

Mike.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Robert Bannister - 25 Jan 2007 00:29 GMT
> the beach off. A pity, really, as I don't grudge the locals their
> bounty.

ObAue: I would have used "begrudge" for this meaning.
Signature

Rob Bannister

Amethyst Deceiver - 25 Jan 2007 11:32 GMT
>>> Chavs from Devon.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> the beach off. A pity, really, as I don't grudge the locals their
> bounty.

I do. Some of the things belong to people. Some of the things are being
shipped from one continent to another to new homes. I'd be livid if
people were breaking into containers and stealing my furniture - would
you be so blase if it were yours?
Mike Lyle - 25 Jan 2007 13:47 GMT
On Jan 25, 11:32am, "Amethyst Deceiver" <s...@lindsayendell.co.uk>
wrote:
> MikeLylewrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> > the beach off. A pity, really, as I don't grudge the locals their
> > bounty.

> I do. Some of the things belong to people. Some of the things are being
> shipped from one continent to another to new homes. I'd be livid if
> people were breaking into containers and stealing my furniture - would
> you be so blase if it were yours?-

See also Matthew and Laura, both speaking wise words. But equally Ross,
and yesterday John D. Yes, I do grudge (obAUE: Coverdale, Johnson,
Addison, Keble, Browning, et al) bounty consisting of that unlucky
family's private stuff. I do begrudge (for Rob) a share to the incoming
"chancers" I mentioned. But I don't give a toss if the villagers score
a few brand-new and, no doubt, handsomely insured commercial goods (or
a reward from the company).

Signature

Mike.

Mike Lyle - 25 Jan 2007 16:16 GMT
> On Jan 25, 11:32am, "Amethyst Deceiver" <s...@lindsayendell.co.uk>
> wrote:
>> MikeLylewrote:
[...]
>>> It actually seems to have turned nasty: apparently, the chancers
>>> were coming in from far away, the damage to the beach is serious,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>> I do. Some of the things belong to people.[...]

Clarification. When I said "A pity. . ." above, I meant "a pity it
turned nasty" not "a pity the police closed the beach". It looks as
though some such un-British steps had to be taken. I'll leave the matter
of such steps' legality to others.

Signature

Mike.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

LFS - 25 Jan 2007 11:46 GMT
>>>Chavs from Devon.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> the beach off. A pity, really, as I don't grudge the locals their
> bounty.

Nasty indeed. I felt very sorry for the woman in South Africa who was
waiting for all her worldly goods to be shipped to her and saw TV
footage of people using crowbars on a container with her name on.

Signature

Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

Archie Valparaiso - 25 Jan 2007 12:08 GMT
>>>>Chavs from Devon.
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>waiting for all her worldly goods to be shipped to her and saw TV
>footage of people using crowbars on a container with her name on.

At the end of the day, though (Brian), what difference does it make?
If those worldly goods hadn't washed up on the beach, it'd be rotting
on the seabed. She'd never see them again in either case.

Signature

Archie Valparaiso

(Me? I blame the weather.)

Matthew Huntbach - 25 Jan 2007 12:21 GMT
>> Nasty indeed. I felt very sorry for the woman in South Africa who was
>> waiting for all her worldly goods to be shipped to her and saw TV
>> footage of people using crowbars on a container with her name on.

> At the end of the day, though (Brian), what difference does it make?
> If those worldly goods hadn't washed up on the beach, it'd be rotting
> on the seabed. She'd never see them again in either case.

The problem seems to be that legislation assumes that to be the
case - it's ancient legislation based on assumptions from the time of
wooden sailing ships. In practice, however, containerisation means the
woman's goods could easily be returned to her in a relatively unharmed
state, forcing the container open with a crowbar does not amount to
rescuing them from certain destruction.

Matthew Huntbach
Archie Valparaiso - 25 Jan 2007 12:32 GMT
>>> Nasty indeed. I felt very sorry for the woman in South Africa who was
>>> waiting for all her worldly goods to be shipped to her and saw TV
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>state, forcing the container open with a crowbar does not amount to
>rescuing them from certain destruction.

The whole story is just another shakes-head-in-amazement moment for
me, I'm afraid. What is this, the summer silly season? Now that the
media have run out of things to say about the bolshy Bermondsey bint
versus bumptious Bollywood bimbo business, the nation wrings its hands
for days over beachcombing.

In saner times, both stories would have merited no more than a
ten-second "And also today...." well-fancy-that epilogue on the news,
no doubt followed by a wry smile from Reggie Bosanquet as he said
goodnight.

Signature

Archie Valparaiso

(Me? I blame the weather.)

Oleg Lego - 24 Jan 2007 04:18 GMT
The TakenEvent entity posted thusly:

>> Tony Cooper wrote, in <tqjcr25kk106su4kn7s01dl8866uvg9q0f@4ax.com>
>>  on Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:11:58 -0500:
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>Seems to be "dark", not "spark", and I agree that neither rhyme with "clerk"
>hereabouts either.

I rhyme dark with spark. (Canada)
Mike M - 24 Jan 2007 14:28 GMT
> Your rhyme of "clerk" with "spark" is something we'd expect in a movie
> about outdated aristocratic Oxford student stereotypes.

Not archaic usage in the original Kipling poem, but absolutely standard
BrE. It would be used not just by "aristocratic Oxford student
stereotypes", but by everybody.

In fact I'd go so far as to say that "clerk" rhyming with "work" is one
of those AmE  pronunciations that BrE speakers might deliberately
choose to demonstrate "talking funny like a Yank".

Incidentally, I wondered just how many posters would immediately spot
the parody - I would guess that most Brits of a "certain age" are
familiar with it. Youngsters perhaps less so (although I read it to my
kids when they were small, so they know it).

Mike M
Tony Cooper - 24 Jan 2007 15:26 GMT
>> Your rhyme of "clerk" with "spark" is something we'd expect in a movie
>> about outdated aristocratic Oxford student stereotypes.
>
>Not archaic usage in the original Kipling poem, but absolutely standard
>BrE. It would be used not just by "aristocratic Oxford student
>stereotypes", but by everybody.

Yes, yes, but you're missing a link.  The above comments plays on a
separate thread about the movie "Oxford Blues".  It's not intended to
be read as a serious comment.

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Mike M - 24 Jan 2007 15:29 GMT
> >> Your rhyme of "clerk" with "spark" is something we'd expect in a movie
> >> about outdated aristocratic Oxford student stereotypes.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> separate thread about the movie "Oxford Blues".  It's not intended to
> be read as a serious comment.

Ah, I see. Mea culpa.

Mike M
Nick Atty - 24 Jan 2007 19:47 GMT
>In fact I'd go so far as to say that "clerk" rhyming with "work" is one
>of those AmE  pronunciations that BrE speakers might deliberately
>choose to demonstrate "talking funny like a Yank".

Absolutely.  It leaps out at me every time I hear "Echo Beach" (and yes,
I know that's NAm rather than Am).
Signature

On-line canal route planner: http://www.canalplan.org.uk

(Waterways World site of the month, April 2001)
My Reply-To address *is* valid, though likely to die soon

Turenne - 24 Jan 2007 20:42 GMT
John Dean wrote:

>Receiver of Wreck. No 's'.

It would seem that in the context of The Merchant Shipping Act 1995,
'wreck' is plural insofar as it is defined as flotsam, jetsam, derelict
(abandoned or deserted property) and lagan (goods cast overboard). I
may have this completely wrong so am happy to be corrected.

Richard Lichten
Robert Bannister - 24 Jan 2007 23:16 GMT
> Incidentally, I wondered just how many posters would immediately spot
> the parody - I would guess that most Brits of a "certain age" are
> familiar with it.

I'm of a certain age. I did recognise it as a poem I must have been
familiar with at one time, but I certainly could not have guessed the
author. Sounds almost Walter de la Mare.
Signature

Rob Bannister

Mike Lyle - 24 Jan 2007 23:39 GMT
>> Incidentally, I wondered just how many posters would immediately spot
>> the parody - I would guess that most Brits of a "certain age" are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> familiar with at one time, but I certainly could not have guessed the
> author. Sounds almost Walter de la Mare.

Kipling sometimes does. This one is good; but I reckon his _Road Through
the Woods_ is a masterpiece -- perhaps because he doesn't let his
Kiplingness get much of a look-in.

Signature

Mike.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

irwell - 24 Jan 2007 23:55 GMT
>> Incidentally, I wondered just how many posters would immediately spot
>> the parody - I would guess that most Brits of a "certain age" are
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>familiar with at one time, but I certainly could not have guessed the
>author. Sounds almost Walter de la Mare.

Or Wm.Allingham

Up the airy mountain
Down the rushy glen
We dare not go a-hunting
For fear of little men.
Nick Spalding - 25 Jan 2007 11:39 GMT
irwell wrote, in <a8sfr2h81qrv1g46ksppirp4rs2v1jsbn8@4ax.com>
on Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:55:50 -0800:

> >> Incidentally, I wondered just how many posters would immediately spot
> >> the parody - I would guess that most Brits of a "certain age" are
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> We dare not go a-hunting
> For fear of little men.

That's just twee, the Kipling isn't.
Signature

Nick Spalding

Mike M - 25 Jan 2007 11:55 GMT
> > Incidentally, I wondered just how many posters would immediately spot
> > the parody - I would guess that most Brits of a "certain age" are
> > familiar with it.I'm of a certain age. I did recognise it as a poem I must have been
> familiar with at one time, but I certainly could not have guessed the
> author. Sounds almost Walter de la Mare.

Yes. Or John Masefield - "Cargoes" has that "list" element to it, as
well as the nautical theme.

All British primary school staples Once Upon A Time.

Mike M
HVS - 24 Jan 2007 23:16 GMT
On 24 Jan 2007, Mike M wrote

> Incidentally, I wondered just how many posters would immediately
> spot the parody - I would guess that most Brits of a "certain
> age" are familiar with it. Youngsters perhaps less so (although
> I read it to my kids when they were small, so they know it).

I knew it was a parody, but had never heard the original -- only the
earlier Flanders & Swann parody of "Bedstead Men".

(It was exactly like hearing a parody of the "Father William" versoin
where he stands on his head.)

Signature

Cheers, Harvey

Canadian and British English, indiscriminately mixed
For e-mail, change harvey.news to harvey.van

Peter Moylan - 25 Jan 2007 01:49 GMT
> (It was exactly like hearing a parody of the "Father William" versoin
>  where he stands on his head.)

The only version of "Father William" that I've ever heard is the Alison
Wonderland one. Some day I must look up the original.

Signature

Peter Moylan                             http://www.pmoylan.org

Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses.  The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses.  The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.

Evan Kirshenbaum - 25 Jan 2007 02:33 GMT
>> (It was exactly like hearing a parody of the "Father William"
>> versoin where he stands on his head.)
>
> The only version of "Father William" that I've ever heard is the
> Alison Wonderland one. Some day I must look up the original.

Don't bother.  There's a good reason that the originals for most of
Carroll's parodies have been forgotten.  This one is a parody of
Robert Southey's "The Old Man's Comforts and How He Gained Them".

Of course, there is one good reason to look up the originals.  It's
that the easiest way to satisfy your curiosity is by obtaining a copy
of Martin Gardner's _The Annotated Alice_.

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |So when can we quit passing laws and
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |raising taxes?  When can we say of
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |our political system, "Stick a fork
                                      |in it, it's done?"
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com             |                  P.J. O'Rourke
   (650)857-7572

   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

Peter Moylan - 25 Jan 2007 01:47 GMT
> In fact I'd go so far as to say that "clerk" rhyming with "work" is
> one of those AmE  pronunciations that BrE speakers might deliberately
>  choose to demonstrate "talking funny like a Yank".

And conversely: Americans hearing BrE "clerk" automatically think of one
of those things that sit on the wall going "tick terk".

Signature

Peter Moylan                             http://www.pmoylan.org

Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses.  The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses.  The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.

Ray O'Hara - 23 Jan 2007 17:00 GMT
> Showing now in Branscombe!

It seems that looting shipwrecks is a trradition still going strong in Old
Blighty.
mike.j.harvey@gmail.com - 23 Jan 2007 17:20 GMT
> > Showing now in Branscombe!
>
>  It seems that looting shipwrecks is a trradition still going strong in Old
> Blighty.

Technically, they aren't "looting a shipwreck", they are salvaging
cargo washed ashore from a beached vessel. Quite legal, as long as you
notify the owners within 28 days. Officials were handing out forms to
do this on the beach.
Tony Cooper - 23 Jan 2007 18:13 GMT
>> Showing now in Branscombe!
>
> It seems that looting shipwrecks is a trradition still going strong in Old
>Blighty.

Ah, but the loot!  BMW motorbikes.  Tempting, no?

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

TakenEvent - 23 Jan 2007 19:26 GMT
> >> Showing now in Branscombe!
> >
> > It seems that looting shipwrecks is a trradition still going strong in Old
> >Blighty.
> >
> Ah, but the loot!  BMW motorbikes.  Tempting, no?

When I read about that I wondered about two different things.  How do you
hide a BMW motorcycle from all your friends and neighbors who undoubtedly
would guess where it came from?  Relatedly, when would you use it?  Plus,
ebay is out of the question.

How was the law arrived at that states a person has--was it 28?--days to
hand such loot over to the proper owner?  Yes, you can steal it, but [you
can] only keep it for a month?
Mike Lyle - 23 Jan 2007 19:48 GMT
[...]
> When I read about that I wondered about two different things.  How do
> you hide a BMW motorcycle from all your friends and neighbors who
> undoubtedly would guess where it came from?  Relatedly, when would
> you use it?  Plus, ebay is out of the question.

I imagine the bikes are too hot to handle profitably in the UK and
neighbours, maybe even as spares. They certainly won't be legally
usable.

> How was the law arrived at that states a person has--was it 28?--days
> to hand such loot over to the proper owner?  Yes, you can steal it,
> but [you can] only keep it for a month?

I wonder if it was more a matter of being given 28 days to inform the
Receiver of Wreck, and then, if there was a claim against you, beginning
a legal process to establish ownership. A Scottish fisherman a year or
two ago was in dispute with the Andrew over a disabled remote-controlled
submarine he'd caught, and wasn't going to give back till they came
across with a good reward. But that was salvage at sea rather than from
the foreshore, so it may be different.

Signature

Mike.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Archie Valparaiso - 23 Jan 2007 21:03 GMT
>> How was the law arrived at that states a person has--was it 28?--days
>> to hand such loot over to the proper owner?  Yes, you can steal it,
>> but [you can] only keep it for a month?
>
>I wonder if it was more a matter of being given 28 days to inform the
>Receiver of Wreck

Isn't that a fantabulous job title -- especially since the current
holder of it is only a temp; the geezer who's been quoted everywhere
talking about the "despicable" scavengers is the "Acting Receiver of
Wreck".

I had that Mervyn Peake in the back of the cab once.

Signature

Archie Valparaiso

(Me? I blame the weather.)

Matthew Huntbach - 25 Jan 2007 11:24 GMT
>> I wonder if it was more a matter of being given 28 days to inform the
>> Receiver of Wreck

> Isn't that a fantabulous job title -- especially since the current
> holder of it is only a temp; the geezer who's been quoted everywhere
> talking about the "despicable" scavengers is the "Acting Receiver of
> Wreck".

I think it's one of those roles where the person who's officially it is
some dignatory (it may even be the Queen), and the real job is done by
someone else. See also "Returning Officer" in elections, who is often
formally the Mayor, he gets to read the results on election night,
but the real job of doing all the organisation of the election is done
by the "Acting Returning Officer" who is some mid-level local government
officer.

Matthew Huntbach
Oleg Lego - 24 Jan 2007 04:24 GMT
The Mike Lyle entity posted thusly:

>[...]
>> When I read about that I wondered about two different things.  How do
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>across with a good reward. But that was salvage at sea rather than from
>the foreshore, so it may be different.

A fellow I know picked up a practice torpedo (he was in his teens at
the time), in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, between Vancouver Island and
the BC mainland. It belonged to the US Navy, and was being tested on
the Nanoose torpedo range.

He caused quite a stir by having it in his garage, and basically told
the USN he really liked it and intended to keep it, as was his right
under salvage laws. He finally turned it over to them, after they
offered a substantial "reward" for its recovery.
Leslie Danks - 23 Jan 2007 20:59 GMT
[...]

> How was the law arrived at that states a person has--was it 28?--days to
> hand such loot over to the proper owner?  Yes, you can steal it, but [you
> can] only keep it for a month?

You're not stealing it, you're rescuing it from further damage by successive
tides. The form you fill in is to enable the Receiver of Wrecks to find the
legal owners and put them in touch with you. Then, says Alison Kentuck, the
MCA's deputy receiver:

"A reward to the finder could be offered, depending on the value of the
goods, the condition they are in after rescue, and the effort involved in
recovering them from the beach. Wheeling something home is not classed as a
huge amount of effort."

(Obviously Ms Deputy Receiver of Wrecks has never wheeled a BMW up a sandy
beach.)

"Hiding the goods and not giving them back is a criminal offence, with a
possible fine of up to £2,500 per offence.

Plus, the hot-fingered beach-comber, would waive their right to a salvage
award, and have to pay the owner twice the good's value: 'In the case of a
BMW motorbike, it could be quite expensive'."

<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6287047.stm>

Signature

Les

Robin Bignall - 23 Jan 2007 23:09 GMT
>[...]
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
><http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6287047.stm>

The Times also mentioned that the owners or their agents have a year
to recover their goods.  If by then they haven't done so, it's
finders, keepers.
Signature

Robin
Herts, England

John Dean - 24 Jan 2007 00:30 GMT
> [...]
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> (Obviously Ms Deputy Receiver of Wrecks has never wheeled a BMW up a
> sandy beach.)

Receiver of Wreck. No 's'.
Signature

John "Noel either" Dean
Oxford

Leslie Danks - 24 Jan 2007 10:58 GMT
>> Receiver of Wrecks

> Receiver of Wreck. No 's'.

Yes - I foolishly copied what the BBC wrote despite an up-thread poster
having got it right. Interestingly, Australia, Canada, India and Ceylon
(and possibly others) have a "Receiver of Wrecks".

Signature

Les

Mike Lyle - 24 Jan 2007 14:09 GMT
> >> Receiver of Wrecks
> > Receiver of Wreck. No 's'.Yes - I foolishly copied what the BBC wrote despite an up-thread poster
> having got it right. Interestingly, Australia, Canada, India and Ceylon
> (and possibly others) have a "Receiver of Wrecks".

Boy, that might keep a lawyer in cigars for a while! Clearly a
countable wreck is very different from uncountable wreck.

Signature

Mike.

John Dean - 24 Jan 2007 00:54 GMT
>>>> Showing now in Branscombe!
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> undoubtedly would guess where it came from?  Relatedly, when would
> you use it?  Plus, ebay is out of the question.

Apparently not.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/01/23/uk.ship/index.html?eref=rss_latest
"And plunder from the ship has already started to appear on Internet auction
Web site eBay, the UK Press Association reported."

> How was the law arrived at that states a person has--was it 28?--days
> to hand such loot over to the proper owner?  Yes, you can steal it,
> but [you can] only keep it for a month?

Because it's helpful if people gather up items deposited on shore from a
wreck and keep them safe for the owners but it's unreasonable to expect them
to hotfoot it to the nearest cop shop the very second they lay their hands
on it. In other words, the law was based on the idea that people will hand
in lost property (as they are expected to do on trains, buses and plain old
pavements) but there's an added remoteness to sea salvage.
Of course, the looters *are* stealing the stuff in this case and the law is
working to their advantage. Usually the law only works to the advantage of
criminals running businesses and the benefits run into millions. The law
aiding ordinary folks to get away with a few hundred quid's worth is unusual
and is therefore exciting comment.
But are we not all wreckers, as Henry David observed in re Cape Cod?

"Though there are wreck-masters appointed to look after valuable property
which must be advertised, yet undoubtedly a great deal of value is secretly
carried off. But are we not all wreckers contriving that some treasure may
be washed up on our beach, that we may secure it, and do we not infer the
habits of these Nauset and Barnegat wreckers, from the common modes of
getting a living?"

Signature

John Dean
Oxford

Amethyst Deceiver - 25 Jan 2007 11:35 GMT
>>>> Showing now in Branscombe!
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> undoubtedly would guess where it came from?  Relatedly, when would
> you use it?  Plus, ebay is out of the question.

You'd be surprised. At least one bike has ended up on ebay.
Peter Moylan - 25 Jan 2007 11:50 GMT
>> When I read about that I wondered about two different things.  How
>> do you hide a BMW motorcycle from all your friends and neighbors
>> who undoubtedly would guess where it came from?  Relatedly, when
>> would you use it?  Plus, ebay is out of the question.
>
> You'd be surprised. At least one bike has ended up on ebay.

And a number of the looters have ended up with their faces displayed on
TV news programs. Presumably the police will be able to use the news
footage as evidence.

Signature

Peter Moylan                             http://www.pmoylan.org

Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses.  The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses.  The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.

Ray O'Hara - 24 Jan 2007 01:11 GMT
> >> Showing now in Branscombe!
> >
> > It seems that looting shipwrecks is a trradition still going strong in Old
> >Blighty.
> >
> Ah, but the loot!  BMW motorbikes.  Tempting, no?

A fine looking bike it was too.
Don't the old laws regading salvage still apply? They didn't "steal" it it
was ashore after a shipwreck
And a legit wreck, not one caused by "mooncussers" so it should be "finders
keepers".
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.