Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

I blame aue

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tony Cooper - 25 Jan 2007 16:41 GMT
From an Associated Press report:

"On Monday, Coach Tony Dungy said that the thumb was discolored and
sore, and that Manning needed X-rays.  Team owner Jim Irsay said later
Monday night that the X-rays were negative..."

Did that surprise Mr Irsay?  Aren't all X-rays negatives?

The meaning, of course, is that the X-rays did not show that the thumb
was broken.  Why is this "negative", though?  Isn't it a good thing
that the thumb is not broken?  

In medical parlance, a test or an X-ray that is "negative" is one that
reveals that all is well.  A positive result means that the patient
should start putting his or her affairs in order.

In other, non-medical, uses of "negative" and "positive",  the meaning
is just the opposite.  

If you sense a negative attitude in this post, it's because I'm
blaming aue for my O-A syndrome.  (That's short for "Over-Analyzation
Of Words As They Are Used")   I can no longer casually read the Sports
Section over a cup of morning coffee.  Words and phrases are jumping
out at me and shouting "This isn't saying what it means!" and "ObAue
this!".

 
Signature


Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Randall Coleman - 25 Jan 2007 16:58 GMT
> From an Associated Press report:
>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> out at me and shouting "This isn't saying what it means!" and "ObAue
> this!".

Positive and negative in medical terminology get their meaning based on the
nature of the tests performed.  For example, if one is suspected of having
hepatitis, a doctor may order a test for the hepatitis C antibody, an
indicator of the presence of a virus that causes hepatitis .  If the test is
positive, that means that the antibody is present, and the patient is
carrying the virus.  If the test is negative, no evidence of the presence of
the virus is found.
Tony Cooper - 25 Jan 2007 17:36 GMT
>> From an Associated Press report:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>carrying the virus.  If the test is negative, no evidence of the presence of
>the virus is found.

I do understand all of this.  I even accept it since I spent all of my
working career dealing with hospitals and doctors.  What's more, my
university education was in the field of business where I was taught
that words are not at all necessarily used to convey traditional and
accepted definitions.  I spent years learning that if we can't
actually change a negative into a positive, we can at least come up
with a way to do so with words.  As a businessman I was never as good
at it as the real professionals who write things like the State of the
Union address, but I got by.

However,  my current career is that of a layabout and reader of aue.
This has changed my perspective and caused me to examine usage with a
different eye.  

Signature

Tony Cooper
Orlando, FL

Spehro Pefhany - 25 Jan 2007 17:27 GMT
>From an Associated Press report:
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>In other, non-medical, uses of "negative" and "positive",  the meaning
>is just the opposite.  

Think of it from the point of view of the diagnostician. If you are
troubleshooting, your job is completed once you identify the problem.
That's a real positive.

>If you sense a negative attitude in this post, it's because I'm
>blaming aue for my O-A syndrome.  (That's short for "Over-Analyzation
>Of Words As They Are Used")   I can no longer casually read the Sports
>Section over a cup of morning coffee.  Words and phrases are jumping
>out at me and shouting "This isn't saying what it means!" and "ObAue
>this!".

Some forms of insanity seem to operate along those lines.

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
Signature

"it's the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com

Evan Kirshenbaum - 25 Jan 2007 17:47 GMT
> The meaning, of course, is that the X-rays did not show that the
> thumb was broken.  Why is this "negative", though?  Isn't it a good
> thing that the thumb is not broken?
>
> In medical parlance,

And, more broadly, in any sort of diagnostic context.  

> a test or an X-ray that is "negative" is one that reveals that all
> is well.  A positive result means that the patient should start
> putting his or her affairs in order.

It means that the test didn't find what it was looking for.  There are
situations in which you hope to find what you're looking for.  For
example, if you're looking for signs of responsiveness in a comatose
patient, "negative" is a bad thing.  Similarly, if you're looking for
signs that a treatment is working, you want the tests to be positive.

> In other, non-medical, uses of "negative" and "positive", the
> meaning is just the opposite.

In classification contexts, "positive" similarly means "We believe
this to be an example of the class we're considering/looking for"
(e.g., likely donors, good credit risks, terrorists), while a
"negative" means "We believe that it isn't".

Signature

Evan Kirshenbaum                       +------------------------------------
   HP Laboratories                    |He seems to be perceptive and
   1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |effective because he states the
   Palo Alto, CA  94304               |obvious to people that don't seem
                                      |to see the obvious.
   kirshenbaum@hpl.hp.com             |
   (650)857-7572                      |          Tony Cooper

   http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

Archie Valparaiso - 25 Jan 2007 18:04 GMT
>> The meaning, of course, is that the X-rays did not show that the
>> thumb was broken.  Why is this "negative", though?  Isn't it a good
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>(e.g., likely donors, good credit risks, terrorists), while a
>"negative" means "We believe that it isn't".

On a similar note, I still sometimes get confused by those deathbed
scenes in films when someone takes the moribund person's pulse, looks
up and slowly shakes his head. What -- so he's not dead yet?

Signature

Archie Valparaiso

(Me? I blame the weather.)

Eric Schwartz - 25 Jan 2007 19:18 GMT
> On a similar note, I still sometimes get confused by those deathbed
> scenes in films when someone takes the moribund person's pulse, looks
> up and slowly shakes his head. What -- so he's not dead yet?

I always figured he'd just lost a bet he made in the staff room.

-=Eric
Mike Lyle - 25 Jan 2007 21:06 GMT
>> On a similar note, I still sometimes get confused by those deathbed
>> scenes in films when someone takes the moribund person's pulse, looks
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> -=Eric

The locus classicus of medical neg-pos must be "Noiss! Eether this man
is dead or my watch has stopped!"

Signature

Mike.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Mark Brader - 26 Jan 2007 23:46 GMT
Ross Howard:
>>> On a similar note, I still sometimes get confused by those deathbed
>>> scenes in films when someone takes the moribund person's pulse, looks
>>> up and slowly shakes his head. What -- so he's not dead yet?

Eric Schwartz:
>> I always figured he'd just lost a bet he made in the staff room.

Mike Lyle:
> The locus classicus of medical neg-pos must be "Noiss! Eether this man
> is dead or my watch has stopped!"

That's Groucho Marx in A Day at the Races.  The companion line is said
by John Mills in The Wrong Box, just after his nephew (Michael Caine)
has pulled the sheet over his face: "Death cannot be assumed just
because signs of life are not present!"
Signature

Mark Brader, Toronto   |  "The time to make up your mind about people
msb@vex.net            |   is never."         --The Philadelphia Story

R H Draney - 25 Jan 2007 20:29 GMT
Archie Valparaiso filted:

>>In classification contexts, "positive" similarly means "We believe
>>this to be an example of the class we're considering/looking for"
>>(e.g., likely donors, good credit risks, terrorists), while a
>>"negative" means "We believe that it isn't".

One of my favorites concerned a medical report on former president Reagan:
"doctors examined Mr Reagan's brain but found nothing"....

>On a similar note, I still sometimes get confused by those deathbed
>scenes in films when someone takes the moribund person's pulse, looks
>up and slowly shakes his head. What -- so he's not dead yet?

I understand the ambiguity; it's a shame that the death-keen never really caught
on in humans....r

Signature

"You got Schadenfreude on my Weltanschauung!"
"You got Weltanschauung in my Schadenfreude!"

Pat Durkin - 25 Jan 2007 17:50 GMT
> If you sense a negative attitude in this post, it's because I'm
> blaming aue for my O-A syndrome.  (That's short for "Over-Analyzation
> Of Words As They Are Used")   I can no longer casually read the Sports
> Section over a cup of morning coffee.  Words and phrases are jumping
> out at me and shouting "This isn't saying what it means!" and "ObAue
> this!".
O-A syndrome?

You mean you don't think first of Old Age?
Most persnicketiness comes from that, I think.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.