> "cybercypher" <dontbother@easypeasy.com> wrote
>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> No, the second example really needs more context.
Yes, for clarity, you're right.
> If Mr. Smith
> was coming to terms with having to spend his life in a wheelchair,
> I'd agree with you, although I'd also rewrite the sentence because
> that's an iffy usage of "face up to" in my book.
Agreed.
> If Mr. Smith was in an accident, and his prognosis was that
> walking again was uncertain, then the sentence-in-question
> indicates that he could be wheelchair-bound for a period of time
> "up to" the rest of his life, with "up to" indicating that it
> could be a shorter period of time. This is the way I understood
> the sentence.
I agree that your interpretation is reasonable, but only because the
sentence as Adrian provided it is ambiguous. The verb phrase "facing
up to" can mean either simply "confronting" or "coming to terms
with". We don't know what the radio headline really means.
I also agree that it's an iffy usage because of the ambiguity. I'd've
said "John Smith may face life in a wheelchair". OTOH, I don't think
that headline writers are concerned about ambiguity. In fact, the
more ambiguous a headline is, the greater the chance the reader or,
in this case, listener will follow the story: just to clear up the
ambiguity.

Signature
Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan.
"It has come to my attention that my opinions are not universally
shared." Scott Adams, The Dilbert Blog, 23 Jan 2007;
http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/
teranews charges a one-time US$3.95 setup fee
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com