Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / January 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Prophesying the more confidently in that they ...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Marius Hancu - 29 Jan 2007 00:55 GMT
Hello:

I'm not able to tell which is the idiom or rule which requires the
presence of
"in" in:
"prophesying the more confidently IN that they themselves would ..."

Is "prophesying in" perhaps a phrasal verb?

-------
Before those who now, for the sake of the Savage, paid their court to
him, Bernard would parade a carping unorthodoxy. He was politely
listened to. But behind his back people shook their heads. "That young
man will come to a bad end," they said, prophesying the more
confidently in that they themselves would in due course personally see
to it that the end was bad. "He won't find another Savage to help him
out a second time," they said. Meanwhile, however, there was the first
Savage; they were polite.

Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, p. 145
http://www.classicreader.com/read.php/sid.1/bookid.1279/sec.11/
-------

Thank you for any pointers.
Marius Hancu
CyberCypher - 29 Jan 2007 01:56 GMT
> I'm not able to tell which is the idiom or rule which requires the
> presence of  "in" in:
> "prophesying the more confidently IN that they themselves would
> ..."
>
> Is "prophesying in" perhaps a phrasal verb?

"In that" here means "because". The verb is not phrasal.

> -------
> Before those who now, for the sake of the Savage, paid their court
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> http://www.classicreader.com/read.php/sid.1/bookid.1279/sec.11/
> -------

--
Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan.
"It has come to my attention that my opinions are not universally
shared." Scott Adams, The Dilbert Blog, 23 Jan 2007;  http://
dilbertblog.typepad.com/
Marius Hancu - 29 Jan 2007 13:21 GMT
> > "That young man will come to a bad end," they said,
> > prophesying the more confidently in that they themselves would in
> > due course personally see to it that the end was bad. "He won't
> > find another Savage to help him out a second time," they said.
> > Meanwhile, however, there was the first Savage; they were polite.

>"In that" here means "because".

Yes, it fits like a glove.

-----
33. in that

because; inasmuch as:

--- In that you won't have time for supper, let me give you something
now.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=in+that&r=66
-----

I'm sure I've seen it before, but I didn't recognize it in the
context.

Thank you all.
Marius Hancu
Lars Eighner - 29 Jan 2007 04:13 GMT
In our last episode,
<FCbvh.2403$hn6.136769@weber.videotron.net>,
the lovely and talented Marius Hancu
broadcast on alt.usage.english:

> Hello:

> I'm not able to tell which is the idiom or rule which requires the
> presence of
> "in" in:
> "prophesying the more confidently IN that they themselves would ..."

> Is "prophesying in" perhaps a phrasal verb?

No.  This meaning 3a of *in* prep. in MWCD11th.  "used as function word to
indicate limitation, qualification, or circumstance <alike ~ some respects>
<left ~ a hurry>"

The circumstance is that they intended ("personally see to it") to cause his
bad end.  In other words they were prophesying what they themselves intended
to do.  Although not everything intended becomes reality, as prophesy goes,
that based on one's own intentions can be offered with a high degree of
confidence.

In other words, the prepositional phrase beginning with *in* is adverbial
and applies to confidently to tell the circumstance or qualification on
confidently.  It has nothing to do with the verb "prophesying."

> -------
> Before those who now, for the sake of the Savage, paid their court to
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> out a second time," they said. Meanwhile, however, there was the first
> Savage; they were polite.

> Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, p. 145
> http://www.classicreader.com/read.php/sid.1/bookid.1279/sec.11/
> -------

> Thank you for any pointers.
> Marius Hancu

Aside:  I read this book when I was about eleven years old, and did not know
until I was in college that Huxley intended it to be dystopian.

Signature

Lars Eighner     <http://larseighner.com/>     <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
                        Countdown: 722 days to go.

R H Draney - 29 Jan 2007 04:42 GMT
Lars Eighner filted:

>Aside:  I read this book when I was about eleven years old, and did not know
>until I was in college that Huxley intended it to be dystopian.

Fancied yourself an alpha, did you?...r

Signature

"You got Schadenfreude on my Weltanschauung!"
"You got Weltanschauung in my Schadenfreude!"

Lars Eighner - 29 Jan 2007 04:53 GMT
In our last episode,
<epju0301tfq@drn.newsguy.com>,
the lovely and talented R H Draney
broadcast on alt.usage.english:

> Lars Eighner filted:
>>
>>Aside:  I read this book when I was about eleven years old, and did not know
>>until I was in college that Huxley intended it to be dystopian.

> Fancied yourself an alpha, did you?...r

Yeah, me and Plato.

I should say, however, I grew up in a segregated city.  Huxley's world
seemed more sensible than assigning caste by accident of birth.

Signature

Lars Eighner     <http://larseighner.com/>     <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
                        Countdown: 722 days to go.

Peter Moylan - 29 Jan 2007 07:39 GMT
>> Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley, p. 145
>> http://www.classicreader.com/read.php/sid.1/bookid.1279/sec.11/ 
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> not know until I was in college that Huxley intended it to be
> dystopian.

I had a similar reaction, but then I read "1984" at about the same time,
so I had a point of comparison. Huxley's world looked fine to me.

On New Year's Day, 1984, I read "1984" again, and found it
disappointing. All the horrible things he had predicted for the remote
future had already happened by the 1970s.

Signature

Peter Moylan                             http://www.pmoylan.org

Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses.  The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses.  The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.

cybercypher - 29 Jan 2007 07:28 GMT
> Lars Eighner wrote:
>> In our last episode, <FCbvh.2403$hn6.136769@weber.videotron.net>,
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> disappointing. All the horrible things he had predicted for the
> remote future had already happened by the 1970s.

But didn't you want to live on the reservation? I did.

Signature

Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan.
"It has come to my attention that my opinions are not universally
shared." Scott Adams, The Dilbert Blog, 23 Jan 2007;  
http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/
teranews charges a one-time US$3.95 setup fee

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Marius Hancu - 30 Jan 2007 16:24 GMT
> Aside:  I read this book when I was about eleven years old

I wonder what your reading of "orgy-porgy" was then:-)

Marius Hancu
Lars Eighner - 30 Jan 2007 19:58 GMT
>> Aside:  I read this book when I was about eleven years old

> I wonder what your reading of "orgy-porgy" was then:-)

Tame compared to my weekends and summers then.

Signature

Lars Eighner     <http://larseighner.com/>     <http://myspace.com/larseighner>
                        Countdown: 720 days to go.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.