The following is extracted from
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Harry_S._Truman :
>And mine - having only a middle initial is not the same as having a one-letter middle name.
>Since it is an initial, it should have a period. The fact that Truman joked about treating it as a
>name is something of a confirmation that it isn't. Perhaps more importantly, the presidential
>library is named after "Harry S. Truman", as is the aircraft carrier. The point could be argued
>endlessly, but official usage seems to include a period. Since the point seems likely to come
>up again, I've restored the link between the controversial character and the explanation
>further down the page. toh
This is exactly what I want to know. *How* does having only a middle
initial differ from having a one-letter middle name? And why was
Truman *joking* when he said that the "S" was a name, not an initial?
Those folks who insist that the form "Harry S. Truman" is incorrect
obviously must feel that the use of a period implies at least one more
letter to the name after the initial.
Tell me, at least, why so many printed books call the "S" in his name
an initial, even though they are perfectly aware that the letter did
not stand for any name.
daniel mcgrath

Signature
Daniel Gerard McGrath, a/k/a "Govende":
for e-mail replace "invalid" with "com"
Developmentally disabled;
has Autism (Pervasive Developmental Disorder),
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder,
& periodic bouts of depression.
[This signature is under construction.]
tinwhistler - 27 Feb 2007 19:10 GMT
On Feb 27, 10:35 am, Daniel al-Autistiqui <govend...@hotmail.invalid>
wrote:
[snip]
> Tell me, at least, why so many printed books call the "S" in his name
> an initial, even though they are perfectly aware that the letter did
> not stand for any name.
[snip]
The letter did double duty for two names, Solomon and Shippe; see:
"...Dad owed the middle initial in his name to both grandparents. To
placate their touchy elders, his parents added an _S_, but studiously
refrained from deciding whether it stood for Solomon or Shippe..."
Margaret Truman, _Harry S. Truman_ (NY Wm Morrow, 1973), p. 46.
Truman's parents added a period after his one-letter second name, or
initial -- what's legally established is the entry on the birth
certificate, and the law doesn't care whether people call that an
initial or a second name with a period added (H*Y*M*A*N K*A*P*L*A*N is
from a novel about a legal name that had punctuation included.) That
there is a period on the document is borne out by the title of
Margaret's book. If we had something with official standing like a
French Academy, we might be able to get an official ruling whether
Truman's name includes a second name with a period, or an initial, but
we don't, and you don't have that standing, which leaves authors quite
free to call it an initial IMO.
Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
Turenne - 27 Feb 2007 21:32 GMT
> On Feb 27, 10:35 am, Daniel al-Autistiqui <govend...@hotmail.invalid>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>
> Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
The 'E' in Alfred E. Neuman didn't stand for anything either, as far
as I know.
Richard Lichten
Narelle - 27 Feb 2007 23:11 GMT
> On Feb 27, 10:35 am, Daniel al-Autistiqui <govend...@hotmail.invalid>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>
> Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego.
I have a son whose middle name is an initial with a period. So named
for similar reasons as Truman it would seem. It is recorded officially
on his birth certificate.
So, speaking from personal experience, I would say that the joke about
name/initial is that for his whole life my son is condemned to
explaining why he has filled out Official Form with just an initial when
Official Form *clearly* states Full Name is required. He then has to go
into his speech about how the Initial-with-period is his middle name,
not an initial. I daresay Truman's experience would have been similar,
thus the joke
Turenne - 28 Feb 2007 09:25 GMT
> have a son whose middle name is an initial with a period. So named
>for similar reasons as Truman it would seem.
When you say 'it would seem'. Does that mean you don't know why you
gave him a middle initial instead of a name?
Richard Lichten
jinhyun - 28 Feb 2007 09:49 GMT
> > have a son whose middle name is an initial with a period. So named
> >for similar reasons as Truman it would seem.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Richard Lichten
No. He's just whipped. He didn't decide his son's name, of course. The
wife gets to do that and he needn't know her reasons.
athel...@yahoo - 28 Feb 2007 10:35 GMT
> > > have a son whose middle name is an initial with a period. So named
> > >for similar reasons as Truman it would seem.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> No. He's just whipped. He didn't decide his son's name, of course. The
> wife gets to do that and he needn't know her reasons.
He? I haven't met the name Narelle before, but it looks more like a
woman's name than a man's.
athel
Turenne - 28 Feb 2007 10:38 GMT
> > > > have a son whose middle name is an initial with a period. So named
> > > >for similar reasons as Truman it would seem.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> athel
You just beat me to it Athel.
Richard
athel...@yahoo - 28 Feb 2007 11:39 GMT
[ ... ]
> > He? I haven't met the name Narelle before, but it looks more like a
> > woman's name than a man's.
>
> > athel
>
> You just beat me to it Athel.
That happens to me all the time.
a.
jinhyun - 28 Feb 2007 10:44 GMT
> > > > have a son whose middle name is an initial with a period. So named
> > > >for similar reasons as Truman it would seem.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> athel
Why would a woman not know why her son had a kinky name? A whipped
wife? Can such things be? I think Narelle's the last name. But let's
wait and see.
CDB - 28 Feb 2007 14:12 GMT
>>>> have a son whose middle name is an initial with a period. So
>>>> named for similar reasons as Truman it would seem.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> He? I haven't met the name Narelle before, but it looks more like a
> woman's name than a man's.
Actually, we have met Rello before, and she is a lady poster.
http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.usage.english/browse_thread/thread/cd434fcd06b
fd246/2c7b48beec012257?lnk=gst&q=Rello&rnum=1&hl=en#2c7b48beec012257
or http://tinyurl.com/yo8ccf . For some reason, you have to scroll
up.
athel...@yahoo - 28 Feb 2007 10:34 GMT
On Feb 27, 7:35 pm, Daniel al-Autistiqui <govend...@hotmail.invalid>
wrote:
[ ... ]
> Those folks who insist that the form "Harry S. Truman" is incorrect
> obviously must feel that the use of a period implies at least one more
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> an initial, even though they are perfectly aware that the letter did
> not stand for any name.
I'm not sure this is actually true. Many years ago (in the 1950s,
probably) I read a story to the effect that the leaders of the
Swinomish tribe invited him to take the name Swinomish as his middle
name, and he agreed to do this. I haven't found an authoritative
confirmation of this story, but googling for "Harry Swinomish Truman"
yields 58 pages (a surprising proportion of which are in Catalan ("Per
oposar-se a la política de Josif Stalin, el president dels EUA Harry
Swinomish Truman crida Europa a unificar-se sota l'autoritat nord-
americana per ..."), oddly enough), suggesting that I didn't just
imagine it.
athel