> I can' t decide whether to use 'thereby" in the following sentence,
> though I like the sentence better with it for some reason I was thus
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> that the murderer had drugged the victim before dumping her in the
> river."
This sentence says the detective's mental processes
revealed that the victim had been drugged. The court
would probably prefer the proposition that forensic
evidence exposed this fact.
The word "associated" seems unusual in this context.
Most writers about crime suggest either that the evidence
speaks for itself or that detectives analyse or integrate
the evidence. The usual meanings of "associate" seem
to provide no information for the sentence.

Signature
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Bob Banks filted:
>I can' t decide whether to use 'thereby" in the following sentence,
>though I like the sentence better with it for some reason I was thus
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>that the murderer had drugged the victim before dumping her in the
>river."
I have no problem with "thereby" in this context, but I'm not as happy with
"logically associated"...there must be a more appropriate verb for what you're
trying to say....r

Signature
"You got Schadenfreude on my Weltanschauung!"
"You got Weltanschauung in my Schadenfreude!"
tinwhistler - 31 May 2007 01:27 GMT
[snip]
> I have no problem with "thereby" in this context, but I'm not as happy with
> "logically associated"...there must be a more appropriate verb for what you're
> trying to say....r
[snip]
Yes, leave "thereby" in and change "logically associated" to something
else, say "pieced together."
--
Aloha ~~~ Ozzie Maland ~~~ San Diego
Fred - 31 May 2007 03:42 GMT
> Bob Banks filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> you're
> trying to say....r
Exactly. He logically weighed, logically considered or logically assessed
the evidence......sound better to me.
Peter Moylan - 31 May 2007 04:07 GMT
> Bob Banks filted:
>> I can' t decide whether to use 'thereby" in the following sentence,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> happy with "logically associated"...there must be a more appropriate
> verb for what you're trying to say....r
My feelings precisely. The use of "thereby" is correct, but the sentence
as a whole looks clumsy. I would go for something like "Having looked at
the evidence, the detective concluded that ...". If it's important to
emphasise that the association of apparently unrelated evidence was the
big breakthrough, or that the detective saw things that other people
missed, this can be done by using two sentences: one for the reasoning
process, the second for the conclusion.

Signature
Peter Moylan http://www.pmoylan.org
Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses. The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses. The optusnet
address could disappear at any time.
Archie Valparaiso - 31 May 2007 10:53 GMT
>Bob Banks filted:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>"logically associated"...there must be a more appropriate verb for what you're
>trying to say....r
Me neither? "Arranged the evidence as a timeline"?
> I can' t decide whether to use 'thereby" in the following sentence,
> though I like the sentence better with it for some reason I was thus
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> that the murderer had drugged the victim before dumping her in the
> river."
Without the "thereby" there is an ambiguity in the sentence regarding who or
what is revealing the actions of the murderer. Do you want it to be the
detective or the evidence?

Signature
Skitt (in Hayward, California)
http://www.geocities.com/opus731/
> I can' t decide whether to use 'thereby" in the following sentence,
> though I like the sentence better with it for some reason I was thus
> wondering what people here would advise.
> "The detective logically associated the evidence, thereby revealing
> that the murderer had drugged the victim before dumping her in the
> river."
Your "thereby" is wonderful with your "logical" context!
Logic - Thereby, yes! Yes!
However, and there is always a but, I am that butt. I will
suggest adding some spice to your sentence, if a story.
Your "logically associated" I like, but as others have whined,
you need a bit more, not removal of your phrase. Thereby is
great with logic!
"Detective Clouseau logically associated his evidence with this
murder, thereby revealing the murderer drugged his victim before
dumping her body into the River Thames."
Give your detective a name. This evidence is not "the" evidence,
this is his or her evidence. Remove your "that" this is too harsh
sounding of a word for good rhythm. Same for "had" in your sentence.
This victim is the murderer's victim, his victim, her victim, not
"the" victim. Use of "her body" provides morbidity and finality.
Give your river a name or personify your river; into that cold, deep
river, into a murky and filthy river. Use of "a river" without name
will add suspense and mystery.
"...before dumping her, still alive, into a dark and deep river"
*SCREAMS* Scary!
"Detective Clouseau, after days of investigation and sleepless thought,
logically associated his gruesome evidence with this murder, thereby
revealing the murderer drugged his helpless victim before dumping her,
still alive, into a chilly dark river, drowning her very soul."
Your "logically" and "thereby" are an excellent pairing regardless
of how you end up writing your paragraph.

Signature
Purl Gurl
--
"Then again what can you expect from a fat-assed, champagne swilling,
half-breed just off the Rez?"
- Joe Kline