> Can I say "my work did meet with the satisfaction of my supervisor"?
>
> Thanks
Yes. But using 'did meet' instead of 'met' would imply that someone had
said that it didn't and you are contadicting. 'Met' is neutral, a simple
statement of fact. hth.
cybercypher - 31 Aug 2007 08:42 GMT
> fyfpoon@gmail.com wrote:
>> Can I say "my work did meet with the satisfaction of my
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> someone had said that it didn't and you are contadicting. 'Met' is
> neutral, a simple statement of fact. hth.
I agree with Derek Turner's comments here but would like to add that it
would, IMHO, be better to say:
"My work satisfied my supervisor", which focuses on your work, or
"My supervisor was satisfied with my work", which focuses on your
supervisor.
The ponderous phrase "met with the satisfaction of my supervisor" is
more than slightly prolix and pretentious, IMHO.

Signature
Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor
Native speaker of American English; posting from Taiwan.
"It has come to my attention that my opinions are not universally
shared." Scott Adams.
Oleg Lego - 31 Aug 2007 15:10 GMT
>> Can I say "my work did meet with the satisfaction of my supervisor"?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>said that it didn't and you are contadicting. 'Met' is neutral, a simple
>statement of fact. hth.
Another possible meaning is "my work no longer meets with.."
Derek Turner - 31 Aug 2007 17:27 GMT
>>> Can I say "my work did meet with the satisfaction of my supervisor"?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Another possible meaning is "my work no longer meets with.."
Good catch!
> Can I say "my work did meet with the satisfaction of my supervisor"?
You can say it more briefly and in the active voice:
"Did the supervisor approve my work?"
"Did the supervisor say he was satisfied?" etc.

Signature
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)