>>>> DAN RATHER MAY SEEK TO DEPOSE PRESIDENT BUSH IN LAWSUIT....
>
>I had another moment's difficulty caused by assuming "rather" was an
>adverb.

Signature
"You got Schadenfreude on my Weltanschauung!"
"You got Weltanschauung in my Schadenfreude!"
Mike Lyle:
>> I had another moment's difficulty caused by assuming "rather" was an
>> adverb.
R.H. Draney:
> Arizona small-town news stories are fraught with peril for the casual
> headline reader; we have towns called Why and Surprise.
I remember an incident some years ago involving a ship whose
captain's name was You. In the Toronto Star, like most newspapers,
second and subsequent references to a person in a news story normally
use the surname alone. I don't remember if there were any actual
ambiguous sentences (like "You had no comment" or "You said he
was on the bridge") in the story I read, but there definitely were
things like "You was on the bridge", which I found rather jarring.
I wished they'd chosen a different form of his name to use.
See my signature quote for a similar example.

Signature
Mark Brader "Male got pregnant -- on the first try."
Toronto Newsweek article on high-tech conception
msb@vex.net November 30, 1987
My text in this article is in the public domain.
R H Draney - 29 Sep 2007 02:21 GMT
Mark Brader filted:
>R.H. Draney:
>> Arizona small-town news stories are fraught with peril for the casual
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
>See my signature quote for a similar example.
C: "All I wanna know is what's the fella's name on first base!"
A: "What is on second."
C: "I'm not askin' ya who's on second!"
A: "Who is on first."
C: "I don't know..."
Both: "Third base!"
....r

Signature
"You got Schadenfreude on my Weltanschauung!"
"You got Weltanschauung in my Schadenfreude!"