Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsEnglish UsageBritish EnglishESL Teaching
Learnglish.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Discussion Groups / English Usage / December 2003



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Fake words [Was Re: Better Not Pout]

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jeffrey Zahn - 31 Dec 2003 09:11 GMT
[posted and mailed]

[Followups redirected to alt.usage.english]

[Previously, in a Very Special Episode of alt.tv.er:]
In article
news:9627-3FF0791F-71@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net,
kitchen_wench@webtv.net (Gina *) wrote:

> I say this because good basic reading skills at least
> enable me to recognize that a word "looks wrong" and to
> recognize that "fictional" and "admittance" are fake words
> though highly educated folks use them.

[Then I wrote:]
I might have a bright, shiny hook in my cheek, but I found
both of these words in a simple search at www.dictionary.com.

Since when have they been "fake words"?  And according to
whom?

[Then Gina * wrote:]
In article
news:15173-3FF1CB90-79@storefull-3173.bay.webtv.net,
kitchen_wench@webtv.net (Gina *) wrote:

> Hey, I'll be 49 in mid-January. I recall when ain't wasn't
> in the dictionary.  Admission and fictitious were pounded
> into my head in Catholic school, so admittance and
> fictional have not been part of my life.  Just as the word
> normality is preferred over normalcy.  
[snippage]

[Now I'm writing:]
 Gina, in other threads (on alt.tv.er) you talk about your
current medical problems, for which you have my sympathy.

 But I somehow can't let a cavalier "fake words" put-down pass
without comment, especially with the off-hand "though educated
people use them" slam.  I perceive that the underlying message
is a supercilious "Well, _I_ know they're 'fake words' and
anyone who uses them is displaying ignorance."

 Languages change, and what was considered non-standard in the
1960's (by teachers who were educated a generation earlier)
doesn't mean that new words or meanings don't develop over time
in the rest of the English-speaking world.

 Now, to address the your assertions about "fake words":

Admission vs. Addmittance
=========================

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=admission

Part of which says:

 Usage Note: It is often maintained that admittance should be
used only to refer to achieving physical access to a place (He
was denied admittance to the courtroom), and that admission
should be used for the wider sense of achieving entry to a group
or institution (her admission to the club; China's admission to
the United Nations). There is no harm in observing this
distinction, though it is often ignored. But admission is much
more common in the sense “a fee paid for the right of entry”:
The admission to the movie was five dollars.

Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English
Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=admittance

Part of which says:

Usage: Admittance, Admission. These words are, to some extent,
in a state of transition and change. Admittance is now chiefly
confined to its primary sense of access into some locality or
building. Thus we see on the doors of factories, shops, etc. No
"admittance." Its secondary or moral sense, as "admittance to
the church," is almost entirely laid aside. Admission has taken
to itself the secondary or figurative senses; as, admission to
the rights of citizenship; admission to the church; the
admissions made by one of the parties in a dispute. And even
when used in its primary sense, it is not identical with
admittance. Thus, we speak of admission into a country,
territory, and other larger localities, etc., where admittance
could not be used. So, when we speak of admission to a concert
or other public assembly, the meaning is not perhaps exactly
that of admittance, viz., access within the walls of the
building, but rather a reception into the audience, or access to
the performances. But the lines of distinction on this subject
are one definitely drawn.

Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998
MICRA, Inc.

Fictional vs. Fictitious
========================

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fictional

Part of which says:

adj 1: related to or involving literary fiction; "clever
fictional devices"; "a fictional treatment of the train
robbery" [ant: nonfictional] 2: formed or conceived by the
imagination; "a fabricated excuse for his absence"; "a fancied
wrong"; "a fictional character"; "used fictitious names"; "a
made-up story" [syn: fabricated, fancied, fictitious, invented,
made-up]

Source: WordNet ® 1.6, © 1997 Princeton University

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fictitious

Part of which says:

adj 1: formed or conceived by the imagination; "a fabricated
excuse for his absence"; "a fancied wrong"; "a fictional
character"; "used fictitious names"; "a made-up story" [syn:
fabricated, fancied, fictional, invented, made-up] 2: adopted in
order to deceive; "an assumed name"; "an assumed cheerfulness";
"a fictitious address"; "fictive sympathy"; "a pretended
interest"; "a put-on childish voice"; "sham modesty" [syn:
assumed, false, fictive, pretended, put on, sham]

Source: WordNet ® 1.6, © 1997 Princeton University

And, even though this wasn't part of the original discussion,
but since you threw it in to your "but that's they way I was
taught" defense:

Normality vs. Normalcy
======================

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=normality

normality

n : conformity with the norm [syn: normalcy] [ant: abnormality]

Source: WordNet ® 1.6, © 1997 Princeton University

normalcy

n : conformity with the norm [syn: normality] [ant: abnormality]

Source: WordNet ® 1.6, © 1997 Princeton University

I'm fairly sure others will join the thread to correct or
contradict me.

Signature

Jeffrey "Flopping in the bottom of the boat" Zahn

Martin Ambuhl - 31 Dec 2003 09:33 GMT
> I'm fairly sure others will join the thread to correct or
> contradict me.

Why, other than the fictitious "law" MC named after himself?

Signature

Martin Ambuhl

Adrian Bailey - 31 Dec 2003 10:53 GMT
> [posted and mailed]
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > recognize that "fictional" and "admittance" are fake words
> > though highly educated folks use them.

Chambers (1910) lists both "fictional" and "fictitious" under "fiction", and
lists "admission" and "admittance" together, with a single definition.

> [Then Gina * wrote:]
> In article
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> > normality is preferred over normalcy.
> [snippage]

Aha. "SISO" psychological patterning. You had to do something you didn't
like and you don't see why anyone else should get away with not doing it.

> Normality vs. Normalcy
> ======================
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Source: WordNet ® 1.6, © 1997 Princeton University

"Normalcy" is not listed in the 1910 dictionary, and the 1993 edition labels
it "esp US"; I don't consider it to be British English.

Adrian
Mike Lyle - 31 Dec 2003 14:09 GMT
[...]
> > normalcy
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> "Normalcy" is not listed in the 1910 dictionary, and the 1993 edition labels
> it "esp US"; I don't consider it to be British English.

I'm sure I remember Alistair Cooke saying that "normalcy" started as a
Bushesque slip by a US President.

Mike.
Don Aitken - 31 Dec 2003 15:04 GMT
>[...]
>> > normalcy
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>I'm sure I remember Alistair Cooke saying that "normalcy" started as a
>Bushesque slip by a US President.

It wasn't a slip - it was a campaign slogan in the 1920 election. You
can hear Harding say it at
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/nfhtml/nfexpe.html.

Signature

Don Aitken

Mail to the addresses given in the headers is no longer being
read. To mail me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com".

Raymond S. Wise - 31 Dec 2003 15:55 GMT
> >[...]
> >> > normalcy
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> can hear Harding say it at
> http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/nfhtml/nfexpe.html.

*The Century Dictionary* ( www.century-dictionary.com ), an American
dictionary of 1895, has an entry for "normalcy":

[quote]

normalcy [...] _n._  [< _normal_ + _-cy._]
In _geom.,_ the state or fact of being normal.
[Rare.]

  The co-ordinates of the point of contact, and _normalcy._
              _Davies and Peck,_ Math. Dict. (_Encyc. Dict._)

[end quote]

It's also in the 1913 Webster's unabridged dictionary.

From
http://machaut.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/WEBSTER.sh?WORD=normalcy

[quote]

Normalcy (Page: 982)
Nor"mal*cy (?), n. The quality, state, or fact of being normal; as, the
point of normalcy. [R.]

[end quote]

Signature

Raymond S. Wise
Minneapolis, Minnesota USA

E-mail: mplsray @ yahoo . com

Mike Lyle - 31 Dec 2003 17:53 GMT
> > >"Adrian Bailey" <dadge@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>  news:<%TxIb.6625$sf5.4218@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk>...
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> [end quote]

Thanks. I see that OED1 dates the mathematicalcy of the form at 1857,
and will henceforward doubt Cooke's practicalcy as a source.

Mike.
R H Draney - 31 Dec 2003 17:05 GMT
Don Aitken filted:

>>I'm sure I remember Alistair Cooke saying that "normalcy" started as a
>>Bushesque slip by a US President.
>>
>It wasn't a slip - it was a campaign slogan in the 1920 election. You
>can hear Harding say it at
>http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/nfhtml/nfexpe.html.

Amazing...Mike's recollection immediately made me think of Harding, though I'd
never heard of the slogan before just now...and then you come along and confirm
it, with documentation and all....

The one trait I associate with ol' Warren G is a perverse knack for saying
things no human being could understand....r
Spehro Pefhany - 31 Dec 2003 18:08 GMT
>> [posted and mailed]
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>Chambers (1910) lists both "fictional" and "fictitious" under "fiction", and
>lists "admission" and "admittance" together, with a single definition.

"Admittance" is a well-established technical term- the reciprocal of
"impedance".

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
Signature

"it's the network..."                          "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com

Raymond S. Wise - 31 Dec 2003 18:00 GMT
> [posted and mailed]
>
> [Followups redirected to alt.usage.english]

[posted and mailed]

> [Previously, in a Very Special Episode of alt.tv.er:]
> In article
[quoted text clipped - 145 lines]
> I'm fairly sure others will join the thread to correct or
> contradict me.

When reading the definitions and usage notes for "Webster's Revised
Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.," it should be kept in mind
that this is essentially the 1913 Webster's revised and unabridged. That is,
revised in 1913, not recently.

See
http://machaut.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/WEBSTER.sh?WORD=Admittance

for the same entry as presented by the ARTFL Project[1].

Someone has done some annotation on the ARTFL version of this dictionary.
The material between the angled brackets in the entry for "yaourt," for
example, has been added.

http://machaut.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/WEBSTER.sh?WORD=yaourt

"Yaourt (Page: 1672)
"Yaourt (?), n. [Turk. yoghurt.] A fermented drink, or milk beer, made by
the Turks.<-- now yoghurt-->"

The MICRA version has no such note.

Gina, the poster to whom you were replying, wrote that "I recall when ain't
wasn't in the dictionary." This just shows that she didn't have a very good
dictionary. "Ain't" was in Webster's Second (_Webster's New International
Dictionary of the English Language,_ 2nd. ed.) It's in the _Century
Dictionary_ ( www.century-dictionary.com ), an American dictionary of 1895,
pronounced as now (rhymes with "paint"), but spelled both "ain't" and
"an't." And it is in Noah Webster's 1828 dictionary, where it is spelled
"ant."
See
http://65.66.134.201/cgi-bin/webster/webster.exe?firstp=8406

The pronunciation that Webster gave it was the same as "ain't" is pronounced
today. I know this because I have seen a facsimile edition of Webster's 1828
dictionary with pronunciations.

I see no justification whatsoever for calling "ain't" a "fake word," or
"fictional," "admittance," or "normalcy." "Ain't" is nonstandard, although
used jocularly by educated people (as when Ronald Reagan said "You ain't
seen nothing yet!") but that makes it no less a word. The others are
entirely standard.

Note:

[1] I finally decided to find out what, exactly, is the ARTFL Project.

From
http://humanities.uchicago.edu/orgs/ARTFL/

"The Project for American and French Research on the Treasury of the French
Language (ARTFL) is a cooperative enterprise of Analyse et Traitement
Informatique de la Langue Française (ATILF) of the Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), the Division of the Humanities, the Division
of the Social Sciences, and Electronic Text Services (ETS) of the University
of Chicago."

Signature

Raymond S. Wise
Minneapolis, Minnesota USA

E-mail: mplsray @ yahoo . com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2012 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.