In our last episode,
<8dbavv0i05miku939lqb4uslo14nrpciu9@4ax.com>,
the lovely and talented nick
broadcast on alt.usage.english:
> Is there supposed to have a 'to' between 'asked not' and 'be
> identified' below? A similar structure I can think of is 'he asked to
> be heard / he asked not to be heard'.
> As man who asked not be identified says
> he believes Mr. Aristide has not fulfilled
> promises he made to the Haitian people.
Yes.

Signature
Lars Eighner -finger for geek code- eighner@io.com http://www.io.com/~eighner/
"Where is human nature so weak as in a bookstore!" --Henry Ward Beecher
nick <nick@news.com> wrote on 02 Jan 2004:
> Is there supposed to have a 'to' between 'asked not' and 'be
> identified' below? A similar structure I can think of is 'he
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> he believes Mr. Aristide has not fulfilled
> promises he made to the Haitian people.
Yes, the "to" is missing: "asked not to be identified" is correct.

Signature
Franke: EFL teacher & medical editor.
Nick wrote:
>Is there supposed to have a 'to' between 'asked not' and
>'be identified' below?. . .
>As man who asked not be identified says
>he believes Mr. Aristide has not fulfilled
>promises he made to the Haitian people.
Yes, and you need an "a" before "man" and (probably) a "the" before "promises."
Unless you add a comma after "says," you'll need to add a comma after "people"
and supply a verb to complete the sentence.
John O'Flaherty - 02 Jan 2004 15:19 GMT
>Nick wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>Unless you add a comma after "says," you'll need to add a comma after "people"
>and supply a verb to complete the sentence.
I don't see that last bit. After your first two corrections, it looks
right to me, and a comma would be out of place after 'says'.
--
john
J. W. Love - 02 Jan 2004 17:50 GMT
John wrote:
> Jan 2004 12:50:24 GMT, lovejw@aol.comma.net (J.
>W. Love) wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>it looks right to me, and a comma would be out of
>place after 'says'.
At least in America, it's pretty much required after initial dependent
clauses, such as those begun by "if," "when," since," "as," and so on. Lacking
a comma after "says," the dependent clause doesn't end with "says": it keeps on
going, with "says [that] he believes" and so on, permitting this continuation:
"As a man who asked not be identified says [that] he believes Mr. Aristide has
not fulfilled the promises he made to the Haitian people, we may conclude that
the public response to Mr. Aristide's rule is not unanimously supportive."
John O'Flaherty - 09 Jan 2004 19:09 GMT
>John wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>not fulfilled the promises he made to the Haitian people, we may conclude that
>the public response to Mr. Aristide's rule is not unanimously supportive."
I misread. I was reading it with the 'A' replacing the intial 'As'.
A man who asked not to be identified says he believes...
--
john
Skitt - 02 Jan 2004 20:36 GMT
> Nick wrote:
>> Is there supposed to have a 'to' between 'asked not' and
>> 'be identified' below?. . .
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> "promises." Unless you add a comma after "says," you'll need to add a
> comma after "people" and supply a verb to complete the sentence.
Here's an example when even the American system will move a comma outside of
the quote marks. Following the instructions above, the resulting sentence
would look like "... be identified says,, he ...". In other words, adding a
comma after the one included in the quote would result in two commas.

Signature
Skitt (in Hayward, California)
www.geocities.com/opus731/
Tony Cooper - 02 Jan 2004 23:02 GMT
>> Nick wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>would look like "... be identified says,, he ...". In other words, adding a
>comma after the one included in the quote would result in two commas.
I dunno about these rules. Consider these sentences and place the
period in both by the American rule and the British rule.
He said the painting was a "fake"
He cried out "Fake!"
Skitt - 03 Jan 2004 01:15 GMT
>>> Nick wrote:
>>>> Is there supposed to have a 'to' between 'asked not' and
>>>> 'be identified' below?. . .
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> He said the painting was a "fake"
> He cried out "Fake!"
I'll try (no guarantees, as I am not an expert on the rules).
AmE: He said the painting was a "fake."
He cried out, "Fake!"
BrE: He said the painting was a "fake".
He cried out: "Fake!"
I sit, ready to be corrected.

Signature
Skitt (in Hayward, California)
www.geocities.com/opus731/
Mark Brader - 02 Jan 2004 21:44 GMT
"Nick" asks:
>> Is there supposed to have a 'to' between 'asked not' and
>> 'be identified' below?. . .
]>> As man who asked not be identified says
]>> he believes Mr. Aristide has not fulfilled
]>> promises he made to the Haitian people.
J.W. Love writes:
> Yes,
Agreed.
> and you need an "a" before "man"
Alternatively, "as" is simply a mistake for "a".
> and (probably) a "the" before "promises."
If the man intends to refer to *all* of Aristide's promises, you need a
"the"; if only some of them, that part is correct as written.
> Unless you add a comma after "says," you'll need to add a comma after
> "people" and supply a verb to complete the sentence.
These are two alternative possible corrections, both assuming that the
initial "as" should be corrected to "as a". Considering my suggestion
above along with these two, the three possibilities are analogous to:
Given:
* As man said the computer was down.
Correct (but all different):
* A man said the computer was down.
* As a man said, the computer was down.
* As a man said the computer was down, I went home.

Signature
Mark Brader "You can do this in a number of ways.
Toronto IBM chose to do all of them...
msb@vex.net why do you find that funny?" --D. Taylor
My text in this article is in the public domain.